WEBVTT Kind: captions Language: en Style: ::cue(c.colorCCCCCC) { color: rgb(204,204,204); } ::cue(c.colorE5E5E5) { color: rgb(229,229,229); } ## 00:00:39.770 --> 00:00:50.180 align:start position:0% coming<00:00:40.770> up<00:00:40.920> on<00:00:41.160> you<00:00:41.640> GTV<00:00:42.570> a<00:00:48.620> special<00:00:49.620> session 00:00:50.180 --> 00:00:50.190 align:start position:0% coming up on you GTV a special session 00:00:50.190 --> 00:00:52.250 align:start position:0% coming up on you GTV a special session of<00:00:50.400> the<00:00:50.460> unified<00:00:51.030> government<00:00:51.300> of<00:00:51.780> Wyandotte 00:00:52.250 --> 00:00:52.260 align:start position:0% of the unified government of Wyandotte 00:00:52.260 --> 00:00:54.840 align:start position:0% of the unified government of Wyandotte County<00:00:52.980> Kansas<00:00:53.760> City<00:00:54.239> Kansas 00:00:54.840 --> 00:00:54.850 align:start position:0% County Kansas City Kansas 00:00:54.850 --> 00:01:04.350 align:start position:0% County Kansas City Kansas [Music] 00:01:04.350 --> 00:01:04.360 align:start position:0% 00:01:04.360 --> 00:01:13.120 align:start position:0% [Music] 00:01:13.120 --> 00:01:13.130 align:start position:0% 00:01:13.130 --> 00:01:14.330 align:start position:0% you 00:01:14.330 --> 00:01:14.340 align:start position:0% you 00:01:14.340 --> 00:01:23.350 align:start position:0% you [Music] 00:01:23.350 --> 00:01:23.360 align:start position:0% 00:01:23.360 --> 00:01:33.530 align:start position:0% you 00:01:33.530 --> 00:01:33.540 align:start position:0% 00:01:33.540 --> 00:01:36.110 align:start position:0% go<00:01:34.290> through<00:01:34.590> and<00:01:34.980> really<00:01:35.400> this<00:01:35.910> is<00:01:36.060> just 00:01:36.110 --> 00:01:36.120 align:start position:0% go through and really this is just 00:01:36.120 --> 00:01:37.970 align:start position:0% go through and really this is just information<00:01:36.750> submitted<00:01:36.990> to<00:01:37.230> you<00:01:37.410> we<00:01:37.740> had<00:01:37.860> the 00:01:37.970 --> 00:01:37.980 align:start position:0% information submitted to you we had the 00:01:37.980 --> 00:01:44.030 align:start position:0% information submitted to you we had the clerical<00:01:38.370> corrections<00:01:38.910> to<00:01:39.030> the<00:01:39.120> budget 00:01:44.030 --> 00:01:44.040 align:start position:0% 00:01:44.040 --> 00:02:00.410 align:start position:0% you 00:02:00.410 --> 00:02:00.420 align:start position:0% 00:02:00.420 --> 00:02:03.350 align:start position:0% different<00:02:01.260> areas<00:02:01.560> that<00:02:01.740> are<00:02:01.890> in<00:02:02.040> there<00:02:02.360> get 00:02:03.350 --> 00:02:03.360 align:start position:0% different areas that are in there get 00:02:03.360 --> 00:02:06.860 align:start position:0% different areas that are in there get that<00:02:03.390> direction<00:02:04.910> then<00:02:05.910> seeking<00:02:06.360> that<00:02:06.480> we<00:02:06.600> go 00:02:06.860 --> 00:02:06.870 align:start position:0% that direction then seeking that we go 00:02:06.870 --> 00:02:08.780 align:start position:0% that direction then seeking that we go ahead<00:02:06.990> and<00:02:07.140> move<00:02:07.350> to<00:02:07.410> our<00:02:07.710> executive<00:02:08.250> session 00:02:08.780 --> 00:02:08.790 align:start position:0% ahead and move to our executive session 00:02:08.790 --> 00:02:11.300 align:start position:0% ahead and move to our executive session on<00:02:09.150> labor<00:02:09.570> there's<00:02:10.140> a<00:02:10.260> chance<00:02:10.530> to<00:02:10.770> reconcile 00:02:11.300 --> 00:02:11.310 align:start position:0% on labor there's a chance to reconcile 00:02:11.310 --> 00:02:12.740 align:start position:0% on labor there's a chance to reconcile everything<00:02:11.550> from<00:02:12.000> the<00:02:12.120> yellow<00:02:12.300> sheet<00:02:12.570> before 00:02:12.740 --> 00:02:12.750 align:start position:0% everything from the yellow sheet before 00:02:12.750 --> 00:02:14.690 align:start position:0% everything from the yellow sheet before we<00:02:13.020> come<00:02:13.260> then<00:02:13.650> we'll<00:02:13.830> come<00:02:13.980> back<00:02:14.220> down<00:02:14.490> in 00:02:14.690 --> 00:02:14.700 align:start position:0% we come then we'll come back down in 00:02:14.700 --> 00:02:18.950 align:start position:0% we come then we'll come back down in here<00:02:15.000> and<00:02:16.700> make<00:02:17.700> sure<00:02:17.850> we're<00:02:18.060> in<00:02:18.180> final<00:02:18.570> format 00:02:18.950 --> 00:02:18.960 align:start position:0% here and make sure we're in final format 00:02:18.960 --> 00:02:20.540 align:start position:0% here and make sure we're in final format for<00:02:19.260> what's<00:02:19.410> going<00:02:19.710> into<00:02:19.890> that<00:02:20.040> yellow<00:02:20.280> sheet 00:02:20.540 --> 00:02:20.550 align:start position:0% for what's going into that yellow sheet 00:02:20.550 --> 00:02:22.400 align:start position:0% for what's going into that yellow sheet and<00:02:20.760> then<00:02:21.090> go<00:02:21.330> through<00:02:21.630> what<00:02:21.870> the<00:02:21.990> approval 00:02:22.400 --> 00:02:22.410 align:start position:0% and then go through what the approval 00:02:22.410 --> 00:02:24.550 align:start position:0% and then go through what the approval documents<00:02:22.980> will<00:02:23.100> be<00:02:23.130> this<00:02:23.370> coming<00:02:23.580> Thursday 00:02:24.550 --> 00:02:24.560 align:start position:0% documents will be this coming Thursday 00:02:24.560 --> 00:02:27.020 align:start position:0% documents will be this coming Thursday so<00:02:25.560> with<00:02:25.710> that<00:02:25.890> I'm<00:02:26.130> gonna<00:02:26.310> move<00:02:26.550> right<00:02:26.580> into 00:02:27.020 --> 00:02:27.030 align:start position:0% so with that I'm gonna move right into 00:02:27.030 --> 00:02:28.880 align:start position:0% so with that I'm gonna move right into this<00:02:27.150> and<00:02:27.450> turn<00:02:27.600> this<00:02:27.780> over<00:02:27.990> to<00:02:28.170> Public<00:02:28.740> Works 00:02:28.880 --> 00:02:28.890 align:start position:0% this and turn this over to Public Works 00:02:28.890 --> 00:02:31.750 align:start position:0% this and turn this over to Public Works Department<00:02:29.040> to<00:02:29.960> Brannon<00:02:30.960> Grover<00:02:31.290> for 00:02:31.750 --> 00:02:31.760 align:start position:0% Department to Brannon Grover for 00:02:31.760 --> 00:02:35.290 align:start position:0% Department to Brannon Grover for presentation<00:02:32.760> on<00:02:32.850> the<00:02:32.970> benefit<00:02:33.300> districts 00:02:35.290 --> 00:02:35.300 align:start position:0% presentation on the benefit districts 00:02:35.300 --> 00:02:37.870 align:start position:0% presentation on the benefit districts thank<00:02:36.300> you<00:02:36.420> Doug<00:02:36.570> mr.<00:02:37.020> mayor<00:02:37.200> commissioners 00:02:37.870 --> 00:02:37.880 align:start position:0% thank you Doug mr. mayor commissioners 00:02:37.880 --> 00:02:40.130 align:start position:0% thank you Doug mr. mayor commissioners as<00:02:38.880> Doug<00:02:39.240> mentioned<00:02:39.270> we<00:02:39.660> wanted<00:02:39.930> to<00:02:39.990> bring 00:02:40.130 --> 00:02:40.140 align:start position:0% as Doug mentioned we wanted to bring 00:02:40.140 --> 00:02:41.660 align:start position:0% as Doug mentioned we wanted to bring back<00:02:40.200> some<00:02:40.590> information<00:02:40.680> to<00:02:41.370> you<00:02:41.490> guys 00:02:41.660 --> 00:02:41.670 align:start position:0% back some information to you guys 00:02:41.670 --> 00:02:43.820 align:start position:0% back some information to you guys regarding<00:02:42.420> the<00:02:42.990> topic<00:02:43.320> of<00:02:43.440> the<00:02:43.500> benefit 00:02:43.820 --> 00:02:43.830 align:start position:0% regarding the topic of the benefit 00:02:43.830 --> 00:02:45.020 align:start position:0% regarding the topic of the benefit districts<00:02:44.250> that<00:02:44.370> were<00:02:44.460> brought<00:02:44.700> up<00:02:44.730> for 00:02:45.020 --> 00:02:45.030 align:start position:0% districts that were brought up for 00:02:45.030 --> 00:02:47.210 align:start position:0% districts that were brought up for coming<00:02:45.330> up<00:02:45.480> the<00:02:46.140> first<00:02:46.290> couple<00:02:46.620> of<00:02:46.650> slides<00:02:46.920> we 00:02:47.210 --> 00:02:47.220 align:start position:0% coming up the first couple of slides we 00:02:47.220 --> 00:02:48.980 align:start position:0% coming up the first couple of slides we have<00:02:47.250> here<00:02:47.700> are<00:02:47.970> going<00:02:48.270> to<00:02:48.360> detail<00:02:48.750> a<00:02:48.780> little 00:02:48.980 --> 00:02:48.990 align:start position:0% have here are going to detail a little 00:02:48.990 --> 00:02:50.750 align:start position:0% have here are going to detail a little bit<00:02:49.230> of<00:02:49.350> information<00:02:49.590> about<00:02:49.980> our<00:02:50.370> benefit 00:02:50.750 --> 00:02:50.760 align:start position:0% bit of information about our benefit 00:02:50.760 --> 00:02:54.500 align:start position:0% bit of information about our benefit district<00:02:52.160> in<00:02:53.160> general<00:02:53.580> before<00:02:53.760> we<00:02:54.030> dive<00:02:54.240> into 00:02:54.500 --> 00:02:54.510 align:start position:0% district in general before we dive into 00:02:54.510 --> 00:02:57.080 align:start position:0% district in general before we dive into this<00:02:54.960> specific<00:02:55.650> instance<00:02:56.430> that<00:02:56.730> was<00:02:56.880> brought 00:02:57.080 --> 00:02:57.090 align:start position:0% this specific instance that was brought 00:02:57.090 --> 00:02:59.600 align:start position:0% this specific instance that was brought up<00:02:57.320> first<00:02:58.320> off<00:02:58.500> we<00:02:58.680> do<00:02:58.860> have<00:02:59.130> an<00:02:59.250> official 00:02:59.600 --> 00:02:59.610 align:start position:0% up first off we do have an official 00:02:59.610 --> 00:03:01.790 align:start position:0% up first off we do have an official policy<00:02:59.790> for<00:03:00.330> benefit<00:03:00.750> for<00:03:01.200> establishing<00:03:01.620> a 00:03:01.790 --> 00:03:01.800 align:start position:0% policy for benefit for establishing a 00:03:01.800 --> 00:03:04.070 align:start position:0% policy for benefit for establishing a benefit<00:03:02.130> district<00:03:02.520> it<00:03:02.640> was<00:03:02.760> brought<00:03:03.080> before 00:03:04.070 --> 00:03:04.080 align:start position:0% benefit district it was brought before 00:03:04.080 --> 00:03:07.729 align:start position:0% benefit district it was brought before us<00:03:04.320> as<00:03:04.709> a<00:03:04.800> formal<00:03:05.250> process<00:03:05.400> in<00:03:05.700> May<00:03:05.880> of<00:03:06.030> 1999<00:03:06.750> as 00:03:07.729 --> 00:03:07.739 align:start position:0% us as a formal process in May of 1999 as 00:03:07.739 --> 00:03:09.920 align:start position:0% us as a formal process in May of 1999 as you<00:03:07.950> can<00:03:08.100> see<00:03:08.310> on<00:03:08.489> the<00:03:08.610> screen<00:03:08.910> it<00:03:09.090> is<00:03:09.180> a<00:03:09.209> 17 00:03:09.920 --> 00:03:09.930 align:start position:0% you can see on the screen it is a 17 00:03:09.930 --> 00:03:13.190 align:start position:0% you can see on the screen it is a 17 step<00:03:10.230> process<00:03:10.709> that<00:03:10.739> takes<00:03:11.600> anywhere<00:03:12.600> from<00:03:12.989> a 00:03:13.190 --> 00:03:13.200 align:start position:0% step process that takes anywhere from a 00:03:13.200 --> 00:03:15.650 align:start position:0% step process that takes anywhere from a year<00:03:13.260> to<00:03:13.560> a<00:03:13.770> year<00:03:14.070> and<00:03:14.100> a<00:03:14.190> half<00:03:14.570> depending<00:03:15.570> on 00:03:15.650 --> 00:03:15.660 align:start position:0% year to a year and a half depending on 00:03:15.660 --> 00:03:18.920 align:start position:0% year to a year and a half depending on the<00:03:15.750> size<00:03:15.930> and<00:03:16.200> complexity<00:03:16.709> of<00:03:17.540> the<00:03:18.540> benefit 00:03:18.920 --> 00:03:18.930 align:start position:0% the size and complexity of the benefit 00:03:18.930 --> 00:03:21.590 align:start position:0% the size and complexity of the benefit district<00:03:19.350> the<00:03:19.800> first<00:03:20.100> step<00:03:20.430> which<00:03:21.120> has<00:03:21.330> to<00:03:21.480> be 00:03:21.590 --> 00:03:21.600 align:start position:0% district the first step which has to be 00:03:21.600 --> 00:03:24.530 align:start position:0% district the first step which has to be done<00:03:21.840> and<00:03:22.680> is<00:03:22.890> honestly<00:03:23.280> the<00:03:23.459> kickoff<00:03:24.180> step 00:03:24.530 --> 00:03:24.540 align:start position:0% done and is honestly the kickoff step 00:03:24.540 --> 00:03:26.660 align:start position:0% done and is honestly the kickoff step that<00:03:24.720> is<00:03:24.900> most<00:03:25.650> often<00:03:25.890> done<00:03:26.220> by<00:03:26.280> the 00:03:26.660 --> 00:03:26.670 align:start position:0% that is most often done by the 00:03:26.670 --> 00:03:29.000 align:start position:0% that is most often done by the neighborhood<00:03:27.150> groups<00:03:27.420> is<00:03:27.750> this<00:03:28.350> informal 00:03:29.000 --> 00:03:29.010 align:start position:0% neighborhood groups is this informal 00:03:29.010 --> 00:03:31.520 align:start position:0% neighborhood groups is this informal petition<00:03:29.370> of<00:03:29.489> interest<00:03:29.880> in<00:03:30.390> our<00:03:30.870> policy<00:03:31.380> it 00:03:31.520 --> 00:03:31.530 align:start position:0% petition of interest in our policy it 00:03:31.530 --> 00:03:36.620 align:start position:0% petition of interest in our policy it states<00:03:31.830> that<00:03:32.160> only<00:03:33.380> 50%<00:03:34.380> of<00:03:35.010> the<00:03:35.630> population 00:03:36.620 --> 00:03:36.630 align:start position:0% states that only 50% of the population 00:03:36.630 --> 00:03:38.570 align:start position:0% states that only 50% of the population or<00:03:36.750> the<00:03:36.780> residents<00:03:37.470> inside<00:03:37.650> of<00:03:38.340> the 00:03:38.570 --> 00:03:38.580 align:start position:0% or the residents inside of the 00:03:38.580 --> 00:03:40.610 align:start position:0% or the residents inside of the designated<00:03:39.150> district<00:03:39.690> return<00:03:40.380> their 00:03:40.610 --> 00:03:40.620 align:start position:0% designated district return their 00:03:40.620 --> 00:03:42.290 align:start position:0% designated district return their signature<00:03:41.130> saying<00:03:41.489> that<00:03:41.700> they<00:03:41.850> are<00:03:41.910> in<00:03:42.090> favor 00:03:42.290 --> 00:03:42.300 align:start position:0% signature saying that they are in favor 00:03:42.300 --> 00:03:43.670 align:start position:0% signature saying that they are in favor of<00:03:42.570> something<00:03:42.870> like<00:03:42.989> this<00:03:43.230> and<00:03:43.440> they<00:03:43.530> are 00:03:43.670 --> 00:03:43.680 align:start position:0% of something like this and they are 00:03:43.680 --> 00:03:45.530 align:start position:0% of something like this and they are aware<00:03:44.070> that<00:03:44.130> they<00:03:44.550> could<00:03:44.790> potentially<00:03:45.090> bear 00:03:45.530 --> 00:03:45.540 align:start position:0% aware that they could potentially bear 00:03:45.540 --> 00:03:48.590 align:start position:0% aware that they could potentially bear some<00:03:45.810> cost<00:03:46.080> on<00:03:46.440> their<00:03:46.680> property<00:03:47.100> taxes<00:03:47.600> once 00:03:48.590 --> 00:03:48.600 align:start position:0% some cost on their property taxes once 00:03:48.600 --> 00:03:51.920 align:start position:0% some cost on their property taxes once that<00:03:48.840> petition<00:03:49.320> is<00:03:49.470> turned<00:03:49.739> into<00:03:50.130> the<00:03:50.670> UG<00:03:51.060> we 00:03:51.920 --> 00:03:51.930 align:start position:0% that petition is turned into the UG we 00:03:51.930 --> 00:03:53.570 align:start position:0% that petition is turned into the UG we then<00:03:52.140> conduct<00:03:52.560> a<00:03:52.650> feasibility<00:03:52.830> study<00:03:53.280> that 00:03:53.570 --> 00:03:53.580 align:start position:0% then conduct a feasibility study that 00:03:53.580 --> 00:03:55.820 align:start position:0% then conduct a feasibility study that takes<00:03:53.910> into<00:03:54.180> account<00:03:54.209> the<00:03:54.630> requests<00:03:55.260> that<00:03:55.709> are 00:03:55.820 --> 00:03:55.830 align:start position:0% takes into account the requests that are 00:03:55.830 --> 00:03:59.180 align:start position:0% takes into account the requests that are clearly<00:03:56.130> stated<00:03:56.700> on<00:03:56.880> the<00:03:57.060> petition<00:03:57.590> and<00:03:58.590> the 00:03:59.180 --> 00:03:59.190 align:start position:0% clearly stated on the petition and the 00:03:59.190 --> 00:04:01.130 align:start position:0% clearly stated on the petition and the validity<00:03:59.610> of<00:03:59.850> the<00:04:00.330> signatures<00:04:00.840> that<00:04:00.870> were 00:04:01.130 --> 00:04:01.140 align:start position:0% validity of the signatures that were 00:04:01.140 --> 00:04:03.080 align:start position:0% validity of the signatures that were turned<00:04:01.290> in<00:04:01.500> to<00:04:01.620> make<00:04:01.769> sure<00:04:01.920> that<00:04:02.190> the<00:04:02.550> names<00:04:02.820> on 00:04:03.080 --> 00:04:03.090 align:start position:0% turned in to make sure that the names on 00:04:03.090 --> 00:04:04.820 align:start position:0% turned in to make sure that the names on the<00:04:03.209> signature<00:04:03.570> match<00:04:03.780> the<00:04:03.989> ownerships<00:04:04.530> and 00:04:04.820 --> 00:04:04.830 align:start position:0% the signature match the ownerships and 00:04:04.830 --> 00:04:08.540 align:start position:0% the signature match the ownerships and things<00:04:05.040> like<00:04:05.250> that<00:04:06.800> this<00:04:07.800> is<00:04:08.070> currently<00:04:08.460> the 00:04:08.540 --> 00:04:08.550 align:start position:0% things like that this is currently the 00:04:08.550 --> 00:04:11.600 align:start position:0% things like that this is currently the step<00:04:08.850> that<00:04:08.970> we're<00:04:09.180> at<00:04:09.390> with<00:04:09.960> the<00:04:10.770> the<00:04:11.280> benefit 00:04:11.600 --> 00:04:11.610 align:start position:0% step that we're at with the the benefit 00:04:11.610 --> 00:04:13.580 align:start position:0% step that we're at with the the benefit district<00:04:11.910> we'll<00:04:12.030> discuss<00:04:12.360> more<00:04:12.660> later 00:04:13.580 --> 00:04:13.590 align:start position:0% district we'll discuss more later 00:04:13.590 --> 00:04:17.210 align:start position:0% district we'll discuss more later after<00:04:14.099> this<00:04:14.310> step<00:04:14.640> is<00:04:15.169> finalized<00:04:16.169> there<00:04:16.859> is<00:04:17.070> a 00:04:17.210 --> 00:04:17.220 align:start position:0% after this step is finalized there is a 00:04:17.220 --> 00:04:20.210 align:start position:0% after this step is finalized there is a portion<00:04:17.459> where<00:04:17.820> the<00:04:18.209> ug<00:04:18.870> goes<00:04:19.139> back<00:04:19.470> to<00:04:19.799> the 00:04:20.210 --> 00:04:20.220 align:start position:0% portion where the ug goes back to the 00:04:20.220 --> 00:04:22.400 align:start position:0% portion where the ug goes back to the neighborhood<00:04:20.400> groups<00:04:20.910> and<00:04:21.150> informs<00:04:22.019> them<00:04:22.230> of 00:04:22.400 --> 00:04:22.410 align:start position:0% neighborhood groups and informs them of 00:04:22.410 --> 00:04:23.900 align:start position:0% neighborhood groups and informs them of what<00:04:22.560> the<00:04:22.680> feasibility<00:04:23.070> study<00:04:23.340> brought 00:04:23.900 --> 00:04:23.910 align:start position:0% what the feasibility study brought 00:04:23.910 --> 00:04:25.700 align:start position:0% what the feasibility study brought forward<00:04:24.330> so<00:04:24.600> it'll<00:04:24.840> be<00:04:24.960> information<00:04:25.620> about 00:04:25.700 --> 00:04:25.710 align:start position:0% forward so it'll be information about 00:04:25.710 --> 00:04:27.860 align:start position:0% forward so it'll be information about what<00:04:26.130> the<00:04:26.250> district<00:04:26.730> boundaries<00:04:27.180> should<00:04:27.600> be 00:04:27.860 --> 00:04:27.870 align:start position:0% what the district boundaries should be 00:04:27.870 --> 00:04:30.650 align:start position:0% what the district boundaries should be based<00:04:28.380> on<00:04:28.560> what<00:04:28.800> the<00:04:29.490> popular<00:04:29.880> the<00:04:30.030> density<00:04:30.450> of 00:04:30.650 --> 00:04:30.660 align:start position:0% based on what the popular the density of 00:04:30.660 --> 00:04:35.060 align:start position:0% based on what the popular the density of signatures<00:04:31.440> the<00:04:32.220> potential<00:04:32.760> cost<00:04:33.120> of<00:04:34.070> the 00:04:35.060 --> 00:04:35.070 align:start position:0% signatures the potential cost of the 00:04:35.070 --> 00:04:37.250 align:start position:0% signatures the potential cost of the improvements<00:04:35.610> to<00:04:35.639> be<00:04:35.850> made<00:04:35.880> and<00:04:36.419> the 00:04:37.250 --> 00:04:37.260 align:start position:0% improvements to be made and the 00:04:37.260 --> 00:04:41.120 align:start position:0% improvements to be made and the potential<00:04:37.770> break<00:04:38.100> out<00:04:38.340> of<00:04:38.669> how<00:04:39.030> much<00:04:39.360> is<00:04:40.130> taken 00:04:41.120 --> 00:04:41.130 align:start position:0% potential break out of how much is taken 00:04:41.130 --> 00:04:43.280 align:start position:0% potential break out of how much is taken care<00:04:41.280> of<00:04:41.340> by<00:04:41.550> the<00:04:41.610> ug<00:04:42.090> versus<00:04:42.540> the<00:04:42.690> population 00:04:43.280 --> 00:04:43.290 align:start position:0% care of by the ug versus the population 00:04:43.290 --> 00:04:46.310 align:start position:0% care of by the ug versus the population or<00:04:43.500> the<00:04:43.620> residents<00:04:44.570> that<00:04:45.570> process<00:04:46.110> usually 00:04:46.310 --> 00:04:46.320 align:start position:0% or the residents that process usually 00:04:46.320 --> 00:04:48.140 align:start position:0% or the residents that process usually does<00:04:46.680> take<00:04:46.950> quite<00:04:47.130> a<00:04:47.250> bit<00:04:47.460> longer<00:04:47.639> than<00:04:48.000> the 00:04:48.140 --> 00:04:48.150 align:start position:0% does take quite a bit longer than the 00:04:48.150 --> 00:04:51.140 align:start position:0% does take quite a bit longer than the one<00:04:48.360> month<00:04:49.220> that<00:04:50.220> it<00:04:50.370> says<00:04:50.580> up<00:04:50.729> here<00:04:50.760> just 00:04:51.140 --> 00:04:51.150 align:start position:0% one month that it says up here just 00:04:51.150 --> 00:04:52.550 align:start position:0% one month that it says up here just because<00:04:51.270> it<00:04:51.389> takes<00:04:51.690> time<00:04:51.840> to<00:04:51.870> arrange<00:04:52.320> those 00:04:52.550 --> 00:04:52.560 align:start position:0% because it takes time to arrange those 00:04:52.560 --> 00:04:54.409 align:start position:0% because it takes time to arrange those kind<00:04:52.800> of<00:04:52.830> neighborhood<00:04:53.220> meetings<00:04:53.610> and<00:04:53.850> go 00:04:54.409 --> 00:04:54.419 align:start position:0% kind of neighborhood meetings and go 00:04:54.419 --> 00:04:57.010 align:start position:0% kind of neighborhood meetings and go around<00:04:54.540> and<00:04:54.810> get<00:04:54.900> those<00:04:55.050> kind<00:04:55.320> of<00:04:55.380> signatures 00:04:57.010 --> 00:04:57.020 align:start position:0% around and get those kind of signatures 00:04:57.020 --> 00:05:00.290 align:start position:0% around and get those kind of signatures several<00:04:58.020> the<00:04:58.440> other<00:04:58.620> key<00:04:59.250> steps<00:04:59.610> to<00:04:59.729> note<00:05:00.030> is 00:05:00.290 --> 00:05:00.300 align:start position:0% several the other key steps to note is 00:05:00.300 --> 00:05:03.560 align:start position:0% several the other key steps to note is that<00:05:00.330> in<00:05:00.900> step<00:05:01.350> five<00:05:01.770> this<00:05:02.700> is<00:05:02.760> where<00:05:03.090> staff 00:05:03.560 --> 00:05:03.570 align:start position:0% that in step five this is where staff 00:05:03.570 --> 00:05:06.800 align:start position:0% that in step five this is where staff brings<00:05:04.050> back<00:05:04.380> the<00:05:05.070> final<00:05:05.460> recommendation<00:05:06.240> to 00:05:06.800 --> 00:05:06.810 align:start position:0% brings back the final recommendation to 00:05:06.810 --> 00:05:09.409 align:start position:0% brings back the final recommendation to the<00:05:07.130> Standing<00:05:08.130> Committee<00:05:08.160> to<00:05:08.880> form<00:05:09.240> the 00:05:09.409 --> 00:05:09.419 align:start position:0% the Standing Committee to form the 00:05:09.419 --> 00:05:12.170 align:start position:0% the Standing Committee to form the district<00:05:09.919> this<00:05:10.919> is<00:05:11.100> where<00:05:11.280> you<00:05:11.520> all<00:05:11.700> approve 00:05:12.170 --> 00:05:12.180 align:start position:0% district this is where you all approve 00:05:12.180 --> 00:05:14.409 align:start position:0% district this is where you all approve how<00:05:13.139> much<00:05:13.290> money<00:05:13.530> we're<00:05:13.680> willing<00:05:13.979> to<00:05:14.070> spend 00:05:14.409 --> 00:05:14.419 align:start position:0% how much money we're willing to spend 00:05:14.419 --> 00:05:16.850 align:start position:0% how much money we're willing to spend and<00:05:15.419> what<00:05:15.720> years<00:05:16.080> we<00:05:16.260> want<00:05:16.410> to<00:05:16.470> allocate<00:05:16.830> that 00:05:16.850 --> 00:05:16.860 align:start position:0% and what years we want to allocate that 00:05:16.860 --> 00:05:19.820 align:start position:0% and what years we want to allocate that funding<00:05:17.460> to<00:05:17.930> but<00:05:18.930> most<00:05:19.169> of<00:05:19.320> the<00:05:19.410> rest<00:05:19.530> of<00:05:19.770> the 00:05:19.820 --> 00:05:19.830 align:start position:0% funding to but most of the rest of the 00:05:19.830 --> 00:05:22.040 align:start position:0% funding to but most of the rest of the steps<00:05:20.010> are<00:05:20.310> either<00:05:20.460> the<00:05:21.240> legal<00:05:21.539> steps<00:05:21.840> that<00:05:21.990> we 00:05:22.040 --> 00:05:22.050 align:start position:0% steps are either the legal steps that we 00:05:22.050 --> 00:05:23.090 align:start position:0% steps are either the legal steps that we have<00:05:22.169> to<00:05:22.289> go<00:05:22.380> through<00:05:22.560> the<00:05:22.650> authorized 00:05:23.090 --> 00:05:23.100 align:start position:0% have to go through the authorized 00:05:23.100 --> 00:05:25.640 align:start position:0% have to go through the authorized resolution<00:05:23.820> or<00:05:24.060> finance<00:05:24.539> it<00:05:24.750> or<00:05:24.900> the<00:05:25.260> regular 00:05:25.640 --> 00:05:25.650 align:start position:0% resolution or finance it or the regular 00:05:25.650 --> 00:05:27.620 align:start position:0% resolution or finance it or the regular construction<00:05:26.310> type<00:05:26.550> processes<00:05:27.210> that<00:05:27.360> we<00:05:27.479> do 00:05:27.620 --> 00:05:27.630 align:start position:0% construction type processes that we do 00:05:27.630 --> 00:05:29.240 align:start position:0% construction type processes that we do on<00:05:27.810> a<00:05:27.840> regular<00:05:27.930> project<00:05:28.440> so<00:05:28.890> we<00:05:29.010> don't<00:05:29.130> really 00:05:29.240 --> 00:05:29.250 align:start position:0% on a regular project so we don't really 00:05:29.250 --> 00:05:32.000 align:start position:0% on a regular project so we don't really need<00:05:29.430> to<00:05:29.490> touch<00:05:29.729> on<00:05:29.940> those<00:05:30.090> too<00:05:30.330> much<00:05:30.510> as<00:05:31.110> I 00:05:32.000 --> 00:05:32.010 align:start position:0% need to touch on those too much as I 00:05:32.010 --> 00:05:33.980 align:start position:0% need to touch on those too much as I said<00:05:32.250> in<00:05:32.400> the<00:05:32.460> beginning<00:05:32.580> or<00:05:33.120> towards<00:05:33.930> the 00:05:33.980 --> 00:05:33.990 align:start position:0% said in the beginning or towards the 00:05:33.990 --> 00:05:36.080 align:start position:0% said in the beginning or towards the beginning<00:05:34.110> we're<00:05:34.770> currently<00:05:35.010> at<00:05:35.400> the<00:05:35.669> end<00:05:35.880> of 00:05:36.080 --> 00:05:36.090 align:start position:0% beginning we're currently at the end of 00:05:36.090 --> 00:05:38.990 align:start position:0% beginning we're currently at the end of step<00:05:36.300> two<00:05:36.660> we<00:05:37.650> have<00:05:37.919> completed<00:05:38.400> a<00:05:38.580> feasibility 00:05:38.990 --> 00:05:39.000 align:start position:0% step two we have completed a feasibility 00:05:39.000 --> 00:05:41.150 align:start position:0% step two we have completed a feasibility study<00:05:39.240> that<00:05:40.110> has<00:05:40.289> given<00:05:40.590> us<00:05:40.740> a<00:05:40.919> few<00:05:41.100> options 00:05:41.150 --> 00:05:41.160 align:start position:0% study that has given us a few options 00:05:41.160 --> 00:05:43.310 align:start position:0% study that has given us a few options and<00:05:41.760> we'll<00:05:41.880> discuss<00:05:42.240> a<00:05:42.539> little<00:05:42.930> bit<00:05:43.139> about 00:05:43.310 --> 00:05:43.320 align:start position:0% and we'll discuss a little bit about 00:05:43.320 --> 00:05:46.330 align:start position:0% and we'll discuss a little bit about that<00:05:43.590> at<00:05:44.130> a<00:05:44.160> later<00:05:44.430> meeting<00:05:44.870> but<00:05:45.870> we<00:05:45.900> have 00:05:46.330 --> 00:05:46.340 align:start position:0% that at a later meeting but we have 00:05:46.340 --> 00:05:48.860 align:start position:0% that at a later meeting but we have really<00:05:47.340> looked<00:05:47.910> into<00:05:48.210> this<00:05:48.330> in<00:05:48.539> a<00:05:48.630> more 00:05:48.860 --> 00:05:48.870 align:start position:0% really looked into this in a more 00:05:48.870 --> 00:05:51.379 align:start position:0% really looked into this in a more thoughtful<00:05:49.200> manner<00:05:49.740> than<00:05:50.220> just<00:05:51.210> kind<00:05:51.360> of 00:05:51.379 --> 00:05:51.389 align:start position:0% thoughtful manner than just kind of 00:05:51.389 --> 00:05:55.879 align:start position:0% thoughtful manner than just kind of glancing<00:05:51.810> over<00:05:53.090> so<00:05:54.139> background<00:05:55.139> on<00:05:55.560> the 00:05:55.879 --> 00:05:55.889 align:start position:0% glancing over so background on the 00:05:55.889 --> 00:05:57.800 align:start position:0% glancing over so background on the specific<00:05:56.460> instance<00:05:56.850> for<00:05:57.120> the<00:05:57.210> TAS<00:05:57.510> and 00:05:57.800 --> 00:05:57.810 align:start position:0% specific instance for the TAS and 00:05:57.810 --> 00:05:59.510 align:start position:0% specific instance for the TAS and friendship<00:05:58.229> by<00:05:58.320> its<00:05:58.470> benefit<00:05:58.860> district<00:05:59.220> for 00:05:59.510 --> 00:05:59.520 align:start position:0% friendship by its benefit district for 00:05:59.520 --> 00:06:02.150 align:start position:0% friendship by its benefit district for those<00:05:59.639> who<00:05:59.760> don't<00:05:59.940> know<00:06:00.000> this<00:06:00.210> area<00:06:00.560> is<00:06:01.560> over 00:06:02.150 --> 00:06:02.160 align:start position:0% those who don't know this area is over 00:06:02.160 --> 00:06:04.159 align:start position:0% those who don't know this area is over on<00:06:02.280> County<00:06:02.669> Line<00:06:02.700> Road<00:06:03.090> about<00:06:03.330> South<00:06:03.810> 10th 00:06:04.159 --> 00:06:04.169 align:start position:0% on County Line Road about South 10th 00:06:04.169 --> 00:06:06.440 align:start position:0% on County Line Road about South 10th Street<00:06:04.610> this<00:06:05.610> neighborhood<00:06:06.000> group<00:06:06.180> is<00:06:06.300> going 00:06:06.440 --> 00:06:06.450 align:start position:0% Street this neighborhood group is going 00:06:06.450 --> 00:06:08.990 align:start position:0% Street this neighborhood group is going to<00:06:06.510> encompass<00:06:07.050> a<00:06:07.710> couple<00:06:08.430> blocks<00:06:08.610> on<00:06:08.880> either 00:06:08.990 --> 00:06:09.000 align:start position:0% to encompass a couple blocks on either 00:06:09.000 --> 00:06:10.640 align:start position:0% to encompass a couple blocks on either side<00:06:09.330> of<00:06:09.360> that<00:06:09.510> and<00:06:09.780> a<00:06:09.900> couple<00:06:10.169> blocks<00:06:10.320> to<00:06:10.560> the 00:06:10.640 --> 00:06:10.650 align:start position:0% side of that and a couple blocks to the 00:06:10.650 --> 00:06:12.890 align:start position:0% side of that and a couple blocks to the north<00:06:10.729> around<00:06:11.729> ta<00:06:12.030> @<00:06:12.240> it's<00:06:12.389> an<00:06:12.450> elementary 00:06:12.890 --> 00:06:12.900 align:start position:0% north around ta @ it's an elementary 00:06:12.900 --> 00:06:17.240 align:start position:0% north around ta @ it's an elementary school<00:06:13.310> some<00:06:14.310> time<00:06:14.490> prior<00:06:14.729> to<00:06:14.970> 2013<00:06:16.250> the 00:06:17.240 --> 00:06:17.250 align:start position:0% school some time prior to 2013 the 00:06:17.250 --> 00:06:19.969 align:start position:0% school some time prior to 2013 the citizens<00:06:17.789> fort<00:06:18.600> did<00:06:18.780> the<00:06:18.930> end<00:06:19.110> that<00:06:19.500> step<00:06:19.770> one 00:06:19.969 --> 00:06:19.979 align:start position:0% citizens fort did the end that step one 00:06:19.979 --> 00:06:23.149 align:start position:0% citizens fort did the end that step one the<00:06:20.160> informal<00:06:20.850> petition<00:06:21.300> of<00:06:21.900> interest<00:06:22.289> we 00:06:23.149 --> 00:06:23.159 align:start position:0% the informal petition of interest we 00:06:23.159 --> 00:06:24.980 align:start position:0% the informal petition of interest we don't<00:06:23.490> have<00:06:23.849> a<00:06:23.880> date<00:06:24.240> on<00:06:24.419> that<00:06:24.539> because<00:06:24.720> the 00:06:24.980 --> 00:06:24.990 align:start position:0% don't have a date on that because the 00:06:24.990 --> 00:06:26.770 align:start position:0% don't have a date on that because the petition<00:06:25.440> they<00:06:25.620> sign<00:06:25.979> it<00:06:26.159> or<00:06:26.280> they<00:06:26.430> turn 00:06:26.770 --> 00:06:26.780 align:start position:0% petition they sign it or they turn 00:06:26.780 --> 00:06:28.480 align:start position:0% petition they sign it or they turn doesn't<00:06:27.170> have<00:06:27.290> a<00:06:27.320> date<00:06:27.590> that<00:06:27.620> they<00:06:27.920> signed<00:06:28.190> or 00:06:28.480 --> 00:06:28.490 align:start position:0% doesn't have a date that they signed or 00:06:28.490 --> 00:06:29.710 align:start position:0% doesn't have a date that they signed or we<00:06:28.580> don't<00:06:28.760> have<00:06:28.880> a<00:06:28.910> date<00:06:29.120> that<00:06:29.270> we<00:06:29.360> received 00:06:29.710 --> 00:06:29.720 align:start position:0% we don't have a date that we received 00:06:29.720 --> 00:06:33.100 align:start position:0% we don't have a date that we received due<00:06:29.900> to<00:06:30.020> prior<00:06:30.970> prior<00:06:31.970> staff<00:06:32.360> being<00:06:32.810> here<00:06:32.990> we 00:06:33.100 --> 00:06:33.110 align:start position:0% due to prior prior staff being here we 00:06:33.110 --> 00:06:35.050 align:start position:0% due to prior prior staff being here we don't<00:06:33.230> know<00:06:33.380> when<00:06:33.530> that<00:06:33.560> exactly<00:06:34.040> was<00:06:34.280> but<00:06:34.580> the 00:06:35.050 --> 00:06:35.060 align:start position:0% don't know when that exactly was but the 00:06:35.060 --> 00:06:37.000 align:start position:0% don't know when that exactly was but the first<00:06:35.300> instance<00:06:35.780> that<00:06:36.230> we<00:06:36.410> see<00:06:36.710> something 00:06:37.000 --> 00:06:37.010 align:start position:0% first instance that we see something 00:06:37.010 --> 00:06:40.000 align:start position:0% first instance that we see something about<00:06:37.250> this<00:06:37.580> is<00:06:37.760> in<00:06:38.300> the<00:06:38.389> 2013<00:06:39.110> budget<00:06:39.139> we 00:06:40.000 --> 00:06:40.010 align:start position:0% about this is in the 2013 budget we 00:06:40.010 --> 00:06:41.820 align:start position:0% about this is in the 2013 budget we place<00:06:40.280> it<00:06:40.490> in<00:06:40.580> the<00:06:40.700> CMI<00:06:41.090> P<00:06:41.150> and<00:06:41.480> the<00:06:41.540> amount<00:06:41.720> of 00:06:41.820 --> 00:06:41.830 align:start position:0% place it in the CMI P and the amount of 00:06:41.830 --> 00:06:46.360 align:start position:0% place it in the CMI P and the amount of $400,000<00:06:42.830> for<00:06:43.130> 2018<00:06:44.620> this<00:06:45.620> is<00:06:45.800> this<00:06:46.040> amount 00:06:46.360 --> 00:06:46.370 align:start position:0% $400,000 for 2018 this is this amount 00:06:46.370 --> 00:06:48.040 align:start position:0% $400,000 for 2018 this is this amount based<00:06:46.639> on<00:06:46.850> the<00:06:46.910> size<00:06:47.240> of<00:06:47.419> this<00:06:47.540> district<00:06:47.930> is 00:06:48.040 --> 00:06:48.050 align:start position:0% based on the size of this district is 00:06:48.050 --> 00:06:49.690 align:start position:0% based on the size of this district is something<00:06:48.350> would<00:06:48.500> usually<00:06:48.770> be<00:06:49.100> associated 00:06:49.690 --> 00:06:49.700 align:start position:0% something would usually be associated 00:06:49.700 --> 00:06:52.780 align:start position:0% something would usually be associated with<00:06:49.730> the<00:06:49.970> potential<00:06:50.930> design<00:06:51.410> of<00:06:51.790> of 00:06:52.780 --> 00:06:52.790 align:start position:0% with the potential design of of 00:06:52.790 --> 00:06:55.180 align:start position:0% with the potential design of of something<00:06:53.270> like<00:06:53.389> this<00:06:53.600> but<00:06:54.530> again<00:06:54.740> because<00:06:54.919> it 00:06:55.180 --> 00:06:55.190 align:start position:0% something like this but again because it 00:06:55.190 --> 00:06:57.490 align:start position:0% something like this but again because it happened<00:06:55.490> before<00:06:55.580> any<00:06:55.970> current<00:06:56.389> staff<00:06:56.690> we're 00:06:57.490 --> 00:06:57.500 align:start position:0% happened before any current staff we're 00:06:57.500 --> 00:06:58.870 align:start position:0% happened before any current staff we're not<00:06:57.650> entirely<00:06:57.919> positive<00:06:58.430> where<00:06:58.550> that<00:06:58.700> number 00:06:58.870 --> 00:06:58.880 align:start position:0% not entirely positive where that number 00:06:58.880 --> 00:06:59.560 align:start position:0% not entirely positive where that number came<00:06:59.240> from 00:06:59.560 --> 00:06:59.570 align:start position:0% came from 00:06:59.570 --> 00:07:02.409 align:start position:0% came from in<00:07:00.340> 2014<00:07:01.340> there<00:07:01.550> was<00:07:01.640> an<00:07:01.790> update<00:07:02.150> to<00:07:02.330> the 00:07:02.409 --> 00:07:02.419 align:start position:0% in 2014 there was an update to the 00:07:02.419 --> 00:07:04.840 align:start position:0% in 2014 there was an update to the budget<00:07:02.750> that<00:07:02.870> moved<00:07:03.140> the<00:07:03.770> 400,000<00:07:04.640> out<00:07:04.730> to 00:07:04.840 --> 00:07:04.850 align:start position:0% budget that moved the 400,000 out to 00:07:04.850 --> 00:07:10.000 align:start position:0% budget that moved the 400,000 out to 2019<00:07:05.780> and<00:07:05.990> put<00:07:06.620> 200,000<00:07:07.490> in<00:07:07.580> 2018<00:07:08.450> in<00:07:09.010> 2015 00:07:10.000 --> 00:07:10.010 align:start position:0% 2019 and put 200,000 in 2018 in 2015 00:07:10.010 --> 00:07:12.220 align:start position:0% 2019 and put 200,000 in 2018 in 2015 again<00:07:10.340> there<00:07:10.610> was<00:07:10.730> another<00:07:11.060> update<00:07:11.630> that 00:07:12.220 --> 00:07:12.230 align:start position:0% again there was another update that 00:07:12.230 --> 00:07:14.590 align:start position:0% again there was another update that moved<00:07:12.440> the<00:07:12.530> budget<00:07:12.860> forward<00:07:13.190> for<00:07:13.760> 400,000<00:07:14.510> in 00:07:14.590 --> 00:07:14.600 align:start position:0% moved the budget forward for 400,000 in 00:07:14.600 --> 00:07:18.640 align:start position:0% moved the budget forward for 400,000 in 2016<00:07:15.560> and<00:07:15.770> 200,000<00:07:16.520> and<00:07:16.669> 2017<00:07:17.630> this<00:07:18.440> is 00:07:18.640 --> 00:07:18.650 align:start position:0% 2016 and 200,000 and 2017 this is 00:07:18.650 --> 00:07:20.650 align:start position:0% 2016 and 200,000 and 2017 this is currently<00:07:19.010> where<00:07:19.250> we<00:07:19.400> stand<00:07:19.700> budgetary<00:07:20.360> wise 00:07:20.650 --> 00:07:20.660 align:start position:0% currently where we stand budgetary wise 00:07:20.660 --> 00:07:22.540 align:start position:0% currently where we stand budgetary wise we<00:07:21.320> have<00:07:21.530> five<00:07:21.770> hundred<00:07:22.100> and<00:07:22.220> seventy<00:07:22.520> eight 00:07:22.540 --> 00:07:22.550 align:start position:0% we have five hundred and seventy eight 00:07:22.550 --> 00:07:23.890 align:start position:0% we have five hundred and seventy eight thousand<00:07:23.090> dollars<00:07:23.360> of<00:07:23.510> the<00:07:23.600> six<00:07:23.870> hundred 00:07:23.890 --> 00:07:23.900 align:start position:0% thousand dollars of the six hundred 00:07:23.900 --> 00:07:25.510 align:start position:0% thousand dollars of the six hundred thousand<00:07:24.380> dollar<00:07:24.560> budget<00:07:24.770> still<00:07:25.130> remaining 00:07:25.510 --> 00:07:25.520 align:start position:0% thousand dollar budget still remaining 00:07:25.520 --> 00:07:27.520 align:start position:0% thousand dollar budget still remaining in<00:07:25.790> our<00:07:25.940> Tim<00:07:26.210> noted<00:07:26.630> budget<00:07:26.990> we've<00:07:27.320> currently 00:07:27.520 --> 00:07:27.530 align:start position:0% in our Tim noted budget we've currently 00:07:27.530 --> 00:07:29.350 align:start position:0% in our Tim noted budget we've currently used<00:07:27.950> that<00:07:28.130> other<00:07:28.310> twenty<00:07:28.669> two<00:07:28.820> thousand<00:07:29.270> to 00:07:29.350 --> 00:07:29.360 align:start position:0% used that other twenty two thousand to 00:07:29.360 --> 00:07:33.340 align:start position:0% used that other twenty two thousand to fund<00:07:29.600> the<00:07:29.720> feasibility<00:07:30.110> study<00:07:31.990> in<00:07:32.990> the<00:07:33.140> fall 00:07:33.340 --> 00:07:33.350 align:start position:0% fund the feasibility study in the fall 00:07:33.350 --> 00:07:35.320 align:start position:0% fund the feasibility study in the fall of<00:07:33.380> 2016<00:07:33.950> we<00:07:34.370> received<00:07:34.790> the<00:07:34.940> feasibility 00:07:35.320 --> 00:07:35.330 align:start position:0% of 2016 we received the feasibility 00:07:35.330 --> 00:07:38.770 align:start position:0% of 2016 we received the feasibility study<00:07:35.770> back<00:07:36.770> to<00:07:37.070> us<00:07:37.250> with<00:07:38.120> some<00:07:38.390> alternate 00:07:38.770 --> 00:07:38.780 align:start position:0% study back to us with some alternate 00:07:38.780 --> 00:07:41.890 align:start position:0% study back to us with some alternate options<00:07:39.400> in<00:07:40.400> which<00:07:40.940> we<00:07:41.479> took<00:07:41.690> that 00:07:41.890 --> 00:07:41.900 align:start position:0% options in which we took that 00:07:41.900 --> 00:07:43.210 align:start position:0% options in which we took that information<00:07:42.050> back<00:07:42.710> to<00:07:42.740> the<00:07:43.039> Rosedale 00:07:43.210 --> 00:07:43.220 align:start position:0% information back to the Rosedale 00:07:43.220 --> 00:07:45.580 align:start position:0% information back to the Rosedale development<00:07:43.850> Association<00:07:44.479> to<00:07:44.750> discuss<00:07:45.410> these 00:07:45.580 --> 00:07:45.590 align:start position:0% development Association to discuss these 00:07:45.590 --> 00:07:50.230 align:start position:0% development Association to discuss these with<00:07:45.830> them<00:07:46.270> well<00:07:47.270> that<00:07:47.750> in<00:07:48.710> that<00:07:48.979> meeting<00:07:49.760> took 00:07:50.230 --> 00:07:50.240 align:start position:0% with them well that in that meeting took 00:07:50.240 --> 00:07:54.279 align:start position:0% with them well that in that meeting took place<00:07:52.210> yeah<00:07:53.210> sorry 00:07:54.279 --> 00:07:54.289 align:start position:0% place yeah sorry 00:07:54.289 --> 00:07:57.909 align:start position:0% place yeah sorry jumping<00:07:55.220> ahead<00:07:55.280> of<00:07:55.400> myself<00:07:55.600> in<00:07:56.600> May<00:07:56.990> of<00:07:57.140> 2017 00:07:57.909 --> 00:07:57.919 align:start position:0% jumping ahead of myself in May of 2017 00:07:57.919 --> 00:08:00.700 align:start position:0% jumping ahead of myself in May of 2017 after<00:07:58.190> our<00:07:58.550> initial<00:07:58.910> meeting<00:07:58.940> with<00:07:59.240> RDA<00:07:59.710> we 00:08:00.700 --> 00:08:00.710 align:start position:0% after our initial meeting with RDA we 00:08:00.710 --> 00:08:02.980 align:start position:0% after our initial meeting with RDA we had<00:08:00.950> our<00:08:01.820> consultant<00:08:02.390> actually<00:08:02.660> look<00:08:02.840> at<00:08:02.960> a 00:08:02.980 --> 00:08:02.990 align:start position:0% had our consultant actually look at a 00:08:02.990 --> 00:08:05.050 align:start position:0% had our consultant actually look at a couple<00:08:03.320> different<00:08:03.350> design<00:08:03.860> options<00:08:04.130> breaking 00:08:05.050 --> 00:08:05.060 align:start position:0% couple different design options breaking 00:08:05.060 --> 00:08:06.880 align:start position:0% couple different design options breaking this<00:08:05.180> down<00:08:05.240> into<00:08:05.720> several<00:08:05.900> smaller<00:08:06.320> segments 00:08:06.880 --> 00:08:06.890 align:start position:0% this down into several smaller segments 00:08:06.890 --> 00:08:08.620 align:start position:0% this down into several smaller segments that<00:08:07.010> would<00:08:07.130> make<00:08:07.310> things<00:08:07.550> more<00:08:07.910> feasible<00:08:08.180> and 00:08:08.620 --> 00:08:08.630 align:start position:0% that would make things more feasible and 00:08:08.630 --> 00:08:11.080 align:start position:0% that would make things more feasible and allow<00:08:09.289> us<00:08:09.470> to<00:08:09.620> really<00:08:09.800> impact<00:08:10.430> the<00:08:10.669> community 00:08:11.080 --> 00:08:11.090 align:start position:0% allow us to really impact the community 00:08:11.090 --> 00:08:13.029 align:start position:0% allow us to really impact the community and<00:08:11.240> the<00:08:11.330> best<00:08:11.510> way<00:08:11.660> possible<00:08:11.690> that<00:08:12.410> was<00:08:12.830> done 00:08:13.029 --> 00:08:13.039 align:start position:0% and the best way possible that was done 00:08:13.039 --> 00:08:16.659 align:start position:0% and the best way possible that was done in<00:08:13.400> May<00:08:13.669> of<00:08:13.700> 2017<00:08:14.600> at<00:08:15.500> this<00:08:15.740> point<00:08:16.070> we<00:08:16.430> then 00:08:16.659 --> 00:08:16.669 align:start position:0% in May of 2017 at this point we then 00:08:16.669 --> 00:08:19.290 align:start position:0% in May of 2017 at this point we then discussed<00:08:17.570> options<00:08:18.050> and<00:08:18.289> looked<00:08:18.500> at<00:08:18.650> funding 00:08:19.290 --> 00:08:19.300 align:start position:0% discussed options and looked at funding 00:08:19.300 --> 00:08:21.850 align:start position:0% discussed options and looked at funding for<00:08:20.300> these<00:08:20.450> options<00:08:20.930> in<00:08:21.140> coordination<00:08:21.680> with 00:08:21.850 --> 00:08:21.860 align:start position:0% for these options in coordination with 00:08:21.860 --> 00:08:23.909 align:start position:0% for these options in coordination with some<00:08:22.190> of<00:08:22.280> our<00:08:22.370> safe<00:08:22.640> routes<00:08:22.820> to<00:08:22.970> school<00:08:23.390> grants 00:08:23.909 --> 00:08:23.919 align:start position:0% some of our safe routes to school grants 00:08:23.919 --> 00:08:26.350 align:start position:0% some of our safe routes to school grants that<00:08:24.919> we've<00:08:25.070> been<00:08:25.460> very<00:08:25.640> successful<00:08:25.729> in 00:08:26.350 --> 00:08:26.360 align:start position:0% that we've been very successful in 00:08:26.360 --> 00:08:27.790 align:start position:0% that we've been very successful in applying<00:08:26.419> for<00:08:27.020> with<00:08:27.229> the<00:08:27.320> mid-america 00:08:27.790 --> 00:08:27.800 align:start position:0% applying for with the mid-america 00:08:27.800 --> 00:08:30.430 align:start position:0% applying for with the mid-america Regional<00:08:28.130> Council<00:08:28.240> in<00:08:29.240> February<00:08:30.200> of<00:08:30.260> this 00:08:30.430 --> 00:08:30.440 align:start position:0% Regional Council in February of this 00:08:30.440 --> 00:08:32.380 align:start position:0% Regional Council in February of this year<00:08:30.500> we<00:08:30.830> selected<00:08:31.310> option<00:08:31.669> a<00:08:31.789> because<00:08:32.240> it 00:08:32.380 --> 00:08:32.390 align:start position:0% year we selected option a because it 00:08:32.390 --> 00:08:34.390 align:start position:0% year we selected option a because it provided<00:08:32.960> some<00:08:32.990> of<00:08:33.289> the<00:08:33.380> major<00:08:33.650> arterial 00:08:34.390 --> 00:08:34.400 align:start position:0% provided some of the major arterial 00:08:34.400 --> 00:08:36.790 align:start position:0% provided some of the major arterial routes<00:08:34.610> through<00:08:34.940> this<00:08:35.089> neighborhood<00:08:35.800> locust 00:08:36.790 --> 00:08:36.800 align:start position:0% routes through this neighborhood locust 00:08:36.800 --> 00:08:38.700 align:start position:0% routes through this neighborhood locust as<00:08:36.979> the<00:08:37.130> east-west<00:08:37.640> route<00:08:37.909> and 00:08:38.700 --> 00:08:38.710 align:start position:0% as the east-west route and 00:08:38.710 --> 00:08:41.810 align:start position:0% as the east-west route and Knight<00:08:39.280> Terrace<00:08:40.060> as<00:08:40.300> the<00:08:40.510> north-south<00:08:40.990> route 00:08:41.810 --> 00:08:41.820 align:start position:0% Knight Terrace as the north-south route 00:08:41.820 --> 00:08:47.010 align:start position:0% Knight Terrace as the north-south route in<00:08:42.820> April<00:08:44.040> it<00:08:45.040> was<00:08:45.220> decided<00:08:45.820> that<00:08:45.850> given<00:08:46.750> the 00:08:47.010 --> 00:08:47.020 align:start position:0% in April it was decided that given the 00:08:47.020 --> 00:08:48.750 align:start position:0% in April it was decided that given the amount<00:08:47.530> of<00:08:47.650> funding<00:08:47.950> that<00:08:48.070> was<00:08:48.160> available<00:08:48.370> for 00:08:48.750 --> 00:08:48.760 align:start position:0% amount of funding that was available for 00:08:48.760 --> 00:08:50.070 align:start position:0% amount of funding that was available for the<00:08:48.880> safe<00:08:49.060> routes<00:08:49.300> to<00:08:49.390> school<00:08:49.690> program 00:08:50.070 --> 00:08:50.080 align:start position:0% the safe routes to school program 00:08:50.080 --> 00:08:51.770 align:start position:0% the safe routes to school program through<00:08:50.320> the<00:08:50.350> mid-america<00:08:50.860> Regional<00:08:51.160> Council 00:08:51.770 --> 00:08:51.780 align:start position:0% through the mid-america Regional Council 00:08:51.780 --> 00:08:55.050 align:start position:0% through the mid-america Regional Council it<00:08:52.780> wouldn't<00:08:53.260> benefit<00:08:53.860> us<00:08:54.070> to<00:08:54.370> apply<00:08:54.640> for<00:08:54.910> that 00:08:55.050 --> 00:08:55.060 align:start position:0% it wouldn't benefit us to apply for that 00:08:55.060 --> 00:08:57.810 align:start position:0% it wouldn't benefit us to apply for that at<00:08:55.420> this<00:08:55.570> time<00:08:55.840> just<00:08:56.800> because<00:08:57.010> the<00:08:57.490> amount<00:08:57.760> of 00:08:57.810 --> 00:08:57.820 align:start position:0% at this time just because the amount of 00:08:57.820 --> 00:08:59.070 align:start position:0% at this time just because the amount of funding<00:08:58.120> that<00:08:58.180> would<00:08:58.300> be<00:08:58.360> available<00:08:58.540> wouldn't 00:08:59.070 --> 00:08:59.080 align:start position:0% funding that would be available wouldn't 00:08:59.080 --> 00:09:01.020 align:start position:0% funding that would be available wouldn't really<00:08:59.200> help<00:08:59.500> us<00:08:59.740> get<00:09:00.190> much<00:09:00.430> accomplished<00:09:00.910> it 00:09:01.020 --> 00:09:01.030 align:start position:0% really help us get much accomplished it 00:09:01.030 --> 00:09:02.730 align:start position:0% really help us get much accomplished it would<00:09:01.150> still<00:09:01.360> put<00:09:01.480> a<00:09:01.510> very<00:09:01.750> large<00:09:01.990> burden<00:09:02.410> on 00:09:02.730 --> 00:09:02.740 align:start position:0% would still put a very large burden on 00:09:02.740 --> 00:09:06.030 align:start position:0% would still put a very large burden on the<00:09:03.280> population<00:09:03.880> and<00:09:04.090> on<00:09:04.180> the<00:09:04.330> ug<00:09:04.830> that<00:09:05.830> kind 00:09:06.030 --> 00:09:06.040 align:start position:0% the population and on the ug that kind 00:09:06.040 --> 00:09:08.630 align:start position:0% the population and on the ug that kind of<00:09:06.130> brings<00:09:06.310> us<00:09:06.460> to<00:09:06.610> where<00:09:06.730> we<00:09:06.880> currently<00:09:07.090> are 00:09:08.630 --> 00:09:08.640 align:start position:0% of brings us to where we currently are 00:09:08.640 --> 00:09:11.400 align:start position:0% of brings us to where we currently are so<00:09:09.640> so<00:09:10.270> describe<00:09:10.660> the<00:09:10.810> district<00:09:11.170> a<00:09:11.230> little 00:09:11.400 --> 00:09:11.410 align:start position:0% so so describe the district a little 00:09:11.410 --> 00:09:12.570 align:start position:0% so so describe the district a little more<00:09:11.530> I<00:09:11.560> already<00:09:11.830> kind<00:09:11.980> of<00:09:12.010> gave<00:09:12.190> you<00:09:12.280> some<00:09:12.490> of 00:09:12.570 --> 00:09:12.580 align:start position:0% more I already kind of gave you some of 00:09:12.580 --> 00:09:14.370 align:start position:0% more I already kind of gave you some of the<00:09:12.670> street<00:09:12.970> boundaries<00:09:13.450> but<00:09:13.990> to<00:09:14.110> give<00:09:14.230> you<00:09:14.320> a 00:09:14.370 --> 00:09:14.380 align:start position:0% the street boundaries but to give you a 00:09:14.380 --> 00:09:16.650 align:start position:0% the street boundaries but to give you a little<00:09:14.590> bit<00:09:14.710> more<00:09:14.920> of<00:09:15.190> the<00:09:15.400> details<00:09:16.150> of<00:09:16.390> it<00:09:16.510> the 00:09:16.650 --> 00:09:16.660 align:start position:0% little bit more of the details of it the 00:09:16.660 --> 00:09:19.230 align:start position:0% little bit more of the details of it the proposed<00:09:17.380> district<00:09:17.800> encompasses<00:09:18.240> 292 00:09:19.230 --> 00:09:19.240 align:start position:0% proposed district encompasses 292 00:09:19.240 --> 00:09:21.630 align:start position:0% proposed district encompasses 292 parcels<00:09:19.720> on<00:09:20.140> the<00:09:20.590> original<00:09:21.010> signatures<00:09:21.520> that 00:09:21.630 --> 00:09:21.640 align:start position:0% parcels on the original signatures that 00:09:21.640 --> 00:09:25.920 align:start position:0% parcels on the original signatures that were<00:09:21.760> returned<00:09:22.140> 142<00:09:23.140> of<00:09:23.170> them<00:09:23.580> or<00:09:24.580> 142<00:09:25.510> parcels 00:09:25.920 --> 00:09:25.930 align:start position:0% were returned 142 of them or 142 parcels 00:09:25.930 --> 00:09:29.160 align:start position:0% were returned 142 of them or 142 parcels were<00:09:26.080> signed<00:09:26.790> the<00:09:27.790> total<00:09:28.210> acreage<00:09:28.450> of<00:09:28.930> this 00:09:29.160 --> 00:09:29.170 align:start position:0% were signed the total acreage of this 00:09:29.170 --> 00:09:32.220 align:start position:0% were signed the total acreage of this area<00:09:29.440> is<00:09:29.530> about<00:09:29.860> 77<00:09:30.820> acres<00:09:31.000> so<00:09:31.870> you're<00:09:32.140> looking 00:09:32.220 --> 00:09:32.230 align:start position:0% area is about 77 acres so you're looking 00:09:32.230 --> 00:09:34.170 align:start position:0% area is about 77 acres so you're looking at<00:09:32.470> an<00:09:32.560> average<00:09:32.650> plot<00:09:33.070> size<00:09:33.370> or<00:09:33.640> partial<00:09:34.000> size 00:09:34.170 --> 00:09:34.180 align:start position:0% at an average plot size or partial size 00:09:34.180 --> 00:09:35.660 align:start position:0% at an average plot size or partial size of<00:09:34.360> about<00:09:34.540> a<00:09:34.570> quarter<00:09:34.780> of<00:09:34.930> an<00:09:35.050> acre 00:09:35.660 --> 00:09:35.670 align:start position:0% of about a quarter of an acre 00:09:35.670 --> 00:09:38.970 align:start position:0% of about a quarter of an acre the<00:09:36.670> average<00:09:37.090> property<00:09:37.600> value<00:09:38.050> is<00:09:38.260> about<00:09:38.950> a 00:09:38.970 --> 00:09:38.980 align:start position:0% the average property value is about a 00:09:38.980 --> 00:09:40.380 align:start position:0% the average property value is about a hundred<00:09:39.340> and<00:09:39.430> one<00:09:39.550> thousand<00:09:40.000> dollars<00:09:40.030> a<00:09:40.360> year 00:09:40.380 --> 00:09:40.390 align:start position:0% hundred and one thousand dollars a year 00:09:40.390 --> 00:09:43.320 align:start position:0% hundred and one thousand dollars a year and<00:09:40.900> the<00:09:41.320> average<00:09:41.560> taxable<00:09:42.400> value<00:09:42.460> is<00:09:42.940> about 00:09:43.320 --> 00:09:43.330 align:start position:0% and the average taxable value is about 00:09:43.330 --> 00:09:46.230 align:start position:0% and the average taxable value is about eighteen<00:09:44.170> hundred<00:09:44.200> dollars<00:09:44.560> a<00:09:44.890> year<00:09:45.090> so<00:09:46.090> those 00:09:46.230 --> 00:09:46.240 align:start position:0% eighteen hundred dollars a year so those 00:09:46.240 --> 00:09:47.550 align:start position:0% eighteen hundred dollars a year so those are<00:09:46.390> the<00:09:46.480> numbers<00:09:46.600> that<00:09:46.780> we<00:09:47.050> look<00:09:47.230> at<00:09:47.410> when 00:09:47.550 --> 00:09:47.560 align:start position:0% are the numbers that we look at when 00:09:47.560 --> 00:09:51.300 align:start position:0% are the numbers that we look at when we're<00:09:47.680> looking<00:09:47.980> at<00:09:48.780> you<00:09:49.780> know<00:09:49.870> what<00:09:50.310> what 00:09:51.300 --> 00:09:51.310 align:start position:0% we're looking at you know what what 00:09:51.310 --> 00:09:53.570 align:start position:0% we're looking at you know what what could<00:09:51.400> potentially<00:09:51.520> be<00:09:51.910> feasible<00:09:52.480> for 00:09:53.570 --> 00:09:53.580 align:start position:0% could potentially be feasible for 00:09:53.580 --> 00:09:59.670 align:start position:0% could potentially be feasible for economic<00:09:54.580> purposes<00:09:56.970> the<00:09:57.970> petition<00:09:58.570> for<00:09:58.930> this 00:09:59.670 --> 00:09:59.680 align:start position:0% economic purposes the petition for this 00:09:59.680 --> 00:10:02.250 align:start position:0% economic purposes the petition for this district<00:10:00.160> actually<00:10:00.370> asked<00:10:01.060> for<00:10:01.260> sidewalks 00:10:02.250 --> 00:10:02.260 align:start position:0% district actually asked for sidewalks 00:10:02.260 --> 00:10:05.340 align:start position:0% district actually asked for sidewalks urban<00:10:03.160> gutter<00:10:03.370> and<00:10:03.610> storm<00:10:04.090> drainage<00:10:04.360> so<00:10:05.050> as<00:10:05.170> we 00:10:05.340 --> 00:10:05.350 align:start position:0% urban gutter and storm drainage so as we 00:10:05.350 --> 00:10:06.810 align:start position:0% urban gutter and storm drainage so as we evaluated<00:10:05.950> this<00:10:06.010> program<00:10:06.370> we<00:10:06.490> made<00:10:06.670> sure<00:10:06.790> to 00:10:06.810 --> 00:10:06.820 align:start position:0% evaluated this program we made sure to 00:10:06.820 --> 00:10:09.030 align:start position:0% evaluated this program we made sure to include<00:10:06.940> all<00:10:07.300> three<00:10:07.600> of<00:10:07.690> those<00:10:07.840> elements<00:10:08.080> the 00:10:09.030 --> 00:10:09.040 align:start position:0% include all three of those elements the 00:10:09.040 --> 00:10:11.580 align:start position:0% include all three of those elements the total<00:10:09.400> project<00:10:09.580> estimate<00:10:10.240> for<00:10:11.140> this<00:10:11.290> project 00:10:11.580 --> 00:10:11.590 align:start position:0% total project estimate for this project 00:10:11.590 --> 00:10:15.840 align:start position:0% total project estimate for this project is<00:10:13.350> almost<00:10:14.350> ten<00:10:14.710> million<00:10:14.890> dollars<00:10:15.220> nine<00:10:15.520> point 00:10:15.840 --> 00:10:15.850 align:start position:0% is almost ten million dollars nine point 00:10:15.850 --> 00:10:18.300 align:start position:0% is almost ten million dollars nine point nine<00:10:16.030> eight<00:10:16.060> million<00:10:16.480> dollars<00:10:17.010> that<00:10:18.010> number 00:10:18.300 --> 00:10:18.310 align:start position:0% nine eight million dollars that number 00:10:18.310 --> 00:10:20.820 align:start position:0% nine eight million dollars that number seems<00:10:18.600> rather<00:10:19.600> large<00:10:19.960> for<00:10:20.080> a<00:10:20.320> sidewalk 00:10:20.820 --> 00:10:20.830 align:start position:0% seems rather large for a sidewalk 00:10:20.830 --> 00:10:22.740 align:start position:0% seems rather large for a sidewalk benefit<00:10:21.640> district<00:10:21.940> but<00:10:22.060> keep<00:10:22.210> in<00:10:22.360> mind<00:10:22.570> that 00:10:22.740 --> 00:10:22.750 align:start position:0% benefit district but keep in mind that 00:10:22.750 --> 00:10:24.630 align:start position:0% benefit district but keep in mind that it<00:10:22.900> does<00:10:23.140> include<00:10:23.530> a<00:10:23.740> lot<00:10:23.950> of<00:10:24.070> storm<00:10:24.340> drainage 00:10:24.630 --> 00:10:24.640 align:start position:0% it does include a lot of storm drainage 00:10:24.640 --> 00:10:27.150 align:start position:0% it does include a lot of storm drainage and<00:10:25.000> the<00:10:25.690> total<00:10:26.230> Lane<00:10:26.410> miles<00:10:26.710> in<00:10:27.010> this 00:10:27.150 --> 00:10:27.160 align:start position:0% and the total Lane miles in this 00:10:27.160 --> 00:10:29.220 align:start position:0% and the total Lane miles in this district<00:10:27.520> is<00:10:27.670> about<00:10:27.940> four<00:10:28.480> point<00:10:28.780> one<00:10:28.960> miles 00:10:29.220 --> 00:10:29.230 align:start position:0% district is about four point one miles 00:10:29.230 --> 00:10:31.410 align:start position:0% district is about four point one miles that's<00:10:29.950> on<00:10:30.100> the<00:10:30.220> same<00:10:30.400> scale<00:10:30.730> as<00:10:30.790> Leavenworth 00:10:31.410 --> 00:10:31.420 align:start position:0% that's on the same scale as Leavenworth 00:10:31.420 --> 00:10:34.200 align:start position:0% that's on the same scale as Leavenworth Road<00:10:31.510> or<00:10:31.990> Merriam<00:10:32.500> Lane<00:10:32.740> the<00:10:33.670> amount<00:10:33.910> of<00:10:34.000> area 00:10:34.200 --> 00:10:34.210 align:start position:0% Road or Merriam Lane the amount of area 00:10:34.210 --> 00:10:36.870 align:start position:0% Road or Merriam Lane the amount of area that<00:10:34.330> we<00:10:34.570> did<00:10:34.840> do<00:10:35.470> work<00:10:35.680> on<00:10:35.890> so<00:10:36.370> it's<00:10:36.550> a<00:10:36.640> very 00:10:36.870 --> 00:10:36.880 align:start position:0% that we did do work on so it's a very 00:10:36.880 --> 00:10:40.200 align:start position:0% that we did do work on so it's a very large<00:10:37.440> geographic<00:10:38.440> area<00:10:38.790> so<00:10:39.790> there's<00:10:39.970> a<00:10:40.060> lot 00:10:40.200 --> 00:10:40.210 align:start position:0% large geographic area so there's a lot 00:10:40.210 --> 00:10:41.310 align:start position:0% large geographic area so there's a lot of<00:10:40.300> work<00:10:40.420> that's<00:10:40.570> going<00:10:40.780> to<00:10:40.840> go<00:10:40.930> into<00:10:41.110> this 00:10:41.310 --> 00:10:41.320 align:start position:0% of work that's going to go into this 00:10:41.320 --> 00:10:45.960 align:start position:0% of work that's going to go into this there<00:10:42.220> is<00:10:42.520> on<00:10:42.910> top<00:10:43.450> of<00:10:43.780> that<00:10:44.760> ten<00:10:45.760> million 00:10:45.960 --> 00:10:45.970 align:start position:0% there is on top of that ten million 00:10:45.970 --> 00:10:47.760 align:start position:0% there is on top of that ten million dollars<00:10:46.300> there<00:10:46.750> is<00:10:46.870> an<00:10:46.990> additional<00:10:47.410> two<00:10:47.590> and<00:10:47.740> a 00:10:47.760 --> 00:10:47.770 align:start position:0% dollars there is an additional two and a 00:10:47.770 --> 00:10:50.070 align:start position:0% dollars there is an additional two and a half<00:10:47.980> million<00:10:48.310> that<00:10:48.580> the<00:10:48.700> ug<00:10:49.240> would<00:10:49.960> be 00:10:50.070 --> 00:10:50.080 align:start position:0% half million that the ug would be 00:10:50.080 --> 00:10:51.360 align:start position:0% half million that the ug would be responsible<00:10:50.440> for<00:10:50.680> that<00:10:51.010> is<00:10:51.160> not 00:10:51.360 --> 00:10:51.370 align:start position:0% responsible for that is not 00:10:51.370 --> 00:10:52.530 align:start position:0% responsible for that is not participating<00:10:51.790> in 00:10:52.530 --> 00:10:52.540 align:start position:0% participating in 00:10:52.540 --> 00:10:54.180 align:start position:0% participating in our<00:10:52.630> policy<00:10:53.080> it<00:10:53.230> says<00:10:53.500> that<00:10:53.770> the<00:10:53.860> unified 00:10:54.180 --> 00:10:54.190 align:start position:0% our policy it says that the unified 00:10:54.190 --> 00:10:56.330 align:start position:0% our policy it says that the unified government<00:10:54.220> will<00:10:54.820> pay<00:10:55.030> for<00:10:55.360> design<00:10:55.930> and 00:10:56.330 --> 00:10:56.340 align:start position:0% government will pay for design and 00:10:56.340 --> 00:10:59.160 align:start position:0% government will pay for design and inspection<00:10:57.340> of<00:10:57.460> the<00:10:57.820> construction<00:10:58.330> so<00:10:59.020> this 00:10:59.160 --> 00:10:59.170 align:start position:0% inspection of the construction so this 00:10:59.170 --> 00:11:00.750 align:start position:0% inspection of the construction so this is<00:10:59.320> something<00:10:59.590> we<00:10:59.710> could<00:11:00.010> not<00:11:00.190> recoup<00:11:00.550> any 00:11:00.750 --> 00:11:00.760 align:start position:0% is something we could not recoup any 00:11:00.760 --> 00:11:04.110 align:start position:0% is something we could not recoup any money<00:11:01.000> for<00:11:01.270> as<00:11:02.250> I<00:11:03.250> said<00:11:03.400> before<00:11:03.550> the<00:11:03.820> total 00:11:04.110 --> 00:11:04.120 align:start position:0% money for as I said before the total 00:11:04.120 --> 00:11:05.490 align:start position:0% money for as I said before the total number<00:11:04.300> of<00:11:04.330> parcels<00:11:04.750> affected<00:11:05.260> in<00:11:05.380> this 00:11:05.490 --> 00:11:05.500 align:start position:0% number of parcels affected in this 00:11:05.500 --> 00:11:08.400 align:start position:0% number of parcels affected in this district<00:11:05.890> would<00:11:05.980> be<00:11:06.120> 292<00:11:07.120> so<00:11:07.780> if<00:11:07.900> you<00:11:07.990> divided 00:11:08.400 --> 00:11:08.410 align:start position:0% district would be 292 so if you divided 00:11:08.410 --> 00:11:10.380 align:start position:0% district would be 292 so if you divided that<00:11:08.530> cost<00:11:08.860> evenly<00:11:09.460> amongst<00:11:09.790> the<00:11:09.940> parcels 00:11:10.380 --> 00:11:10.390 align:start position:0% that cost evenly amongst the parcels 00:11:10.390 --> 00:11:13.080 align:start position:0% that cost evenly amongst the parcels you'd<00:11:10.900> come<00:11:11.080> up<00:11:11.110> with<00:11:11.350> an<00:11:11.470> average<00:11:11.850> you<00:11:12.850> come 00:11:13.080 --> 00:11:13.090 align:start position:0% you'd come up with an average you come 00:11:13.090 --> 00:11:14.400 align:start position:0% you'd come up with an average you come up<00:11:13.210> with<00:11:13.360> twenty<00:11:13.720> seven<00:11:13.960> thousand<00:11:14.320> seven 00:11:14.400 --> 00:11:14.410 align:start position:0% up with twenty seven thousand seven 00:11:14.410 --> 00:11:16.020 align:start position:0% up with twenty seven thousand seven hundred<00:11:14.710> sixty<00:11:14.980> one<00:11:15.100> dollars<00:11:15.130> per<00:11:15.580> parcel 00:11:16.020 --> 00:11:16.030 align:start position:0% hundred sixty one dollars per parcel 00:11:16.030 --> 00:11:19.620 align:start position:0% hundred sixty one dollars per parcel that<00:11:16.210> would<00:11:17.170> be<00:11:17.670> if<00:11:18.670> somebody<00:11:19.090> wanted<00:11:19.330> to<00:11:19.390> pay 00:11:19.620 --> 00:11:19.630 align:start position:0% that would be if somebody wanted to pay 00:11:19.630 --> 00:11:21.300 align:start position:0% that would be if somebody wanted to pay that<00:11:19.900> total<00:11:20.350> that<00:11:20.800> way<00:11:20.860> they<00:11:20.980> wouldn't<00:11:21.160> have 00:11:21.300 --> 00:11:21.310 align:start position:0% that total that way they wouldn't have 00:11:21.310 --> 00:11:23.010 align:start position:0% that total that way they wouldn't have to<00:11:21.400> pay<00:11:21.550> it<00:11:21.670> out<00:11:21.790> over<00:11:21.850> the<00:11:22.150> 15<00:11:22.540> years<00:11:22.810> or<00:11:22.990> 20 00:11:23.010 --> 00:11:23.020 align:start position:0% to pay it out over the 15 years or 20 00:11:23.020 --> 00:11:26.040 align:start position:0% to pay it out over the 15 years or 20 years<00:11:23.260> whatever<00:11:23.680> we<00:11:24.010> decide<00:11:24.310> on<00:11:24.900> that<00:11:25.900> would 00:11:26.040 --> 00:11:26.050 align:start position:0% years whatever we decide on that would 00:11:26.050 --> 00:11:27.360 align:start position:0% years whatever we decide on that would be<00:11:26.080> what<00:11:26.290> they'd<00:11:26.440> have<00:11:26.590> to<00:11:26.680> pay<00:11:26.830> at<00:11:26.950> that<00:11:26.980> time 00:11:27.360 --> 00:11:27.370 align:start position:0% be what they'd have to pay at that time 00:11:27.370 --> 00:11:30.360 align:start position:0% be what they'd have to pay at that time if<00:11:27.940> they<00:11:28.240> wanted<00:11:28.510> to<00:11:28.600> break<00:11:28.810> it<00:11:28.960> out<00:11:29.110> over<00:11:29.800> the 00:11:30.360 --> 00:11:30.370 align:start position:0% if they wanted to break it out over the 00:11:30.370 --> 00:11:32.450 align:start position:0% if they wanted to break it out over the 15<00:11:30.700> or<00:11:30.820> 20<00:11:31.090> years<00:11:31.300> you're<00:11:31.690> looking<00:11:31.840> at<00:11:32.080> about 00:11:32.450 --> 00:11:32.460 align:start position:0% 15 or 20 years you're looking at about 00:11:32.460 --> 00:11:35.640 align:start position:0% 15 or 20 years you're looking at about $2,600<00:11:33.460> annually<00:11:34.240> which<00:11:34.930> does<00:11:35.170> include<00:11:35.350> our 00:11:35.640 --> 00:11:35.650 align:start position:0% $2,600 annually which does include our 00:11:35.650 --> 00:11:37.710 align:start position:0% $2,600 annually which does include our interest<00:11:36.010> fees<00:11:36.160> and<00:11:36.280> our<00:11:36.340> financing<00:11:36.940> fees<00:11:37.150> in 00:11:37.710 --> 00:11:37.720 align:start position:0% interest fees and our financing fees in 00:11:37.720 --> 00:11:39.630 align:start position:0% interest fees and our financing fees in addition<00:11:38.200> to<00:11:39.010> what<00:11:39.190> they<00:11:39.310> are<00:11:39.340> currently 00:11:39.630 --> 00:11:39.640 align:start position:0% addition to what they are currently 00:11:39.640 --> 00:11:43.770 align:start position:0% addition to what they are currently paying<00:11:40.090> on<00:11:40.450> their<00:11:40.840> property<00:11:41.200> taxes<00:11:42.600> the<00:11:43.600> map 00:11:43.770 --> 00:11:43.780 align:start position:0% paying on their property taxes the map 00:11:43.780 --> 00:11:45.480 align:start position:0% paying on their property taxes the map you<00:11:43.990> see<00:11:44.170> on<00:11:44.320> the<00:11:44.410> screen<00:11:44.710> is<00:11:44.890> highlighted<00:11:45.340> in 00:11:45.480 --> 00:11:45.490 align:start position:0% you see on the screen is highlighted in 00:11:45.490 --> 00:11:47.670 align:start position:0% you see on the screen is highlighted in different<00:11:45.790> colors<00:11:46.090> as<00:11:46.680> constructability 00:11:47.670 --> 00:11:47.680 align:start position:0% different colors as constructability 00:11:47.680 --> 00:11:49.260 align:start position:0% different colors as constructability options<00:11:48.130> or<00:11:48.340> constructability 00:11:49.260 --> 00:11:49.270 align:start position:0% options or constructability 00:11:49.270 --> 00:11:51.720 align:start position:0% options or constructability possibilities<00:11:49.870> the<00:11:50.860> red<00:11:51.040> areas<00:11:51.370> of<00:11:51.550> course 00:11:51.720 --> 00:11:51.730 align:start position:0% possibilities the red areas of course 00:11:51.730 --> 00:11:53.580 align:start position:0% possibilities the red areas of course are<00:11:51.910> more<00:11:52.150> difficult<00:11:52.390> to<00:11:52.660> construct<00:11:52.870> green<00:11:53.410> or 00:11:53.580 --> 00:11:53.590 align:start position:0% are more difficult to construct green or 00:11:53.590 --> 00:11:58.620 align:start position:0% are more difficult to construct green or easier<00:11:53.980> yellows<00:11:54.430> a<00:11:54.730> mid-range<00:11:57.300> so<00:11:58.300> we<00:11:58.420> wanted 00:11:58.620 --> 00:11:58.630 align:start position:0% easier yellows a mid-range so we wanted 00:11:58.630 --> 00:12:01.770 align:start position:0% easier yellows a mid-range so we wanted to<00:11:58.690> tell<00:11:58.840> you<00:11:58.870> so<00:11:59.770> all<00:11:59.980> that<00:12:00.280> was<00:12:00.520> done<00:12:00.780> prior 00:12:01.770 --> 00:12:01.780 align:start position:0% to tell you so all that was done prior 00:12:01.780 --> 00:12:05.880 align:start position:0% to tell you so all that was done prior to<00:12:01.810> the<00:12:02.230> fall<00:12:02.800> of<00:12:02.830> 2017<00:12:04.290> once<00:12:05.290> we<00:12:05.440> got<00:12:05.620> the 00:12:05.880 --> 00:12:05.890 align:start position:0% to the fall of 2017 once we got the 00:12:05.890 --> 00:12:07.980 align:start position:0% to the fall of 2017 once we got the study<00:12:06.190> back<00:12:06.460> and<00:12:06.700> realized<00:12:07.090> some<00:12:07.780> of<00:12:07.810> this 00:12:07.980 --> 00:12:07.990 align:start position:0% study back and realized some of this 00:12:07.990 --> 00:12:10.410 align:start position:0% study back and realized some of this information<00:12:08.340> we<00:12:09.340> started<00:12:09.670> looking<00:12:09.970> at<00:12:10.090> it<00:12:10.120> and 00:12:10.410 --> 00:12:10.420 align:start position:0% information we started looking at it and 00:12:10.420 --> 00:12:12.120 align:start position:0% information we started looking at it and these<00:12:11.080> are<00:12:11.260> the<00:12:11.350> activities<00:12:11.770> that<00:12:11.800> we've<00:12:12.010> done 00:12:12.120 --> 00:12:12.130 align:start position:0% these are the activities that we've done 00:12:12.130 --> 00:12:13.920 align:start position:0% these are the activities that we've done recently<00:12:12.190> so<00:12:12.820> we<00:12:12.850> met<00:12:13.120> with<00:12:13.150> the<00:12:13.330> RDA<00:12:13.660> in 00:12:13.920 --> 00:12:13.930 align:start position:0% recently so we met with the RDA in 00:12:13.930 --> 00:12:16.920 align:start position:0% recently so we met with the RDA in January<00:12:14.320> of<00:12:14.380> 2017<00:12:15.060> they<00:12:16.060> agreed<00:12:16.510> with<00:12:16.540> us<00:12:16.750> that 00:12:16.920 --> 00:12:16.930 align:start position:0% January of 2017 they agreed with us that 00:12:16.930 --> 00:12:19.410 align:start position:0% January of 2017 they agreed with us that that<00:12:17.590> dollar<00:12:18.220> value<00:12:18.730> just<00:12:18.970> doesn't<00:12:19.270> seem 00:12:19.410 --> 00:12:19.420 align:start position:0% that dollar value just doesn't seem 00:12:19.420 --> 00:12:21.000 align:start position:0% that dollar value just doesn't seem something<00:12:19.810> that<00:12:19.930> could<00:12:20.110> be<00:12:20.260> really<00:12:20.470> supported 00:12:21.000 --> 00:12:21.010 align:start position:0% something that could be really supported 00:12:21.010 --> 00:12:22.680 align:start position:0% something that could be really supported by<00:12:21.130> the<00:12:21.190> community<00:12:21.760> so<00:12:22.000> that's<00:12:22.150> when<00:12:22.390> we<00:12:22.480> broke 00:12:22.680 --> 00:12:22.690 align:start position:0% by the community so that's when we broke 00:12:22.690 --> 00:12:24.660 align:start position:0% by the community so that's when we broke this<00:12:22.900> into<00:12:23.200> the<00:12:23.290> four<00:12:23.530> possible<00:12:24.010> options<00:12:24.460> that 00:12:24.660 --> 00:12:24.670 align:start position:0% this into the four possible options that 00:12:24.670 --> 00:12:25.920 align:start position:0% this into the four possible options that we'll<00:12:24.790> talk<00:12:24.970> to<00:12:25.180> you<00:12:25.240> about<00:12:25.330> at<00:12:25.540> a<00:12:25.630> different 00:12:25.920 --> 00:12:25.930 align:start position:0% we'll talk to you about at a different 00:12:25.930 --> 00:12:29.940 align:start position:0% we'll talk to you about at a different meeting<00:12:27.420> to<00:12:28.420> try<00:12:28.720> and<00:12:28.870> make<00:12:29.020> things<00:12:29.230> easy 00:12:29.940 --> 00:12:29.950 align:start position:0% meeting to try and make things easy 00:12:29.950 --> 00:12:31.470 align:start position:0% meeting to try and make things easy you're<00:12:30.220> not<00:12:30.280> easier<00:12:30.790> but<00:12:31.000> something<00:12:31.330> more 00:12:31.470 --> 00:12:31.480 align:start position:0% you're not easier but something more 00:12:31.480 --> 00:12:33.330 align:start position:0% you're not easier but something more affordable<00:12:32.080> and<00:12:32.260> something<00:12:32.680> that<00:12:32.950> can<00:12:33.070> still 00:12:33.330 --> 00:12:33.340 align:start position:0% affordable and something that can still 00:12:33.340 --> 00:12:35.580 align:start position:0% affordable and something that can still benefit<00:12:33.820> the<00:12:33.940> area<00:12:34.210> because<00:12:34.450> we<00:12:34.600> do<00:12:34.840> see<00:12:35.380> the 00:12:35.580 --> 00:12:35.590 align:start position:0% benefit the area because we do see the 00:12:35.590 --> 00:12:37.620 align:start position:0% benefit the area because we do see the need<00:12:35.620> and<00:12:35.980> the<00:12:36.160> want<00:12:36.430> in<00:12:36.760> this<00:12:37.030> area<00:12:37.360> to<00:12:37.480> get 00:12:37.620 --> 00:12:37.630 align:start position:0% need and the want in this area to get 00:12:37.630 --> 00:12:39.360 align:start position:0% need and the want in this area to get something<00:12:37.990> done<00:12:38.140> it's<00:12:38.530> just<00:12:38.830> finding<00:12:39.160> that 00:12:39.360 --> 00:12:39.370 align:start position:0% something done it's just finding that 00:12:39.370 --> 00:12:43.410 align:start position:0% something done it's just finding that right<00:12:39.730> piece<00:12:41.130> we<00:12:42.130> had<00:12:42.280> to<00:12:42.370> tempt<00:12:42.700> note<00:12:42.850> the<00:12:43.120> two 00:12:43.410 --> 00:12:43.420 align:start position:0% right piece we had to tempt note the two 00:12:43.420 --> 00:12:45.300 align:start position:0% right piece we had to tempt note the two or<00:12:43.750> the<00:12:43.840> six<00:12:44.050> hundred<00:12:44.290> thousand<00:12:44.770> dollars<00:12:45.070> that 00:12:45.300 --> 00:12:45.310 align:start position:0% or the six hundred thousand dollars that 00:12:45.310 --> 00:12:48.690 align:start position:0% or the six hundred thousand dollars that was<00:12:45.430> in<00:12:45.670> the<00:12:45.760> budget<00:12:46.290> so<00:12:47.290> that<00:12:47.500> we<00:12:47.620> did<00:12:47.800> in<00:12:47.950> 2017 00:12:48.690 --> 00:12:48.700 align:start position:0% was in the budget so that we did in 2017 00:12:48.700 --> 00:12:51.150 align:start position:0% was in the budget so that we did in 2017 and<00:12:48.910> as<00:12:49.660> I<00:12:49.780> mentioned<00:12:50.140> earlier<00:12:50.380> we<00:12:50.770> took<00:12:50.950> some 00:12:51.150 --> 00:12:51.160 align:start position:0% and as I mentioned earlier we took some 00:12:51.160 --> 00:12:53.490 align:start position:0% and as I mentioned earlier we took some alternate<00:12:51.550> designs<00:12:51.910> one<00:12:52.420> of<00:12:52.540> them<00:12:52.660> has<00:12:53.320> become 00:12:53.490 --> 00:12:53.500 align:start position:0% alternate designs one of them has become 00:12:53.500 --> 00:12:55.620 align:start position:0% alternate designs one of them has become Safe<00:12:53.920> Routes<00:12:54.130> Phase<00:12:54.460> II<00:12:54.880> that<00:12:55.090> actually<00:12:55.390> bids 00:12:55.620 --> 00:12:55.630 align:start position:0% Safe Routes Phase II that actually bids 00:12:55.630 --> 00:12:58.140 align:start position:0% Safe Routes Phase II that actually bids out<00:12:55.810> in<00:12:56.080> September<00:12:56.920> of<00:12:56.950> this<00:12:57.220> year<00:12:57.280> that's 00:12:58.140 --> 00:12:58.150 align:start position:0% out in September of this year that's 00:12:58.150 --> 00:13:00.540 align:start position:0% out in September of this year that's really<00:12:58.720> one<00:12:58.960> to<00:12:59.560> one<00:12:59.710> and<00:12:59.830> a<00:12:59.890> half<00:13:00.040> blocks<00:13:00.250> of 00:13:00.540 --> 00:13:00.550 align:start position:0% really one to one and a half blocks of 00:13:00.550 --> 00:13:02.850 align:start position:0% really one to one and a half blocks of sidewalk<00:13:01.060> along<00:13:01.330> 10th<00:13:01.780> Street<00:13:02.110> going<00:13:02.470> from 00:13:02.850 --> 00:13:02.860 align:start position:0% sidewalk along 10th Street going from 00:13:02.860 --> 00:13:05.110 align:start position:0% sidewalk along 10th Street going from Oliver<00:13:03.490> to<00:13:03.730> Locust 00:13:05.110 --> 00:13:05.120 align:start position:0% Oliver to Locust 00:13:05.120 --> 00:13:06.999 align:start position:0% Oliver to Locust right<00:13:05.480> now<00:13:05.660> that<00:13:05.720> is<00:13:06.019> estimated<00:13:06.620> to<00:13:06.769> come<00:13:06.889> in 00:13:06.999 --> 00:13:07.009 align:start position:0% right now that is estimated to come in 00:13:07.009 --> 00:13:10.860 align:start position:0% right now that is estimated to come in probably<00:13:07.490> about<00:13:07.899> 1.2<00:13:08.899> million<00:13:09.170> dollars 00:13:10.860 --> 00:13:10.870 align:start position:0% probably about 1.2 million dollars 00:13:10.870 --> 00:13:14.499 align:start position:0% probably about 1.2 million dollars we<00:13:11.870> took<00:13:12.110> the<00:13:12.319> option<00:13:12.800> a<00:13:12.920> that<00:13:13.459> was<00:13:14.120> taken<00:13:14.480> from 00:13:14.499 --> 00:13:14.509 align:start position:0% we took the option a that was taken from 00:13:14.509 --> 00:13:16.269 align:start position:0% we took the option a that was taken from our<00:13:14.779> feasibility<00:13:15.170> study<00:13:15.620> and<00:13:15.709> looked<00:13:16.100> at 00:13:16.269 --> 00:13:16.279 align:start position:0% our feasibility study and looked at 00:13:16.279 --> 00:13:20.110 align:start position:0% our feasibility study and looked at doing<00:13:16.670> Safe<00:13:17.509> Routes<00:13:17.689> phase<00:13:18.019> G<00:13:18.499> as<00:13:19.490> stated<00:13:19.999> up 00:13:20.110 --> 00:13:20.120 align:start position:0% doing Safe Routes phase G as stated up 00:13:20.120 --> 00:13:21.549 align:start position:0% doing Safe Routes phase G as stated up here<00:13:20.300> but<00:13:20.449> ultimately<00:13:20.540> it<00:13:20.930> was<00:13:20.959> decided<00:13:21.439> to 00:13:21.549 --> 00:13:21.559 align:start position:0% here but ultimately it was decided to 00:13:21.559 --> 00:13:23.170 align:start position:0% here but ultimately it was decided to not<00:13:21.769> apply<00:13:22.100> for<00:13:22.309> that<00:13:22.370> just<00:13:22.639> because<00:13:22.910> of<00:13:22.939> the 00:13:23.170 --> 00:13:23.180 align:start position:0% not apply for that just because of the 00:13:23.180 --> 00:13:24.939 align:start position:0% not apply for that just because of the total<00:13:23.600> price<00:13:23.839> tag<00:13:23.870> that<00:13:24.290> that<00:13:24.470> was<00:13:24.620> going<00:13:24.860> to 00:13:24.939 --> 00:13:24.949 align:start position:0% total price tag that that was going to 00:13:24.949 --> 00:13:26.590 align:start position:0% total price tag that that was going to be<00:13:25.129> that<00:13:25.730> was<00:13:25.819> gonna<00:13:25.910> be<00:13:26.059> somewhere<00:13:26.389> in<00:13:26.509> the 00:13:26.590 --> 00:13:26.600 align:start position:0% be that was gonna be somewhere in the 00:13:26.600 --> 00:13:30.160 align:start position:0% be that was gonna be somewhere in the neighborhood<00:13:26.629> of<00:13:27.019> 3.4<00:13:28.569> so<00:13:29.569> we<00:13:29.689> had<00:13:29.809> to<00:13:29.930> and<00:13:30.079> we 00:13:30.160 --> 00:13:30.170 align:start position:0% neighborhood of 3.4 so we had to and we 00:13:30.170 --> 00:13:31.480 align:start position:0% neighborhood of 3.4 so we had to and we decided<00:13:30.439> to<00:13:30.589> pull<00:13:30.740> that<00:13:30.889> since<00:13:31.220> the<00:13:31.339> five 00:13:31.480 --> 00:13:31.490 align:start position:0% decided to pull that since the five 00:13:31.490 --> 00:13:33.460 align:start position:0% decided to pull that since the five hundred<00:13:31.790> thousand<00:13:32.240> in<00:13:32.480> federal<00:13:32.990> money<00:13:33.019> wasn't 00:13:33.460 --> 00:13:33.470 align:start position:0% hundred thousand in federal money wasn't 00:13:33.470 --> 00:13:35.679 align:start position:0% hundred thousand in federal money wasn't really<00:13:33.649> gonna<00:13:33.740> help<00:13:33.889> us<00:13:34.129> all<00:13:34.279> that<00:13:34.459> much<00:13:34.689> we 00:13:35.679 --> 00:13:35.689 align:start position:0% really gonna help us all that much we 00:13:35.689 --> 00:13:38.139 align:start position:0% really gonna help us all that much we had<00:13:35.839> a<00:13:35.870> follow-up<00:13:36.199> meeting<00:13:36.800> in<00:13:36.980> April<00:13:37.610> of<00:13:37.970> this 00:13:38.139 --> 00:13:38.149 align:start position:0% had a follow-up meeting in April of this 00:13:38.149 --> 00:13:40.689 align:start position:0% had a follow-up meeting in April of this year<00:13:38.209> with<00:13:39.019> RDA<00:13:39.439> to<00:13:39.589> let<00:13:39.889> them<00:13:40.069> know<00:13:40.279> that<00:13:40.309> this 00:13:40.689 --> 00:13:40.699 align:start position:0% year with RDA to let them know that this 00:13:40.699 --> 00:13:44.519 align:start position:0% year with RDA to let them know that this is<00:13:40.879> where<00:13:40.999> we're<00:13:41.209> currently<00:13:41.389> at<00:13:42.399> so<00:13:43.399> this<00:13:43.699> is 00:13:44.519 --> 00:13:44.529 align:start position:0% is where we're currently at so this is 00:13:44.529 --> 00:13:47.530 align:start position:0% is where we're currently at so this is where<00:13:45.529> we<00:13:45.800> are<00:13:45.829> currently<00:13:46.189> we<00:13:46.879> haven't<00:13:47.449> made 00:13:47.530 --> 00:13:47.540 align:start position:0% where we are currently we haven't made 00:13:47.540 --> 00:13:49.090 align:start position:0% where we are currently we haven't made any<00:13:47.600> more<00:13:47.870> advances<00:13:48.319> at<00:13:48.499> this<00:13:48.620> time<00:13:48.800> because 00:13:49.090 --> 00:13:49.100 align:start position:0% any more advances at this time because 00:13:49.100 --> 00:13:50.860 align:start position:0% any more advances at this time because we're<00:13:49.309> needing<00:13:50.300> to<00:13:50.420> get<00:13:50.540> some<00:13:50.720> direction 00:13:50.860 --> 00:13:50.870 align:start position:0% we're needing to get some direction 00:13:50.870 --> 00:13:53.699 align:start position:0% we're needing to get some direction about<00:13:51.410> how<00:13:51.589> we<00:13:51.649> want<00:13:51.980> to<00:13:52.040> move<00:13:52.160> forward<00:13:52.639> the 00:13:53.699 --> 00:13:53.709 align:start position:0% about how we want to move forward the 00:13:53.709 --> 00:13:57.189 align:start position:0% about how we want to move forward the next<00:13:54.709> couple<00:13:55.009> things<00:13:55.249> we<00:13:55.670> we<00:13:56.540> plan<00:13:56.749> on<00:13:56.899> doing 00:13:57.189 --> 00:13:57.199 align:start position:0% next couple things we we plan on doing 00:13:57.199 --> 00:13:58.660 align:start position:0% next couple things we we plan on doing is<00:13:57.379> we're<00:13:57.559> going<00:13:57.680> to<00:13:57.740> go<00:13:57.860> back<00:13:58.100> to<00:13:58.459> the 00:13:58.660 --> 00:13:58.670 align:start position:0% is we're going to go back to the 00:13:58.670 --> 00:14:00.790 align:start position:0% is we're going to go back to the neighborhood<00:13:58.879> itself<00:13:59.540> not<00:13:59.809> just<00:13:59.870> RTA<00:14:00.439> and 00:14:00.790 --> 00:14:00.800 align:start position:0% neighborhood itself not just RTA and 00:14:00.800 --> 00:14:03.489 align:start position:0% neighborhood itself not just RTA and re-engage<00:14:01.189> everybody<00:14:01.819> and<00:14:01.999> say<00:14:02.470> these<00:14:03.470> are 00:14:03.489 --> 00:14:03.499 align:start position:0% re-engage everybody and say these are 00:14:03.499 --> 00:14:05.170 align:start position:0% re-engage everybody and say these are the<00:14:03.829> potential<00:14:04.129> options<00:14:04.670> with<00:14:04.999> some 00:14:05.170 --> 00:14:05.180 align:start position:0% the potential options with some 00:14:05.180 --> 00:14:07.030 align:start position:0% the potential options with some potential<00:14:05.569> dollar<00:14:05.779> values<00:14:06.259> is<00:14:06.470> this<00:14:06.800> still 00:14:07.030 --> 00:14:07.040 align:start position:0% potential dollar values is this still 00:14:07.040 --> 00:14:09.129 align:start position:0% potential dollar values is this still something<00:14:07.550> you're<00:14:07.730> looking<00:14:07.910> and<00:14:08.389> okay<00:14:08.959> with 00:14:09.129 --> 00:14:09.139 align:start position:0% something you're looking and okay with 00:14:09.139 --> 00:14:12.549 align:start position:0% something you're looking and okay with pursuing<00:14:09.879> if<00:14:10.879> the<00:14:11.509> overwhelming<00:14:12.050> response<00:14:12.139> is 00:14:12.549 --> 00:14:12.559 align:start position:0% pursuing if the overwhelming response is 00:14:12.559 --> 00:14:14.499 align:start position:0% pursuing if the overwhelming response is yes<00:14:12.740> we'll<00:14:13.040> bring<00:14:13.279> it<00:14:13.429> back<00:14:13.459> to<00:14:13.970> you<00:14:14.179> as<00:14:14.360> the 00:14:14.499 --> 00:14:14.509 align:start position:0% yes we'll bring it back to you as the 00:14:14.509 --> 00:14:17.169 align:start position:0% yes we'll bring it back to you as the boat<00:14:14.660> as<00:14:14.839> the<00:14:15.050> commission<00:14:15.550> for<00:14:16.550> your<00:14:16.699> decision 00:14:17.169 --> 00:14:17.179 align:start position:0% boat as the commission for your decision 00:14:17.179 --> 00:14:20.710 align:start position:0% boat as the commission for your decision on<00:14:17.559> the<00:14:18.559> potential<00:14:19.249> scope<00:14:19.699> to<00:14:20.149> choose<00:14:20.360> what 00:14:20.710 --> 00:14:20.720 align:start position:0% on the potential scope to choose what 00:14:20.720 --> 00:14:23.739 align:start position:0% on the potential scope to choose what project<00:14:21.529> size<00:14:21.740> we<00:14:22.069> want<00:14:22.189> to<00:14:22.309> do<00:14:22.459> the<00:14:23.389> potential 00:14:23.739 --> 00:14:23.749 align:start position:0% project size we want to do the potential 00:14:23.749 --> 00:14:25.650 align:start position:0% project size we want to do the potential funding<00:14:24.139> level<00:14:24.470> that<00:14:24.499> you're<00:14:24.769> willing<00:14:24.920> to 00:14:25.650 --> 00:14:25.660 align:start position:0% funding level that you're willing to 00:14:25.660 --> 00:14:28.299 align:start position:0% funding level that you're willing to allocate<00:14:26.660> to<00:14:26.929> this<00:14:27.110> project<00:14:27.559> and<00:14:27.709> the 00:14:28.299 --> 00:14:28.309 align:start position:0% allocate to this project and the 00:14:28.309 --> 00:14:32.230 align:start position:0% allocate to this project and the possible<00:14:28.850> percentage<00:14:29.420> of<00:14:29.660> cost<00:14:30.439> shared<00:14:31.240> but 00:14:32.230 --> 00:14:32.240 align:start position:0% possible percentage of cost shared but 00:14:32.240 --> 00:14:36.069 align:start position:0% possible percentage of cost shared but that'll<00:14:32.449> be<00:14:32.480> at<00:14:32.629> a<00:14:32.660> later<00:14:32.870> meeting<00:14:34.509> after<00:14:35.509> we 00:14:36.069 --> 00:14:36.079 align:start position:0% that'll be at a later meeting after we 00:14:36.079 --> 00:14:37.629 align:start position:0% that'll be at a later meeting after we get<00:14:36.199> that<00:14:36.379> approval<00:14:36.769> from<00:14:36.980> you<00:14:37.100> guys<00:14:37.279> or 00:14:37.629 --> 00:14:37.639 align:start position:0% get that approval from you guys or 00:14:37.639 --> 00:14:40.059 align:start position:0% get that approval from you guys or decision<00:14:38.420> from<00:14:38.600> you<00:14:38.689> guys<00:14:38.899> well<00:14:39.559> then<00:14:39.740> go<00:14:39.860> back 00:14:40.059 --> 00:14:40.069 align:start position:0% decision from you guys well then go back 00:14:40.069 --> 00:14:42.460 align:start position:0% decision from you guys well then go back to<00:14:40.220> the<00:14:40.339> district<00:14:40.699> champions<00:14:41.179> let<00:14:42.079> them<00:14:42.290> know 00:14:42.460 --> 00:14:42.470 align:start position:0% to the district champions let them know 00:14:42.470 --> 00:14:45.040 align:start position:0% to the district champions let them know of<00:14:42.620> that<00:14:42.769> and<00:14:43.100> if<00:14:43.459> the<00:14:43.850> decision<00:14:44.569> on<00:14:44.689> the 00:14:45.040 --> 00:14:45.050 align:start position:0% of that and if the decision on the 00:14:45.050 --> 00:14:46.569 align:start position:0% of that and if the decision on the councilor<00:14:45.529> and<00:14:45.620> the<00:14:45.709> Commission's<00:14:46.069> part<00:14:46.339> is 00:14:46.569 --> 00:14:46.579 align:start position:0% councilor and the Commission's part is 00:14:46.579 --> 00:14:48.759 align:start position:0% councilor and the Commission's part is to<00:14:46.999> move<00:14:47.149> forward<00:14:47.389> they<00:14:48.139> will<00:14:48.290> then<00:14:48.439> begin<00:14:48.620> the 00:14:48.759 --> 00:14:48.769 align:start position:0% to move forward they will then begin the 00:14:48.769 --> 00:14:50.679 align:start position:0% to move forward they will then begin the process<00:14:48.860> of<00:14:49.309> circulating<00:14:49.879> for<00:14:49.970> that<00:14:50.120> in<00:14:50.300> that 00:14:50.679 --> 00:14:50.689 align:start position:0% process of circulating for that in that 00:14:50.689 --> 00:14:55.090 align:start position:0% process of circulating for that in that formal<00:14:51.230> signature<00:14:51.800> and<00:14:52.160> at<00:14:52.639> that<00:14:52.850> time<00:14:54.100> that's 00:14:55.090 --> 00:14:55.100 align:start position:0% formal signature and at that time that's 00:14:55.100 --> 00:14:56.230 align:start position:0% formal signature and at that time that's whenever<00:14:55.429> we'll<00:14:55.759> be<00:14:55.879> getting<00:14:56.149> that 00:14:56.230 --> 00:14:56.240 align:start position:0% whenever we'll be getting that 00:14:56.240 --> 00:14:58.929 align:start position:0% whenever we'll be getting that information<00:14:56.449> back<00:14:56.899> verify<00:14:57.829> and<00:14:58.220> then<00:14:58.579> come 00:14:58.929 --> 00:14:58.939 align:start position:0% information back verify and then come 00:14:58.939 --> 00:15:01.090 align:start position:0% information back verify and then come back<00:14:58.970> to<00:14:59.209> you<00:14:59.300> for<00:14:59.540> and<00:14:59.839> we'll<00:15:00.740> get<00:15:00.829> it<00:15:00.949> put<00:15:01.069> in 00:15:01.090 --> 00:15:01.100 align:start position:0% back to you for and we'll get it put in 00:15:01.100 --> 00:15:06.030 align:start position:0% back to you for and we'll get it put in the<00:15:01.189> budget 00:15:06.030 --> 00:15:06.040 align:start position:0% 00:15:06.040 --> 00:15:08.770 align:start position:0% Samara<00:15:07.040> that's<00:15:07.250> the<00:15:07.520> rundown<00:15:08.330> on<00:15:08.390> what's 00:15:08.770 --> 00:15:08.780 align:start position:0% Samara that's the rundown on what's 00:15:08.780 --> 00:15:10.930 align:start position:0% Samara that's the rundown on what's happened<00:15:09.200> so<00:15:09.380> far<00:15:09.590> on<00:15:09.770> this<00:15:09.920> project<00:15:10.190> can't 00:15:10.930 --> 00:15:10.940 align:start position:0% happened so far on this project can't 00:15:10.940 --> 00:15:13.600 align:start position:0% happened so far on this project can't say<00:15:11.150> that<00:15:11.360> or<00:15:11.560> clearly<00:15:12.560> some<00:15:12.860> delays<00:15:13.400> along 00:15:13.600 --> 00:15:13.610 align:start position:0% say that or clearly some delays along 00:15:13.610 --> 00:15:15.520 align:start position:0% say that or clearly some delays along the<00:15:13.910> way<00:15:14.030> some<00:15:14.390> time<00:15:14.420> frames<00:15:14.990> we<00:15:15.170> did<00:15:15.320> try<00:15:15.500> to 00:15:15.520 --> 00:15:15.530 align:start position:0% the way some time frames we did try to 00:15:15.530 --> 00:15:17.200 align:start position:0% the way some time frames we did try to stay<00:15:15.800> in<00:15:15.920> communication<00:15:16.550> with<00:15:16.640> the<00:15:16.850> group 00:15:17.200 --> 00:15:17.210 align:start position:0% stay in communication with the group 00:15:17.210 --> 00:15:19.150 align:start position:0% stay in communication with the group that<00:15:17.390> put<00:15:17.540> it<00:15:17.660> in<00:15:17.780> but<00:15:18.080> somewhere<00:15:19.010> between 00:15:19.150 --> 00:15:19.160 align:start position:0% that put it in but somewhere between 00:15:19.160 --> 00:15:21.760 align:start position:0% that put it in but somewhere between last<00:15:19.550> year<00:15:19.910> and<00:15:19.940> this<00:15:20.150> year<00:15:20.300> when<00:15:20.690> you<00:15:21.560> know<00:15:21.650> we 00:15:21.760 --> 00:15:21.770 align:start position:0% last year and this year when you know we 00:15:21.770 --> 00:15:23.770 align:start position:0% last year and this year when you know we allocated<00:15:22.550> the<00:15:22.670> money<00:15:22.850> for<00:15:23.150> this<00:15:23.240> project 00:15:23.770 --> 00:15:23.780 align:start position:0% allocated the money for this project 00:15:23.780 --> 00:15:26.520 align:start position:0% allocated the money for this project which<00:15:23.930> brandon<00:15:24.320> noted<00:15:24.650> was<00:15:24.860> in<00:15:25.280> play<00:15:25.700> we<00:15:25.970> spent 00:15:26.520 --> 00:15:26.530 align:start position:0% which brandon noted was in play we spent 00:15:26.530 --> 00:15:28.570 align:start position:0% which brandon noted was in play we spent $22,000<00:15:27.530> on<00:15:27.680> some<00:15:27.920> of<00:15:28.010> the<00:15:28.070> preliminary 00:15:28.570 --> 00:15:28.580 align:start position:0% $22,000 on some of the preliminary 00:15:28.580 --> 00:15:32.220 align:start position:0% $22,000 on some of the preliminary design<00:15:28.790> work<00:15:29.210> to<00:15:29.360> get<00:15:29.510> some<00:15:29.860> numbers<00:15:30.860> in<00:15:31.700> hand 00:15:32.220 --> 00:15:32.230 align:start position:0% design work to get some numbers in hand 00:15:32.230 --> 00:15:35.320 align:start position:0% design work to get some numbers in hand I<00:15:33.230> think<00:15:34.040> it's<00:15:34.160> the<00:15:34.280> daunting<00:15:34.730> numbers<00:15:35.180> of 00:15:35.320 --> 00:15:35.330 align:start position:0% I think it's the daunting numbers of 00:15:35.330 --> 00:15:37.720 align:start position:0% I think it's the daunting numbers of knowing<00:15:35.720> that<00:15:35.900> this<00:15:36.170> benefit<00:15:36.650> district<00:15:37.070> if<00:15:37.250> we 00:15:37.720 --> 00:15:37.730 align:start position:0% knowing that this benefit district if we 00:15:37.730 --> 00:15:39.790 align:start position:0% knowing that this benefit district if we approved<00:15:38.090> it<00:15:38.180> at<00:15:38.330> a<00:15:38.390> 50/50<00:15:39.110> would<00:15:39.320> double<00:15:39.680> the 00:15:39.790 --> 00:15:39.800 align:start position:0% approved it at a 50/50 would double the 00:15:39.800 --> 00:15:42.250 align:start position:0% approved it at a 50/50 would double the taxes<00:15:40.280> on<00:15:40.430> the<00:15:40.550> residents<00:15:41.000> in<00:15:41.180> the<00:15:41.270> area<00:15:41.300> is 00:15:42.250 --> 00:15:42.260 align:start position:0% taxes on the residents in the area is 00:15:42.260 --> 00:15:44.020 align:start position:0% taxes on the residents in the area is what<00:15:42.590> made<00:15:42.800> everybody<00:15:43.220> looking<00:15:43.550> at<00:15:43.640> it<00:15:43.820> say 00:15:44.020 --> 00:15:44.030 align:start position:0% what made everybody looking at it say 00:15:44.030 --> 00:15:46.990 align:start position:0% what made everybody looking at it say what<00:15:44.840> are<00:15:44.930> some<00:15:45.050> other<00:15:45.230> options<00:15:45.260> we<00:15:45.920> can<00:15:46.100> come 00:15:46.990 --> 00:15:47.000 align:start position:0% what are some other options we can come 00:15:47.000 --> 00:15:49.990 align:start position:0% what are some other options we can come to<00:15:47.240> and<00:15:47.540> consider<00:15:48.020> for<00:15:48.470> this<00:15:48.620> area<00:15:48.890> to<00:15:49.670> be<00:15:49.820> more 00:15:49.990 --> 00:15:50.000 align:start position:0% to and consider for this area to be more 00:15:50.000 --> 00:15:52.170 align:start position:0% to and consider for this area to be more practical<00:15:50.630> to<00:15:50.780> go<00:15:50.900> back<00:15:51.080> into<00:15:51.290> play<00:15:51.560> and<00:15:51.800> and 00:15:52.170 --> 00:15:52.180 align:start position:0% practical to go back into play and and 00:15:52.180 --> 00:15:55.450 align:start position:0% practical to go back into play and and and<00:15:53.180> I<00:15:53.360> think<00:15:53.630> the<00:15:53.750> staff<00:15:54.020> there<00:15:54.710> were<00:15:54.890> in<00:15:55.310> the 00:15:55.450 --> 00:15:55.460 align:start position:0% and I think the staff there were in the 00:15:55.460 --> 00:15:58.060 align:start position:0% and I think the staff there were in the line<00:15:55.640> level<00:15:55.880> working<00:15:56.240> on<00:15:56.480> this<00:15:56.780> if<00:15:57.770> that 00:15:58.060 --> 00:15:58.070 align:start position:0% line level working on this if that 00:15:58.070 --> 00:16:00.640 align:start position:0% line level working on this if that caused<00:15:58.490> it<00:15:58.730> to<00:15:58.880> delay<00:15:59.360> then<00:15:59.630> I<00:15:59.750> guess<00:15:59.930> there 00:16:00.640 --> 00:16:00.650 align:start position:0% caused it to delay then I guess there 00:16:00.650 --> 00:16:03.280 align:start position:0% caused it to delay then I guess there were<00:16:01.160> at<00:16:01.310> fault<00:16:01.550> for<00:16:01.640> doing<00:16:01.910> that<00:16:02.210> but<00:16:02.600> that<00:16:03.140> is 00:16:03.280 --> 00:16:03.290 align:start position:0% were at fault for doing that but that is 00:16:03.290 --> 00:16:05.080 align:start position:0% were at fault for doing that but that is how<00:16:03.470> they<00:16:03.650> were<00:16:03.710> trying<00:16:04.010> to<00:16:04.130> advance<00:16:04.820> it<00:16:05.000> and 00:16:05.080 --> 00:16:05.090 align:start position:0% how they were trying to advance it and 00:16:05.090 --> 00:16:06.520 align:start position:0% how they were trying to advance it and figure<00:16:05.300> out<00:16:05.450> ways<00:16:05.630> that<00:16:05.660> were<00:16:05.930> practical<00:16:06.440> to 00:16:06.520 --> 00:16:06.530 align:start position:0% figure out ways that were practical to 00:16:06.530 --> 00:16:08.800 align:start position:0% figure out ways that were practical to implement<00:16:06.950> so<00:16:07.880> at<00:16:08.000> this<00:16:08.150> point<00:16:08.450> there<00:16:08.660> is 00:16:08.800 --> 00:16:08.810 align:start position:0% implement so at this point there is 00:16:08.810 --> 00:16:09.940 align:start position:0% implement so at this point there is still<00:16:09.020> five<00:16:09.230> hundred<00:16:09.560> seventy<00:16:09.920> eight 00:16:09.940 --> 00:16:09.950 align:start position:0% still five hundred seventy eight 00:16:09.950 --> 00:16:12.370 align:start position:0% still five hundred seventy eight thousand<00:16:10.460> dollars<00:16:10.760> in<00:16:11.420> design<00:16:11.870> money<00:16:12.140> and 00:16:12.370 --> 00:16:12.380 align:start position:0% thousand dollars in design money and 00:16:12.380 --> 00:16:14.590 align:start position:0% thousand dollars in design money and temp<00:16:12.620> notes<00:16:12.890> that's<00:16:13.730> waiting<00:16:14.000> to<00:16:14.210> work<00:16:14.360> on 00:16:14.590 --> 00:16:14.600 align:start position:0% temp notes that's waiting to work on 00:16:14.600 --> 00:16:17.860 align:start position:0% temp notes that's waiting to work on this<00:16:15.340> it'll<00:16:16.340> probably<00:16:16.610> take<00:16:16.940> more<00:16:17.300> than<00:16:17.630> that 00:16:17.860 --> 00:16:17.870 align:start position:0% this it'll probably take more than that 00:16:17.870 --> 00:16:19.780 align:start position:0% this it'll probably take more than that to<00:16:17.930> do<00:16:18.350> the<00:16:18.530> design<00:16:18.860> of<00:16:19.040> this<00:16:19.250> now<00:16:19.490> if<00:16:19.610> they've 00:16:19.780 --> 00:16:19.790 align:start position:0% to do the design of this now if they've 00:16:19.790 --> 00:16:21.430 align:start position:0% to do the design of this now if they've got<00:16:20.000> into<00:16:20.360> it<00:16:20.510> to<00:16:20.630> realize<00:16:20.960> the<00:16:21.170> order<00:16:21.350> of 00:16:21.430 --> 00:16:21.440 align:start position:0% got into it to realize the order of 00:16:21.440 --> 00:16:23.380 align:start position:0% got into it to realize the order of magnitude<00:16:21.590> though<00:16:22.370> I'm<00:16:22.520> not<00:16:22.760> concerned<00:16:23.210> about 00:16:23.380 --> 00:16:23.390 align:start position:0% magnitude though I'm not concerned about 00:16:23.390 --> 00:16:25.840 align:start position:0% magnitude though I'm not concerned about putting<00:16:23.840> that<00:16:23.930> money<00:16:24.200> in<00:16:24.380> clay<00:16:24.620> until<00:16:24.830> we<00:16:25.730> got 00:16:25.840 --> 00:16:25.850 align:start position:0% putting that money in clay until we got 00:16:25.850 --> 00:16:29.020 align:start position:0% putting that money in clay until we got enough<00:16:26.090> to<00:16:26.210> work<00:16:26.390> with<00:16:26.420> until<00:16:27.610> we<00:16:28.610> see<00:16:28.820> that 00:16:29.020 --> 00:16:29.030 align:start position:0% enough to work with until we see that 00:16:29.030 --> 00:16:31.450 align:start position:0% enough to work with until we see that the<00:16:29.350> residents<00:16:30.350> are<00:16:30.470> ready<00:16:30.680> to<00:16:30.800> move<00:16:30.950> forward 00:16:31.450 --> 00:16:31.460 align:start position:0% the residents are ready to move forward 00:16:31.460 --> 00:16:35.800 align:start position:0% the residents are ready to move forward with<00:16:32.290> this<00:16:33.290> kind<00:16:33.560> of<00:16:33.650> a<00:16:34.000> magnitude<00:16:35.000> tax<00:16:35.480> manner 00:16:35.800 --> 00:16:35.810 align:start position:0% with this kind of a magnitude tax manner 00:16:35.810 --> 00:16:37.540 align:start position:0% with this kind of a magnitude tax manner of<00:16:35.900> a<00:16:35.930> district<00:16:36.410> or<00:16:36.620> if<00:16:36.800> we<00:16:36.920> find<00:16:37.130> a<00:16:37.220> different 00:16:37.540 --> 00:16:37.550 align:start position:0% of a district or if we find a different 00:16:37.550 --> 00:16:42.700 align:start position:0% of a district or if we find a different option<00:16:37.880> to<00:16:37.970> work<00:16:38.060> with<00:16:40.030> what<00:16:41.200> mr.<00:16:42.200> mayor<00:16:42.410> I 00:16:42.700 --> 00:16:42.710 align:start position:0% option to work with what mr. mayor I 00:16:42.710 --> 00:16:44.920 align:start position:0% option to work with what mr. mayor I have<00:16:42.830> a<00:16:42.860> question<00:16:43.580> or<00:16:43.760> a<00:16:43.820> comment<00:16:44.090> sure 00:16:44.920 --> 00:16:44.930 align:start position:0% have a question or a comment sure 00:16:44.930 --> 00:16:48.640 align:start position:0% have a question or a comment sure Commissioner<00:16:46.720> thank<00:16:47.720> you<00:16:47.840> so<00:16:48.020> I<00:16:48.050> apologize 00:16:48.640 --> 00:16:48.650 align:start position:0% Commissioner thank you so I apologize 00:16:48.650 --> 00:16:50.590 align:start position:0% Commissioner thank you so I apologize everyone<00:16:48.890> I<00:16:48.980> have<00:16:49.220> a<00:16:49.250> broken<00:16:49.760> car<00:16:50.000> otherwise<00:16:50.420> I 00:16:50.590 --> 00:16:50.600 align:start position:0% everyone I have a broken car otherwise I 00:16:50.600 --> 00:16:53.470 align:start position:0% everyone I have a broken car otherwise I wouldn't<00:16:51.110> be<00:16:51.230> there<00:16:51.410> right<00:16:51.740> now<00:16:52.240> this<00:16:53.240> issue 00:16:53.470 --> 00:16:53.480 align:start position:0% wouldn't be there right now this issue 00:16:53.480 --> 00:16:55.660 align:start position:0% wouldn't be there right now this issue as<00:16:53.810> you<00:16:53.960> know<00:16:54.080> is<00:16:54.260> very<00:16:54.320> important<00:16:55.040> to<00:16:55.130> me<00:16:55.280> and 00:16:55.660 --> 00:16:55.670 align:start position:0% as you know is very important to me and 00:16:55.670 --> 00:16:58.210 align:start position:0% as you know is very important to me and I'm<00:16:56.360> not<00:16:56.510> sure<00:16:56.810> if<00:16:57.140> it<00:16:57.290> was<00:16:57.380> bred<00:16:57.650> or<00:16:57.680> who<00:16:57.980> was 00:16:58.210 --> 00:16:58.220 align:start position:0% I'm not sure if it was bred or who was 00:16:58.220 --> 00:17:02.140 align:start position:0% I'm not sure if it was bred or who was it<00:16:58.460> that<00:16:59.530> gave<00:17:00.530> the<00:17:00.710> presentation<00:17:01.490> I<00:17:01.700> don't 00:17:02.140 --> 00:17:02.150 align:start position:0% it that gave the presentation I don't 00:17:02.150 --> 00:17:04.840 align:start position:0% it that gave the presentation I don't have<00:17:02.300> a<00:17:02.330> television<00:17:02.690> in<00:17:03.050> front<00:17:03.290> of<00:17:03.350> me<00:17:03.579> but<00:17:04.579> I 00:17:04.840 --> 00:17:04.850 align:start position:0% have a television in front of me but I 00:17:04.850 --> 00:17:06.939 align:start position:0% have a television in front of me but I just<00:17:05.089> want<00:17:05.270> to<00:17:05.360> say<00:17:05.540> that<00:17:05.810> how<00:17:06.230> is<00:17:06.470> all<00:17:06.890> of 00:17:06.939 --> 00:17:06.949 align:start position:0% just want to say that how is all of 00:17:06.949 --> 00:17:08.860 align:start position:0% just want to say that how is all of these<00:17:07.339> community<00:17:07.760> meetings<00:17:08.120> and<00:17:08.329> all<00:17:08.570> of<00:17:08.720> this 00:17:08.860 --> 00:17:08.870 align:start position:0% these community meetings and all of this 00:17:08.870 --> 00:17:10.930 align:start position:0% these community meetings and all of this neighborhood<00:17:09.260> stuff<00:17:09.560> gone<00:17:09.770> on<00:17:09.980> and<00:17:10.339> not<00:17:10.610> one 00:17:10.930 --> 00:17:10.940 align:start position:0% neighborhood stuff gone on and not one 00:17:10.940 --> 00:17:12.699 align:start position:0% neighborhood stuff gone on and not one time<00:17:10.970> as<00:17:11.810> the<00:17:12.050> Commissioner<00:17:12.470> for<00:17:12.500> the 00:17:12.699 --> 00:17:12.709 align:start position:0% time as the Commissioner for the 00:17:12.709 --> 00:17:15.460 align:start position:0% time as the Commissioner for the districts<00:17:13.310> been<00:17:13.459> updated<00:17:14.060> our<00:17:14.270> brief<00:17:14.540> on<00:17:14.839> this 00:17:15.460 --> 00:17:15.470 align:start position:0% districts been updated our brief on this 00:17:15.470 --> 00:17:19.410 align:start position:0% districts been updated our brief on this project<00:17:16.480> that's<00:17:17.480> very<00:17:17.870> concerning<00:17:18.290> to<00:17:18.589> me<00:17:18.709> and 00:17:19.410 --> 00:17:19.420 align:start position:0% project that's very concerning to me and 00:17:19.420 --> 00:17:22.170 align:start position:0% project that's very concerning to me and I<00:17:19.450> have<00:17:19.750> a<00:17:19.780> great<00:17:20.110> deal<00:17:20.320> of<00:17:20.350> respect<00:17:20.980> for<00:17:21.250> the 00:17:22.170 --> 00:17:22.180 align:start position:0% I have a great deal of respect for the 00:17:22.180 --> 00:17:24.590 align:start position:0% I have a great deal of respect for the work<00:17:22.390> that<00:17:22.420> neighborhood<00:17:23.140> groups<00:17:23.440> do 00:17:24.590 --> 00:17:24.600 align:start position:0% work that neighborhood groups do 00:17:24.600 --> 00:17:27.810 align:start position:0% work that neighborhood groups do RDA<00:17:25.600> is<00:17:25.900> not<00:17:26.200> the<00:17:26.440> commissioner<00:17:27.010> and<00:17:27.310> not<00:17:27.640> the 00:17:27.810 --> 00:17:27.820 align:start position:0% RDA is not the commissioner and not the 00:17:27.820 --> 00:17:31.920 align:start position:0% RDA is not the commissioner and not the elected<00:17:28.210> official<00:17:28.720> for<00:17:29.290> Rosedale<00:17:29.770> and<00:17:30.930> I 00:17:31.920 --> 00:17:31.930 align:start position:0% elected official for Rosedale and I 00:17:31.930 --> 00:17:33.300 align:start position:0% elected official for Rosedale and I understand<00:17:32.440> they<00:17:32.560> were<00:17:32.590> involved<00:17:33.100> in<00:17:33.190> this 00:17:33.300 --> 00:17:33.310 align:start position:0% understand they were involved in this 00:17:33.310 --> 00:17:36.810 align:start position:0% understand they were involved in this project<00:17:33.580> but<00:17:34.180> it<00:17:34.360> was<00:17:34.540> I<00:17:35.070> myself<00:17:36.070> who<00:17:36.490> was<00:17:36.610> out 00:17:36.810 --> 00:17:36.820 align:start position:0% project but it was I myself who was out 00:17:36.820 --> 00:17:38.940 align:start position:0% project but it was I myself who was out there<00:17:37.030> getting<00:17:37.660> signatures<00:17:38.170> on<00:17:38.680> the<00:17:38.830> petition 00:17:38.940 --> 00:17:38.950 align:start position:0% there getting signatures on the petition 00:17:38.950 --> 00:17:42.300 align:start position:0% there getting signatures on the petition I<00:17:39.730> myself<00:17:40.240> who<00:17:40.990> organized<00:17:41.590> residents<00:17:42.160> at 00:17:42.300 --> 00:17:42.310 align:start position:0% I myself who organized residents at 00:17:42.310 --> 00:17:44.450 align:start position:0% I myself who organized residents at neighborhood<00:17:42.730> to<00:17:43.510> help<00:17:43.780> with<00:17:44.020> those 00:17:44.450 --> 00:17:44.460 align:start position:0% neighborhood to help with those 00:17:44.460 --> 00:17:47.490 align:start position:0% neighborhood to help with those petitions<00:17:45.460> and<00:17:45.670> art<00:17:46.180> RDA<00:17:46.810> was<00:17:47.140> simply<00:17:47.470> a 00:17:47.490 --> 00:17:47.500 align:start position:0% petitions and art RDA was simply a 00:17:47.500 --> 00:17:51.360 align:start position:0% petitions and art RDA was simply a participant<00:17:48.400> in<00:17:48.700> that<00:17:48.760> process<00:17:49.600> and<00:17:50.370> frankly 00:17:51.360 --> 00:17:51.370 align:start position:0% participant in that process and frankly 00:17:51.370 --> 00:17:55.680 align:start position:0% participant in that process and frankly no<00:17:52.030> one<00:17:52.360> neighborhood<00:17:52.780> group<00:17:53.790> decides<00:17:54.790> what's 00:17:55.680 --> 00:17:55.690 align:start position:0% no one neighborhood group decides what's 00:17:55.690 --> 00:17:58.680 align:start position:0% no one neighborhood group decides what's going<00:17:55.960> to<00:17:56.050> happen<00:17:56.440> in<00:17:57.100> a<00:17:57.280> particular<00:17:57.430> area<00:17:57.910> or 00:17:58.680 --> 00:17:58.690 align:start position:0% going to happen in a particular area or 00:17:58.690 --> 00:18:05.820 align:start position:0% going to happen in a particular area or a<00:17:58.720> district<00:17:59.410> I<00:18:00.270> am<00:18:01.470> so<00:18:02.470> frustrated<00:18:02.950> with<00:18:04.830> what 00:18:05.820 --> 00:18:05.830 align:start position:0% a district I am so frustrated with what 00:18:05.830 --> 00:18:08.190 align:start position:0% a district I am so frustrated with what appears<00:18:06.160> to<00:18:06.250> have<00:18:06.490> been<00:18:06.520> over<00:18:07.030> the<00:18:07.180> years<00:18:07.570> this 00:18:08.190 --> 00:18:08.200 align:start position:0% appears to have been over the years this 00:18:08.200 --> 00:18:10.590 align:start position:0% appears to have been over the years this incredible<00:18:08.860> power<00:18:09.130> and<00:18:09.280> control<00:18:09.880> that<00:18:10.390> one 00:18:10.590 --> 00:18:10.600 align:start position:0% incredible power and control that one 00:18:10.600 --> 00:18:12.720 align:start position:0% incredible power and control that one neighborhood<00:18:11.140> organization<00:18:12.010> has<00:18:12.250> over<00:18:12.610> an 00:18:12.720 --> 00:18:12.730 align:start position:0% neighborhood organization has over an 00:18:12.730 --> 00:18:15.240 align:start position:0% neighborhood organization has over an entire<00:18:13.120> neighborhood<00:18:13.710> I've<00:18:14.710> walked<00:18:15.040> that 00:18:15.240 --> 00:18:15.250 align:start position:0% entire neighborhood I've walked that 00:18:15.250 --> 00:18:17.610 align:start position:0% entire neighborhood I've walked that neighborhood<00:18:15.700> many<00:18:15.910> times<00:18:16.270> and<00:18:16.600> I<00:18:17.230> can<00:18:17.440> tell 00:18:17.610 --> 00:18:17.620 align:start position:0% neighborhood many times and I can tell 00:18:17.620 --> 00:18:20.070 align:start position:0% neighborhood many times and I can tell you<00:18:17.710> many<00:18:18.010> times<00:18:18.460> I've<00:18:18.910> knocked<00:18:19.420> on<00:18:19.600> doors<00:18:19.630> and 00:18:20.070 --> 00:18:20.080 align:start position:0% you many times I've knocked on doors and 00:18:20.080 --> 00:18:22.680 align:start position:0% you many times I've knocked on doors and people<00:18:20.470> have<00:18:20.800> never<00:18:20.980> even<00:18:21.220> heard<00:18:21.610> of<00:18:21.880> RDA<00:18:22.330> or 00:18:22.680 --> 00:18:22.690 align:start position:0% people have never even heard of RDA or 00:18:22.690 --> 00:18:25.650 align:start position:0% people have never even heard of RDA or Rosedale<00:18:23.170> Development<00:18:23.710> Association<00:18:24.660> so 00:18:25.650 --> 00:18:25.660 align:start position:0% Rosedale Development Association so 00:18:25.660 --> 00:18:28.620 align:start position:0% Rosedale Development Association so moving<00:18:26.380> forward<00:18:26.800> as<00:18:27.120> the<00:18:28.120> Commissioner 00:18:28.620 --> 00:18:28.630 align:start position:0% moving forward as the Commissioner 00:18:28.630 --> 00:18:30.420 align:start position:0% moving forward as the Commissioner that's<00:18:28.810> elected<00:18:29.410> that<00:18:29.680> puts<00:18:29.890> their<00:18:30.070> name<00:18:30.250> on<00:18:30.400> a 00:18:30.420 --> 00:18:30.430 align:start position:0% that's elected that puts their name on a 00:18:30.430 --> 00:18:32.850 align:start position:0% that's elected that puts their name on a ballot<00:18:30.910> and<00:18:31.090> it<00:18:31.720> talks<00:18:31.960> to<00:18:32.140> people<00:18:32.260> and<00:18:32.500> has<00:18:32.710> to 00:18:32.850 --> 00:18:32.860 align:start position:0% ballot and it talks to people and has to 00:18:32.860 --> 00:18:35.280 align:start position:0% ballot and it talks to people and has to go<00:18:33.010> door<00:18:33.250> to<00:18:33.280> door<00:18:33.400> to<00:18:33.580> be<00:18:33.880> elected<00:18:34.360> I'd<00:18:35.080> like 00:18:35.280 --> 00:18:35.290 align:start position:0% go door to door to be elected I'd like 00:18:35.290 --> 00:18:37.610 align:start position:0% go door to door to be elected I'd like to<00:18:35.440> be<00:18:35.560> involved<00:18:35.860> and<00:18:36.160> updated<00:18:36.790> on<00:18:36.910> every 00:18:37.610 --> 00:18:37.620 align:start position:0% to be involved and updated on every 00:18:37.620 --> 00:18:40.890 align:start position:0% to be involved and updated on every project<00:18:38.620> that<00:18:38.980> goes<00:18:39.160> on<00:18:39.400> in<00:18:39.820> my<00:18:40.360> district 00:18:40.890 --> 00:18:40.900 align:start position:0% project that goes on in my district 00:18:40.900 --> 00:18:42.420 align:start position:0% project that goes on in my district especially<00:18:41.230> when<00:18:41.740> you're<00:18:41.890> talking<00:18:42.220> about<00:18:42.280> a 00:18:42.420 --> 00:18:42.430 align:start position:0% especially when you're talking about a 00:18:42.430 --> 00:18:45.060 align:start position:0% especially when you're talking about a 10<00:18:42.730> million<00:18:43.030> dollar<00:18:43.210> benefit<00:18:44.020> district<00:18:44.470> we're 00:18:45.060 --> 00:18:45.070 align:start position:0% 10 million dollar benefit district we're 00:18:45.070 --> 00:18:47.880 align:start position:0% 10 million dollar benefit district we're not<00:18:45.190> talking<00:18:45.550> about<00:18:45.610> a<00:18:45.760> stop<00:18:46.090> sign<00:18:46.890> so 00:18:47.880 --> 00:18:47.890 align:start position:0% not talking about a stop sign so 00:18:47.890 --> 00:18:50.460 align:start position:0% not talking about a stop sign so hopefully<00:18:48.670> in<00:18:48.850> the<00:18:48.970> future<00:18:49.330> when<00:18:49.900> things<00:18:50.170> go 00:18:50.460 --> 00:18:50.470 align:start position:0% hopefully in the future when things go 00:18:50.470 --> 00:18:54.900 align:start position:0% hopefully in the future when things go on<00:18:50.710> in<00:18:51.070> Rosedale<00:18:52.410> that<00:18:53.410> staff<00:18:54.190> from<00:18:54.580> now<00:18:54.730> on 00:18:54.900 --> 00:18:54.910 align:start position:0% on in Rosedale that staff from now on 00:18:54.910 --> 00:18:56.580 align:start position:0% on in Rosedale that staff from now on will<00:18:55.180> come<00:18:55.360> to<00:18:55.540> me<00:18:55.660> as<00:18:55.780> a<00:18:55.810> commissioner<00:18:56.350> and 00:18:56.580 --> 00:18:56.590 align:start position:0% will come to me as a commissioner and 00:18:56.590 --> 00:18:58.380 align:start position:0% will come to me as a commissioner and not<00:18:56.950> to<00:18:57.370> the<00:18:57.460> Rosedale<00:18:57.670> Development 00:18:58.380 --> 00:18:58.390 align:start position:0% not to the Rosedale Development 00:18:58.390 --> 00:19:01.040 align:start position:0% not to the Rosedale Development Association<00:18:58.840> I'd<00:18:59.440> really<00:18:59.770> appreciate<00:19:00.190> that 00:19:01.040 --> 00:19:01.050 align:start position:0% Association I'd really appreciate that 00:19:01.050 --> 00:19:03.450 align:start position:0% Association I'd really appreciate that it's<00:19:02.050> understood<00:19:02.410> commissioner<00:19:03.010> and<00:19:03.160> noted 00:19:03.450 --> 00:19:03.460 align:start position:0% it's understood commissioner and noted 00:19:03.460 --> 00:19:05.160 align:start position:0% it's understood commissioner and noted that<00:19:03.610> as<00:19:03.850> we<00:19:04.030> went<00:19:04.240> through<00:19:04.420> the<00:19:04.540> steps<00:19:04.600> that 00:19:05.160 --> 00:19:05.170 align:start position:0% that as we went through the steps that 00:19:05.170 --> 00:19:08.550 align:start position:0% that as we went through the steps that it<00:19:05.560> appeared<00:19:06.010> that<00:19:07.200> communication<00:19:08.200> with<00:19:08.380> you 00:19:08.550 --> 00:19:08.560 align:start position:0% it appeared that communication with you 00:19:08.560 --> 00:19:11.850 align:start position:0% it appeared that communication with you seem<00:19:08.830> to<00:19:08.950> be<00:19:09.070> in<00:19:09.220> void<00:19:09.900> as<00:19:10.900> we<00:19:11.230> went<00:19:11.440> back 00:19:11.850 --> 00:19:11.860 align:start position:0% seem to be in void as we went back 00:19:11.860 --> 00:19:13.290 align:start position:0% seem to be in void as we went back through<00:19:12.160> the<00:19:12.220> record<00:19:12.640> of<00:19:12.730> what<00:19:12.850> was<00:19:12.880> going<00:19:13.180> on 00:19:13.290 --> 00:19:13.300 align:start position:0% through the record of what was going on 00:19:13.300 --> 00:19:16.110 align:start position:0% through the record of what was going on there<00:19:13.740> so<00:19:14.740> we<00:19:14.890> will<00:19:15.100> keep<00:19:15.580> you<00:19:15.790> in<00:19:15.910> touch<00:19:16.060> with 00:19:16.110 --> 00:19:16.120 align:start position:0% there so we will keep you in touch with 00:19:16.120 --> 00:19:18.780 align:start position:0% there so we will keep you in touch with this<00:19:16.510> and<00:19:16.780> as<00:19:16.840> you<00:19:16.870> can<00:19:17.050> see<00:19:17.110> it's<00:19:17.440> a<00:19:17.790> major 00:19:18.780 --> 00:19:18.790 align:start position:0% this and as you can see it's a major 00:19:18.790 --> 00:19:21.390 align:start position:0% this and as you can see it's a major project<00:19:19.150> so<00:19:19.750> figuring<00:19:20.680> out<00:19:20.800> what<00:19:20.980> direction 00:19:21.390 --> 00:19:21.400 align:start position:0% project so figuring out what direction 00:19:21.400 --> 00:19:27.850 align:start position:0% project so figuring out what direction we<00:19:21.490> go<00:19:21.640> from<00:19:21.820> this<00:19:22.030> point<00:19:22.300> will<00:19:22.480> be<00:19:22.630> important 00:19:27.850 --> 00:19:27.860 align:start position:0% 00:19:27.860 --> 00:19:31.730 align:start position:0% yes<00:19:28.860> Commissioner<00:19:29.220> Markley<00:19:30.380> thank<00:19:31.380> you<00:19:31.560> I'm 00:19:31.730 --> 00:19:31.740 align:start position:0% yes Commissioner Markley thank you I'm 00:19:31.740 --> 00:19:34.370 align:start position:0% yes Commissioner Markley thank you I'm just<00:19:31.950> curious<00:19:32.280> and<00:19:32.850> the<00:19:33.510> answer<00:19:33.780> may<00:19:33.990> just<00:19:34.230> be 00:19:34.370 --> 00:19:34.380 align:start position:0% just curious and the answer may just be 00:19:34.380 --> 00:19:35.690 align:start position:0% just curious and the answer may just be that<00:19:34.530> we<00:19:34.620> drop<00:19:34.830> the<00:19:34.950> ball<00:19:34.980> and<00:19:35.160> if<00:19:35.400> that's<00:19:35.520> the 00:19:35.690 --> 00:19:35.700 align:start position:0% that we drop the ball and if that's the 00:19:35.700 --> 00:19:37.400 align:start position:0% that we drop the ball and if that's the answer<00:19:35.850> fine<00:19:36.240> but<00:19:36.510> what<00:19:36.900> happened<00:19:37.290> between 00:19:37.400 --> 00:19:37.410 align:start position:0% answer fine but what happened between 00:19:37.410 --> 00:19:41.180 align:start position:0% answer fine but what happened between 2013<00:19:38.310> and<00:19:38.520> 2016<00:19:39.380> look<00:19:40.380> like<00:19:40.560> we<00:19:40.710> put<00:19:40.920> money<00:19:41.070> in 00:19:41.180 --> 00:19:41.190 align:start position:0% 2013 and 2016 look like we put money in 00:19:41.190 --> 00:19:43.070 align:start position:0% 2013 and 2016 look like we put money in the<00:19:41.280> budget<00:19:41.430> but<00:19:41.850> we<00:19:42.150> did<00:19:42.330> nothing<00:19:42.480> else<00:19:42.840> for 00:19:43.070 --> 00:19:43.080 align:start position:0% the budget but we did nothing else for 00:19:43.080 --> 00:19:45.020 align:start position:0% the budget but we did nothing else for three<00:19:43.320> years<00:19:43.590> and<00:19:44.010> that<00:19:44.190> seems<00:19:44.520> to<00:19:44.700> be<00:19:44.850> where 00:19:45.020 --> 00:19:45.030 align:start position:0% three years and that seems to be where 00:19:45.030 --> 00:19:46.670 align:start position:0% three years and that seems to be where the<00:19:45.180> problem<00:19:45.510> occurred<00:19:45.810> right<00:19:46.080> because<00:19:46.470> then 00:19:46.670 --> 00:19:46.680 align:start position:0% the problem occurred right because then 00:19:46.680 --> 00:19:48.170 align:start position:0% the problem occurred right because then it<00:19:46.800> got<00:19:46.950> us<00:19:47.130> all<00:19:47.280> out<00:19:47.430> of<00:19:47.460> time<00:19:47.700> line<00:19:47.880> with<00:19:48.060> the 00:19:48.170 --> 00:19:48.180 align:start position:0% it got us all out of time line with the 00:19:48.180 --> 00:19:49.900 align:start position:0% it got us all out of time line with the petition<00:19:48.600> like<00:19:48.960> I<00:19:48.990> said<00:19:49.230> if<00:19:49.380> the<00:19:49.530> answers<00:19:49.800> just 00:19:49.900 --> 00:19:49.910 align:start position:0% petition like I said if the answers just 00:19:49.910 --> 00:19:52.400 align:start position:0% petition like I said if the answers just we<00:19:50.910> drop<00:19:51.120> the<00:19:51.240> ball<00:19:51.270> fine<00:19:51.660> but<00:19:51.930> I<00:19:51.960> was<00:19:52.110> curious 00:19:52.400 --> 00:19:52.410 align:start position:0% we drop the ball fine but I was curious 00:19:52.410 --> 00:19:54.380 align:start position:0% we drop the ball fine but I was curious if<00:19:52.650> I<00:19:52.800> was<00:19:52.950> missing<00:19:53.250> something<00:19:53.490> in<00:19:53.850> that<00:19:54.150> time 00:19:54.380 --> 00:19:54.390 align:start position:0% if I was missing something in that time 00:19:54.390 --> 00:19:59.720 align:start position:0% if I was missing something in that time line<00:19:54.600> I<00:19:57.290> would<00:19:58.290> say<00:19:58.590> that<00:19:58.890> what<00:19:59.190> happened 00:19:59.720 --> 00:19:59.730 align:start position:0% line I would say that what happened 00:19:59.730 --> 00:20:01.640 align:start position:0% line I would say that what happened during<00:19:59.880> that<00:20:00.030> time<00:20:00.210> period<00:20:00.780> was<00:20:00.960> a<00:20:01.020> change<00:20:01.500> in 00:20:01.640 --> 00:20:01.650 align:start position:0% during that time period was a change in 00:20:01.650 --> 00:20:05.570 align:start position:0% during that time period was a change in Public<00:20:02.610> Works<00:20:02.760> leadership<00:20:03.860> when<00:20:04.860> not<00:20:05.280> a<00:20:05.310> lot 00:20:05.570 --> 00:20:05.580 align:start position:0% Public Works leadership when not a lot 00:20:05.580 --> 00:20:08.120 align:start position:0% Public Works leadership when not a lot of<00:20:05.670> information<00:20:06.270> was<00:20:06.420> known<00:20:06.780> to<00:20:07.350> current 00:20:08.120 --> 00:20:08.130 align:start position:0% of information was known to current 00:20:08.130 --> 00:20:11.470 align:start position:0% of information was known to current staff<00:20:08.480> about<00:20:09.480> this<00:20:09.810> project<00:20:10.080> in<00:20:10.350> particular 00:20:11.470 --> 00:20:11.480 align:start position:0% staff about this project in particular 00:20:11.480 --> 00:20:14.570 align:start position:0% staff about this project in particular so<00:20:12.480> that<00:20:12.750> would<00:20:12.960> be<00:20:13.200> that<00:20:14.010> change<00:20:14.340> over 00:20:14.570 --> 00:20:14.580 align:start position:0% so that would be that change over 00:20:14.580 --> 00:20:16.550 align:start position:0% so that would be that change over whenever<00:20:15.060> our<00:20:15.150> former<00:20:15.630> county<00:20:15.930> engineer<00:20:16.050> left 00:20:16.550 --> 00:20:16.560 align:start position:0% whenever our former county engineer left 00:20:16.560 --> 00:20:18.650 align:start position:0% whenever our former county engineer left a<00:20:16.890> few<00:20:17.220> of<00:20:17.370> us<00:20:17.460> were<00:20:17.610> going<00:20:17.730> through<00:20:18.030> project 00:20:18.650 --> 00:20:18.660 align:start position:0% a few of us were going through project 00:20:18.660 --> 00:20:21.110 align:start position:0% a few of us were going through project files<00:20:18.930> that<00:20:19.230> he<00:20:19.410> had<00:20:19.590> and<00:20:19.860> giving<00:20:20.790> them<00:20:20.970> up 00:20:21.110 --> 00:20:21.120 align:start position:0% files that he had and giving them up 00:20:21.120 --> 00:20:22.880 align:start position:0% files that he had and giving them up amongst<00:20:21.510> remaining<00:20:21.930> staff<00:20:22.170> and<00:20:22.470> that's<00:20:22.560> when 00:20:22.880 --> 00:20:22.890 align:start position:0% amongst remaining staff and that's when 00:20:22.890 --> 00:20:28.370 align:start position:0% amongst remaining staff and that's when in<00:20:23.190> 2016<00:20:24.030> when<00:20:24.210> this<00:20:24.330> is<00:20:24.480> reinitiated<00:20:27.380> we 00:20:28.370 --> 00:20:28.380 align:start position:0% in 2016 when this is reinitiated we 00:20:28.380 --> 00:20:34.340 align:start position:0% in 2016 when this is reinitiated we dropped<00:20:28.590> the<00:20:28.710> ball<00:20:32.780> and<00:20:33.780> then<00:20:33.990> any<00:20:34.320> other 00:20:34.340 --> 00:20:34.350 align:start position:0% dropped the ball and then any other 00:20:34.350 --> 00:20:36.710 align:start position:0% dropped the ball and then any other thing<00:20:34.890> that<00:20:34.920> I<00:20:35.040> have<00:20:35.370> to<00:20:35.430> say<00:20:35.700> and<00:20:35.880> this<00:20:36.420> is<00:20:36.570> up 00:20:36.710 --> 00:20:36.720 align:start position:0% thing that I have to say and this is up 00:20:36.720 --> 00:20:37.850 align:start position:0% thing that I have to say and this is up to<00:20:36.930> Commissioner<00:20:37.380> Maria<00:20:37.680> in<00:20:37.770> the 00:20:37.850 --> 00:20:37.860 align:start position:0% to Commissioner Maria in the 00:20:37.860 --> 00:20:39.290 align:start position:0% to Commissioner Maria in the neighborhood<00:20:38.280> when<00:20:38.430> it<00:20:38.550> when<00:20:38.880> it<00:20:39.000> gets<00:20:39.150> to 00:20:39.290 --> 00:20:39.300 align:start position:0% neighborhood when it when it gets to 00:20:39.300 --> 00:20:40.610 align:start position:0% neighborhood when it when it gets to that<00:20:39.420> point<00:20:39.480> because<00:20:40.080> it<00:20:40.110> looks<00:20:40.320> like<00:20:40.380> we<00:20:40.530> have 00:20:40.610 --> 00:20:40.620 align:start position:0% that point because it looks like we have 00:20:40.620 --> 00:20:44.060 align:start position:0% that point because it looks like we have a<00:20:40.650> few<00:20:40.830> steps<00:20:41.100> before<00:20:41.400> that<00:20:41.610> but<00:20:41.970> I<00:20:42.920> we<00:20:43.920> had 00:20:44.060 --> 00:20:44.070 align:start position:0% a few steps before that but I we had 00:20:44.070 --> 00:20:45.380 align:start position:0% a few steps before that but I we had this<00:20:44.190> discussion<00:20:44.760> at<00:20:44.880> the<00:20:44.970> last<00:20:45.000> meeting 00:20:45.380 --> 00:20:45.390 align:start position:0% this discussion at the last meeting 00:20:45.390 --> 00:20:47.210 align:start position:0% this discussion at the last meeting about<00:20:45.720> having<00:20:45.990> to<00:20:46.230> go<00:20:46.320> get<00:20:46.470> signatures<00:20:46.920> again 00:20:47.210 --> 00:20:47.220 align:start position:0% about having to go get signatures again 00:20:47.220 --> 00:20:48.980 align:start position:0% about having to go get signatures again and<00:20:47.550> I<00:20:47.670> agree<00:20:48.030> that<00:20:48.060> it's<00:20:48.480> gonna<00:20:48.630> be<00:20:48.810> very 00:20:48.980 --> 00:20:48.990 align:start position:0% and I agree that it's gonna be very 00:20:48.990 --> 00:20:52.460 align:start position:0% and I agree that it's gonna be very difficult<00:20:49.230> to<00:20:49.770> get<00:20:50.220> people<00:20:50.570> to<00:20:51.570> to<00:20:52.170> get<00:20:52.320> those 00:20:52.460 --> 00:20:52.470 align:start position:0% difficult to get people to to get those 00:20:52.470 --> 00:20:54.170 align:start position:0% difficult to get people to to get those people<00:20:52.770> to<00:20:52.890> walk<00:20:53.040> door-to-door<00:20:53.640> again 00:20:54.170 --> 00:20:54.180 align:start position:0% people to walk door-to-door again 00:20:54.180 --> 00:20:55.730 align:start position:0% people to walk door-to-door again when<00:20:54.390> we<00:20:54.690> made<00:20:54.870> and<00:20:55.020> walked<00:20:55.170> order<00:20:55.440> over<00:20:55.530> last 00:20:55.730 --> 00:20:55.740 align:start position:0% when we made and walked order over last 00:20:55.740 --> 00:20:58.850 align:start position:0% when we made and walked order over last time<00:20:55.890> and<00:20:56.370> then<00:20:56.790> we<00:20:57.270> didn't<00:20:58.020> do<00:20:58.170> anything<00:20:58.410> for 00:20:58.850 --> 00:20:58.860 align:start position:0% time and then we didn't do anything for 00:20:58.860 --> 00:21:02.420 align:start position:0% time and then we didn't do anything for three<00:20:59.670> years<00:20:59.910> so<00:21:00.300> I<00:21:01.050> would<00:21:01.770> still<00:21:02.010> be<00:21:02.040> in<00:21:02.130> favor 00:21:02.420 --> 00:21:02.430 align:start position:0% three years so I would still be in favor 00:21:02.430 --> 00:21:06.340 align:start position:0% three years so I would still be in favor of<00:21:02.760> the<00:21:03.500> situation<00:21:04.500> where<00:21:04.680> this<00:21:04.890> board<00:21:05.330> in 00:21:06.340 --> 00:21:06.350 align:start position:0% of the situation where this board in 00:21:06.350 --> 00:21:08.360 align:start position:0% of the situation where this board in statestat<00:21:07.350> district<00:21:07.830> once<00:21:08.100> we're<00:21:08.340> sure 00:21:08.360 --> 00:21:08.370 align:start position:0% statestat district once we're sure 00:21:08.370 --> 00:21:10.520 align:start position:0% statestat district once we're sure there's<00:21:08.790> a<00:21:08.850> majority<00:21:09.420> in<00:21:09.510> favor<00:21:09.780> based<00:21:10.140> on<00:21:10.350> our 00:21:10.520 --> 00:21:10.530 align:start position:0% there's a majority in favor based on our 00:21:10.530 --> 00:21:14.540 align:start position:0% there's a majority in favor based on our group<00:21:10.920> meetings<00:21:11.450> or<00:21:12.450> some<00:21:13.110> other<00:21:13.290> system<00:21:14.130> that 00:21:14.540 --> 00:21:14.550 align:start position:0% group meetings or some other system that 00:21:14.550 --> 00:21:18.320 align:start position:0% group meetings or some other system that makes<00:21:14.730> it<00:21:14.910> easier<00:21:15.210> for<00:21:15.480> residents<00:21:15.600> to<00:21:17.330> through 00:21:18.320 --> 00:21:18.330 align:start position:0% makes it easier for residents to through 00:21:18.330 --> 00:21:18.920 align:start position:0% makes it easier for residents to through that<00:21:18.420> process 00:21:18.920 --> 00:21:18.930 align:start position:0% that process 00:21:18.930 --> 00:21:22.940 align:start position:0% that process yeah<00:21:19.710> I<00:21:19.950> might<00:21:20.280> clarify<00:21:20.970> too<00:21:21.330> that<00:21:21.900> probably<00:21:22.890> a 00:21:22.940 --> 00:21:22.950 align:start position:0% yeah I might clarify too that probably a 00:21:22.950 --> 00:21:24.290 align:start position:0% yeah I might clarify too that probably a little<00:21:23.100> misunderstanding<00:21:23.760> from<00:21:24.000> what<00:21:24.210> had 00:21:24.290 --> 00:21:24.300 align:start position:0% little misunderstanding from what had 00:21:24.300 --> 00:21:27.410 align:start position:0% little misunderstanding from what had happened<00:21:24.660> that<00:21:24.690> previous<00:21:25.170> time<00:21:25.380> so<00:21:26.090> the<00:21:27.090> door 00:21:27.410 --> 00:21:27.420 align:start position:0% happened that previous time so the door 00:21:27.420 --> 00:21:30.280 align:start position:0% happened that previous time so the door to<00:21:27.570> door<00:21:27.720> before<00:21:27.960> was<00:21:28.500> the<00:21:28.650> informal<00:21:29.490> petition 00:21:30.280 --> 00:21:30.290 align:start position:0% to door before was the informal petition 00:21:30.290 --> 00:21:33.380 align:start position:0% to door before was the informal petition so<00:21:31.290> I<00:21:31.320> mean<00:21:31.650> just<00:21:31.950> for<00:21:32.370> that<00:21:32.550> point<00:21:32.850> so<00:21:33.210> that 00:21:33.380 --> 00:21:33.390 align:start position:0% so I mean just for that point so that 00:21:33.390 --> 00:21:35.960 align:start position:0% so I mean just for that point so that was<00:21:33.600> Annette<00:21:34.140> and<00:21:34.890> our<00:21:35.040> policy<00:21:35.520> does<00:21:35.700> require 00:21:35.960 --> 00:21:35.970 align:start position:0% was Annette and our policy does require 00:21:35.970 --> 00:21:38.900 align:start position:0% was Annette and our policy does require that<00:21:36.300> 50%<00:21:36.630> be<00:21:37.620> turned<00:21:37.950> in<00:21:38.160> for<00:21:38.370> the<00:21:38.460> district 00:21:38.900 --> 00:21:38.910 align:start position:0% that 50% be turned in for the district 00:21:38.910 --> 00:21:40.520 align:start position:0% that 50% be turned in for the district you<00:21:39.510> know<00:21:39.540> and<00:21:39.780> going<00:21:39.900> back<00:21:40.170> through<00:21:40.350> those 00:21:40.520 --> 00:21:40.530 align:start position:0% you know and going back through those 00:21:40.530 --> 00:21:41.220 align:start position:0% you know and going back through those numbers<00:21:40.920> now 00:21:41.220 --> 00:21:41.230 align:start position:0% numbers now 00:21:41.230 --> 00:21:43.260 align:start position:0% numbers now we<00:21:41.350> were<00:21:41.500> far<00:21:42.100> less<00:21:42.400> than<00:21:42.460> that<00:21:42.910> that<00:21:43.150> was 00:21:43.260 --> 00:21:43.270 align:start position:0% we were far less than that that was 00:21:43.270 --> 00:21:45.990 align:start position:0% we were far less than that that was actually<00:21:43.660> turned<00:21:43.960> in<00:21:44.230> for<00:21:44.740> this<00:21:45.070> but<00:21:45.429> we 00:21:45.990 --> 00:21:46.000 align:start position:0% actually turned in for this but we 00:21:46.000 --> 00:21:47.909 align:start position:0% actually turned in for this but we accepted<00:21:46.450> it<00:21:46.570> started<00:21:46.929> working<00:21:47.320> it<00:21:47.470> so<00:21:47.710> that's 00:21:47.909 --> 00:21:47.919 align:start position:0% accepted it started working it so that's 00:21:47.919 --> 00:21:49.799 align:start position:0% accepted it started working it so that's that<00:21:48.340> feedback<00:21:48.640> was<00:21:49.030> not<00:21:49.210> offered<00:21:49.570> out<00:21:49.690> at 00:21:49.799 --> 00:21:49.809 align:start position:0% that feedback was not offered out at 00:21:49.809 --> 00:21:54.390 align:start position:0% that feedback was not offered out at that<00:21:49.960> time<00:21:50.200> so<00:21:51.929> the<00:21:52.929> big<00:21:53.200> step<00:21:53.500> is<00:21:53.740> that<00:21:53.919> formal 00:21:54.390 --> 00:21:54.400 align:start position:0% that time so the big step is that formal 00:21:54.400 --> 00:21:56.130 align:start position:0% that time so the big step is that formal petition<00:21:54.730> when<00:21:55.059> you're<00:21:55.210> showing<00:21:55.720> all<00:21:55.990> the 00:21:56.130 --> 00:21:56.140 align:start position:0% petition when you're showing all the 00:21:56.140 --> 00:21:57.810 align:start position:0% petition when you're showing all the people<00:21:56.410> in<00:21:56.500> the<00:21:56.590> district<00:21:57.040> this<00:21:57.490> is<00:21:57.700> the 00:21:57.810 --> 00:21:57.820 align:start position:0% people in the district this is the 00:21:57.820 --> 00:21:59.250 align:start position:0% people in the district this is the actual<00:21:58.090> cost<00:21:58.419> because<00:21:58.720> the<00:21:58.840> first<00:21:59.049> time 00:21:59.250 --> 00:21:59.260 align:start position:0% actual cost because the first time 00:21:59.260 --> 00:22:02.580 align:start position:0% actual cost because the first time around<00:21:59.470> is<00:21:59.890> more<00:22:00.130> of<00:22:00.370> it's<00:22:01.179> the<00:22:01.419> here's<00:22:02.410> the 00:22:02.580 --> 00:22:02.590 align:start position:0% around is more of it's the here's the 00:22:02.590 --> 00:22:04.230 align:start position:0% around is more of it's the here's the type<00:22:02.770> of<00:22:02.799> project<00:22:03.400> we<00:22:03.549> would<00:22:03.700> like<00:22:03.910> to<00:22:03.940> do 00:22:04.230 --> 00:22:04.240 align:start position:0% type of project we would like to do 00:22:04.240 --> 00:22:06.630 align:start position:0% type of project we would like to do would<00:22:04.450> you<00:22:04.570> be<00:22:04.720> interested<00:22:04.960> in<00:22:05.410> that<00:22:05.640> versus 00:22:06.630 --> 00:22:06.640 align:start position:0% would you be interested in that versus 00:22:06.640 --> 00:22:08.310 align:start position:0% would you be interested in that versus coming<00:22:06.910> back<00:22:07.150> to<00:22:07.330> them<00:22:07.450> and<00:22:07.570> saying<00:22:07.840> here's 00:22:08.310 --> 00:22:08.320 align:start position:0% coming back to them and saying here's 00:22:08.320 --> 00:22:10.890 align:start position:0% coming back to them and saying here's the<00:22:08.410> project<00:22:09.010> we'd<00:22:09.190> like<00:22:09.429> to<00:22:10.090> do<00:22:10.330> in<00:22:10.570> the<00:22:10.690> area 00:22:10.890 --> 00:22:10.900 align:start position:0% the project we'd like to do in the area 00:22:10.900 --> 00:22:14.070 align:start position:0% the project we'd like to do in the area and<00:22:11.350> would<00:22:12.340> you<00:22:12.490> be<00:22:12.669> willing<00:22:12.880> to<00:22:13.030> pay<00:22:13.360> from 00:22:14.070 --> 00:22:14.080 align:start position:0% and would you be willing to pay from 00:22:14.080 --> 00:22:17.820 align:start position:0% and would you be willing to pay from 1300<00:22:14.919> to<00:22:15.179> $2,700<00:22:16.179> a<00:22:16.210> month<00:22:16.540> or<00:22:16.780> a<00:22:16.840> year<00:22:16.960> in 00:22:17.820 --> 00:22:17.830 align:start position:0% 1300 to $2,700 a month or a year in 00:22:17.830 --> 00:22:19.919 align:start position:0% 1300 to $2,700 a month or a year in additional<00:22:18.309> property<00:22:18.970> taxes<00:22:19.450> so<00:22:19.480> that's<00:22:19.720> a 00:22:19.919 --> 00:22:19.929 align:start position:0% additional property taxes so that's a 00:22:19.929 --> 00:22:22.169 align:start position:0% additional property taxes so that's a that's<00:22:20.799> a<00:22:20.980> whole<00:22:21.160> different<00:22:21.730> level<00:22:21.910> of 00:22:22.169 --> 00:22:22.179 align:start position:0% that's a whole different level of 00:22:22.179 --> 00:22:24.270 align:start position:0% that's a whole different level of petition<00:22:22.870> to<00:22:22.990> go<00:22:23.140> around<00:22:23.470> and<00:22:23.590> that<00:22:23.650> that<00:22:23.980> step 00:22:24.270 --> 00:22:24.280 align:start position:0% petition to go around and that that step 00:22:24.280 --> 00:22:33.630 align:start position:0% petition to go around and that that step has<00:22:24.460> not<00:22:24.610> been<00:22:24.820> done<00:22:25.120> for<00:22:25.809> this<00:22:26.020> district 00:22:33.630 --> 00:22:33.640 align:start position:0% 00:22:33.640 --> 00:22:36.120 align:start position:0% mr.<00:22:34.360> Townsend<00:22:34.570> yes<00:22:35.170> thank<00:22:35.530> you<00:22:35.590> Mary<00:22:35.860> this<00:22:36.010> is 00:22:36.120 --> 00:22:36.130 align:start position:0% mr. Townsend yes thank you Mary this is 00:22:36.130 --> 00:22:37.530 align:start position:0% mr. Townsend yes thank you Mary this is just<00:22:36.280> a<00:22:36.370> general<00:22:36.700> question<00:22:36.880> about<00:22:37.300> these 00:22:37.530 --> 00:22:37.540 align:start position:0% just a general question about these 00:22:37.540 --> 00:22:39.450 align:start position:0% just a general question about these districts<00:22:38.260> since<00:22:38.560> there<00:22:38.770> would<00:22:38.950> be<00:22:38.980> another 00:22:39.450 --> 00:22:39.460 align:start position:0% districts since there would be another 00:22:39.460 --> 00:22:46.380 align:start position:0% districts since there would be another process<00:22:42.990> for<00:22:43.990> a<00:22:44.020> petition<00:22:44.500> of<00:22:44.620> formal<00:22:45.330> do<00:22:46.330> you 00:22:46.380 --> 00:22:46.390 align:start position:0% process for a petition of formal do you 00:22:46.390 --> 00:22:48.660 align:start position:0% process for a petition of formal do you still<00:22:46.630> need<00:22:46.810> what<00:22:47.170> fifty<00:22:47.560> percent<00:22:48.040> and<00:22:48.370> what 00:22:48.660 --> 00:22:48.670 align:start position:0% still need what fifty percent and what 00:22:48.670 --> 00:22:49.530 align:start position:0% still need what fifty percent and what happens 00:22:49.530 --> 00:22:49.540 align:start position:0% happens 00:22:49.540 --> 00:22:54.270 align:start position:0% happens in<00:22:49.600> the<00:22:49.840> event<00:22:50.170> that<00:22:52.170> well<00:22:53.170> what<00:22:53.560> happens<00:22:53.980> for 00:22:54.270 --> 00:22:54.280 align:start position:0% in the event that well what happens for 00:22:54.280 --> 00:22:58.020 align:start position:0% in the event that well what happens for those<00:22:54.430> citizens<00:22:54.910> in<00:22:55.420> the<00:22:55.750> district<00:22:56.640> who<00:22:57.640> were 00:22:58.020 --> 00:22:58.030 align:start position:0% those citizens in the district who were 00:22:58.030 --> 00:23:01.680 align:start position:0% those citizens in the district who were not<00:22:58.810> in<00:22:59.110> agreement<00:22:59.560> will<00:22:59.950> they<00:23:00.100> be<00:23:00.160> taxed<00:23:00.820> they 00:23:01.680 --> 00:23:01.690 align:start position:0% not in agreement will they be taxed they 00:23:01.690 --> 00:23:04.110 align:start position:0% not in agreement will they be taxed they are<00:23:01.810> taxed<00:23:02.320> okay<00:23:02.740> well<00:23:02.890> ultimately<00:23:03.070> with<00:23:04.000> the 00:23:04.110 --> 00:23:04.120 align:start position:0% are taxed okay well ultimately with the 00:23:04.120 --> 00:23:05.850 align:start position:0% are taxed okay well ultimately with the benefit<00:23:04.510> district<00:23:04.870> process<00:23:05.320> yeah<00:23:05.620> it 00:23:05.850 --> 00:23:05.860 align:start position:0% benefit district process yeah it 00:23:05.860 --> 00:23:08.750 align:start position:0% benefit district process yeah it requires<00:23:06.310> it<00:23:06.520> to<00:23:06.550> be<00:23:06.760> fifty<00:23:07.480> a<00:23:07.750> majority<00:23:08.410> 51% 00:23:08.750 --> 00:23:08.760 align:start position:0% requires it to be fifty a majority 51% 00:23:08.760 --> 00:23:12.090 align:start position:0% requires it to be fifty a majority 51% come<00:23:09.760> in<00:23:09.910> to<00:23:10.120> sign<00:23:10.420> it<00:23:10.600> to<00:23:10.720> come<00:23:10.900> forward<00:23:11.170> but 00:23:12.090 --> 00:23:12.100 align:start position:0% come in to sign it to come forward but 00:23:12.100 --> 00:23:13.590 align:start position:0% come in to sign it to come forward but then<00:23:12.280> it<00:23:12.400> does<00:23:12.580> have<00:23:12.610> to<00:23:12.880> come<00:23:13.030> before<00:23:13.210> you<00:23:13.480> as 00:23:13.590 --> 00:23:13.600 align:start position:0% then it does have to come before you as 00:23:13.600 --> 00:23:16.770 align:start position:0% then it does have to come before you as a<00:23:13.630> governing<00:23:14.080> body<00:23:14.230> so<00:23:14.710> if<00:23:15.010> you<00:23:15.160> had<00:23:15.660> you<00:23:16.660> know 00:23:16.770 --> 00:23:16.780 align:start position:0% a governing body so if you had you know 00:23:16.780 --> 00:23:18.360 align:start position:0% a governing body so if you had you know one<00:23:17.050> hundred<00:23:17.140> people<00:23:17.620> come<00:23:17.860> to<00:23:17.980> the<00:23:18.070> room<00:23:18.220> and 00:23:18.360 --> 00:23:18.370 align:start position:0% one hundred people come to the room and 00:23:18.370 --> 00:23:20.310 align:start position:0% one hundred people come to the room and forty<00:23:18.700> nine<00:23:18.880> of<00:23:19.090> them<00:23:19.180> were<00:23:19.270> saying<00:23:19.570> we<00:23:20.140> don't 00:23:20.310 --> 00:23:20.320 align:start position:0% forty nine of them were saying we don't 00:23:20.320 --> 00:23:21.870 align:start position:0% forty nine of them were saying we don't want<00:23:20.440> that<00:23:20.560> additional<00:23:21.010> tax<00:23:21.310> you're<00:23:21.610> the<00:23:21.700> ones 00:23:21.870 --> 00:23:21.880 align:start position:0% want that additional tax you're the ones 00:23:21.880 --> 00:23:22.830 align:start position:0% want that additional tax you're the ones that<00:23:21.970> would<00:23:22.090> ultimately<00:23:22.240> make<00:23:22.660> the<00:23:22.810> decision 00:23:22.830 --> 00:23:22.840 align:start position:0% that would ultimately make the decision 00:23:22.840 --> 00:23:24.960 align:start position:0% that would ultimately make the decision whether<00:23:23.410> you<00:23:23.530> would<00:23:23.800> go<00:23:24.040> forward<00:23:24.370> with<00:23:24.580> it<00:23:24.790> or 00:23:24.960 --> 00:23:24.970 align:start position:0% whether you would go forward with it or 00:23:24.970 --> 00:23:27.900 align:start position:0% whether you would go forward with it or not<00:23:25.560> it<00:23:26.560> doesn't<00:23:26.800> I<00:23:27.400> don't<00:23:27.490> think<00:23:27.760> there's 00:23:27.900 --> 00:23:27.910 align:start position:0% not it doesn't I don't think there's 00:23:27.910 --> 00:23:29.490 align:start position:0% not it doesn't I don't think there's anything<00:23:28.090> that<00:23:28.330> makes<00:23:28.480> it<00:23:28.660> automatic<00:23:29.290> just 00:23:29.490 --> 00:23:29.500 align:start position:0% anything that makes it automatic just 00:23:29.500 --> 00:23:31.200 align:start position:0% anything that makes it automatic just because<00:23:29.830> the<00:23:29.980> petitioners<00:23:30.520> that<00:23:30.550> just<00:23:30.910> allows 00:23:31.200 --> 00:23:31.210 align:start position:0% because the petitioners that just allows 00:23:31.210 --> 00:23:33.240 align:start position:0% because the petitioners that just allows the<00:23:31.480> process<00:23:31.960> to<00:23:32.140> continue<00:23:32.410> moving<00:23:32.710> forward 00:23:33.240 --> 00:23:33.250 align:start position:0% the process to continue moving forward 00:23:33.250 --> 00:23:34.800 align:start position:0% the process to continue moving forward so<00:23:33.520> that<00:23:34.270> would<00:23:34.390> be<00:23:34.510> one<00:23:34.660> of<00:23:34.690> those 00:23:34.800 --> 00:23:34.810 align:start position:0% so that would be one of those 00:23:34.810 --> 00:23:36.540 align:start position:0% so that would be one of those considerations<00:23:35.590> to<00:23:35.800> make<00:23:35.830> if<00:23:36.130> it<00:23:36.280> were<00:23:36.370> that 00:23:36.540 --> 00:23:36.550 align:start position:0% considerations to make if it were that 00:23:36.550 --> 00:23:39.660 align:start position:0% considerations to make if it were that close<00:23:37.350> but<00:23:38.350> they<00:23:38.500> would<00:23:38.740> be<00:23:38.950> paying<00:23:39.220> the<00:23:39.400> tax 00:23:39.660 --> 00:23:39.670 align:start position:0% close but they would be paying the tax 00:23:39.670 --> 00:23:40.950 align:start position:0% close but they would be paying the tax because<00:23:40.090> we're<00:23:40.240> in<00:23:40.300> this<00:23:40.450> within<00:23:40.750> the 00:23:40.950 --> 00:23:40.960 align:start position:0% because we're in this within the 00:23:40.960 --> 00:23:42.540 align:start position:0% because we're in this within the confines<00:23:41.350> of<00:23:41.410> the<00:23:41.620> district<00:23:42.010> your<00:23:42.190> proof<00:23:42.430> that 00:23:42.540 --> 00:23:42.550 align:start position:0% confines of the district your proof that 00:23:42.550 --> 00:23:44.340 align:start position:0% confines of the district your proof that you<00:23:42.970> approve<00:23:43.210> the<00:23:43.300> district<00:23:43.720> everybody<00:23:44.170> in<00:23:44.320> a 00:23:44.340 --> 00:23:44.350 align:start position:0% you approve the district everybody in a 00:23:44.350 --> 00:23:55.110 align:start position:0% you approve the district everybody in a pace<00:23:48.180> thank<00:23:49.180> you<00:23:49.240> very<00:23:49.390> much<00:23:52.920> okay<00:23:53.920> the<00:23:54.430> next 00:23:55.110 --> 00:23:55.120 align:start position:0% pace thank you very much okay the next 00:23:55.120 --> 00:23:57.930 align:start position:0% pace thank you very much okay the next item<00:23:55.330> on<00:23:55.600> the<00:23:55.660> agenda<00:23:55.780> is<00:23:56.440> our<00:23:56.940> clerical 00:23:57.930 --> 00:23:57.940 align:start position:0% item on the agenda is our clerical 00:23:57.940 --> 00:24:00.060 align:start position:0% item on the agenda is our clerical corrections<00:23:58.630> to<00:23:58.840> the<00:23:58.960> budget<00:23:59.290> document<00:23:59.470> which 00:24:00.060 --> 00:24:00.070 align:start position:0% corrections to the budget document which 00:24:00.070 --> 00:24:01.770 align:start position:0% corrections to the budget document which is<00:24:00.370> we<00:24:00.700> don't<00:24:00.790> really<00:24:00.940> have<00:24:01.240> a<00:24:01.270> formal 00:24:01.770 --> 00:24:01.780 align:start position:0% is we don't really have a formal 00:24:01.780 --> 00:24:04.350 align:start position:0% is we don't really have a formal presentation<00:24:01.990> to<00:24:02.650> run<00:24:02.860> through<00:24:03.100> you<00:24:03.370> received 00:24:04.350 --> 00:24:04.360 align:start position:0% presentation to run through you received 00:24:04.360 --> 00:24:06.570 align:start position:0% presentation to run through you received an<00:24:04.510> attachment<00:24:04.900> there<00:24:05.500> was<00:24:05.620> a<00:24:05.650> hard<00:24:05.920> copy<00:24:06.160> also 00:24:06.570 --> 00:24:06.580 align:start position:0% an attachment there was a hard copy also 00:24:06.580 --> 00:24:09.600 align:start position:0% an attachment there was a hard copy also or<00:24:07.180> electric<00:24:07.660> copy<00:24:07.930> that<00:24:08.440> was<00:24:08.530> separate<00:24:08.920> these 00:24:09.600 --> 00:24:09.610 align:start position:0% or electric copy that was separate these 00:24:09.610 --> 00:24:12.000 align:start position:0% or electric copy that was separate these are<00:24:09.790> not<00:24:09.970> amendments<00:24:10.720> to<00:24:11.020> the<00:24:11.230> document<00:24:11.800> these 00:24:12.000 --> 00:24:12.010 align:start position:0% are not amendments to the document these 00:24:12.010 --> 00:24:13.590 align:start position:0% are not amendments to the document these are<00:24:12.160> just<00:24:12.340> ones<00:24:12.610> as<00:24:12.820> we've<00:24:13.030> gone<00:24:13.210> through<00:24:13.270> the 00:24:13.590 --> 00:24:13.600 align:start position:0% are just ones as we've gone through the 00:24:13.600 --> 00:24:17.100 align:start position:0% are just ones as we've gone through the past<00:24:13.840> several<00:24:14.110> weeks<00:24:14.260> and<00:24:14.650> the<00:24:15.570> 650<00:24:16.570> pages<00:24:16.990> in 00:24:17.100 --> 00:24:17.110 align:start position:0% past several weeks and the 650 pages in 00:24:17.110 --> 00:24:19.320 align:start position:0% past several weeks and the 650 pages in the<00:24:17.200> document<00:24:17.350> determined<00:24:18.220> there<00:24:18.340> is<00:24:18.550> some 00:24:19.320 --> 00:24:19.330 align:start position:0% the document determined there is some 00:24:19.330 --> 00:24:21.900 align:start position:0% the document determined there is some things<00:24:19.570> missing<00:24:19.810> the<00:24:20.500> most<00:24:20.740> notable<00:24:21.340> one<00:24:21.580> was 00:24:21.900 --> 00:24:21.910 align:start position:0% things missing the most notable one was 00:24:21.910 --> 00:24:24.240 align:start position:0% things missing the most notable one was the<00:24:22.260> one<00:24:23.260> we<00:24:23.440> went<00:24:23.590> through<00:24:23.860> and<00:24:24.010> we<00:24:24.130> were 00:24:24.240 --> 00:24:24.250 align:start position:0% the one we went through and we were 00:24:24.250 --> 00:24:26.250 align:start position:0% the one we went through and we were going<00:24:24.460> through<00:24:24.580> debt<00:24:25.060> or<00:24:25.450> we<00:24:25.810> left<00:24:26.020> a<00:24:26.080> couple 00:24:26.250 --> 00:24:26.260 align:start position:0% going through debt or we left a couple 00:24:26.260 --> 00:24:30.150 align:start position:0% going through debt or we left a couple zeros<00:24:26.560> off<00:24:27.040> at<00:24:27.250> the<00:24:27.400> end<00:24:27.550> so<00:24:28.350> but<00:24:29.350> there<00:24:29.590> as<00:24:29.890> I 00:24:30.150 --> 00:24:30.160 align:start position:0% zeros off at the end so but there as I 00:24:30.160 --> 00:24:32.760 align:start position:0% zeros off at the end so but there as I said<00:24:30.190> these<00:24:30.610> are<00:24:30.670> not<00:24:31.440> any<00:24:32.440> of<00:24:32.530> the<00:24:32.650> other 00:24:32.760 --> 00:24:32.770 align:start position:0% said these are not any of the other 00:24:32.770 --> 00:24:35.100 align:start position:0% said these are not any of the other changes<00:24:33.040> or<00:24:33.460> just<00:24:33.730> clerical<00:24:34.630> yeah<00:24:34.780> that's<00:24:34.990> a 00:24:35.100 --> 00:24:35.110 align:start position:0% changes or just clerical yeah that's a 00:24:35.110 --> 00:24:39.120 align:start position:0% changes or just clerical yeah that's a big<00:24:35.260> one<00:24:35.470> that's<00:24:35.950> why<00:24:36.130> pointed<00:24:36.550> that<00:24:36.670> out<00:24:38.130> but 00:24:39.120 --> 00:24:39.130 align:start position:0% big one that's why pointed that out but 00:24:39.130 --> 00:24:41.250 align:start position:0% big one that's why pointed that out but the<00:24:39.250> other<00:24:39.280> ones<00:24:39.550> are<00:24:39.670> not<00:24:39.760> policy<00:24:40.420> changes<00:24:40.960> or 00:24:41.250 --> 00:24:41.260 align:start position:0% the other ones are not policy changes or 00:24:41.260 --> 00:24:43.110 align:start position:0% the other ones are not policy changes or we're<00:24:41.440> adding<00:24:41.770> to<00:24:41.920> it<00:24:42.040> it's<00:24:42.190> just<00:24:42.280> cleaning<00:24:43.000> it 00:24:43.110 --> 00:24:43.120 align:start position:0% we're adding to it it's just cleaning it 00:24:43.120 --> 00:24:45.799 align:start position:0% we're adding to it it's just cleaning it up<00:24:43.240> am<00:24:43.690> I<00:24:43.870> missing<00:24:44.080> anything<00:24:44.260> with<00:24:44.740> that 00:24:45.799 --> 00:24:45.809 align:start position:0% up am I missing anything with that 00:24:45.809 --> 00:24:51.109 align:start position:0% up am I missing anything with that regi<00:24:47.359> okay<00:24:49.460> alright<00:24:50.460> now<00:24:50.669> let's<00:24:50.820> get<00:24:50.940> to<00:24:50.999> the 00:24:51.109 --> 00:24:51.119 align:start position:0% regi okay alright now let's get to the 00:24:51.119 --> 00:24:54.680 align:start position:0% regi okay alright now let's get to the fun<00:24:51.330> part<00:24:51.359> of<00:24:51.719> the<00:24:51.960> seedlings<00:24:53.389> not<00:24:54.389> that<00:24:54.599> the 00:24:54.680 --> 00:24:54.690 align:start position:0% fun part of the seedlings not that the 00:24:54.690 --> 00:24:56.899 align:start position:0% fun part of the seedlings not that the other<00:24:54.869> part<00:24:55.139> hadn't<00:24:55.349> been<00:24:55.440> fun<00:24:55.700> but<00:24:56.700> I<00:24:56.789> get 00:24:56.899 --> 00:24:56.909 align:start position:0% other part hadn't been fun but I get 00:24:56.909 --> 00:25:00.789 align:start position:0% other part hadn't been fun but I get somebody<00:24:57.090> hit<00:24:57.330> the<00:24:57.649> clicker<00:24:58.649> for<00:24:58.739> me 00:25:00.789 --> 00:25:00.799 align:start position:0% somebody hit the clicker for me 00:25:00.799 --> 00:25:03.019 align:start position:0% somebody hit the clicker for me so<00:25:01.799> the<00:25:01.919> potential<00:25:02.190> yellow<00:25:02.580> sheet<00:25:02.879> or 00:25:03.019 --> 00:25:03.029 align:start position:0% so the potential yellow sheet or 00:25:03.029 --> 00:25:05.450 align:start position:0% so the potential yellow sheet or reconciliation<00:25:03.479> items<00:25:04.440> these<00:25:05.009> are<00:25:05.190> the<00:25:05.279> items 00:25:05.450 --> 00:25:05.460 align:start position:0% reconciliation items these are the items 00:25:05.460 --> 00:25:07.249 align:start position:0% reconciliation items these are the items that<00:25:05.820> we're<00:25:05.969> going<00:25:06.149> to<00:25:06.359> talk<00:25:06.570> about<00:25:06.779> and<00:25:07.169> we 00:25:07.249 --> 00:25:07.259 align:start position:0% that we're going to talk about and we 00:25:07.259 --> 00:25:08.899 align:start position:0% that we're going to talk about and we have<00:25:07.289> a<00:25:07.469> little<00:25:07.739> bit<00:25:07.889> more<00:25:08.009> detail<00:25:08.519> and<00:25:08.729> kind 00:25:08.899 --> 00:25:08.909 align:start position:0% have a little bit more detail and kind 00:25:08.909 --> 00:25:10.039 align:start position:0% have a little bit more detail and kind of<00:25:08.969> broke<00:25:09.149> them<00:25:09.330> down<00:25:09.359> by<00:25:09.659> different 00:25:10.039 --> 00:25:10.049 align:start position:0% of broke them down by different 00:25:10.049 --> 00:25:12.440 align:start position:0% of broke them down by different categories<00:25:10.679> so<00:25:10.950> we<00:25:11.099> have<00:25:11.279> the<00:25:11.519> conviction 00:25:12.440 --> 00:25:12.450 align:start position:0% categories so we have the conviction 00:25:12.450 --> 00:25:13.430 align:start position:0% categories so we have the conviction Integrity<00:25:13.109> Unit 00:25:13.430 --> 00:25:13.440 align:start position:0% Integrity Unit 00:25:13.440 --> 00:25:16.820 align:start position:0% Integrity Unit there's<00:25:13.710> Schlitterbahn<00:25:14.009> case<00:25:14.429> the<00:25:14.789> Smid<00:25:15.830> the 00:25:16.820 --> 00:25:16.830 align:start position:0% there's Schlitterbahn case the Smid the 00:25:16.830 --> 00:25:18.469 align:start position:0% there's Schlitterbahn case the Smid the abatement<00:25:17.429> team<00:25:17.609> that's<00:25:18.029> out<00:25:18.179> there 00:25:18.469 --> 00:25:18.479 align:start position:0% abatement team that's out there 00:25:18.479 --> 00:25:20.869 align:start position:0% abatement team that's out there increases<00:25:19.379> 2nb<00:25:19.619> arse<00:25:19.950> building<00:25:20.519> security 00:25:20.869 --> 00:25:20.879 align:start position:0% increases 2nb arse building security 00:25:20.879 --> 00:25:24.349 align:start position:0% increases 2nb arse building security juvenile<00:25:21.479> Center<00:25:21.809> funding<00:25:22.349> increase<00:25:23.239> k7<00:25:24.239> and 00:25:24.349 --> 00:25:24.359 align:start position:0% juvenile Center funding increase k7 and 00:25:24.359 --> 00:25:27.200 align:start position:0% juvenile Center funding increase k7 and parallel<00:25:25.489> those<00:25:26.489> are<00:25:26.669> the<00:25:26.759> ones<00:25:26.940> that<00:25:27.029> are 00:25:27.200 --> 00:25:27.210 align:start position:0% parallel those are the ones that are 00:25:27.210 --> 00:25:29.209 align:start position:0% parallel those are the ones that are more<00:25:27.389> in<00:25:27.509> the<00:25:27.629> dollars<00:25:28.080> and<00:25:28.109> cents<00:25:28.529> changes 00:25:29.209 --> 00:25:29.219 align:start position:0% more in the dollars and cents changes 00:25:29.219 --> 00:25:30.739 align:start position:0% more in the dollars and cents changes that<00:25:29.369> are<00:25:29.489> there<00:25:29.669> then<00:25:29.940> we<00:25:30.029> have<00:25:30.149> some<00:25:30.330> policy 00:25:30.739 --> 00:25:30.749 align:start position:0% that are there then we have some policy 00:25:30.749 --> 00:25:32.779 align:start position:0% that are there then we have some policy direction<00:25:31.379> in<00:25:31.589> areas<00:25:32.009> of<00:25:32.249> the<00:25:32.369> right<00:25:32.580> away 00:25:32.779 --> 00:25:32.789 align:start position:0% direction in areas of the right away 00:25:32.789 --> 00:25:35.359 align:start position:0% direction in areas of the right away mowing<00:25:33.179> and<00:25:33.330> then<00:25:34.109> where<00:25:34.679> we're<00:25:34.859> going<00:25:35.129> with 00:25:35.359 --> 00:25:35.369 align:start position:0% mowing and then where we're going with 00:25:35.369 --> 00:25:37.129 align:start position:0% mowing and then where we're going with future<00:25:35.820> discussion<00:25:36.359> on<00:25:36.450> the<00:25:36.539> Western<00:25:36.869> fire 00:25:37.129 --> 00:25:37.139 align:start position:0% future discussion on the Western fire 00:25:37.139 --> 00:25:39.549 align:start position:0% future discussion on the Western fire station<00:25:37.619> reporting<00:25:38.039> to<00:25:38.129> standing<00:25:38.519> committees 00:25:39.549 --> 00:25:39.559 align:start position:0% station reporting to standing committees 00:25:39.559 --> 00:25:42.619 align:start position:0% station reporting to standing committees employees<00:25:40.559> state<00:25:40.830> of<00:25:41.210> statewide<00:25:42.210> economic 00:25:42.619 --> 00:25:42.629 align:start position:0% employees state of statewide economic 00:25:42.629 --> 00:25:45.950 align:start position:0% employees state of statewide economic overview<00:25:43.529> our<00:25:44.339> strategic<00:25:45.330> planning<00:25:45.599> around 00:25:45.950 --> 00:25:45.960 align:start position:0% overview our strategic planning around 00:25:45.960 --> 00:25:47.719 align:start position:0% overview our strategic planning around economic<00:25:46.440> development<00:25:46.469> planning<00:25:47.070> areas<00:25:47.519> and 00:25:47.719 --> 00:25:47.729 align:start position:0% economic development planning areas and 00:25:47.729 --> 00:25:50.029 align:start position:0% economic development planning areas and livable<00:25:48.059> neighborhoods<00:25:48.149> staffing<00:25:49.049> so<00:25:49.320> that's 00:25:50.029 --> 00:25:50.039 align:start position:0% livable neighborhoods staffing so that's 00:25:50.039 --> 00:25:51.769 align:start position:0% livable neighborhoods staffing so that's what<00:25:50.190> we've<00:25:50.309> captured<00:25:50.669> we're<00:25:51.509> going<00:25:51.629> to<00:25:51.690> go 00:25:51.769 --> 00:25:51.779 align:start position:0% what we've captured we're going to go 00:25:51.779 --> 00:25:53.119 align:start position:0% what we've captured we're going to go into<00:25:51.960> each<00:25:52.139> one<00:25:52.320> of<00:25:52.379> these<00:25:52.469> here<00:25:52.799> in<00:25:52.889> a<00:25:52.950> little 00:25:53.119 --> 00:25:53.129 align:start position:0% into each one of these here in a little 00:25:53.129 --> 00:25:56.359 align:start position:0% into each one of these here in a little bit<00:25:53.279> and<00:25:54.379> it's<00:25:55.379> my<00:25:55.589> goal<00:25:55.769> from<00:25:55.919> this<00:25:56.099> point 00:25:56.359 --> 00:25:56.369 align:start position:0% bit and it's my goal from this point 00:25:56.369 --> 00:25:57.469 align:start position:0% bit and it's my goal from this point that<00:25:56.549> I<00:25:56.609> make<00:25:56.820> sure<00:25:56.849> I<00:25:56.999> have<00:25:57.179> the<00:25:57.299> right 00:25:57.469 --> 00:25:57.479 align:start position:0% that I make sure I have the right 00:25:57.479 --> 00:26:00.379 align:start position:0% that I make sure I have the right direction<00:25:57.869> from<00:25:58.679> you<00:25:58.859> all<00:25:59.070> as<00:25:59.429> to<00:26:00.059> what<00:26:00.239> we 00:26:00.379 --> 00:26:00.389 align:start position:0% direction from you all as to what we 00:26:00.389 --> 00:26:01.909 align:start position:0% direction from you all as to what we need<00:26:00.509> to<00:26:00.719> address<00:26:00.960> from<00:26:01.200> a<00:26:01.320> financial 00:26:01.909 --> 00:26:01.919 align:start position:0% need to address from a financial 00:26:01.919 --> 00:26:03.469 align:start position:0% need to address from a financial perspective<00:26:02.070> of<00:26:02.820> what<00:26:02.999> we're<00:26:03.149> going<00:26:03.269> to<00:26:03.330> work 00:26:03.469 --> 00:26:03.479 align:start position:0% perspective of what we're going to work 00:26:03.479 --> 00:26:09.079 align:start position:0% perspective of what we're going to work with<00:26:03.509> future<00:26:05.330> next<00:26:06.330> slide<00:26:07.429> so<00:26:08.429> I<00:26:08.759> think<00:26:08.849> you 00:26:09.079 --> 00:26:09.089 align:start position:0% with future next slide so I think you 00:26:09.089 --> 00:26:11.320 align:start position:0% with future next slide so I think you gave<00:26:09.359> us<00:26:09.539> direction<00:26:10.080> the<00:26:10.169> other<00:26:10.229> night<00:26:10.529> on<00:26:10.559> the 00:26:11.320 --> 00:26:11.330 align:start position:0% gave us direction the other night on the 00:26:11.330 --> 00:26:16.129 align:start position:0% gave us direction the other night on the Kin<00:26:12.379> DA's<00:26:13.379> conviction<00:26:14.099> Integrity<00:26:14.700> Unit<00:26:15.139> he 00:26:16.129 --> 00:26:16.139 align:start position:0% Kin DA's conviction Integrity Unit he 00:26:16.139 --> 00:26:18.169 align:start position:0% Kin DA's conviction Integrity Unit he came<00:26:16.349> in<00:26:16.499> and<00:26:16.649> he<00:26:16.739> asked<00:26:17.249> for<00:26:17.309> some<00:26:17.940> additional 00:26:18.169 --> 00:26:18.179 align:start position:0% came in and he asked for some additional 00:26:18.179 --> 00:26:21.019 align:start position:0% came in and he asked for some additional staffing<00:26:18.950> the<00:26:19.950> staffing<00:26:20.190> request<00:26:20.789> it<00:26:20.940> was 00:26:21.019 --> 00:26:21.029 align:start position:0% staffing the staffing request it was 00:26:21.029 --> 00:26:22.489 align:start position:0% staffing the staffing request it was about<00:26:21.269> a<00:26:21.299> hundred<00:26:21.419> fifty<00:26:21.690> five<00:26:21.929> thousand 00:26:22.489 --> 00:26:22.499 align:start position:0% about a hundred fifty five thousand 00:26:22.499 --> 00:26:24.440 align:start position:0% about a hundred fifty five thousand dollars<00:26:22.799> worth<00:26:23.009> and<00:26:23.639> he's<00:26:23.879> seventy<00:26:24.269> five 00:26:24.440 --> 00:26:24.450 align:start position:0% dollars worth and he's seventy five 00:26:24.450 --> 00:26:26.779 align:start position:0% dollars worth and he's seventy five hundred<00:26:24.809> dollars<00:26:25.049> worth<00:26:25.229> of<00:26:25.349> equipment<00:26:25.789> so 00:26:26.779 --> 00:26:26.789 align:start position:0% hundred dollars worth of equipment so 00:26:26.789 --> 00:26:28.820 align:start position:0% hundred dollars worth of equipment so what<00:26:27.089> we<00:26:27.239> did<00:26:27.419> was<00:26:27.629> he<00:26:27.779> built<00:26:28.019> the<00:26:28.229> budget<00:26:28.649> for 00:26:28.820 --> 00:26:28.830 align:start position:0% what we did was he built the budget for 00:26:28.830 --> 00:26:30.700 align:start position:0% what we did was he built the budget for this<00:26:28.950> started<00:26:29.519> in<00:26:29.580> the<00:26:29.639> fourth<00:26:29.969> quarter<00:26:30.389> of 00:26:30.700 --> 00:26:30.710 align:start position:0% this started in the fourth quarter of 00:26:30.710 --> 00:26:35.060 align:start position:0% this started in the fourth quarter of 2018<00:26:32.239> and<00:26:33.239> buy<00:26:33.749> the<00:26:33.809> equipment<00:26:34.139> this<00:26:34.559> year<00:26:34.889> and 00:26:35.060 --> 00:26:35.070 align:start position:0% 2018 and buy the equipment this year and 00:26:35.070 --> 00:26:37.820 align:start position:0% 2018 and buy the equipment this year and then<00:26:35.700> built<00:26:35.969> in<00:26:36.210> the<00:26:36.479> full<00:26:36.899> amount<00:26:37.169> for<00:26:37.589> the 00:26:37.820 --> 00:26:37.830 align:start position:0% then built in the full amount for the 00:26:37.830 --> 00:26:41.089 align:start position:0% then built in the full amount for the staffing<00:26:38.159> in<00:26:38.570> 2019<00:26:39.570> and<00:26:39.839> then<00:26:40.649> we'd<00:26:40.889> be 00:26:41.089 --> 00:26:41.099 align:start position:0% staffing in 2019 and then we'd be 00:26:41.099 --> 00:26:44.570 align:start position:0% staffing in 2019 and then we'd be looking<00:26:41.249> at<00:26:41.580> the<00:26:42.269> other<00:26:42.419> one<00:26:42.539> is<00:26:43.339> contact<00:26:44.339> with 00:26:44.570 --> 00:26:44.580 align:start position:0% looking at the other one is contact with 00:26:44.580 --> 00:26:47.419 align:start position:0% looking at the other one is contact with the<00:26:45.229> AG<00:26:46.229> regarding<00:26:46.859> what<00:26:46.979> we<00:26:47.070> thought<00:26:47.219> the 00:26:47.419 --> 00:26:47.429 align:start position:0% the AG regarding what we thought the 00:26:47.429 --> 00:26:50.060 align:start position:0% the AG regarding what we thought the cost<00:26:48.269> of<00:26:48.539> the<00:26:48.629> case<00:26:48.869> would<00:26:49.139> be<00:26:49.169> the<00:26:49.320> DA<00:26:49.710> did 00:26:50.060 --> 00:26:50.070 align:start position:0% cost of the case would be the DA did 00:26:50.070 --> 00:26:55.249 align:start position:0% cost of the case would be the DA did that<00:26:51.049> so<00:26:52.049> we<00:26:52.320> think<00:26:52.559> it's<00:26:52.769> at<00:26:53.509> $350,000<00:26:54.539> for 00:26:55.249 --> 00:26:55.259 align:start position:0% that so we think it's at $350,000 for 00:26:55.259 --> 00:26:57.529 align:start position:0% that so we think it's at $350,000 for both<00:26:55.830> the<00:26:55.859> cases<00:26:56.249> we<00:26:56.639> have<00:26:56.669> in<00:26:57.029> there<00:26:57.210> so<00:26:57.389> that 00:26:57.529 --> 00:26:57.539 align:start position:0% both the cases we have in there so that 00:26:57.539 --> 00:26:59.629 align:start position:0% both the cases we have in there so that impacts<00:26:57.929> both<00:26:58.169> where<00:26:58.529> we're<00:26:58.679> at<00:26:58.769> on<00:26:58.919> the<00:26:59.009> 2018 00:26:59.629 --> 00:26:59.639 align:start position:0% impacts both where we're at on the 2018 00:26:59.639 --> 00:26:59.940 align:start position:0% impacts both where we're at on the 2018 and 00:26:59.940 --> 00:26:59.950 align:start position:0% and 00:26:59.950 --> 00:27:03.509 align:start position:0% and 90<00:27:00.480> am<00:27:01.480> i<00:27:02.230> clear<00:27:02.649> and<00:27:02.830> moving<00:27:03.130> forward<00:27:03.399> with 00:27:03.509 --> 00:27:03.519 align:start position:0% 90 am i clear and moving forward with 00:27:03.519 --> 00:27:13.350 align:start position:0% 90 am i clear and moving forward with this<00:27:03.820> direction 00:27:13.350 --> 00:27:13.360 align:start position:0% 00:27:13.360 --> 00:27:16.649 align:start position:0% yes<00:27:13.960> Commissioner<00:27:14.320> banner<00:27:14.769> I<00:27:15.299> think<00:27:16.299> you<00:27:16.480> can 00:27:16.649 --> 00:27:16.659 align:start position:0% yes Commissioner banner I think you can 00:27:16.659 --> 00:27:19.320 align:start position:0% yes Commissioner banner I think you can see<00:27:16.869> that<00:27:17.080> we<00:27:17.230> have<00:27:17.350> support<00:27:18.249> for<00:27:18.460> the<00:27:18.610> item 00:27:19.320 --> 00:27:19.330 align:start position:0% see that we have support for the item 00:27:19.330 --> 00:27:22.590 align:start position:0% see that we have support for the item but<00:27:20.019> we<00:27:20.169> have<00:27:20.409> a<00:27:20.440> very<00:27:20.679> late<00:27:21.009> letter<00:27:21.600> received 00:27:22.590 --> 00:27:22.600 align:start position:0% but we have a very late letter received 00:27:22.600 --> 00:27:30.419 align:start position:0% but we have a very late letter received today<00:27:25.169> with<00:27:26.169> concerns<00:27:26.710> from<00:27:28.019> our<00:27:29.129> two<00:27:30.129> main 00:27:30.419 --> 00:27:30.429 align:start position:0% today with concerns from our two main 00:27:30.429 --> 00:27:34.519 align:start position:0% today with concerns from our two main law<00:27:30.639> enforcement<00:27:31.269> partners<00:27:31.889> about<00:27:32.889> how<00:27:33.190> to 00:27:34.519 --> 00:27:34.529 align:start position:0% law enforcement partners about how to 00:27:34.529 --> 00:27:39.479 align:start position:0% law enforcement partners about how to protect<00:27:35.789> the<00:27:36.789> entire<00:27:37.210> process<00:27:37.659> so<00:27:38.369> I<00:27:39.369> think 00:27:39.479 --> 00:27:39.489 align:start position:0% protect the entire process so I think 00:27:39.489 --> 00:27:44.539 align:start position:0% protect the entire process so I think while<00:27:40.029> we<00:27:41.489> agree<00:27:42.489> we<00:27:42.759> need<00:27:42.970> to<00:27:43.119> fund<00:27:43.749> this<00:27:44.049> I 00:27:44.539 --> 00:27:44.549 align:start position:0% while we agree we need to fund this I 00:27:44.549 --> 00:27:49.340 align:start position:0% while we agree we need to fund this I think<00:27:45.549> we<00:27:45.669> need<00:27:45.879> to<00:27:45.999> pay<00:27:46.980> good<00:27:47.980> attention<00:27:48.309> to 00:27:49.340 --> 00:27:49.350 align:start position:0% think we need to pay good attention to 00:27:49.350 --> 00:27:53.009 align:start position:0% think we need to pay good attention to what<00:27:50.350> our<00:27:50.730> police<00:27:51.730> chief<00:27:52.059> and<00:27:52.299> sheriff<00:27:52.749> bring 00:27:53.009 --> 00:27:53.019 align:start position:0% what our police chief and sheriff bring 00:27:53.019 --> 00:27:56.820 align:start position:0% what our police chief and sheriff bring forward<00:27:53.499> as<00:27:54.840> potential<00:27:55.840> concerns<00:27:56.289> as<00:27:56.649> we 00:27:56.820 --> 00:27:56.830 align:start position:0% forward as potential concerns as we 00:27:56.830 --> 00:27:58.950 align:start position:0% forward as potential concerns as we develop<00:27:57.340> this<00:27:57.580> unit<00:27:58.029> and<00:27:58.239> I<00:27:58.389> would<00:27:58.570> just<00:27:58.809> ask 00:27:58.950 --> 00:27:58.960 align:start position:0% develop this unit and I would just ask 00:27:58.960 --> 00:28:04.950 align:start position:0% develop this unit and I would just ask us<00:27:59.529> to<00:27:59.830> be<00:28:00.239> diligent<00:28:01.239> in<00:28:03.779> hearing<00:28:04.779> their 00:28:04.950 --> 00:28:04.960 align:start position:0% us to be diligent in hearing their 00:28:04.960 --> 00:28:07.560 align:start position:0% us to be diligent in hearing their concerns<00:28:05.139> and<00:28:06.009> if<00:28:06.399> there<00:28:06.669> are<00:28:06.820> things<00:28:07.119> we<00:28:07.359> can 00:28:07.560 --> 00:28:07.570 align:start position:0% concerns and if there are things we can 00:28:07.570 --> 00:28:10.950 align:start position:0% concerns and if there are things we can build<00:28:07.809> into<00:28:08.619> this<00:28:08.799> unit<00:28:09.389> working<00:28:10.389> with<00:28:10.570> the<00:28:10.749> DA 00:28:10.950 --> 00:28:10.960 align:start position:0% build into this unit working with the DA 00:28:10.960 --> 00:28:14.700 align:start position:0% build into this unit working with the DA that<00:28:11.590> that<00:28:12.009> helps<00:28:12.460> satisfy<00:28:13.320> their<00:28:14.320> side<00:28:14.679> of 00:28:14.700 --> 00:28:14.710 align:start position:0% that that helps satisfy their side of 00:28:14.710 --> 00:28:17.310 align:start position:0% that that helps satisfy their side of this<00:28:15.039> equation<00:28:15.429> but<00:28:16.149> they<00:28:16.359> this<00:28:16.629> email<00:28:17.080> came 00:28:17.310 --> 00:28:17.320 align:start position:0% this equation but they this email came 00:28:17.320 --> 00:28:23.460 align:start position:0% this equation but they this email came today<00:28:17.859> at<00:28:18.100> 5:30<00:28:18.899> to<00:28:19.899> all<00:28:20.080> of<00:28:20.230> us<00:28:21.480> so<00:28:22.480> we<00:28:22.779> may 00:28:23.460 --> 00:28:23.470 align:start position:0% today at 5:30 to all of us so we may 00:28:23.470 --> 00:28:25.649 align:start position:0% today at 5:30 to all of us so we may want<00:28:23.679> to<00:28:23.769> have<00:28:23.859> a<00:28:23.950> look<00:28:24.100> at<00:28:24.249> that<00:28:24.429> and<00:28:24.879> see<00:28:25.480> what 00:28:25.649 --> 00:28:25.659 align:start position:0% want to have a look at that and see what 00:28:25.659 --> 00:28:27.830 align:start position:0% want to have a look at that and see what concerns<00:28:26.440> they're<00:28:26.710> bringing<00:28:27.100> forward<00:28:27.519> but 00:28:27.830 --> 00:28:27.840 align:start position:0% concerns they're bringing forward but 00:28:27.840 --> 00:28:30.769 align:start position:0% concerns they're bringing forward but I've<00:28:28.840> glanced<00:28:29.499> at<00:28:29.649> it 00:28:30.769 --> 00:28:30.779 align:start position:0% I've glanced at it 00:28:30.779 --> 00:28:38.759 align:start position:0% I've glanced at it sure<00:28:33.539> okay<00:28:36.090> the<00:28:37.090> karenann<00:28:37.570> is<00:28:37.779> sending<00:28:38.230> them<00:28:38.499> I 00:28:38.759 --> 00:28:38.769 align:start position:0% sure okay the karenann is sending them I 00:28:38.769 --> 00:28:42.779 align:start position:0% sure okay the karenann is sending them I get<00:28:39.700> to<00:28:39.850> you<00:28:39.940> I<00:28:40.320> just<00:28:41.320> I<00:28:41.619> just<00:28:41.679> want<00:28:42.249> us<00:28:42.460> to<00:28:42.519> be 00:28:42.779 --> 00:28:42.789 align:start position:0% get to you I just I just want us to be 00:28:42.789 --> 00:28:46.109 align:start position:0% get to you I just I just want us to be aware<00:28:43.299> as<00:28:43.840> we<00:28:44.679> move<00:28:44.889> forward<00:28:45.279> I<00:28:45.700> think<00:28:45.730> we 00:28:46.109 --> 00:28:46.119 align:start position:0% aware as we move forward I think we 00:28:46.119 --> 00:28:49.710 align:start position:0% aware as we move forward I think we understand<00:28:47.190> what<00:28:48.190> the<00:28:48.340> DA<00:28:48.609> was<00:28:49.059> bringing<00:28:49.509> us 00:28:49.710 --> 00:28:49.720 align:start position:0% understand what the DA was bringing us 00:28:49.720 --> 00:28:52.320 align:start position:0% understand what the DA was bringing us and<00:28:50.169> I<00:28:50.379> think<00:28:50.440> we<00:28:50.919> agree<00:28:51.820> with<00:28:52.029> that 00:28:52.320 --> 00:28:52.330 align:start position:0% and I think we agree with that 00:28:52.330 --> 00:28:57.149 align:start position:0% and I think we agree with that but<00:28:52.749> we<00:28:53.230> need<00:28:53.649> to<00:28:53.950> also<00:28:53.980> be<00:28:54.730> aware<00:28:54.970> of<00:28:55.859> what<00:28:56.859> our 00:28:57.149 --> 00:28:57.159 align:start position:0% but we need to also be aware of what our 00:28:57.159 --> 00:29:00.269 align:start position:0% but we need to also be aware of what our two<00:28:58.119> chief<00:28:58.539> law<00:28:58.899> enforcement<00:28:59.009> officers<00:29:00.009> in 00:29:00.269 --> 00:29:00.279 align:start position:0% two chief law enforcement officers in 00:29:00.279 --> 00:29:02.789 align:start position:0% two chief law enforcement officers in this<00:29:00.429> county<00:29:00.820> are<00:29:00.940> saying<00:29:01.239> so<00:29:02.169> that's<00:29:02.440> all<00:29:02.619> I'm 00:29:02.789 --> 00:29:02.799 align:start position:0% this county are saying so that's all I'm 00:29:02.799 --> 00:29:07.409 align:start position:0% this county are saying so that's all I'm asking<00:29:03.220> for<00:29:03.429> I<00:29:04.440> still<00:29:05.440> support<00:29:05.710> it<00:29:06.129> I<00:29:06.419> just 00:29:07.409 --> 00:29:07.419 align:start position:0% asking for I still support it I just 00:29:07.419 --> 00:29:09.359 align:start position:0% asking for I still support it I just want<00:29:07.659> awareness<00:29:08.259> that<00:29:08.559> we've<00:29:08.799> got<00:29:09.100> to<00:29:09.340> work 00:29:09.359 --> 00:29:09.369 align:start position:0% want awareness that we've got to work 00:29:09.369 --> 00:29:13.529 align:start position:0% want awareness that we've got to work with<00:29:09.820> our<00:29:10.379> police<00:29:11.379> and<00:29:11.649> sheriff<00:29:12.369> so<00:29:13.179> if<00:29:13.359> we 00:29:13.529 --> 00:29:13.539 align:start position:0% with our police and sheriff so if we 00:29:13.539 --> 00:29:16.129 align:start position:0% with our police and sheriff so if we were<00:29:13.690> to<00:29:13.869> approve<00:29:14.289> this<00:29:14.619> for<00:29:15.100> the<00:29:15.249> budget<00:29:15.669> and 00:29:16.129 --> 00:29:16.139 align:start position:0% were to approve this for the budget and 00:29:16.139 --> 00:29:19.519 align:start position:0% were to approve this for the budget and we<00:29:17.139> were<00:29:17.289> to<00:29:17.559> find<00:29:17.799> that<00:29:18.070> the<00:29:18.279> the<00:29:18.730> concerns 00:29:19.519 --> 00:29:19.529 align:start position:0% we were to find that the the concerns 00:29:19.529 --> 00:29:21.149 align:start position:0% we were to find that the the concerns outlined<00:29:20.529> in<00:29:20.679> the<00:29:20.739> letter<00:29:20.919> were 00:29:21.149 --> 00:29:21.159 align:start position:0% outlined in the letter were 00:29:21.159 --> 00:29:24.690 align:start position:0% outlined in the letter were substantiated<00:29:21.639> that<00:29:22.299> would<00:29:22.960> cause<00:29:23.230> us<00:29:23.679> to<00:29:24.309> not 00:29:24.690 --> 00:29:24.700 align:start position:0% substantiated that would cause us to not 00:29:24.700 --> 00:29:26.909 align:start position:0% substantiated that would cause us to not be<00:29:24.879> able<00:29:24.999> to<00:29:25.090> implement<00:29:25.210> it<00:29:25.629> that<00:29:25.840> money<00:29:26.679> would 00:29:26.909 --> 00:29:26.919 align:start position:0% be able to implement it that money would 00:29:26.919 --> 00:29:27.580 align:start position:0% be able to implement it that money would simply 00:29:27.580 --> 00:29:27.590 align:start position:0% simply 00:29:27.590 --> 00:29:29.990 align:start position:0% simply be<00:29:28.590> hanging<00:29:28.920> out<00:29:29.010> there<00:29:29.070> I<00:29:29.490> don't<00:29:29.670> think 00:29:29.990 --> 00:29:30.000 align:start position:0% be hanging out there I don't think 00:29:30.000 --> 00:29:33.470 align:start position:0% be hanging out there I don't think that's<00:29:30.480> what<00:29:30.780> the<00:29:30.930> letter<00:29:31.140> is<00:29:31.260> saying<00:29:32.300> and<00:29:33.300> I 00:29:33.470 --> 00:29:33.480 align:start position:0% that's what the letter is saying and I 00:29:33.480 --> 00:29:35.810 align:start position:0% that's what the letter is saying and I would<00:29:33.660> hope<00:29:34.140> that<00:29:34.170> we<00:29:34.740> all<00:29:34.890> take<00:29:35.130> a<00:29:35.190> minute<00:29:35.430> to 00:29:35.810 --> 00:29:35.820 align:start position:0% would hope that we all take a minute to 00:29:35.820 --> 00:29:37.760 align:start position:0% would hope that we all take a minute to at<00:29:35.940> least<00:29:36.090> but<00:29:36.390> I<00:29:36.570> don't<00:29:36.780> think<00:29:37.230> they<00:29:37.590> are 00:29:37.760 --> 00:29:37.770 align:start position:0% at least but I don't think they are 00:29:37.770 --> 00:29:42.010 align:start position:0% at least but I don't think they are saying<00:29:38.070> don't<00:29:38.790> fund<00:29:39.150> this<00:29:39.450> just<00:29:40.320> to<00:29:40.500> be<00:29:40.620> clear 00:29:42.010 --> 00:29:42.020 align:start position:0% saying don't fund this just to be clear 00:29:42.020 --> 00:29:43.970 align:start position:0% saying don't fund this just to be clear but<00:29:43.020> but<00:29:43.230> I<00:29:43.260> think<00:29:43.320> what<00:29:43.560> the<00:29:43.650> mayor<00:29:43.800> is<00:29:43.860> saying 00:29:43.970 --> 00:29:43.980 align:start position:0% but but I think what the mayor is saying 00:29:43.980 --> 00:29:45.770 align:start position:0% but but I think what the mayor is saying is<00:29:44.340> that<00:29:44.520> if<00:29:44.730> we<00:29:44.760> would<00:29:45.150> read<00:29:45.390> that<00:29:45.570> letter 00:29:45.770 --> 00:29:45.780 align:start position:0% is that if we would read that letter 00:29:45.780 --> 00:29:48.260 align:start position:0% is that if we would read that letter discuss<00:29:46.410> those<00:29:46.590> concerns<00:29:47.040> and<00:29:47.280> decide<00:29:47.820> at 00:29:48.260 --> 00:29:48.270 align:start position:0% discuss those concerns and decide at 00:29:48.270 --> 00:29:50.510 align:start position:0% discuss those concerns and decide at some<00:29:48.720> future<00:29:48.870> point<00:29:49.290> that<00:29:50.160> we<00:29:50.250> wanted<00:29:50.460> to 00:29:50.510 --> 00:29:50.520 align:start position:0% some future point that we wanted to 00:29:50.520 --> 00:29:52.340 align:start position:0% some future point that we wanted to change<00:29:50.610> the<00:29:50.850> funding<00:29:51.330> then<00:29:51.690> that<00:29:52.110> would 00:29:52.340 --> 00:29:52.350 align:start position:0% change the funding then that would 00:29:52.350 --> 00:29:55.190 align:start position:0% change the funding then that would simply<00:29:52.770> be<00:29:52.800> an<00:29:53.510> item<00:29:54.510> that<00:29:54.720> would<00:29:54.810> not<00:29:54.960> receive 00:29:55.190 --> 00:29:55.200 align:start position:0% simply be an item that would not receive 00:29:55.200 --> 00:29:56.480 align:start position:0% simply be an item that would not receive funding<00:29:55.530> and<00:29:55.680> that<00:29:55.770> funding<00:29:56.100> would<00:29:56.220> fall 00:29:56.480 --> 00:29:56.490 align:start position:0% funding and that funding would fall 00:29:56.490 --> 00:29:57.950 align:start position:0% funding and that funding would fall either<00:29:56.820> to<00:29:57.030> the<00:29:57.120> bottom<00:29:57.330> line<00:29:57.510> or<00:29:57.630> to<00:29:57.720> another 00:29:57.950 --> 00:29:57.960 align:start position:0% either to the bottom line or to another 00:29:57.960 --> 00:30:00.430 align:start position:0% either to the bottom line or to another purpose<00:29:58.350> in<00:29:58.590> the<00:29:58.710> budget<00:29:59.010> correct<00:29:59.400> correct 00:30:00.430 --> 00:30:00.440 align:start position:0% purpose in the budget correct correct 00:30:00.440 --> 00:30:02.630 align:start position:0% purpose in the budget correct correct I'd<00:30:01.440> be<00:30:01.560> okay<00:30:01.800> with<00:30:01.830> them<00:30:02.130> and<00:30:02.310> this<00:30:02.430> was<00:30:02.610> a 00:30:02.630 --> 00:30:02.640 align:start position:0% I'd be okay with them and this was a 00:30:02.640 --> 00:30:04.070 align:start position:0% I'd be okay with them and this was a letter<00:30:02.880> to<00:30:03.060> the<00:30:03.180> Attorney<00:30:03.330> General<00:30:03.630> of<00:30:03.990> the 00:30:04.070 --> 00:30:04.080 align:start position:0% letter to the Attorney General of the 00:30:04.080 --> 00:30:06.470 align:start position:0% letter to the Attorney General of the state<00:30:04.140> of<00:30:04.410> Kansas<00:30:04.590> and<00:30:05.100> so<00:30:05.280> we're<00:30:05.910> looking<00:30:06.210> for 00:30:06.470 --> 00:30:06.480 align:start position:0% state of Kansas and so we're looking for 00:30:06.480 --> 00:30:10.700 align:start position:0% state of Kansas and so we're looking for an<00:30:06.750> opinion<00:30:07.200> which<00:30:07.650> could<00:30:07.860> then<00:30:07.890> be<00:30:09.560> it<00:30:10.560> could 00:30:10.700 --> 00:30:10.710 align:start position:0% an opinion which could then be it could 00:30:10.710 --> 00:30:14.240 align:start position:0% an opinion which could then be it could be<00:30:10.770> decisive<00:30:11.510> yes<00:30:12.510> Commissioner<00:30:12.960> Kane<00:30:13.220> well<00:30:14.220> I 00:30:14.240 --> 00:30:14.250 align:start position:0% be decisive yes Commissioner Kane well I 00:30:14.250 --> 00:30:19.190 align:start position:0% be decisive yes Commissioner Kane well I got<00:30:14.970> it<00:30:15.180> and<00:30:16.760> for<00:30:17.760> that<00:30:17.880> amount<00:30:18.120> of<00:30:18.270> money<00:30:18.420> and 00:30:19.190 --> 00:30:19.200 align:start position:0% got it and for that amount of money and 00:30:19.200 --> 00:30:21.170 align:start position:0% got it and for that amount of money and with<00:30:19.440> the<00:30:19.470> concern<00:30:19.950> from<00:30:20.250> the<00:30:20.310> other<00:30:20.550> folks<00:30:20.910> I 00:30:21.170 --> 00:30:21.180 align:start position:0% with the concern from the other folks I 00:30:21.180 --> 00:30:23.450 align:start position:0% with the concern from the other folks I think<00:30:21.660> we<00:30:22.230> do<00:30:22.410> need<00:30:22.620> to<00:30:22.650> take<00:30:22.860> a<00:30:22.920> serious<00:30:23.310> look 00:30:23.450 --> 00:30:23.460 align:start position:0% think we do need to take a serious look 00:30:23.460 --> 00:30:27.200 align:start position:0% think we do need to take a serious look at<00:30:23.700> it<00:30:24.890> you<00:30:25.890> know<00:30:25.980> normally<00:30:26.370> we<00:30:26.490> say<00:30:26.730> what<00:30:26.970> are 00:30:27.200 --> 00:30:27.210 align:start position:0% at it you know normally we say what are 00:30:27.210 --> 00:30:29.420 align:start position:0% at it you know normally we say what are the<00:30:27.390> surrounding<00:30:27.840> municipalities<00:30:27.960> doing<00:30:28.800> an 00:30:29.420 --> 00:30:29.430 align:start position:0% the surrounding municipalities doing an 00:30:29.430 --> 00:30:33.410 align:start position:0% the surrounding municipalities doing an event<00:30:29.730> like<00:30:29.940> this<00:30:30.180> so<00:30:31.100> yes<00:30:32.100> I<00:30:32.280> think<00:30:32.340> that<00:30:32.610> at 00:30:33.410 --> 00:30:33.420 align:start position:0% event like this so yes I think that at 00:30:33.420 --> 00:30:35.060 align:start position:0% event like this so yes I think that at first<00:30:33.840> blush<00:30:34.080> it<00:30:34.290> looks<00:30:34.320> great<00:30:34.680> but<00:30:34.920> I<00:30:34.950> would 00:30:35.060 --> 00:30:35.070 align:start position:0% first blush it looks great but I would 00:30:35.070 --> 00:30:40.630 align:start position:0% first blush it looks great but I would like<00:30:35.400> to<00:30:35.460> see<00:30:35.820> what<00:30:36.360> the<00:30:36.480> opinion<00:30:36.900> comes<00:30:37.080> back 00:30:40.630 --> 00:30:40.640 align:start position:0% 00:30:40.640 --> 00:30:43.520 align:start position:0% yes<00:30:41.640> Commissioner<00:30:42.030> markley<00:30:42.360> I'm<00:30:43.200> just<00:30:43.410> gonna 00:30:43.520 --> 00:30:43.530 align:start position:0% yes Commissioner markley I'm just gonna 00:30:43.530 --> 00:30:45.860 align:start position:0% yes Commissioner markley I'm just gonna say<00:30:43.770> can<00:30:44.010> we<00:30:44.070> obviously<00:30:44.910> we're<00:30:45.450> kind<00:30:45.630> of<00:30:45.690> on<00:30:45.840> a 00:30:45.860 --> 00:30:45.870 align:start position:0% say can we obviously we're kind of on a 00:30:45.870 --> 00:30:47.840 align:start position:0% say can we obviously we're kind of on a tight<00:30:45.960> schedule<00:30:46.140> with<00:30:46.650> the<00:30:46.740> budget<00:30:47.040> so<00:30:47.370> can<00:30:47.730> we 00:30:47.840 --> 00:30:47.850 align:start position:0% tight schedule with the budget so can we 00:30:47.850 --> 00:30:49.850 align:start position:0% tight schedule with the budget so can we put<00:30:48.030> it<00:30:48.150> in<00:30:48.210> the<00:30:48.300> budget<00:30:48.480> and<00:30:48.810> then<00:30:49.020> require<00:30:49.590> to 00:30:49.850 --> 00:30:49.860 align:start position:0% put it in the budget and then require to 00:30:49.860 --> 00:30:51.890 align:start position:0% put it in the budget and then require to come<00:30:50.100> before<00:30:50.280> a<00:30:50.520> Standing<00:30:51.060> Committee<00:30:51.360> for 00:30:51.890 --> 00:30:51.900 align:start position:0% come before a Standing Committee for 00:30:51.900 --> 00:30:54.200 align:start position:0% come before a Standing Committee for further<00:30:52.500> discussion<00:30:53.190> based<00:30:53.490> on<00:30:53.730> this<00:30:53.850> last 00:30:54.200 --> 00:30:54.210 align:start position:0% further discussion based on this last 00:30:54.210 --> 00:30:56.270 align:start position:0% further discussion based on this last minute<00:30:54.420> information<00:30:55.170> so<00:30:55.830> we<00:30:55.920> can<00:30:56.100> make<00:30:56.250> sure 00:30:56.270 --> 00:30:56.280 align:start position:0% minute information so we can make sure 00:30:56.280 --> 00:30:59.870 align:start position:0% minute information so we can make sure we<00:30:56.640> know<00:30:56.760> what's<00:30:56.940> going<00:30:57.180> on<00:30:57.360> in<00:30:58.580> you<00:30:59.580> can 00:30:59.870 --> 00:30:59.880 align:start position:0% we know what's going on in you can 00:30:59.880 --> 00:31:02.240 align:start position:0% we know what's going on in you can though<00:31:00.360> what<00:31:00.960> we<00:31:01.140> would<00:31:01.350> need<00:31:01.500> to<00:31:01.560> do<00:31:01.830> because 00:31:02.240 --> 00:31:02.250 align:start position:0% though what we would need to do because 00:31:02.250 --> 00:31:03.770 align:start position:0% though what we would need to do because the<00:31:02.550> district<00:31:02.910> attorney<00:31:03.120> is<00:31:03.270> an<00:31:03.360> elected 00:31:03.770 --> 00:31:03.780 align:start position:0% the district attorney is an elected 00:31:03.780 --> 00:31:05.840 align:start position:0% the district attorney is an elected official<00:31:03.870> so<00:31:04.530> when<00:31:04.710> we<00:31:04.890> approve<00:31:05.250> his<00:31:05.430> budget 00:31:05.840 --> 00:31:05.850 align:start position:0% official so when we approve his budget 00:31:05.850 --> 00:31:09.980 align:start position:0% official so when we approve his budget it<00:31:05.970> is<00:31:06.090> his<00:31:06.330> budget<00:31:06.720> to<00:31:06.840> utilize<00:31:07.970> I<00:31:08.970> would<00:31:09.750> say 00:31:09.980 --> 00:31:09.990 align:start position:0% it is his budget to utilize I would say 00:31:09.990 --> 00:31:11.510 align:start position:0% it is his budget to utilize I would say that<00:31:10.170> we<00:31:10.260> would<00:31:10.440> need<00:31:10.590> to<00:31:10.740> put<00:31:10.950> it<00:31:11.070> into<00:31:11.400> the 00:31:11.510 --> 00:31:11.520 align:start position:0% that we would need to put it into the 00:31:11.520 --> 00:31:13.550 align:start position:0% that we would need to put it into the county<00:31:12.000> budget<00:31:12.240> but<00:31:12.840> were<00:31:12.960> you<00:31:12.990> and<00:31:13.110> hold<00:31:13.410> it 00:31:13.550 --> 00:31:13.560 align:start position:0% county budget but were you and hold it 00:31:13.560 --> 00:31:17.050 align:start position:0% county budget but were you and hold it in<00:31:13.680> a<00:31:13.740> separate<00:31:14.190> fund<00:31:14.520> are<00:31:15.240> not<00:31:15.510> fun<00:31:15.780> to<00:31:15.960> count 00:31:17.050 --> 00:31:17.060 align:start position:0% in a separate fund are not fun to count 00:31:17.060 --> 00:31:20.320 align:start position:0% in a separate fund are not fun to count so<00:31:18.060> it<00:31:18.240> would<00:31:18.360> not<00:31:18.510> be<00:31:18.570> part<00:31:19.200> of<00:31:19.350> that<00:31:19.560> budget 00:31:20.320 --> 00:31:20.330 align:start position:0% so it would not be part of that budget 00:31:20.330 --> 00:31:23.330 align:start position:0% so it would not be part of that budget until<00:31:21.330> such<00:31:21.600> time<00:31:21.960> that<00:31:21.990> you<00:31:22.590> authorize<00:31:23.310> a 00:31:23.330 --> 00:31:23.340 align:start position:0% until such time that you authorize a 00:31:23.340 --> 00:31:25.370 align:start position:0% until such time that you authorize a revision<00:31:23.910> to<00:31:23.940> transfer<00:31:24.660> it<00:31:24.750> over<00:31:25.050> so<00:31:25.200> if<00:31:25.260> you 00:31:25.370 --> 00:31:25.380 align:start position:0% revision to transfer it over so if you 00:31:25.380 --> 00:31:26.720 align:start position:0% revision to transfer it over so if you wanted<00:31:25.560> to<00:31:25.650> have<00:31:25.740> that<00:31:25.770> kind<00:31:26.130> of<00:31:26.190> control<00:31:26.370> of 00:31:26.720 --> 00:31:26.730 align:start position:0% wanted to have that kind of control of 00:31:26.730 --> 00:31:28.940 align:start position:0% wanted to have that kind of control of it<00:31:26.880> because<00:31:27.570> if<00:31:27.720> we<00:31:27.870> were<00:31:27.990> to<00:31:28.110> move<00:31:28.410> forward<00:31:28.830> as 00:31:28.940 --> 00:31:28.950 align:start position:0% it because if we were to move forward as 00:31:28.950 --> 00:31:31.520 align:start position:0% it because if we were to move forward as is<00:31:29.130> up<00:31:29.280> here<00:31:29.550> and<00:31:29.670> we<00:31:29.820> approve<00:31:30.150> it<00:31:30.320> September<00:31:31.320> 1 00:31:31.520 --> 00:31:31.530 align:start position:0% is up here and we approve it September 1 00:31:31.530 --> 00:31:33.950 align:start position:0% is up here and we approve it September 1 that<00:31:32.430> money<00:31:32.670> goes<00:31:32.910> into<00:31:33.210> his<00:31:33.270> budget<00:31:33.720> and<00:31:33.810> he 00:31:33.950 --> 00:31:33.960 align:start position:0% that money goes into his budget and he 00:31:33.960 --> 00:31:35.750 align:start position:0% that money goes into his budget and he would<00:31:34.110> have<00:31:34.320> his<00:31:34.590> he<00:31:35.190> would<00:31:35.370> have<00:31:35.520> the 00:31:35.750 --> 00:31:35.760 align:start position:0% would have his he would have the 00:31:35.760 --> 00:31:37.850 align:start position:0% would have his he would have the correction<00:31:36.660> or<00:31:36.780> he<00:31:36.900> has<00:31:37.020> his<00:31:37.230> authority<00:31:37.740> to 00:31:37.850 --> 00:31:37.860 align:start position:0% correction or he has his authority to 00:31:37.860 --> 00:31:39.020 align:start position:0% correction or he has his authority to spend<00:31:38.100> that<00:31:38.220> money<00:31:38.370> how<00:31:38.580> he<00:31:38.640> deems 00:31:39.020 --> 00:31:39.030 align:start position:0% spend that money how he deems 00:31:39.030 --> 00:31:40.440 align:start position:0% spend that money how he deems appropriate 00:31:40.440 --> 00:31:40.450 align:start position:0% appropriate 00:31:40.450 --> 00:31:42.990 align:start position:0% appropriate I<00:31:40.950> think<00:31:41.950> if<00:31:42.070> we<00:31:42.220> would<00:31:42.340> hold<00:31:42.670> that<00:31:42.760> in 00:31:42.990 --> 00:31:43.000 align:start position:0% I think if we would hold that in 00:31:43.000 --> 00:31:45.300 align:start position:0% I think if we would hold that in abeyance<00:31:43.120> or<00:31:43.600> in<00:31:44.170> reserve<00:31:44.500> somehow<00:31:45.040> I<00:31:45.220> think 00:31:45.300 --> 00:31:45.310 align:start position:0% abeyance or in reserve somehow I think 00:31:45.310 --> 00:31:46.710 align:start position:0% abeyance or in reserve somehow I think that's<00:31:45.520> the<00:31:45.640> appropriate<00:31:45.880> way<00:31:46.090> to<00:31:46.180> go<00:31:46.420> with<00:31:46.570> it 00:31:46.710 --> 00:31:46.720 align:start position:0% that's the appropriate way to go with it 00:31:46.720 --> 00:31:57.050 align:start position:0% that's the appropriate way to go with it I<00:31:54.660> think<00:31:55.660> you<00:31:55.720> have<00:31:55.870> your<00:31:55.990> direction<00:31:56.260> on<00:31:56.530> this 00:31:57.050 --> 00:31:57.060 align:start position:0% I think you have your direction on this 00:31:57.060 --> 00:31:59.670 align:start position:0% I think you have your direction on this okay<00:31:58.060> so<00:31:58.120> we<00:31:58.570> move<00:31:58.720> forward<00:31:59.020> with<00:31:59.230> it<00:31:59.410> but 00:31:59.670 --> 00:31:59.680 align:start position:0% okay so we move forward with it but 00:31:59.680 --> 00:32:03.950 align:start position:0% okay so we move forward with it but we're<00:31:59.800> putting<00:31:59.980> it<00:32:00.130> into<00:32:00.280> a<00:32:01.020> special<00:32:02.020> account 00:32:03.950 --> 00:32:03.960 align:start position:0% we're putting it into a special account 00:32:03.960 --> 00:32:07.710 align:start position:0% we're putting it into a special account outside<00:32:04.960> of<00:32:05.170> the<00:32:05.260> DA's<00:32:06.040> office<00:32:06.360> and<00:32:07.360> tell<00:32:07.540> such 00:32:07.710 --> 00:32:07.720 align:start position:0% outside of the DA's office and tell such 00:32:07.720 --> 00:32:09.300 align:start position:0% outside of the DA's office and tell such time<00:32:07.990> you<00:32:08.170> give<00:32:08.350> us<00:32:08.440> the<00:32:08.560> go-ahead<00:32:08.710> to<00:32:08.950> move<00:32:09.190> it 00:32:09.300 --> 00:32:09.310 align:start position:0% time you give us the go-ahead to move it 00:32:09.310 --> 00:32:13.310 align:start position:0% time you give us the go-ahead to move it into<00:32:09.460> it<00:32:11.370> thank<00:32:12.370> you 00:32:13.310 --> 00:32:13.320 align:start position:0% into it thank you 00:32:13.320 --> 00:32:17.670 align:start position:0% into it thank you next<00:32:14.320> slide<00:32:14.530> please<00:32:16.050> Dupree<00:32:17.050> just<00:32:17.320> texted<00:32:17.620> me 00:32:17.670 --> 00:32:17.680 align:start position:0% next slide please Dupree just texted me 00:32:17.680 --> 00:32:20.880 align:start position:0% next slide please Dupree just texted me and<00:32:17.740> said<00:32:17.800> he<00:32:17.950> could<00:32:18.100> come<00:32:18.280> over<00:32:18.310> now<00:32:19.290> but<00:32:20.290> well 00:32:20.880 --> 00:32:20.890 align:start position:0% and said he could come over now but well 00:32:20.890 --> 00:32:22.800 align:start position:0% and said he could come over now but well it<00:32:21.130> would<00:32:21.310> still<00:32:21.550> depend<00:32:22.030> upon<00:32:22.330> what<00:32:22.660> we'd 00:32:22.800 --> 00:32:22.810 align:start position:0% it would still depend upon what we'd 00:32:22.810 --> 00:32:24.360 align:start position:0% it would still depend upon what we'd hear<00:32:23.050> from<00:32:23.170> the<00:32:23.290> Attorney<00:32:23.350> General<00:32:24.010> I<00:32:24.100> think 00:32:24.360 --> 00:32:24.370 align:start position:0% hear from the Attorney General I think 00:32:24.370 --> 00:32:26.040 align:start position:0% hear from the Attorney General I think just<00:32:24.670> Johnny<00:32:24.820> what<00:32:25.060> he<00:32:25.120> takes<00:32:25.300> me<00:32:25.480> relaying<00:32:25.900> a 00:32:26.040 --> 00:32:26.050 align:start position:0% just Johnny what he takes me relaying a 00:32:26.050 --> 00:32:27.960 align:start position:0% just Johnny what he takes me relaying a message<00:32:26.370> telling<00:32:27.370> that<00:32:27.490> no<00:32:27.550> we've<00:32:27.820> already 00:32:27.960 --> 00:32:27.970 align:start position:0% message telling that no we've already 00:32:27.970 --> 00:32:30.990 align:start position:0% message telling that no we've already decided<00:32:28.570> to<00:32:29.040> put<00:32:30.040> into<00:32:30.340> a<00:32:30.370> separate<00:32:30.760> account 00:32:30.990 --> 00:32:31.000 align:start position:0% decided to put into a separate account 00:32:31.000 --> 00:32:33.480 align:start position:0% decided to put into a separate account which<00:32:31.300> will<00:32:31.450> be<00:32:31.570> decided<00:32:32.080> after<00:32:32.770> we<00:32:33.190> receive 00:32:33.480 --> 00:32:33.490 align:start position:0% which will be decided after we receive 00:32:33.490 --> 00:32:39.800 align:start position:0% which will be decided after we receive full<00:32:34.360> opinions<00:32:35.260> from<00:32:35.410> the<00:32:36.150> Attorney<00:32:37.150> General 00:32:39.800 --> 00:32:39.810 align:start position:0% 00:32:39.810 --> 00:32:42.360 align:start position:0% okay<00:32:40.810> the<00:32:40.960> next<00:32:41.230> items<00:32:41.590> are<00:32:41.830> under 00:32:42.360 --> 00:32:42.370 align:start position:0% okay the next items are under 00:32:42.370 --> 00:32:44.640 align:start position:0% okay the next items are under consideration<00:32:42.730> I<00:32:43.360> would<00:32:43.390> say<00:32:43.690> because<00:32:44.140> there 00:32:44.640 --> 00:32:44.650 align:start position:0% consideration I would say because there 00:32:44.650 --> 00:32:47.400 align:start position:0% consideration I would say because there were<00:32:44.740> some<00:32:44.920> attention<00:32:45.310> about<00:32:45.670> these<00:32:46.320> but<00:32:47.320> we 00:32:47.400 --> 00:32:47.410 align:start position:0% were some attention about these but we 00:32:47.410 --> 00:32:48.960 align:start position:0% were some attention about these but we did<00:32:47.530> not<00:32:47.650> have<00:32:47.830> any<00:32:47.980> consensus<00:32:48.640> from<00:32:48.760> the 00:32:48.960 --> 00:32:48.970 align:start position:0% did not have any consensus from the 00:32:48.970 --> 00:32:50.490 align:start position:0% did not have any consensus from the governing<00:32:49.270> body<00:32:49.480> we're<00:32:49.720> at<00:32:49.960> so<00:32:50.290> I'm<00:32:50.380> gonna 00:32:50.490 --> 00:32:50.500 align:start position:0% governing body we're at so I'm gonna 00:32:50.500 --> 00:32:53.760 align:start position:0% governing body we're at so I'm gonna start<00:32:50.770> with<00:32:50.920> the<00:32:51.070> Smid<00:32:52.020> one<00:32:53.020> thing<00:32:53.230> I<00:32:53.350> did<00:32:53.560> find 00:32:53.760 --> 00:32:53.770 align:start position:0% start with the Smid one thing I did find 00:32:53.770 --> 00:32:56.490 align:start position:0% start with the Smid one thing I did find probably<00:32:54.220> with<00:32:54.400> that<00:32:54.430> that<00:32:54.820> it<00:32:54.970> I<00:32:55.260> just<00:32:56.260> wanted 00:32:56.490 --> 00:32:56.500 align:start position:0% probably with that that it I just wanted 00:32:56.500 --> 00:32:58.140 align:start position:0% probably with that that it I just wanted to<00:32:56.590> show<00:32:56.800> you<00:32:56.830> at<00:32:57.130> least<00:32:57.340> the<00:32:57.460> numbers<00:32:57.970> behind 00:32:58.140 --> 00:32:58.150 align:start position:0% to show you at least the numbers behind 00:32:58.150 --> 00:33:00.470 align:start position:0% to show you at least the numbers behind that<00:32:58.480> Reggie<00:32:58.810> if<00:32:58.990> you'll<00:32:59.110> hit<00:32:59.230> the<00:32:59.440> next<00:32:59.980> slide 00:33:00.470 --> 00:33:00.480 align:start position:0% that Reggie if you'll hit the next slide 00:33:00.480 --> 00:33:03.600 align:start position:0% that Reggie if you'll hit the next slide it<00:33:01.480> currently<00:33:02.110> I<00:33:02.440> thought<00:33:03.160> it<00:33:03.250> would<00:33:03.340> be<00:33:03.430> worth 00:33:03.600 --> 00:33:03.610 align:start position:0% it currently I thought it would be worth 00:33:03.610 --> 00:33:06.210 align:start position:0% it currently I thought it would be worth this<00:33:03.850> just<00:33:04.180> showing<00:33:04.450> so<00:33:04.690> that<00:33:04.900> if<00:33:05.710> you<00:33:05.890> look<00:33:06.070> in 00:33:06.210 --> 00:33:06.220 align:start position:0% this just showing so that if you look in 00:33:06.220 --> 00:33:08.340 align:start position:0% this just showing so that if you look in the<00:33:06.430> first<00:33:06.880> column<00:33:07.300> you<00:33:07.360> see<00:33:07.450> it's<00:33:07.720> the<00:33:07.840> 2018 00:33:08.340 --> 00:33:08.350 align:start position:0% the first column you see it's the 2018 00:33:08.350 --> 00:33:10.680 align:start position:0% the first column you see it's the 2018 mil<00:33:08.950> rate<00:33:09.190> for<00:33:09.670> the<00:33:09.820> Smid<00:33:10.090> district<00:33:10.540> was 00:33:10.680 --> 00:33:10.690 align:start position:0% mil rate for the Smid district was 00:33:10.690 --> 00:33:14.610 align:start position:0% mil rate for the Smid district was twelve<00:33:10.990> point<00:33:11.260> six<00:33:11.470> three<00:33:11.620> five<00:33:12.570> then<00:33:13.570> you<00:33:14.440> all 00:33:14.610 --> 00:33:14.620 align:start position:0% twelve point six three five then you all 00:33:14.620 --> 00:33:17.310 align:start position:0% twelve point six three five then you all set<00:33:15.160> a<00:33:15.430> maximum<00:33:16.000> mil<00:33:16.390> rate<00:33:16.660> for<00:33:16.960> the<00:33:17.050> Smith 00:33:17.310 --> 00:33:17.320 align:start position:0% set a maximum mil rate for the Smith 00:33:17.320 --> 00:33:20.370 align:start position:0% set a maximum mil rate for the Smith District<00:33:17.800> at<00:33:17.980> 12<00:33:18.340> they<00:33:19.270> requested<00:33:20.020> what's<00:33:20.230> in 00:33:20.370 --> 00:33:20.380 align:start position:0% District at 12 they requested what's in 00:33:20.380 --> 00:33:22.140 align:start position:0% District at 12 they requested what's in the<00:33:20.500> third<00:33:20.710> column<00:33:21.010> of<00:33:21.340> eleven<00:33:21.700> point<00:33:21.940> O<00:33:22.090> two 00:33:22.140 --> 00:33:22.150 align:start position:0% the third column of eleven point O two 00:33:22.150 --> 00:33:22.830 align:start position:0% the third column of eleven point O two six 00:33:22.830 --> 00:33:22.840 align:start position:0% six 00:33:22.840 --> 00:33:26.340 align:start position:0% six okay<00:33:23.620> so<00:33:23.680> house<00:33:23.950> is<00:33:24.250> kind<00:33:24.760> of<00:33:24.880> come<00:33:25.060> down<00:33:25.200> so<00:33:26.200> in 00:33:26.340 --> 00:33:26.350 align:start position:0% okay so house is kind of come down so in 00:33:26.350 --> 00:33:28.230 align:start position:0% okay so house is kind of come down so in the<00:33:26.500> if<00:33:26.680> we<00:33:26.740> were<00:33:27.040> to<00:33:27.190> adopt<00:33:27.400> it<00:33:27.670> at<00:33:27.790> last 00:33:28.230 --> 00:33:28.240 align:start position:0% the if we were to adopt it at last 00:33:28.240 --> 00:33:30.060 align:start position:0% the if we were to adopt it at last year's<00:33:28.600> mill<00:33:28.870> are<00:33:29.140> this<00:33:29.320> year's<00:33:29.590> mill<00:33:29.860> rate 00:33:30.060 --> 00:33:30.070 align:start position:0% year's mill are this year's mill rate 00:33:30.070 --> 00:33:32.340 align:start position:0% year's mill are this year's mill rate 2018<00:33:30.820> it<00:33:31.450> would<00:33:31.570> generate<00:33:31.720> two<00:33:32.080> hundred 00:33:32.340 --> 00:33:32.350 align:start position:0% 2018 it would generate two hundred 00:33:32.350 --> 00:33:34.560 align:start position:0% 2018 it would generate two hundred thirty<00:33:32.530> nine<00:33:32.620> thousand<00:33:33.340> you<00:33:34.180> did<00:33:34.330> at<00:33:34.450> the 00:33:34.560 --> 00:33:34.570 align:start position:0% thirty nine thousand you did at the 00:33:34.570 --> 00:33:36.990 align:start position:0% thirty nine thousand you did at the twelve<00:33:34.840> it<00:33:35.230> would<00:33:35.380> be<00:33:35.440> 227<00:33:36.370> if<00:33:36.490> you<00:33:36.610> did<00:33:36.760> it<00:33:36.880> at 00:33:36.990 --> 00:33:37.000 align:start position:0% twelve it would be 227 if you did it at 00:33:37.000 --> 00:33:40.110 align:start position:0% twelve it would be 227 if you did it at what<00:33:37.240> they've<00:33:37.420> requested<00:33:37.780> its<00:33:38.110> 208<00:33:39.120> unify 00:33:40.110 --> 00:33:40.120 align:start position:0% what they've requested its 208 unify 00:33:40.120 --> 00:33:42.080 align:start position:0% what they've requested its 208 unify governments<00:33:40.750> currently<00:33:41.260> proposed<00:33:41.740> but 00:33:42.080 --> 00:33:42.090 align:start position:0% governments currently proposed but 00:33:42.090 --> 00:33:44.940 align:start position:0% governments currently proposed but $100,000<00:33:43.090> into<00:33:43.300> their<00:33:43.480> budget<00:33:43.900> they<00:33:44.560> received 00:33:44.940 --> 00:33:44.950 align:start position:0% $100,000 into their budget they received 00:33:44.950 --> 00:33:47.610 align:start position:0% $100,000 into their budget they received other<00:33:45.220> funding<00:33:45.880> from<00:33:46.240> sources<00:33:46.900> such<00:33:47.050> as<00:33:47.260> the 00:33:47.610 --> 00:33:47.620 align:start position:0% other funding from sources such as the 00:33:47.620 --> 00:33:53.250 align:start position:0% other funding from sources such as the BPU<00:33:48.040> and<00:33:48.880> or<00:33:49.180> in<00:33:49.600> the<00:33:50.550> K<00:33:51.550> you<00:33:52.140> Strawberry<00:33:53.140> Hill 00:33:53.250 --> 00:33:53.260 align:start position:0% BPU and or in the K you Strawberry Hill 00:33:53.260 --> 00:33:54.040 align:start position:0% BPU and or in the K you Strawberry Hill campus 00:33:54.040 --> 00:33:54.050 align:start position:0% campus 00:33:54.050 --> 00:33:56.420 align:start position:0% campus combined<00:33:55.050> equal<00:33:55.470> around<00:33:55.680> forty<00:33:56.010> three<00:33:56.220> five 00:33:56.420 --> 00:33:56.430 align:start position:0% combined equal around forty three five 00:33:56.430 --> 00:33:57.950 align:start position:0% combined equal around forty three five there<00:33:56.730> might<00:33:56.880> be<00:33:56.910> something<00:33:57.330> else<00:33:57.420> in<00:33:57.630> there 00:33:57.950 --> 00:33:57.960 align:start position:0% there might be something else in there 00:33:57.960 --> 00:34:01.100 align:start position:0% there might be something else in there so<00:33:58.800> there's<00:33:59.490> the<00:33:59.670> total<00:33:59.880> revenues<00:34:00.390> you<00:34:00.630> see<00:34:00.840> in 00:34:01.100 --> 00:34:01.110 align:start position:0% so there's the total revenues you see in 00:34:01.110 --> 00:34:03.800 align:start position:0% so there's the total revenues you see in each<00:34:01.740> of<00:34:01.950> these<00:34:02.040> scenarios<00:34:02.310> and<00:34:03.030> then<00:34:03.630> they 00:34:03.800 --> 00:34:03.810 align:start position:0% each of these scenarios and then they 00:34:03.810 --> 00:34:05.480 align:start position:0% each of these scenarios and then they have<00:34:03.990> their<00:34:04.140> proposed<00:34:04.590> budget<00:34:05.010> that<00:34:05.040> they<00:34:05.280> put 00:34:05.480 --> 00:34:05.490 align:start position:0% have their proposed budget that they put 00:34:05.490 --> 00:34:07.790 align:start position:0% have their proposed budget that they put out<00:34:05.640> at<00:34:05.790> three<00:34:05.940> sixty<00:34:06.330> four<00:34:06.510> one<00:34:06.720> hundred<00:34:06.870> so 00:34:07.790 --> 00:34:07.800 align:start position:0% out at three sixty four one hundred so 00:34:07.800 --> 00:34:11.120 align:start position:0% out at three sixty four one hundred so the<00:34:07.950> request<00:34:08.370> is<00:34:08.820> to<00:34:09.150> move<00:34:09.990> the<00:34:10.350> to<00:34:10.860> use<00:34:11.100> the 00:34:11.120 --> 00:34:11.130 align:start position:0% the request is to move the to use the 00:34:11.130 --> 00:34:14.530 align:start position:0% the request is to move the to use the third<00:34:11.880> column<00:34:12.210> over<00:34:12.690> at<00:34:12.929> the<00:34:13.260> lower<00:34:13.470> mill<00:34:13.830> rate 00:34:14.530 --> 00:34:14.540 align:start position:0% third column over at the lower mill rate 00:34:14.540 --> 00:34:16.940 align:start position:0% third column over at the lower mill rate lowering<00:34:15.540> it<00:34:15.690> by<00:34:15.840> one<00:34:16.110> and<00:34:16.200> a<00:34:16.290> half<00:34:16.440> mil<00:34:16.710> from 00:34:16.940 --> 00:34:16.950 align:start position:0% lowering it by one and a half mil from 00:34:16.950 --> 00:34:19.280 align:start position:0% lowering it by one and a half mil from last<00:34:17.220> year<00:34:17.610> and<00:34:17.790> have<00:34:18.750> the<00:34:18.870> unified 00:34:19.280 --> 00:34:19.290 align:start position:0% last year and have the unified 00:34:19.290 --> 00:34:24.350 align:start position:0% last year and have the unified government<00:34:19.610> pay<00:34:20.610> additional<00:34:21.530> $25,000<00:34:23.240> so<00:34:24.240> as 00:34:24.350 --> 00:34:24.360 align:start position:0% government pay additional $25,000 so as 00:34:24.360 --> 00:34:26.120 align:start position:0% government pay additional $25,000 so as you're<00:34:24.480> considering<00:34:24.840> this<00:34:25.140> I<00:34:25.350> thought<00:34:25.590> you 00:34:26.120 --> 00:34:26.130 align:start position:0% you're considering this I thought you 00:34:26.130 --> 00:34:33.350 align:start position:0% you're considering this I thought you should<00:34:26.310> at<00:34:26.400> least<00:34:26.840> see<00:34:27.840> this<00:34:27.990> perspective<00:34:32.360> so 00:34:33.350 --> 00:34:33.360 align:start position:0% should at least see this perspective so 00:34:33.360 --> 00:34:39.919 align:start position:0% should at least see this perspective so mr.<00:34:33.720> mayor<00:34:33.929> a<00:34:34.080> question<00:34:34.770> about<00:34:34.890> this<00:34:35.220> sure<00:34:38.929> did 00:34:39.919 --> 00:34:39.929 align:start position:0% mr. mayor a question about this sure did 00:34:39.929 --> 00:34:42.440 align:start position:0% mr. mayor a question about this sure did you<00:34:40.050> just<00:34:40.260> say<00:34:40.500> that<00:34:40.530> the<00:34:41.460> dam<00:34:42.000> songster 00:34:42.440 --> 00:34:42.450 align:start position:0% you just say that the dam songster 00:34:42.450 --> 00:34:45.350 align:start position:0% you just say that the dam songster holders<00:34:42.750> group<00:34:43.080> just<00:34:44.010> get<00:34:44.490> an<00:34:44.790> additional 00:34:45.350 --> 00:34:45.360 align:start position:0% holders group just get an additional 00:34:45.360 --> 00:34:47.390 align:start position:0% holders group just get an additional thousand<00:34:46.080> dollar<00:34:46.200> grant<00:34:46.650> from<00:34:46.890> the<00:34:46.980> unified 00:34:47.390 --> 00:34:47.400 align:start position:0% thousand dollar grant from the unified 00:34:47.400 --> 00:34:49.970 align:start position:0% thousand dollar grant from the unified government<00:34:47.610> every<00:34:48.030> year<00:34:48.500> hundred<00:34:49.500> thousand 00:34:49.970 --> 00:34:49.980 align:start position:0% government every year hundred thousand 00:34:49.980 --> 00:34:52.430 align:start position:0% government every year hundred thousand we<00:34:50.070> give<00:34:50.220> a<00:34:50.250> we<00:34:51.000> are<00:34:51.179> not<00:34:51.330> part<00:34:51.750> of<00:34:51.840> the<00:34:51.960> Smid<00:34:52.230> we 00:34:52.430 --> 00:34:52.440 align:start position:0% we give a we are not part of the Smid we 00:34:52.440 --> 00:34:56.180 align:start position:0% we give a we are not part of the Smid we own<00:34:52.590> property<00:34:53.220> within<00:34:53.400> the<00:34:53.580> Smid<00:34:53.970> district<00:34:55.190> so 00:34:56.180 --> 00:34:56.190 align:start position:0% own property within the Smid district so 00:34:56.190 --> 00:34:58.370 align:start position:0% own property within the Smid district so years<00:34:56.880> ago<00:34:57.150> when<00:34:57.360> that<00:34:57.450> came<00:34:57.690> about<00:34:57.840> we<00:34:58.140> told 00:34:58.370 --> 00:34:58.380 align:start position:0% years ago when that came about we told 00:34:58.380 --> 00:35:01.430 align:start position:0% years ago when that came about we told them<00:34:58.500> we<00:34:58.620> were<00:34:58.710> not<00:34:58.890> going<00:34:59.100> to<00:34:59.420> just<00:35:00.420> be<00:35:00.510> given 00:35:01.430 --> 00:35:01.440 align:start position:0% them we were not going to just be given 00:35:01.440 --> 00:35:03.890 align:start position:0% them we were not going to just be given a<00:35:01.700> we're<00:35:02.700> not<00:35:02.790> gonna<00:35:02.910> pay<00:35:03.210> into<00:35:03.540> it<00:35:03.630> from<00:35:03.780> that 00:35:03.890 --> 00:35:03.900 align:start position:0% a we're not gonna pay into it from that 00:35:03.900 --> 00:35:05.660 align:start position:0% a we're not gonna pay into it from that perspective<00:35:04.110> but<00:35:04.770> we<00:35:04.920> will<00:35:05.100> pay<00:35:05.310> a<00:35:05.340> hundred 00:35:05.660 --> 00:35:05.670 align:start position:0% perspective but we will pay a hundred 00:35:05.670 --> 00:35:07.760 align:start position:0% perspective but we will pay a hundred thousand<00:35:06.240> dollars<00:35:06.540> and<00:35:06.780> that's<00:35:06.870> that<00:35:07.500> number 00:35:07.760 --> 00:35:07.770 align:start position:0% thousand dollars and that's that number 00:35:07.770 --> 00:35:10.910 align:start position:0% thousand dollars and that's that number has<00:35:08.010> changed<00:35:08.040> over<00:35:08.640> the<00:35:08.790> years<00:35:09.060> too<00:35:09.440> but<00:35:10.440> it's 00:35:10.910 --> 00:35:10.920 align:start position:0% has changed over the years too but it's 00:35:10.920 --> 00:35:13.820 align:start position:0% has changed over the years too but it's at<00:35:11.070> a<00:35:11.130> hundred<00:35:11.400> thousand<00:35:11.790> dollars<00:35:12.030> now<00:35:12.830> and 00:35:13.820 --> 00:35:13.830 align:start position:0% at a hundred thousand dollars now and 00:35:13.830 --> 00:35:15.740 align:start position:0% at a hundred thousand dollars now and that's<00:35:14.070> in<00:35:14.250> lieu<00:35:14.460> of<00:35:14.490> what<00:35:14.940> you<00:35:15.120> make<00:35:15.480> it<00:35:15.600> sound 00:35:15.740 --> 00:35:15.750 align:start position:0% that's in lieu of what you make it sound 00:35:15.750 --> 00:35:18.620 align:start position:0% that's in lieu of what you make it sound like<00:35:15.900> it's<00:35:16.170> in<00:35:16.320> lieu<00:35:16.470> of<00:35:16.500> something<00:35:17.210> it's<00:35:18.210> in 00:35:18.620 --> 00:35:18.630 align:start position:0% like it's in lieu of something it's in 00:35:18.630 --> 00:35:22.790 align:start position:0% like it's in lieu of something it's in lieu<00:35:18.930> of<00:35:18.960> paying<00:35:19.500> property<00:35:20.100> tax<00:35:20.660> because<00:35:21.660> as<00:35:21.960> a 00:35:22.790 --> 00:35:22.800 align:start position:0% lieu of paying property tax because as a 00:35:22.800 --> 00:35:25.400 align:start position:0% lieu of paying property tax because as a property<00:35:23.460> owner<00:35:23.550> within<00:35:24.060> the<00:35:24.420> Smid<00:35:24.840> we<00:35:25.170> no 00:35:25.400 --> 00:35:25.410 align:start position:0% property owner within the Smid we no 00:35:25.410 --> 00:35:27.500 align:start position:0% property owner within the Smid we no doubt<00:35:25.650> get<00:35:25.980> some<00:35:26.220> benefit<00:35:26.700> from<00:35:26.850> what<00:35:27.090> goes<00:35:27.270> on 00:35:27.500 --> 00:35:27.510 align:start position:0% doubt get some benefit from what goes on 00:35:27.510 --> 00:35:30.050 align:start position:0% doubt get some benefit from what goes on in<00:35:27.930> that<00:35:28.200> district<00:35:28.710> from<00:35:28.950> the<00:35:29.100> cleaning<00:35:29.790> that 00:35:30.050 --> 00:35:30.060 align:start position:0% in that district from the cleaning that 00:35:30.060 --> 00:35:34.100 align:start position:0% in that district from the cleaning that they<00:35:30.210> do<00:35:30.270> all<00:35:30.600> around<00:35:30.900> the<00:35:30.990> downtown<00:35:31.170> area<00:35:33.110> the 00:35:34.100 --> 00:35:34.110 align:start position:0% they do all around the downtown area the 00:35:34.110 --> 00:35:36.950 align:start position:0% they do all around the downtown area the added<00:35:34.350> security<00:35:34.500> that<00:35:35.130> they<00:35:35.280> do<00:35:35.340> so<00:35:35.910> and<00:35:36.300> it 00:35:36.950 --> 00:35:36.960 align:start position:0% added security that they do so and it 00:35:36.960 --> 00:35:39.020 align:start position:0% added security that they do so and it the<00:35:37.110> same<00:35:37.290> decision<00:35:37.710> the<00:35:37.800> BPU<00:35:38.160> made<00:35:38.550> and<00:35:38.820> the 00:35:39.020 --> 00:35:39.030 align:start position:0% the same decision the BPU made and the 00:35:39.030 --> 00:35:41.120 align:start position:0% the same decision the BPU made and the same<00:35:39.240> decision<00:35:39.720> that<00:35:39.750> ku's<00:35:40.440> making<00:35:40.860> coming 00:35:41.120 --> 00:35:41.130 align:start position:0% same decision that ku's making coming 00:35:41.130 --> 00:35:43.310 align:start position:0% same decision that ku's making coming down<00:35:41.310> here<00:35:41.610> since<00:35:41.880> they<00:35:42.210> are<00:35:42.390> non<00:35:42.900> taxable 00:35:43.310 --> 00:35:43.320 align:start position:0% down here since they are non taxable 00:35:43.320 --> 00:35:46.130 align:start position:0% down here since they are non taxable entities<00:35:44.100> they<00:35:44.850> would<00:35:45.060> not<00:35:45.210> have<00:35:45.420> to<00:35:45.570> pay<00:35:45.720> into 00:35:46.130 --> 00:35:46.140 align:start position:0% entities they would not have to pay into 00:35:46.140 --> 00:35:48.140 align:start position:0% entities they would not have to pay into it<00:35:46.290> but<00:35:46.560> they<00:35:46.740> make<00:35:46.980> a<00:35:47.010> payment<00:35:47.880> in<00:35:47.970> lieu<00:35:48.000> of 00:35:48.140 --> 00:35:48.150 align:start position:0% it but they make a payment in lieu of 00:35:48.150 --> 00:35:54.950 align:start position:0% it but they make a payment in lieu of that<00:35:48.330> tax<00:35:51.500> okay<00:35:52.850> and<00:35:53.850> did<00:35:54.180> they<00:35:54.270> get<00:35:54.420> any<00:35:54.660> other 00:35:54.950 --> 00:35:54.960 align:start position:0% that tax okay and did they get any other 00:35:54.960 --> 00:35:57.800 align:start position:0% that tax okay and did they get any other additional<00:35:55.530> money<00:35:56.190> besides<00:35:56.550> was<00:35:57.150> part<00:35:57.480> of<00:35:57.600> the 00:35:57.800 --> 00:35:57.810 align:start position:0% additional money besides was part of the 00:35:57.810 --> 00:36:00.870 align:start position:0% additional money besides was part of the SMED 00:36:00.870 --> 00:36:00.880 align:start position:0% 00:36:00.880 --> 00:36:03.699 align:start position:0% every<00:36:01.880> do<00:36:02.029> you<00:36:02.089> know<00:36:02.209> do<00:36:03.109> they<00:36:03.229> get<00:36:03.380> any<00:36:03.499> other 00:36:03.699 --> 00:36:03.709 align:start position:0% every do you know do they get any other 00:36:03.709 --> 00:36:07.390 align:start position:0% every do you know do they get any other revenue<00:36:04.249> sources<00:36:04.519> I<00:36:05.089> mean<00:36:05.630> they're<00:36:05.839> I<00:36:06.829> don't 00:36:07.390 --> 00:36:07.400 align:start position:0% revenue sources I mean they're I don't 00:36:07.400 --> 00:36:09.219 align:start position:0% revenue sources I mean they're I don't that<00:36:07.849> are<00:36:07.940> substantial<00:36:08.539> they<00:36:08.719> may<00:36:08.839> get<00:36:08.989> a<00:36:09.049> few 00:36:09.219 --> 00:36:09.229 align:start position:0% that are substantial they may get a few 00:36:09.229 --> 00:36:10.779 align:start position:0% that are substantial they may get a few thousand<00:36:09.739> from<00:36:09.890> something<00:36:10.339> but<00:36:10.519> I<00:36:10.549> don't<00:36:10.640> know 00:36:10.779 --> 00:36:10.789 align:start position:0% thousand from something but I don't know 00:36:10.789 --> 00:36:12.190 align:start position:0% thousand from something but I don't know that<00:36:10.849> there's<00:36:11.150> that<00:36:11.299> this<00:36:11.660> is<00:36:11.809> the<00:36:11.930> majority 00:36:12.190 --> 00:36:12.200 align:start position:0% that there's that this is the majority 00:36:12.200 --> 00:36:14.469 align:start position:0% that there's that this is the majority of<00:36:12.469> the<00:36:12.589> revenue<00:36:12.739> that<00:36:12.950> they<00:36:13.190> receive<00:36:13.549> so 00:36:14.469 --> 00:36:14.479 align:start position:0% of the revenue that they receive so 00:36:14.479 --> 00:36:16.599 align:start position:0% of the revenue that they receive so these<00:36:14.599> are<00:36:15.049> the<00:36:15.140> majority<00:36:15.440> it's<00:36:15.769> the<00:36:16.249> property 00:36:16.599 --> 00:36:16.609 align:start position:0% these are the majority it's the property 00:36:16.609 --> 00:36:18.370 align:start position:0% these are the majority it's the property taxes<00:36:17.180> the<00:36:17.299> majority<00:36:17.719> of<00:36:17.779> the<00:36:17.869> revenue<00:36:18.019> that 00:36:18.370 --> 00:36:18.380 align:start position:0% taxes the majority of the revenue that 00:36:18.380 --> 00:36:22.329 align:start position:0% taxes the majority of the revenue that they<00:36:18.499> make<00:36:20.019> okay<00:36:21.019> and<00:36:21.200> I<00:36:21.349> have<00:36:21.529> an<00:36:21.650> I<00:36:21.799> apologize 00:36:22.329 --> 00:36:22.339 align:start position:0% they make okay and I have an I apologize 00:36:22.339 --> 00:36:24.249 align:start position:0% they make okay and I have an I apologize I<00:36:22.519> haven't<00:36:22.819> followed<00:36:23.029> this<00:36:23.329> very<00:36:23.660> closely<00:36:23.959> but 00:36:24.249 --> 00:36:24.259 align:start position:0% I haven't followed this very closely but 00:36:24.259 --> 00:36:26.319 align:start position:0% I haven't followed this very closely but I'm<00:36:24.410> some<00:36:24.709> just<00:36:24.950> curious<00:36:25.400> so<00:36:25.579> I'm<00:36:25.880> sorry<00:36:26.180> if 00:36:26.319 --> 00:36:26.329 align:start position:0% I'm some just curious so I'm sorry if 00:36:26.329 --> 00:36:29.199 align:start position:0% I'm some just curious so I'm sorry if you<00:36:26.479> have<00:36:26.599> to<00:36:26.719> repeat<00:36:27.700> so<00:36:28.700> this<00:36:28.849> is<00:36:28.969> the<00:36:29.089> way 00:36:29.199 --> 00:36:29.209 align:start position:0% you have to repeat so this is the way 00:36:29.209 --> 00:36:31.900 align:start position:0% you have to repeat so this is the way the<00:36:29.329> schmidt<00:36:29.599> is<00:36:29.630> set<00:36:29.900> up<00:36:30.049> is<00:36:30.319> that<00:36:30.670> they<00:36:31.670> get<00:36:31.849> a 00:36:31.900 --> 00:36:31.910 align:start position:0% the schmidt is set up is that they get a 00:36:31.910 --> 00:36:35.259 align:start position:0% the schmidt is set up is that they get a percentage<00:36:32.209> of<00:36:32.989> the<00:36:33.619> property<00:36:34.219> tax<00:36:34.489> collected 00:36:35.259 --> 00:36:35.269 align:start position:0% percentage of the property tax collected 00:36:35.269 --> 00:36:37.509 align:start position:0% percentage of the property tax collected in<00:36:35.450> this<00:36:35.599> particular<00:36:35.989> area<00:36:36.440> or<00:36:36.619> they<00:36:37.039> put<00:36:37.400> an 00:36:37.509 --> 00:36:37.519 align:start position:0% in this particular area or they put an 00:36:37.519 --> 00:36:40.539 align:start position:0% in this particular area or they put an additional<00:36:38.180> tax<00:36:38.989> on<00:36:39.440> the<00:36:39.799> businesses<00:36:40.279> in<00:36:40.519> that 00:36:40.539 --> 00:36:40.549 align:start position:0% additional tax on the businesses in that 00:36:40.549 --> 00:36:43.269 align:start position:0% additional tax on the businesses in that area<00:36:41.059> and<00:36:41.239> they<00:36:41.450> get<00:36:41.690> that<00:36:41.930> they<00:36:42.920> put<00:36:43.160> an 00:36:43.269 --> 00:36:43.279 align:start position:0% area and they get that they put an 00:36:43.279 --> 00:36:47.829 align:start position:0% area and they get that they put an additional<00:36:43.940> tax<00:36:44.299> on<00:36:44.660> themselves<00:36:45.249> and<00:36:46.839> they 00:36:47.829 --> 00:36:47.839 align:start position:0% additional tax on themselves and they 00:36:47.839 --> 00:36:50.949 align:start position:0% additional tax on themselves and they get<00:36:48.049> all<00:36:48.289> apparently<00:36:49.390> so<00:36:50.390> it's<00:36:50.569> over<00:36:50.839> and 00:36:50.949 --> 00:36:50.959 align:start position:0% get all apparently so it's over and 00:36:50.959 --> 00:36:52.930 align:start position:0% get all apparently so it's over and above<00:36:51.170> what<00:36:51.529> all<00:36:51.680> the<00:36:51.859> other<00:36:52.009> tax<00:36:52.369> rates<00:36:52.700> are 00:36:52.930 --> 00:36:52.940 align:start position:0% above what all the other tax rates are 00:36:52.940 --> 00:36:56.739 align:start position:0% above what all the other tax rates are set<00:36:53.239> by<00:36:53.420> every<00:36:53.749> taxing<00:36:54.200> entity<00:36:54.529> so<00:36:55.239> the<00:36:56.239> the 00:36:56.739 --> 00:36:56.749 align:start position:0% set by every taxing entity so the the 00:36:56.749 --> 00:37:00.219 align:start position:0% set by every taxing entity so the the property<00:36:57.229> owners<00:36:57.469> in<00:36:57.619> this<00:36:57.769> area<00:36:58.099> pay<00:36:59.229> this 00:37:00.219 --> 00:37:00.229 align:start position:0% property owners in this area pay this 00:37:00.229 --> 00:37:01.959 align:start position:0% property owners in this area pay this year<00:37:00.529> and<00:37:00.739> they're<00:37:00.829> paying<00:37:01.099> twelve<00:37:01.459> point<00:37:01.729> six 00:37:01.959 --> 00:37:01.969 align:start position:0% year and they're paying twelve point six 00:37:01.969 --> 00:37:05.109 align:start position:0% year and they're paying twelve point six mils<00:37:02.329> more<00:37:02.779> than<00:37:03.739> somebody<00:37:04.459> that<00:37:04.609> sits<00:37:04.910> right 00:37:05.109 --> 00:37:05.119 align:start position:0% mils more than somebody that sits right 00:37:05.119 --> 00:37:10.870 align:start position:0% mils more than somebody that sits right outside<00:37:05.180> of<00:37:05.599> that<00:37:05.779> meant<00:37:06.079> that's<00:37:06.319> mid<00:37:09.369> and<00:37:10.369> and 00:37:10.870 --> 00:37:10.880 align:start position:0% outside of that meant that's mid and and 00:37:10.880 --> 00:37:12.219 align:start position:0% outside of that meant that's mid and and they<00:37:11.029> have<00:37:11.150> to<00:37:11.269> get<00:37:11.390> a<00:37:11.420> petition<00:37:11.809> for<00:37:12.109> that 00:37:12.219 --> 00:37:12.229 align:start position:0% they have to get a petition for that 00:37:12.229 --> 00:37:14.199 align:start position:0% they have to get a petition for that right<00:37:12.440> so<00:37:12.709> it<00:37:12.769> has<00:37:12.890> to<00:37:13.009> be<00:37:13.160> over<00:37:13.249> 50%<00:37:13.759> of<00:37:14.150> the 00:37:14.199 --> 00:37:14.209 align:start position:0% right so it has to be over 50% of the 00:37:14.209 --> 00:37:16.599 align:start position:0% right so it has to be over 50% of the people<00:37:14.420> agreed<00:37:15.019> to<00:37:15.289> pay<00:37:15.469> that<00:37:15.709> correct<00:37:16.069> yes<00:37:16.549> it 00:37:16.599 --> 00:37:16.609 align:start position:0% people agreed to pay that correct yes it 00:37:16.609 --> 00:37:19.150 align:start position:0% people agreed to pay that correct yes it was<00:37:16.940> a<00:37:16.969> very<00:37:17.089> long<00:37:18.049> process<00:37:18.469> that<00:37:18.799> they've 00:37:19.150 --> 00:37:19.160 align:start position:0% was a very long process that they've 00:37:19.160 --> 00:37:22.449 align:start position:0% was a very long process that they've gone<00:37:19.369> through<00:37:19.670> to<00:37:19.789> get<00:37:19.940> all<00:37:20.029> that<00:37:20.180> set<00:37:20.449> up<00:37:21.459> okay 00:37:22.449 --> 00:37:22.459 align:start position:0% gone through to get all that set up okay 00:37:22.459 --> 00:37:25.410 align:start position:0% gone through to get all that set up okay that's<00:37:22.789> all<00:37:22.910> I<00:37:22.999> have<00:37:23.180> thank<00:37:23.209> you<00:37:23.539> very<00:37:23.779> much 00:37:25.410 --> 00:37:25.420 align:start position:0% that's all I have thank you very much 00:37:25.420 --> 00:37:30.249 align:start position:0% that's all I have thank you very much any<00:37:26.420> other<00:37:26.539> comments<00:37:27.309> directions<00:37:29.170> so<00:37:30.170> the 00:37:30.249 --> 00:37:30.259 align:start position:0% any other comments directions so the 00:37:30.259 --> 00:37:31.479 align:start position:0% any other comments directions so the request<00:37:30.619> is<00:37:30.829> that<00:37:30.859> the<00:37:31.130> unified<00:37:31.459> government 00:37:31.479 --> 00:37:31.489 align:start position:0% request is that the unified government 00:37:31.489 --> 00:37:36.370 align:start position:0% request is that the unified government add<00:37:32.289> $25,000<00:37:33.289> to<00:37:33.499> our<00:37:33.619> share<00:37:34.809> well<00:37:35.809> certainly 00:37:36.370 --> 00:37:36.380 align:start position:0% add $25,000 to our share well certainly 00:37:36.380 --> 00:37:38.319 align:start position:0% add $25,000 to our share well certainly I<00:37:36.469> do<00:37:36.589> believe<00:37:36.979> that<00:37:37.160> as<00:37:37.430> property<00:37:37.940> owners<00:37:37.969> in 00:37:38.319 --> 00:37:38.329 align:start position:0% I do believe that as property owners in 00:37:38.329 --> 00:37:40.329 align:start position:0% I do believe that as property owners in the<00:37:38.449> district<00:37:38.809> we<00:37:38.930> do<00:37:39.109> get<00:37:39.259> a<00:37:39.289> benefit<00:37:39.709> for<00:37:40.069> the 00:37:40.329 --> 00:37:40.339 align:start position:0% the district we do get a benefit for the 00:37:40.339 --> 00:37:42.939 align:start position:0% the district we do get a benefit for the money<00:37:40.489> that<00:37:40.549> we<00:37:40.759> invest<00:37:41.680> this<00:37:42.680> hundred 00:37:42.939 --> 00:37:42.949 align:start position:0% money that we invest this hundred 00:37:42.949 --> 00:37:44.589 align:start position:0% money that we invest this hundred twenty-five<00:37:43.369> would<00:37:43.729> end<00:37:43.880> up<00:37:43.999> being<00:37:44.299> less<00:37:44.539> than 00:37:44.589 --> 00:37:44.599 align:start position:0% twenty-five would end up being less than 00:37:44.599 --> 00:37:46.779 align:start position:0% twenty-five would end up being less than we<00:37:45.109> originally<00:37:45.259> committed<00:37:46.099> to<00:37:46.249> when<00:37:46.609> the 00:37:46.779 --> 00:37:46.789 align:start position:0% we originally committed to when the 00:37:46.789 --> 00:37:49.660 align:start position:0% we originally committed to when the district<00:37:47.180> was<00:37:47.239> formed<00:37:48.069> but<00:37:49.069> certainly<00:37:49.549> it 00:37:49.660 --> 00:37:49.670 align:start position:0% district was formed but certainly it 00:37:49.670 --> 00:37:50.709 align:start position:0% district was formed but certainly it would<00:37:49.729> be<00:37:49.880> higher<00:37:50.059> than<00:37:50.299> what<00:37:50.359> we've<00:37:50.599> been 00:37:50.709 --> 00:37:50.719 align:start position:0% would be higher than what we've been 00:37:50.719 --> 00:37:54.039 align:start position:0% would be higher than what we've been paying<00:37:50.989> historically<00:37:51.680> if<00:37:52.690> commissioners<00:37:53.690> are 00:37:54.039 --> 00:37:54.049 align:start position:0% paying historically if commissioners are 00:37:54.049 --> 00:37:57.130 align:start position:0% paying historically if commissioners are not<00:37:54.589> in<00:37:54.769> favor<00:37:55.039> of<00:37:55.339> an<00:37:55.759> additional<00:37:56.140> $25,000 00:37:57.130 --> 00:37:57.140 align:start position:0% not in favor of an additional $25,000 00:37:57.140 --> 00:38:00.069 align:start position:0% not in favor of an additional $25,000 investment<00:37:57.640> then<00:37:58.640> I<00:37:58.670> would<00:37:59.150> wonder<00:37:59.390> could<00:37:59.900> we 00:38:00.069 --> 00:38:00.079 align:start position:0% investment then I would wonder could we 00:38:00.079 --> 00:38:02.949 align:start position:0% investment then I would wonder could we set<00:38:00.380> the<00:38:00.589> mill<00:38:00.769> at<00:38:01.039> eleven<00:38:01.430> point<00:38:01.729> five<00:38:02.059> one 00:38:02.949 --> 00:38:02.959 align:start position:0% set the mill at eleven point five one 00:38:02.959 --> 00:38:05.529 align:start position:0% set the mill at eleven point five one point<00:38:03.229> four<00:38:03.589> point<00:38:03.920> one<00:38:04.489> one<00:38:04.729> lower<00:38:05.119> than<00:38:05.239> it 00:38:05.529 --> 00:38:05.539 align:start position:0% point four point one one lower than it 00:38:05.539 --> 00:38:06.549 align:start position:0% point four point one one lower than it was<00:38:05.690> last<00:38:05.959> year 00:38:06.549 --> 00:38:06.559 align:start position:0% was last year 00:38:06.559 --> 00:38:09.009 align:start position:0% was last year which<00:38:07.130> would<00:38:07.339> be<00:38:07.489> roughly<00:38:08.119> a<00:38:08.209> way<00:38:08.420> to<00:38:08.479> meet<00:38:08.809> in 00:38:09.009 --> 00:38:09.019 align:start position:0% which would be roughly a way to meet in 00:38:09.019 --> 00:38:11.769 align:start position:0% which would be roughly a way to meet in the<00:38:09.140> middle<00:38:09.609> why<00:38:10.609> still<00:38:10.969> lowering<00:38:11.420> the<00:38:11.539> mill 00:38:11.769 --> 00:38:11.779 align:start position:0% the middle why still lowering the mill 00:38:11.779 --> 00:38:14.859 align:start position:0% the middle why still lowering the mill by<00:38:11.989> over<00:38:12.519> well<00:38:13.519> if<00:38:13.670> I<00:38:13.849> say<00:38:14.029> a<00:38:14.059> point<00:38:14.329> but<00:38:14.719> by 00:38:14.859 --> 00:38:14.869 align:start position:0% by over well if I say a point but by 00:38:14.869 --> 00:38:15.130 align:start position:0% by over well if I say a point but by over 00:38:15.130 --> 00:38:15.140 align:start position:0% over 00:38:15.140 --> 00:38:19.800 align:start position:0% over full<00:38:15.350> 10<00:38:15.680> from<00:38:16.670> where<00:38:16.940> it<00:38:17.030> was<00:38:17.180> last<00:38:17.240> year<00:38:18.340> and 00:38:19.800 --> 00:38:19.810 align:start position:0% full 10 from where it was last year and 00:38:19.810 --> 00:38:23.110 align:start position:0% full 10 from where it was last year and yet<00:38:20.810> keeping<00:38:21.200> our<00:38:21.470> cash<00:38:21.830> investment<00:38:22.580> low<00:38:22.850> I 00:38:23.110 --> 00:38:23.120 align:start position:0% yet keeping our cash investment low I 00:38:23.120 --> 00:38:26.800 align:start position:0% yet keeping our cash investment low I would<00:38:23.480> favor<00:38:25.150> $125,000<00:38:26.150> to<00:38:26.180> this<00:38:26.390> made<00:38:26.630> for 00:38:26.800 --> 00:38:26.810 align:start position:0% would favor $125,000 to this made for 00:38:26.810 --> 00:38:30.190 align:start position:0% would favor $125,000 to this made for the<00:38:26.900> benefit<00:38:27.290> that<00:38:27.320> we<00:38:27.590> receive<00:38:28.040> I<00:38:29.110> think<00:38:30.110> I 00:38:30.190 --> 00:38:30.200 align:start position:0% the benefit that we receive I think I 00:38:30.200 --> 00:38:31.900 align:start position:0% the benefit that we receive I think I would<00:38:30.380> agree<00:38:30.500> with<00:38:30.620> that<00:38:30.770> again<00:38:31.340> they've<00:38:31.730> been 00:38:31.900 --> 00:38:31.910 align:start position:0% would agree with that again they've been 00:38:31.910 --> 00:38:34.170 align:start position:0% would agree with that again they've been we<00:38:32.450> had<00:38:32.570> committed<00:38:33.140> to<00:38:33.440> funding<00:38:33.620> them<00:38:33.890> at 00:38:34.170 --> 00:38:34.180 align:start position:0% we had committed to funding them at 00:38:34.180 --> 00:38:36.550 align:start position:0% we had committed to funding them at $150,000<00:38:35.180> over<00:38:35.300> many<00:38:35.600> years<00:38:35.690> we're<00:38:36.260> not<00:38:36.410> able 00:38:36.550 --> 00:38:36.560 align:start position:0% $150,000 over many years we're not able 00:38:36.560 --> 00:38:37.420 align:start position:0% $150,000 over many years we're not able to<00:38:36.710> do<00:38:36.980> that 00:38:37.420 --> 00:38:37.430 align:start position:0% to do that 00:38:37.430 --> 00:38:39.430 align:start position:0% to do that it<00:38:37.820> simply<00:38:38.180> asked<00:38:38.420> over<00:38:38.540> the<00:38:38.660> past<00:38:39.080> couple<00:38:39.320> of 00:38:39.430 --> 00:38:39.440 align:start position:0% it simply asked over the past couple of 00:38:39.440 --> 00:38:41.290 align:start position:0% it simply asked over the past couple of years<00:38:39.500> that<00:38:39.770> we<00:38:40.040> restore<00:38:40.520> what<00:38:40.760> we<00:38:40.850> originally 00:38:41.290 --> 00:38:41.300 align:start position:0% years that we restore what we originally 00:38:41.300 --> 00:38:43.450 align:start position:0% years that we restore what we originally committed<00:38:41.870> to<00:38:42.170> and<00:38:42.410> this<00:38:42.950> line<00:38:43.160> gets<00:38:43.340> us 00:38:43.450 --> 00:38:43.460 align:start position:0% committed to and this line gets us 00:38:43.460 --> 00:38:53.730 align:start position:0% committed to and this line gets us really<00:38:43.700> halfway<00:38:44.630> to<00:38:44.690> that<00:38:47.440> five<00:38:48.440> six 00:38:53.730 --> 00:38:53.740 align:start position:0% 00:38:53.740 --> 00:38:56.790 align:start position:0% so<00:38:54.339> I'm<00:38:54.640> gonna<00:38:55.020> mr.<00:38:56.020> mayor<00:38:56.230> of<00:38:56.440> one<00:38:56.619> more 00:38:56.790 --> 00:38:56.800 align:start position:0% so I'm gonna mr. mayor of one more 00:38:56.800 --> 00:38:59.420 align:start position:0% so I'm gonna mr. mayor of one more question<00:38:57.510> go<00:38:58.510> for<00:38:58.540> it 00:38:59.420 --> 00:38:59.430 align:start position:0% question go for it 00:38:59.430 --> 00:39:02.220 align:start position:0% question go for it I'm<00:39:00.430> sorry<00:39:00.730> I'm<00:39:00.970> -<00:39:01.270> keep<00:39:01.480> jumping<00:39:01.690> in<00:39:01.930> but<00:39:02.109> I'm 00:39:02.220 --> 00:39:02.230 align:start position:0% I'm sorry I'm - keep jumping in but I'm 00:39:02.230 --> 00:39:04.950 align:start position:0% I'm sorry I'm - keep jumping in but I'm just<00:39:02.410> curious<00:39:02.680> about<00:39:02.950> this<00:39:03.250> also<00:39:03.700> so<00:39:04.660> what<00:39:04.839> is 00:39:04.950 --> 00:39:04.960 align:start position:0% just curious about this also so what is 00:39:04.960 --> 00:39:06.930 align:start position:0% just curious about this also so what is the<00:39:05.170> total<00:39:05.560> amount<00:39:05.680> of<00:39:06.070> money<00:39:06.310> annually 00:39:06.930 --> 00:39:06.940 align:start position:0% the total amount of money annually 00:39:06.940 --> 00:39:11.970 align:start position:0% the total amount of money annually collected<00:39:08.160> from<00:39:09.160> this<00:39:09.849> minute<00:39:10.300> in<00:39:10.690> this<00:39:11.619> area 00:39:11.970 --> 00:39:11.980 align:start position:0% collected from this minute in this area 00:39:11.980 --> 00:39:14.280 align:start position:0% collected from this minute in this area the<00:39:12.550> Smid<00:39:12.940> generates<00:39:13.510> two<00:39:13.930> hundred<00:39:14.230> and 00:39:14.280 --> 00:39:14.290 align:start position:0% the Smid generates two hundred and 00:39:14.290 --> 00:39:15.810 align:start position:0% the Smid generates two hundred and thirty<00:39:14.530> nine<00:39:14.740> thousand<00:39:15.280> four<00:39:15.490> hundred<00:39:15.640> and 00:39:15.810 --> 00:39:15.820 align:start position:0% thirty nine thousand four hundred and 00:39:15.820 --> 00:39:21.240 align:start position:0% thirty nine thousand four hundred and two<00:39:16.000> dollars<00:39:16.390> for<00:39:17.140> 2018<00:39:19.380> and<00:39:20.380> if<00:39:20.680> we<00:39:20.830> put<00:39:21.010> in<00:39:21.130> a 00:39:21.240 --> 00:39:21.250 align:start position:0% two dollars for 2018 and if we put in a 00:39:21.250 --> 00:39:23.339 align:start position:0% two dollars for 2018 and if we put in a hundred<00:39:21.609> and<00:39:21.730> twenty-five<00:39:22.420> thousand<00:39:23.050> dollars 00:39:23.339 --> 00:39:23.349 align:start position:0% hundred and twenty-five thousand dollars 00:39:23.349 --> 00:39:26.420 align:start position:0% hundred and twenty-five thousand dollars we'll<00:39:23.589> be<00:39:23.740> paying<00:39:24.010> more<00:39:24.310> than<00:39:24.369> 50%<00:39:24.910> of<00:39:25.359> that 00:39:26.420 --> 00:39:26.430 align:start position:0% we'll be paying more than 50% of that 00:39:26.430 --> 00:39:32.310 align:start position:0% we'll be paying more than 50% of that correct<00:39:29.580> well<00:39:30.580> yeah<00:39:30.940> I'm<00:39:31.390> very<00:39:31.839> good 00:39:32.310 --> 00:39:32.320 align:start position:0% correct well yeah I'm very good 00:39:32.320 --> 00:39:34.050 align:start position:0% correct well yeah I'm very good Commissioner<00:39:32.740> yeah<00:39:32.890> that's<00:39:33.160> our<00:39:33.460> hundred 00:39:34.050 --> 00:39:34.060 align:start position:0% Commissioner yeah that's our hundred 00:39:34.060 --> 00:39:35.460 align:start position:0% Commissioner yeah that's our hundred thousand<00:39:34.480> is<00:39:34.570> over<00:39:34.780> and<00:39:34.869> above<00:39:35.050> so<00:39:35.290> what<00:39:35.440> I 00:39:35.460 --> 00:39:35.470 align:start position:0% thousand is over and above so what I 00:39:35.470 --> 00:39:37.650 align:start position:0% thousand is over and above so what I gave<00:39:35.710> you<00:39:35.740> that<00:39:36.130> quote<00:39:36.400> is<00:39:36.609> what<00:39:36.820> the<00:39:37.000> property 00:39:37.650 --> 00:39:37.660 align:start position:0% gave you that quote is what the property 00:39:37.660 --> 00:39:39.690 align:start position:0% gave you that quote is what the property owners<00:39:38.260> that<00:39:38.290> pay<00:39:38.710> into<00:39:38.920> the<00:39:39.040> Smid<00:39:39.310> pay<00:39:39.550> the 00:39:39.690 --> 00:39:39.700 align:start position:0% owners that pay into the Smid pay the 00:39:39.700 --> 00:39:42.599 align:start position:0% owners that pay into the Smid pay the 239<00:39:40.359> so<00:39:41.290> we'd<00:39:41.500> pay<00:39:41.710> another<00:39:41.950> hundred<00:39:42.250> our 00:39:42.599 --> 00:39:42.609 align:start position:0% 239 so we'd pay another hundred our 00:39:42.609 --> 00:39:45.150 align:start position:0% 239 so we'd pay another hundred our hundred<00:39:42.940> thousand<00:39:43.390> is<00:39:43.450> on<00:39:43.599> top<00:39:43.869> of<00:39:44.050> that<00:39:44.170> plus 00:39:45.150 --> 00:39:45.160 align:start position:0% hundred thousand is on top of that plus 00:39:45.160 --> 00:39:47.099 align:start position:0% hundred thousand is on top of that plus the<00:39:45.369> money<00:39:45.550> from<00:39:45.730> the<00:39:45.849> BPU<00:39:46.210> and<00:39:46.450> kayuu<00:39:46.660> is<00:39:46.960> on 00:39:47.099 --> 00:39:47.109 align:start position:0% the money from the BPU and kayuu is on 00:39:47.109 --> 00:39:48.510 align:start position:0% the money from the BPU and kayuu is on top<00:39:47.349> of<00:39:47.500> that<00:39:47.589> as<00:39:47.740> well<00:39:47.770> so<00:39:48.220> the<00:39:48.339> total 00:39:48.510 --> 00:39:48.520 align:start position:0% top of that as well so the total 00:39:48.520 --> 00:39:49.950 align:start position:0% top of that as well so the total generated<00:39:49.180> is<00:39:49.330> three<00:39:49.540> hundred<00:39:49.660> and<00:39:49.839> eighty 00:39:49.950 --> 00:39:49.960 align:start position:0% generated is three hundred and eighty 00:39:49.960 --> 00:39:53.130 align:start position:0% generated is three hundred and eighty two<00:39:50.260> thousand<00:39:50.770> nine<00:39:50.950> oh<00:39:50.980> two<00:39:51.869> so<00:39:52.869> we're<00:39:53.050> about 00:39:53.130 --> 00:39:53.140 align:start position:0% two thousand nine oh two so we're about 00:39:53.140 --> 00:39:56.940 align:start position:0% two thousand nine oh two so we're about so<00:39:53.500> would<00:39:53.800> it<00:39:53.920> be<00:39:54.300> no<00:39:55.530> approximately<00:39:56.530> one<00:39:56.740> so 00:39:56.940 --> 00:39:56.950 align:start position:0% so would it be no approximately one so 00:39:56.950 --> 00:40:00.450 align:start position:0% so would it be no approximately one so would<00:39:57.190> it<00:39:57.280> be<00:39:57.310> okay<00:39:58.770> so<00:39:59.770> would<00:39:59.920> it<00:40:00.040> be<00:40:00.099> fair<00:40:00.400> to 00:40:00.450 --> 00:40:00.460 align:start position:0% would it be okay so would it be fair to 00:40:00.460 --> 00:40:02.550 align:start position:0% would it be okay so would it be fair to say<00:40:00.640> out<00:40:01.119> of<00:40:01.180> all<00:40:01.450> of<00:40:01.510> the<00:40:01.900> money<00:40:02.140> that<00:40:02.349> the 00:40:02.550 --> 00:40:02.560 align:start position:0% say out of all of the money that the 00:40:02.560 --> 00:40:06.540 align:start position:0% say out of all of the money that the schmid<00:40:02.980> generate<00:40:04.109> itself<00:40:05.109> the<00:40:06.099> unified 00:40:06.540 --> 00:40:06.550 align:start position:0% schmid generate itself the unified 00:40:06.550 --> 00:40:13.260 align:start position:0% schmid generate itself the unified government<00:40:08.339> is<00:40:10.680> matching<00:40:11.680> that<00:40:11.950> by<00:40:12.849> fifty 00:40:13.260 --> 00:40:13.270 align:start position:0% government is matching that by fifty 00:40:13.270 --> 00:40:20.280 align:start position:0% government is matching that by fifty percent<00:40:15.720> thirty<00:40:18.359> not<00:40:19.359> the<00:40:19.510> total<00:40:19.750> amount<00:40:20.140> no 00:40:20.280 --> 00:40:20.290 align:start position:0% percent thirty not the total amount no 00:40:20.290 --> 00:40:22.230 align:start position:0% percent thirty not the total amount no that's<00:40:20.530> your<00:40:20.710> correct<00:40:20.920> ID<00:40:21.190> five<00:40:21.609> percent<00:40:22.030> no 00:40:22.230 --> 00:40:22.240 align:start position:0% that's your correct ID five percent no 00:40:22.240 --> 00:40:26.150 align:start position:0% that's your correct ID five percent no it's<00:40:22.750> a<00:40:22.869> 40<00:40:23.650> plus<00:40:23.920> forty<00:40:24.369> two<00:40:24.550> hundred<00:40:24.580> eighty 00:40:26.150 --> 00:40:26.160 align:start position:0% it's a 40 plus forty two hundred eighty 00:40:26.160 --> 00:40:30.780 align:start position:0% it's a 40 plus forty two hundred eighty thousand<00:40:28.950> unified<00:40:29.950> government<00:40:30.130> piece<00:40:30.580> of 00:40:30.780 --> 00:40:30.790 align:start position:0% thousand unified government piece of 00:40:30.790 --> 00:40:34.349 align:start position:0% thousand unified government piece of this<00:40:30.970> is<00:40:31.270> about<00:40:32.640> one-third<00:40:33.640> of<00:40:33.940> the<00:40:34.030> total 00:40:34.349 --> 00:40:34.359 align:start position:0% this is about one-third of the total 00:40:34.359 --> 00:40:40.140 align:start position:0% this is about one-third of the total revenues<00:40:34.990> that<00:40:36.270> in<00:40:37.270> the<00:40:38.140> bank<00:40:38.349> of<00:40:38.680> the<00:40:38.940> in<00:40:39.940> the 00:40:40.140 --> 00:40:40.150 align:start position:0% revenues that in the bank of the in the 00:40:40.150 --> 00:40:47.579 align:start position:0% revenues that in the bank of the in the ledger<00:40:40.900> of<00:40:41.109> the<00:40:41.260> Smid<00:40:44.010> okay<00:40:45.010> so<00:40:45.760> I<00:40:46.500> hear<00:40:47.500> what 00:40:47.579 --> 00:40:47.589 align:start position:0% ledger of the Smid okay so I hear what 00:40:47.589 --> 00:40:49.230 align:start position:0% ledger of the Smid okay so I hear what you're<00:40:47.680> saying<00:40:47.950> the<00:40:48.400> the<00:40:48.700> total<00:40:49.089> not 00:40:49.230 --> 00:40:49.240 align:start position:0% you're saying the the total not 00:40:49.240 --> 00:40:51.290 align:start position:0% you're saying the the total not generated<00:40:49.839> though<00:40:49.990> from<00:40:50.260> the<00:40:50.440> people<00:40:50.800> that 00:40:51.290 --> 00:40:51.300 align:start position:0% generated though from the people that 00:40:51.300 --> 00:40:53.670 align:start position:0% generated though from the people that submitted<00:40:52.300> to<00:40:52.540> sell<00:40:52.690> not<00:40:53.109> the<00:40:53.260> government 00:40:53.670 --> 00:40:53.680 align:start position:0% submitted to sell not the government 00:40:53.680 --> 00:40:59.099 align:start position:0% submitted to sell not the government okay<00:40:54.070> you<00:40:54.310> said<00:40:54.670> with<00:40:55.500> $239,000<00:40:56.500> crest<00:40:58.109> the 00:40:59.099 --> 00:40:59.109 align:start position:0% okay you said with $239,000 crest the 00:40:59.109 --> 00:41:02.370 align:start position:0% okay you said with $239,000 crest the non-governmental<00:40:59.950> entities<00:41:00.460> yes<00:41:01.380> that's 00:41:02.370 --> 00:41:02.380 align:start position:0% non-governmental entities yes that's 00:41:02.380 --> 00:41:02.700 align:start position:0% non-governmental entities yes that's right 00:41:02.700 --> 00:41:02.710 align:start position:0% right 00:41:02.710 --> 00:41:07.310 align:start position:0% right so<00:41:02.800> in<00:41:02.980> addition<00:41:03.130> to<00:41:03.609> that<00:41:04.890> $239,000 00:41:07.310 --> 00:41:07.320 align:start position:0% so in addition to that $239,000 00:41:07.320 --> 00:41:10.730 align:start position:0% so in addition to that $239,000 what<00:41:08.320> they're<00:41:08.500> bringing<00:41:08.710> to<00:41:08.890> the<00:41:09.070> table<00:41:09.220> is 00:41:10.730 --> 00:41:10.740 align:start position:0% what they're bringing to the table is 00:41:10.740 --> 00:41:11.940 align:start position:0% what they're bringing to the table is $239,000 00:41:11.940 --> 00:41:11.950 align:start position:0% $239,000 00:41:11.950 --> 00:41:13.800 align:start position:0% $239,000 so<00:41:12.400> the<00:41:12.640> government<00:41:13.119> is<00:41:13.180> going<00:41:13.390> to<00:41:13.480> put<00:41:13.660> in 00:41:13.800 --> 00:41:13.810 align:start position:0% so the government is going to put in 00:41:13.810 --> 00:41:17.300 align:start position:0% so the government is going to put in another<00:41:14.200> hundred<00:41:14.980> and<00:41:15.100> twenty<00:41:15.430> five<00:41:15.630> thousand 00:41:17.300 --> 00:41:17.310 align:start position:0% another hundred and twenty five thousand 00:41:17.310 --> 00:41:20.310 align:start position:0% another hundred and twenty five thousand then<00:41:18.310> we're<00:41:18.610> giving<00:41:18.970> them<00:41:19.119> 50<00:41:19.720> cents<00:41:20.050> on<00:41:20.170> the 00:41:20.310 --> 00:41:20.320 align:start position:0% then we're giving them 50 cents on the 00:41:20.320 --> 00:41:23.250 align:start position:0% then we're giving them 50 cents on the dollar<00:41:20.850> for<00:41:21.850> every<00:41:21.940> dollar<00:41:22.210> they<00:41:22.450> raise<00:41:22.720> we're 00:41:23.250 --> 00:41:23.260 align:start position:0% dollar for every dollar they raise we're 00:41:23.260 --> 00:41:25.920 align:start position:0% dollar for every dollar they raise we're giving<00:41:23.560> them<00:41:23.650> fifty<00:41:24.040> cents<00:41:24.660> well<00:41:25.660> they<00:41:25.780> also 00:41:25.920 --> 00:41:25.930 align:start position:0% giving them fifty cents well they also 00:41:25.930 --> 00:41:27.600 align:start position:0% giving them fifty cents well they also have<00:41:26.260> there's<00:41:26.619> forty<00:41:26.890> three<00:41:27.100> thousand 00:41:27.600 --> 00:41:27.610 align:start position:0% have there's forty three thousand 00:41:27.610 --> 00:41:29.910 align:start position:0% have there's forty three thousand dollars<00:41:27.940> there<00:41:28.150> from<00:41:28.480> other<00:41:29.320> government 00:41:29.910 --> 00:41:29.920 align:start position:0% dollars there from other government 00:41:29.920 --> 00:41:34.050 align:start position:0% dollars there from other government entities<00:41:30.250> -<00:41:32.310> okay<00:41:33.310> so<00:41:33.550> if<00:41:33.610> you<00:41:33.700> add<00:41:33.820> those 00:41:34.050 --> 00:41:34.060 align:start position:0% entities - okay so if you add those 00:41:34.060 --> 00:41:36.210 align:start position:0% entities - okay so if you add those together<00:41:34.330> we're<00:41:35.140> probably<00:41:35.380> pretty<00:41:35.740> close<00:41:35.950> to 00:41:36.210 --> 00:41:36.220 align:start position:0% together we're probably pretty close to 00:41:36.220 --> 00:41:38.970 align:start position:0% together we're probably pretty close to matching<00:41:36.400> them<00:41:36.820> almost<00:41:37.119> dollars<00:41:37.750> a<00:41:37.869> dollar<00:41:38.050> if 00:41:38.970 --> 00:41:38.980 align:start position:0% matching them almost dollars a dollar if 00:41:38.980 --> 00:41:41.180 align:start position:0% matching them almost dollars a dollar if you<00:41:39.040> count<00:41:39.369> all<00:41:39.520> the<00:41:39.640> government<00:41:40.119> and<00:41:40.240> to<00:41:40.360> be 00:41:41.180 --> 00:41:41.190 align:start position:0% you count all the government and to be 00:41:41.190 --> 00:41:43.700 align:start position:0% you count all the government and to be some<00:41:42.190> of<00:41:42.340> the<00:41:42.490> other<00:41:42.730> includes 00:41:43.700 --> 00:41:43.710 align:start position:0% some of the other includes 00:41:43.710 --> 00:41:47.070 align:start position:0% some of the other includes non-government<00:41:44.710> entities<00:41:45.840> buildings<00:41:46.840> that 00:41:47.070 --> 00:41:47.080 align:start position:0% non-government entities buildings that 00:41:47.080 --> 00:41:49.590 align:start position:0% non-government entities buildings that are<00:41:47.140> not<00:41:47.410> on<00:41:47.619> the<00:41:47.650> tax<00:41:48.010> roll<00:41:48.280> that<00:41:49.240> are<00:41:49.390> making 00:41:49.590 --> 00:41:49.600 align:start position:0% are not on the tax roll that are making 00:41:49.600 --> 00:41:52.070 align:start position:0% are not on the tax roll that are making a<00:41:49.900> contribution<00:41:50.140> to<00:41:50.680> the<00:41:50.950> smooth<00:41:51.220> in<00:41:51.550> lieu<00:41:51.850> of 00:41:52.070 --> 00:41:52.080 align:start position:0% a contribution to the smooth in lieu of 00:41:52.080 --> 00:41:55.609 align:start position:0% a contribution to the smooth in lieu of being<00:41:53.080> on<00:41:53.320> the<00:41:53.470> tax<00:41:53.680> roll<00:41:54.010> in<00:41:54.190> paying<00:41:54.460> taxes 00:41:55.609 --> 00:41:55.619 align:start position:0% being on the tax roll in paying taxes 00:41:55.619 --> 00:41:57.780 align:start position:0% being on the tax roll in paying taxes okay<00:41:56.619> well<00:41:56.830> let's<00:41:56.980> just<00:41:57.040> make<00:41:57.280> it<00:41:57.340> really<00:41:57.760> easy 00:41:57.780 --> 00:41:57.790 align:start position:0% okay well let's just make it really easy 00:41:57.790 --> 00:42:00.090 align:start position:0% okay well let's just make it really easy then<00:41:58.240> because<00:41:58.570> it's<00:41:58.869> too<00:41:59.110> complicated<00:41:59.500> I'll 00:42:00.090 --> 00:42:00.100 align:start position:0% then because it's too complicated I'll 00:42:00.100 --> 00:42:02.220 align:start position:0% then because it's too complicated I'll go<00:42:00.280> back<00:42:00.400> to<00:42:00.550> what<00:42:00.670> I<00:42:00.700> originally<00:42:01.180> said<00:42:01.450> if<00:42:02.050> we 00:42:02.220 --> 00:42:02.230 align:start position:0% go back to what I originally said if we 00:42:02.230 --> 00:42:04.050 align:start position:0% go back to what I originally said if we just<00:42:02.380> talk<00:42:02.560> about<00:42:02.619> our<00:42:02.980> portion<00:42:03.490> the<00:42:03.730> unified 00:42:04.050 --> 00:42:04.060 align:start position:0% just talk about our portion the unified 00:42:04.060 --> 00:42:05.220 align:start position:0% just talk about our portion the unified government<00:42:04.180> person<00:42:04.690> that<00:42:04.780> you're<00:42:04.869> asking<00:42:05.170> for 00:42:05.220 --> 00:42:05.230 align:start position:0% government person that you're asking for 00:42:05.230 --> 00:42:09.060 align:start position:0% government person that you're asking for tonight<00:42:06.450> $125,000<00:42:07.450> urine<00:42:08.350> essence<00:42:08.740> giving 00:42:09.060 --> 00:42:09.070 align:start position:0% tonight $125,000 urine essence giving 00:42:09.070 --> 00:42:10.950 align:start position:0% tonight $125,000 urine essence giving Schmidt<00:42:09.550> this<00:42:09.820> med<00:42:10.060> who's<00:42:10.450> bringing<00:42:10.869> a 00:42:10.950 --> 00:42:10.960 align:start position:0% Schmidt this med who's bringing a 00:42:10.960 --> 00:42:13.280 align:start position:0% Schmidt this med who's bringing a substantial<00:42:11.590> amount<00:42:11.740> of<00:42:11.859> money<00:42:11.920> to<00:42:12.190> the<00:42:12.430> table 00:42:13.280 --> 00:42:13.290 align:start position:0% substantial amount of money to the table 00:42:13.290 --> 00:42:16.109 align:start position:0% substantial amount of money to the table almost<00:42:14.290> 50<00:42:14.619> cents<00:42:15.040> for<00:42:15.220> every<00:42:15.280> dollar<00:42:15.520> that 00:42:16.109 --> 00:42:16.119 align:start position:0% almost 50 cents for every dollar that 00:42:16.119 --> 00:42:17.760 align:start position:0% almost 50 cents for every dollar that they<00:42:16.510> bring<00:42:16.690> to<00:42:16.840> the<00:42:16.990> table<00:42:17.170> and<00:42:17.619> their 00:42:17.760 --> 00:42:17.770 align:start position:0% they bring to the table and their 00:42:17.770 --> 00:42:20.130 align:start position:0% they bring to the table and their primary<00:42:18.220> function<00:42:18.400> is<00:42:18.910> to<00:42:19.150> provide<00:42:19.630> security 00:42:20.130 --> 00:42:20.140 align:start position:0% primary function is to provide security 00:42:20.140 --> 00:42:23.310 align:start position:0% primary function is to provide security and<00:42:20.590> beautification<00:42:21.250> in<00:42:21.880> their<00:42:22.600> geographic 00:42:23.310 --> 00:42:23.320 align:start position:0% and beautification in their geographic 00:42:23.320 --> 00:42:30.120 align:start position:0% and beautification in their geographic area<00:42:24.010> correct 00:42:30.120 --> 00:42:30.130 align:start position:0% 00:42:30.130 --> 00:42:33.450 align:start position:0% don't<00:42:30.730> make<00:42:30.850> it<00:42:31.000> complicated<00:42:32.160> that's<00:42:33.160> fine 00:42:33.450 --> 00:42:33.460 align:start position:0% don't make it complicated that's fine 00:42:33.460 --> 00:42:35.880 align:start position:0% don't make it complicated that's fine with<00:42:33.670> me<00:42:33.700> and<00:42:34.030> by<00:42:34.180> the<00:42:34.210> way<00:42:34.480> I<00:42:34.810> am<00:42:35.380> fine<00:42:35.650> with 00:42:35.880 --> 00:42:35.890 align:start position:0% with me and by the way I am fine with 00:42:35.890 --> 00:42:38.250 align:start position:0% with me and by the way I am fine with that<00:42:35.950> I<00:42:36.250> just<00:42:36.520> want<00:42:36.700> to<00:42:36.760> be<00:42:36.850> clear<00:42:37.330> so<00:42:38.020> that's 00:42:38.250 --> 00:42:38.260 align:start position:0% that I just want to be clear so that's 00:42:38.260 --> 00:42:46.200 align:start position:0% that I just want to be clear so that's what's<00:42:38.470> happening<00:42:43.380> mr.<00:42:44.380> mctierney<00:42:45.180> yeah<00:42:46.180> I 00:42:46.200 --> 00:42:46.210 align:start position:0% what's happening mr. mctierney yeah I 00:42:46.210 --> 00:42:47.610 align:start position:0% what's happening mr. mctierney yeah I think<00:42:46.330> it<00:42:46.480> ends<00:42:46.690> up<00:42:46.750> being<00:42:46.960> instead<00:42:47.260> of<00:42:47.320> 50 00:42:47.610 --> 00:42:47.620 align:start position:0% think it ends up being instead of 50 00:42:47.620 --> 00:42:49.620 align:start position:0% think it ends up being instead of 50 cents<00:42:47.830> it<00:42:47.980> ends<00:42:48.100> up<00:42:48.220> being<00:42:48.340> about<00:42:48.430> 34<00:42:49.030> cents<00:42:49.510> if 00:42:49.620 --> 00:42:49.630 align:start position:0% cents it ends up being about 34 cents if 00:42:49.630 --> 00:42:51.750 align:start position:0% cents it ends up being about 34 cents if we<00:42:49.750> really<00:42:49.960> want<00:42:50.170> to<00:42:50.230> do<00:42:50.710> the<00:42:50.860> math<00:42:51.040> on<00:42:51.310> it<00:42:51.340> but 00:42:51.750 --> 00:42:51.760 align:start position:0% we really want to do the math on it but 00:42:51.760 --> 00:42:54.900 align:start position:0% we really want to do the math on it but but<00:42:52.060> you<00:42:52.180> are<00:42:52.210> correct<00:42:52.570> that<00:42:53.050> that<00:42:53.830> is<00:42:54.130> our 00:42:54.900 --> 00:42:54.910 align:start position:0% but you are correct that that is our 00:42:54.910 --> 00:42:57.360 align:start position:0% but you are correct that that is our contribution<00:42:55.240> again<00:42:55.960> I<00:42:56.170> support<00:42:56.800> it<00:42:56.890> based<00:42:57.130> on 00:42:57.360 --> 00:42:57.370 align:start position:0% contribution again I support it based on 00:42:57.370 --> 00:42:59.370 align:start position:0% contribution again I support it based on our<00:42:57.610> significant<00:42:58.300> property<00:42:58.660> holdings<00:42:59.080> in 00:42:59.370 --> 00:42:59.380 align:start position:0% our significant property holdings in 00:42:59.380 --> 00:43:01.230 align:start position:0% our significant property holdings in inside<00:42:59.950> their<00:43:00.160> service<00:43:00.550> area<00:43:00.880> and<00:43:01.150> the 00:43:01.230 --> 00:43:01.240 align:start position:0% inside their service area and the 00:43:01.240 --> 00:43:03.330 align:start position:0% inside their service area and the benefit<00:43:01.600> they<00:43:01.750> bring<00:43:02.020> to<00:43:02.290> us<00:43:02.320> and<00:43:02.740> our 00:43:03.330 --> 00:43:03.340 align:start position:0% benefit they bring to us and our 00:43:03.340 --> 00:43:06.270 align:start position:0% benefit they bring to us and our property<00:43:03.820> holdings<00:43:04.480> in<00:43:04.720> that<00:43:04.900> area<00:43:05.260> but<00:43:06.010> if<00:43:06.160> it 00:43:06.270 --> 00:43:06.280 align:start position:0% property holdings in that area but if it 00:43:06.280 --> 00:43:07.650 align:start position:0% property holdings in that area but if it is<00:43:06.430> the<00:43:06.610> will<00:43:06.760> of<00:43:06.790> the<00:43:07.000> Commission<00:43:07.390> that<00:43:07.570> we 00:43:07.650 --> 00:43:07.660 align:start position:0% is the will of the Commission that we 00:43:07.660 --> 00:43:09.720 align:start position:0% is the will of the Commission that we stay<00:43:07.900> at<00:43:08.020> a<00:43:08.050> hundred<00:43:08.320> then<00:43:09.040> I<00:43:09.070> would<00:43:09.400> propose 00:43:09.720 --> 00:43:09.730 align:start position:0% stay at a hundred then I would propose 00:43:09.730 --> 00:43:15.810 align:start position:0% stay at a hundred then I would propose that<00:43:10.380> we<00:43:11.380> consider<00:43:12.310> the<00:43:12.700> mill<00:43:12.940> of<00:43:13.120> 11.5<00:43:14.820> yeah 00:43:15.810 --> 00:43:15.820 align:start position:0% that we consider the mill of 11.5 yeah 00:43:15.820 --> 00:43:18.060 align:start position:0% that we consider the mill of 11.5 yeah Brian<00:43:16.270> I'm<00:43:16.480> not<00:43:16.660> are<00:43:16.900> not<00:43:17.140> contrasting<00:43:17.740> that<00:43:17.860> I 00:43:18.060 --> 00:43:18.070 align:start position:0% Brian I'm not are not contrasting that I 00:43:18.070 --> 00:43:19.710 align:start position:0% Brian I'm not are not contrasting that I just<00:43:18.310> want<00:43:18.490> you<00:43:18.550> to<00:43:18.640> be<00:43:18.760> very<00:43:18.940> clear<00:43:19.180> I'm<00:43:19.540> not 00:43:19.710 --> 00:43:19.720 align:start position:0% just want you to be very clear I'm not 00:43:19.720 --> 00:43:22.500 align:start position:0% just want you to be very clear I'm not suggesting<00:43:19.960> that<00:43:20.380> I<00:43:20.800> just<00:43:21.610> I<00:43:21.790> just<00:43:22.120> want<00:43:22.300> to<00:43:22.390> be 00:43:22.500 --> 00:43:22.510 align:start position:0% suggesting that I just I just want to be 00:43:22.510 --> 00:43:25.050 align:start position:0% suggesting that I just I just want to be very<00:43:22.540> clear<00:43:22.960> but<00:43:23.530> if<00:43:23.830> it's<00:43:24.040> if<00:43:24.370> they're<00:43:24.640> asking 00:43:25.050 --> 00:43:25.060 align:start position:0% very clear but if it's if they're asking 00:43:25.060 --> 00:43:27.210 align:start position:0% very clear but if it's if they're asking for<00:43:25.180> a<00:43:25.270> hundred<00:43:25.630> and<00:43:25.690> twenty<00:43:26.050> five<00:43:26.530> thousand 00:43:27.210 --> 00:43:27.220 align:start position:0% for a hundred and twenty five thousand 00:43:27.220 --> 00:43:28.980 align:start position:0% for a hundred and twenty five thousand dollars<00:43:27.550> if<00:43:27.790> you<00:43:27.940> double<00:43:28.300> that<00:43:28.450> that's<00:43:28.750> two 00:43:28.980 --> 00:43:28.990 align:start position:0% dollars if you double that that's two 00:43:28.990 --> 00:43:31.320 align:start position:0% dollars if you double that that's two hundred<00:43:29.080> fifty<00:43:29.620> thousand<00:43:30.100> dollars<00:43:30.430> and<00:43:30.640> what 00:43:31.320 --> 00:43:31.330 align:start position:0% hundred fifty thousand dollars and what 00:43:31.330 --> 00:43:33.600 align:start position:0% hundred fifty thousand dollars and what they<00:43:31.540> were<00:43:31.600> bringing<00:43:31.900> to<00:43:32.230> the<00:43:32.350> table<00:43:32.560> is<00:43:33.220> two 00:43:33.600 --> 00:43:33.610 align:start position:0% they were bringing to the table is two 00:43:33.610 --> 00:43:35.720 align:start position:0% they were bringing to the table is two hundred<00:43:34.030> and<00:43:34.210> thirty<00:43:34.510> nine<00:43:34.780> thousand<00:43:35.320> dollars 00:43:35.720 --> 00:43:35.730 align:start position:0% hundred and thirty nine thousand dollars 00:43:35.730 --> 00:43:39.710 align:start position:0% hundred and thirty nine thousand dollars so<00:43:36.730> I<00:43:36.760> was<00:43:37.060> saying<00:43:37.300> it's<00:43:37.510> approximately<00:43:38.290> 50% 00:43:39.710 --> 00:43:39.720 align:start position:0% so I was saying it's approximately 50% 00:43:39.720 --> 00:43:42.150 align:start position:0% so I was saying it's approximately 50% we're<00:43:40.720> paying<00:43:41.020> them<00:43:41.230> fifty<00:43:41.560> cents<00:43:41.830> on<00:43:42.040> every 00:43:42.150 --> 00:43:42.160 align:start position:0% we're paying them fifty cents on every 00:43:42.160 --> 00:43:43.770 align:start position:0% we're paying them fifty cents on every dollar<00:43:42.310> they<00:43:42.730> bring<00:43:42.940> to<00:43:43.030> the<00:43:43.120> table<00:43:43.270> I<00:43:43.510> think 00:43:43.770 --> 00:43:43.780 align:start position:0% dollar they bring to the table I think 00:43:43.780 --> 00:43:45.630 align:start position:0% dollar they bring to the table I think that's<00:43:43.960> great<00:43:44.140> and<00:43:44.500> just<00:43:45.100> so<00:43:45.220> we<00:43:45.340> know<00:43:45.460> what 00:43:45.630 --> 00:43:45.640 align:start position:0% that's great and just so we know what 00:43:45.640 --> 00:43:47.610 align:start position:0% that's great and just so we know what we're<00:43:45.790> getting<00:43:46.000> in<00:43:46.300> return<00:43:46.450> for<00:43:46.840> that<00:43:46.990> which 00:43:47.610 --> 00:43:47.620 align:start position:0% we're getting in return for that which 00:43:47.620 --> 00:43:49.860 align:start position:0% we're getting in return for that which is<00:43:47.650> security<00:43:48.280> and<00:43:48.600> beautification<00:43:49.600> and 00:43:49.860 --> 00:43:49.870 align:start position:0% is security and beautification and 00:43:49.870 --> 00:43:51.660 align:start position:0% is security and beautification and cleanup<00:43:50.560> that's<00:43:51.130> great 00:43:51.660 --> 00:43:51.670 align:start position:0% cleanup that's great 00:43:51.670 --> 00:43:54.810 align:start position:0% cleanup that's great I'm<00:43:51.730> good<00:43:52.210> with<00:43:52.350> 125<00:43:53.350> I<00:43:53.740> just<00:43:54.430> want<00:43:54.640> to<00:43:54.700> make 00:43:54.810 --> 00:43:54.820 align:start position:0% I'm good with 125 I just want to make 00:43:54.820 --> 00:43:57.510 align:start position:0% I'm good with 125 I just want to make sure<00:43:55.120> that<00:43:55.840> I<00:43:55.900> understood<00:43:56.890> that<00:43:57.070> and<00:43:57.130> if<00:43:57.340> I'm 00:43:57.510 --> 00:43:57.520 align:start position:0% sure that I understood that and if I'm 00:43:57.520 --> 00:43:59.910 align:start position:0% sure that I understood that and if I'm wrong<00:43:57.730> correct<00:43:58.510> me<00:43:58.750> if<00:43:58.900> I'm<00:43:59.050> not<00:43:59.230> I'm<00:43:59.530> good 00:43:59.910 --> 00:43:59.920 align:start position:0% wrong correct me if I'm not I'm good 00:43:59.920 --> 00:44:03.900 align:start position:0% wrong correct me if I'm not I'm good with<00:44:00.100> 125<00:44:01.680> I'm<00:44:02.680> good<00:44:02.920> with<00:44:03.130> it<00:44:03.160> as<00:44:03.430> well<00:44:03.580> I 00:44:03.900 --> 00:44:03.910 align:start position:0% with 125 I'm good with it as well I 00:44:03.910 --> 00:44:07.530 align:start position:0% with 125 I'm good with it as well I support<00:44:04.450> it<00:44:04.570> as<00:44:04.720> well<00:44:04.750> mr.<00:44:05.500> Philbrook<00:44:06.540> yes 00:44:07.530 --> 00:44:07.540 align:start position:0% support it as well mr. Philbrook yes 00:44:07.540 --> 00:44:09.570 align:start position:0% support it as well mr. Philbrook yes they<00:44:07.990> do<00:44:08.410> a<00:44:08.440> little<00:44:08.740> bit<00:44:08.920> more<00:44:09.130> than<00:44:09.370> that 00:44:09.570 --> 00:44:09.580 align:start position:0% they do a little bit more than that 00:44:09.580 --> 00:44:11.760 align:start position:0% they do a little bit more than that they're<00:44:09.910> very<00:44:10.090> pro-business<00:44:10.480> and<00:44:11.170> they<00:44:11.710> do 00:44:11.760 --> 00:44:11.770 align:start position:0% they're very pro-business and they do 00:44:11.770 --> 00:44:14.580 align:start position:0% they're very pro-business and they do encourage<00:44:12.510> business<00:44:13.510> in<00:44:13.690> that<00:44:13.870> area<00:44:14.200> and<00:44:14.320> work 00:44:14.580 --> 00:44:14.590 align:start position:0% encourage business in that area and work 00:44:14.590 --> 00:44:18.150 align:start position:0% encourage business in that area and work with<00:44:14.860> downtown<00:44:15.580> shareholders<00:44:16.240> but<00:44:17.050> yeah<00:44:17.920> I'm 00:44:18.150 --> 00:44:18.160 align:start position:0% with downtown shareholders but yeah I'm 00:44:18.160 --> 00:44:20.300 align:start position:0% with downtown shareholders but yeah I'm for<00:44:18.490> the<00:44:18.580> hundred<00:44:18.880> and<00:44:19.030> twenty<00:44:19.360> five 00:44:20.300 --> 00:44:20.310 align:start position:0% for the hundred and twenty five 00:44:20.310 --> 00:44:22.530 align:start position:0% for the hundred and twenty five understanding<00:44:21.310> that<00:44:21.520> we're<00:44:21.790> gonna<00:44:21.970> decrease 00:44:22.530 --> 00:44:22.540 align:start position:0% understanding that we're gonna decrease 00:44:22.540 --> 00:44:25.410 align:start position:0% understanding that we're gonna decrease the<00:44:22.750> mill<00:44:22.960> rate<00:44:23.260> to<00:44:24.040> eleven<00:44:24.400> point<00:44:24.670> O<00:44:24.790> to<00:44:24.850> six 00:44:25.410 --> 00:44:25.420 align:start position:0% the mill rate to eleven point O to six 00:44:25.420 --> 00:44:31.410 align:start position:0% the mill rate to eleven point O to six so<00:44:26.410> I'm<00:44:27.010> for<00:44:27.700> the<00:44:27.940> suggested<00:44:29.250> last<00:44:30.250> column<00:44:30.880> for 00:44:31.410 --> 00:44:31.420 align:start position:0% so I'm for the suggested last column for 00:44:31.420 --> 00:44:36.630 align:start position:0% so I'm for the suggested last column for this<00:44:31.570> year<00:44:31.890> for<00:44:32.890> 2019<00:44:34.950> any<00:44:35.950> other<00:44:36.160> comments<00:44:36.580> or 00:44:36.630 --> 00:44:36.640 align:start position:0% this year for 2019 any other comments or 00:44:36.640 --> 00:44:37.670 align:start position:0% this year for 2019 any other comments or questions 00:44:37.670 --> 00:44:37.680 align:start position:0% questions 00:44:37.680 --> 00:44:40.100 align:start position:0% questions Commissioner<00:44:38.680> Townsend<00:44:39.130> Inc<00:44:39.280> mr.<00:44:39.730> Burroughs 00:44:40.100 --> 00:44:40.110 align:start position:0% Commissioner Townsend Inc mr. Burroughs 00:44:40.110 --> 00:44:42.090 align:start position:0% Commissioner Townsend Inc mr. Burroughs just<00:44:41.110> for<00:44:41.320> clarity 00:44:42.090 --> 00:44:42.100 align:start position:0% just for clarity 00:44:42.100 --> 00:44:43.710 align:start position:0% just for clarity what<00:44:42.640> was<00:44:42.940> the<00:44:43.090> symmetry 00:44:43.710 --> 00:44:43.720 align:start position:0% what was the symmetry 00:44:43.720 --> 00:44:46.440 align:start position:0% what was the symmetry recall<00:44:44.560> from<00:44:44.800> me<00:44:45.010> what<00:44:45.579> was<00:44:45.790> the<00:44:45.940> reason<00:44:46.329> they 00:44:46.440 --> 00:44:46.450 align:start position:0% recall from me what was the reason they 00:44:46.450 --> 00:44:51.530 align:start position:0% recall from me what was the reason they were<00:44:46.510> asking<00:44:46.930> for<00:44:46.990> the<00:44:47.290> addition<00:44:48.660> funds<00:44:49.660> I 00:44:51.530 --> 00:44:51.540 align:start position:0% were asking for the addition funds I 00:44:51.540 --> 00:44:54.359 align:start position:0% were asking for the addition funds I don't<00:44:52.540> know<00:44:52.630> that<00:44:52.780> I<00:44:52.810> ever<00:44:52.869> had<00:44:53.290> that<00:44:53.319> direct<00:44:53.920> I 00:44:54.359 --> 00:44:54.369 align:start position:0% don't know that I ever had that direct I 00:44:54.369 --> 00:44:55.980 align:start position:0% don't know that I ever had that direct I bet<00:44:54.730> I<00:44:54.760> believe<00:44:55.089> it<00:44:55.210> was<00:44:55.270> so<00:44:55.450> they<00:44:55.599> could<00:44:55.630> lower 00:44:55.980 --> 00:44:55.990 align:start position:0% bet I believe it was so they could lower 00:44:55.990 --> 00:44:59.099 align:start position:0% bet I believe it was so they could lower their<00:44:56.200> mill<00:44:56.410> rate<00:44:56.589> a<00:44:56.619> little<00:44:56.890> bit<00:44:57.040> Oh<00:44:57.420> to<00:44:58.420> to 00:44:59.099 --> 00:44:59.109 align:start position:0% their mill rate a little bit Oh to to 00:44:59.109 --> 00:45:01.910 align:start position:0% their mill rate a little bit Oh to to their<00:44:59.319> shareholders<00:44:59.650> okay<00:45:00.160> thank<00:45:00.490> you 00:45:01.910 --> 00:45:01.920 align:start position:0% their shareholders okay thank you 00:45:01.920 --> 00:45:04.260 align:start position:0% their shareholders okay thank you commissioners<00:45:02.920> thank<00:45:03.369> you 00:45:04.260 --> 00:45:04.270 align:start position:0% commissioners thank you 00:45:04.270 --> 00:45:08.370 align:start position:0% commissioners thank you the<00:45:04.930> others<00:45:05.319> in<00:45:05.619> the<00:45:05.710> 43<00:45:06.280> 5<00:45:06.550> does<00:45:07.089> that<00:45:07.329> we<00:45:08.200> hear 00:45:08.370 --> 00:45:08.380 align:start position:0% the others in the 43 5 does that we hear 00:45:08.380 --> 00:45:10.710 align:start position:0% the others in the 43 5 does that we hear correctly<00:45:08.530> that<00:45:08.950> that<00:45:09.280> includes<00:45:09.790> the 00:45:10.710 --> 00:45:10.720 align:start position:0% correctly that that includes the 00:45:10.720 --> 00:45:12.569 align:start position:0% correctly that that includes the partnership<00:45:11.410> from<00:45:11.710> the<00:45:11.859> University<00:45:12.550> of 00:45:12.569 --> 00:45:12.579 align:start position:0% partnership from the University of 00:45:12.579 --> 00:45:18.599 align:start position:0% partnership from the University of Kansas<00:45:14.579> facility<00:45:15.579> also<00:45:17.069> we<00:45:18.069> know<00:45:18.220> for<00:45:18.490> how 00:45:18.599 --> 00:45:18.609 align:start position:0% Kansas facility also we know for how 00:45:18.609 --> 00:45:22.410 align:start position:0% Kansas facility also we know for how long<00:45:18.670> how<00:45:19.089> many<00:45:19.240> years<00:45:20.010> um<00:45:21.010> I<00:45:21.490> I<00:45:21.910> don't<00:45:22.240> know 00:45:22.410 --> 00:45:22.420 align:start position:0% long how many years um I I don't know 00:45:22.420 --> 00:45:24.420 align:start position:0% long how many years um I I don't know that<00:45:22.630> they<00:45:23.319> just<00:45:23.500> gave<00:45:23.619> me<00:45:23.800> an<00:45:23.920> amount<00:45:24.220> for 00:45:24.420 --> 00:45:24.430 align:start position:0% that they just gave me an amount for 00:45:24.430 --> 00:45:27.300 align:start position:0% that they just gave me an amount for them<00:45:24.550> for<00:45:24.790> next<00:45:24.880> year<00:45:25.210> I<00:45:25.800> got<00:45:26.800> a<00:45:26.859> sense<00:45:27.130> that 00:45:27.300 --> 00:45:27.310 align:start position:0% them for next year I got a sense that 00:45:27.310 --> 00:45:29.700 align:start position:0% them for next year I got a sense that it's<00:45:27.460> an<00:45:27.609> ongoing<00:45:27.910> commitment<00:45:28.420> that<00:45:28.960> in<00:45:29.410> lieu 00:45:29.700 --> 00:45:29.710 align:start position:0% it's an ongoing commitment that in lieu 00:45:29.710 --> 00:45:30.839 align:start position:0% it's an ongoing commitment that in lieu of<00:45:29.740> the<00:45:29.950> fact<00:45:30.160> that<00:45:30.220> they're<00:45:30.400> not<00:45:30.520> paying 00:45:30.839 --> 00:45:30.849 align:start position:0% of the fact that they're not paying 00:45:30.849 --> 00:45:32.490 align:start position:0% of the fact that they're not paying taxes<00:45:31.390> because<00:45:31.660> they<00:45:31.990> are<00:45:32.109> not-for-profit 00:45:32.490 --> 00:45:32.500 align:start position:0% taxes because they are not-for-profit 00:45:32.500 --> 00:45:35.339 align:start position:0% taxes because they are not-for-profit they<00:45:33.220> would<00:45:33.490> a<00:45:33.760> state<00:45:34.180> entity<00:45:34.510> that<00:45:35.050> they<00:45:35.260> are 00:45:35.339 --> 00:45:35.349 align:start position:0% they would a state entity that they are 00:45:35.349 --> 00:45:37.079 align:start position:0% they would a state entity that they are committed<00:45:35.800> to<00:45:35.829> doing<00:45:36.130> what<00:45:36.369> they<00:45:36.520> can<00:45:36.790> to<00:45:36.819> help 00:45:37.079 --> 00:45:37.089 align:start position:0% committed to doing what they can to help 00:45:37.089 --> 00:45:39.089 align:start position:0% committed to doing what they can to help the<00:45:37.270> downtown<00:45:37.690> area<00:45:38.109> and<00:45:38.260> it<00:45:38.740> includes 00:45:39.089 --> 00:45:39.099 align:start position:0% the downtown area and it includes 00:45:39.099 --> 00:45:40.740 align:start position:0% the downtown area and it includes bringing<00:45:39.490> resources<00:45:39.760> to<00:45:40.210> downtown 00:45:40.740 --> 00:45:40.750 align:start position:0% bringing resources to downtown 00:45:40.750 --> 00:45:44.190 align:start position:0% bringing resources to downtown shareholders<00:45:41.760> yeah 00:45:44.190 --> 00:45:44.200 align:start position:0% shareholders yeah 00:45:44.200 --> 00:45:47.190 align:start position:0% shareholders yeah I<00:45:44.849> received<00:45:45.849> an<00:45:45.970> agreement<00:45:46.300> from<00:45:46.810> them<00:45:46.990> but<00:45:47.140> I 00:45:47.190 --> 00:45:47.200 align:start position:0% I received an agreement from them but I 00:45:47.200 --> 00:45:48.750 align:start position:0% I received an agreement from them but I don't<00:45:47.290> remember<00:45:47.650> offhand<00:45:47.859> how<00:45:48.280> many<00:45:48.490> years 00:45:48.750 --> 00:45:48.760 align:start position:0% don't remember offhand how many years 00:45:48.760 --> 00:45:56.340 align:start position:0% don't remember offhand how many years it's<00:45:49.240> for<00:45:49.810> but<00:45:50.079> the<00:45:50.530> mayor's<00:45:50.710> right<00:45:51.010> there 00:45:56.340 --> 00:45:56.350 align:start position:0% 00:45:56.350 --> 00:46:01.920 align:start position:0% okay<00:45:57.130> I<00:45:57.340> think<00:45:57.640> you<00:45:57.970> have<00:45:58.180> direction<00:46:00.690> go<00:46:01.690> back 00:46:01.920 --> 00:46:01.930 align:start position:0% okay I think you have direction go back 00:46:01.930 --> 00:46:07.320 align:start position:0% okay I think you have direction go back to<00:46:02.110> the<00:46:02.200> previous<00:46:02.410> slide<00:46:02.710> please<00:46:03.130> so<00:46:06.330> the 00:46:07.320 --> 00:46:07.330 align:start position:0% to the previous slide please so the 00:46:07.330 --> 00:46:09.660 align:start position:0% to the previous slide please so the question<00:46:07.780> was<00:46:07.900> asked<00:46:08.170> about<00:46:08.500> our<00:46:08.860> abatements 00:46:09.660 --> 00:46:09.670 align:start position:0% question was asked about our abatements 00:46:09.670 --> 00:46:11.340 align:start position:0% question was asked about our abatements and<00:46:09.820> our<00:46:09.910> ability<00:46:10.330> to<00:46:10.360> continue<00:46:10.930> to<00:46:11.080> do<00:46:11.200> the 00:46:11.340 --> 00:46:11.350 align:start position:0% and our ability to continue to do the 00:46:11.350 --> 00:46:13.560 align:start position:0% and our ability to continue to do the abatements<00:46:11.950> at<00:46:12.100> the<00:46:12.190> 14-day<00:46:12.820> timeframe<00:46:13.060> which 00:46:13.560 --> 00:46:13.570 align:start position:0% abatements at the 14-day timeframe which 00:46:13.570 --> 00:46:15.780 align:start position:0% abatements at the 14-day timeframe which we<00:46:13.780> were<00:46:13.960> not<00:46:14.680> doing<00:46:15.190> and<00:46:15.400> I<00:46:15.490> believe 00:46:15.780 --> 00:46:15.790 align:start position:0% we were not doing and I believe 00:46:15.790 --> 00:46:18.270 align:start position:0% we were not doing and I believe Commissioner<00:46:16.060> mckernon<00:46:16.930> was<00:46:17.050> very<00:46:17.350> clear 00:46:18.270 --> 00:46:18.280 align:start position:0% Commissioner mckernon was very clear 00:46:18.280 --> 00:46:20.400 align:start position:0% Commissioner mckernon was very clear Ness<00:46:18.490> in<00:46:18.700> the<00:46:18.820> question<00:46:19.240> what<00:46:20.020> would<00:46:20.140> it<00:46:20.230> take 00:46:20.400 --> 00:46:20.410 align:start position:0% Ness in the question what would it take 00:46:20.410 --> 00:46:22.830 align:start position:0% Ness in the question what would it take for<00:46:20.710> you<00:46:21.160> to<00:46:21.340> be<00:46:21.460> getting<00:46:21.760> it<00:46:22.030> back<00:46:22.300> to<00:46:22.360> that 00:46:22.830 --> 00:46:22.840 align:start position:0% for you to be getting it back to that 00:46:22.840 --> 00:46:25.860 align:start position:0% for you to be getting it back to that level<00:46:23.880> this<00:46:24.880> is<00:46:25.030> classified<00:46:25.420> as<00:46:25.600> a<00:46:25.630> quick 00:46:25.860 --> 00:46:25.870 align:start position:0% level this is classified as a quick 00:46:25.870 --> 00:46:27.330 align:start position:0% level this is classified as a quick response<00:46:26.140> to<00:46:26.380> trash<00:46:26.650> team<00:46:26.980> the<00:46:27.190> quick 00:46:27.330 --> 00:46:27.340 align:start position:0% response to trash team the quick 00:46:27.340 --> 00:46:29.460 align:start position:0% response to trash team the quick response<00:46:27.760> trash<00:46:28.330> team<00:46:28.600> is<00:46:28.720> currently<00:46:29.050> what<00:46:29.290> we 00:46:29.460 --> 00:46:29.470 align:start position:0% response trash team is currently what we 00:46:29.470 --> 00:46:32.460 align:start position:0% response trash team is currently what we use<00:46:29.710> to<00:46:29.890> go<00:46:30.040> out<00:46:30.070> and<00:46:30.400> do<00:46:31.080> abatement<00:46:32.080> so<00:46:32.320> they 00:46:32.460 --> 00:46:32.470 align:start position:0% use to go out and do abatement so they 00:46:32.470 --> 00:46:34.650 align:start position:0% use to go out and do abatement so they mow<00:46:32.770> they<00:46:33.160> just<00:46:33.340> don't<00:46:33.550> do<00:46:33.700> trash<00:46:34.030> they<00:46:34.360> stop 00:46:34.650 --> 00:46:34.660 align:start position:0% mow they just don't do trash they stop 00:46:34.660 --> 00:46:36.960 align:start position:0% mow they just don't do trash they stop on<00:46:34.870> a<00:46:34.900> lot<00:46:35.200> they<00:46:35.860> clear<00:46:36.190> it<00:46:36.220> they<00:46:36.550> pick<00:46:36.730> up<00:46:36.850> the 00:46:36.960 --> 00:46:36.970 align:start position:0% on a lot they clear it they pick up the 00:46:36.970 --> 00:46:39.360 align:start position:0% on a lot they clear it they pick up the trash<00:46:37.090> off<00:46:37.420> of<00:46:37.660> it<00:46:37.810> they<00:46:37.990> mow<00:46:38.200> it<00:46:38.380> sometimes 00:46:39.360 --> 00:46:39.370 align:start position:0% trash off of it they mow it sometimes 00:46:39.370 --> 00:46:41.940 align:start position:0% trash off of it they mow it sometimes they'll<00:46:39.640> spend<00:46:39.990> most<00:46:40.990> of<00:46:41.290> the<00:46:41.350> part<00:46:41.560> of<00:46:41.650> a<00:46:41.710> day 00:46:41.940 --> 00:46:41.950 align:start position:0% they'll spend most of the part of a day 00:46:41.950 --> 00:46:43.620 align:start position:0% they'll spend most of the part of a day going<00:46:42.340> through<00:46:42.460> and<00:46:42.790> trying<00:46:42.970> to<00:46:43.120> clear<00:46:43.330> a<00:46:43.360> lot 00:46:43.620 --> 00:46:43.630 align:start position:0% going through and trying to clear a lot 00:46:43.630 --> 00:46:47.520 align:start position:0% going through and trying to clear a lot like<00:46:44.410> that<00:46:44.760> so<00:46:45.760> in<00:46:45.910> order<00:46:46.090> to<00:46:46.360> get<00:46:46.630> closer<00:46:47.380> to 00:46:47.520 --> 00:46:47.530 align:start position:0% like that so in order to get closer to 00:46:47.530 --> 00:46:50.700 align:start position:0% like that so in order to get closer to the<00:46:47.920> 14-day<00:46:48.880> abatement<00:46:49.420> period<00:46:49.780> versus<00:46:50.530> where 00:46:50.700 --> 00:46:50.710 align:start position:0% the 14-day abatement period versus where 00:46:50.710 --> 00:46:52.740 align:start position:0% the 14-day abatement period versus where we're<00:46:50.860> backlog<00:46:51.280> to<00:46:51.520> today<00:46:51.850> we<00:46:52.360> feel<00:46:52.540> like<00:46:52.690> that 00:46:52.740 --> 00:46:52.750 align:start position:0% we're backlog to today we feel like that 00:46:52.750 --> 00:46:54.540 align:start position:0% we're backlog to today we feel like that would<00:46:53.050> require<00:46:53.260> the<00:46:53.740> addition<00:46:54.160> of<00:46:54.250> another 00:46:54.540 --> 00:46:54.550 align:start position:0% would require the addition of another 00:46:54.550 --> 00:46:58.050 align:start position:0% would require the addition of another team<00:46:55.030> these<00:46:55.690> are<00:46:55.870> three<00:46:56.080> member<00:46:56.410> teams<00:46:57.060> they 00:46:58.050 --> 00:46:58.060 align:start position:0% team these are three member teams they 00:46:58.060 --> 00:47:01.350 align:start position:0% team these are three member teams they use<00:46:58.210> a<00:46:58.240> dump<00:46:58.510> truck<00:46:58.720> and<00:46:59.100> a<00:47:00.100> few<00:47:00.610> mowers<00:47:01.060> and 00:47:01.350 --> 00:47:01.360 align:start position:0% use a dump truck and a few mowers and 00:47:01.360 --> 00:47:04.110 align:start position:0% use a dump truck and a few mowers and other<00:47:01.510> such<00:47:01.750> equipment<00:47:02.050> that's<00:47:02.470> the<00:47:03.120> $180,000 00:47:04.110 --> 00:47:04.120 align:start position:0% other such equipment that's the $180,000 00:47:04.120 --> 00:47:07.170 align:start position:0% other such equipment that's the $180,000 part<00:47:04.450> so<00:47:04.810> to<00:47:05.620> do<00:47:05.770> this<00:47:06.010> you<00:47:06.940> see<00:47:07.090> the 00:47:07.170 --> 00:47:07.180 align:start position:0% part so to do this you see the 00:47:07.180 --> 00:47:11.250 align:start position:0% part so to do this you see the combination<00:47:07.750> of<00:47:07.840> a<00:47:07.930> number<00:47:08.230> that's<00:47:10.260> $320,000 00:47:11.250 --> 00:47:11.260 align:start position:0% combination of a number that's $320,000 00:47:11.260 --> 00:47:12.980 align:start position:0% combination of a number that's $320,000 there<00:47:11.470> are<00:47:11.530> $30,000 00:47:12.980 --> 00:47:12.990 align:start position:0% there are $30,000 00:47:12.990 --> 00:47:17.240 align:start position:0% there are $30,000 that's<00:47:13.990> bad<00:47:14.230> 340<00:47:15.040> thousand<00:47:15.490> almost<00:47:15.910> 350<00:47:16.450> so 00:47:17.240 --> 00:47:17.250 align:start position:0% that's bad 340 thousand almost 350 so 00:47:17.250 --> 00:47:21.870 align:start position:0% that's bad 340 thousand almost 350 so but<00:47:18.250> the<00:47:18.370> 180<00:47:18.820> portion<00:47:19.420> is<00:47:19.570> a<00:47:19.920> one-time<00:47:20.920> then 00:47:21.870 --> 00:47:21.880 align:start position:0% but the 180 portion is a one-time then 00:47:21.880 --> 00:47:24.630 align:start position:0% but the 180 portion is a one-time then the<00:47:22.060> staff<00:47:22.270> would<00:47:22.510> be<00:47:22.630> the<00:47:22.750> ongoing<00:47:22.900> and<00:47:23.590> if<00:47:24.490> we 00:47:24.630 --> 00:47:24.640 align:start position:0% the staff would be the ongoing and if we 00:47:24.640 --> 00:47:26.670 align:start position:0% the staff would be the ongoing and if we were<00:47:24.730> to<00:47:24.760> do<00:47:25.000> this<00:47:25.210> starting<00:47:25.990> next<00:47:26.170> year<00:47:26.350> that 00:47:26.670 --> 00:47:26.680 align:start position:0% were to do this starting next year that 00:47:26.680 --> 00:47:29.600 align:start position:0% were to do this starting next year that would<00:47:26.830> be<00:47:26.890> the<00:47:27.130> cost<00:47:28.140> commissioner<00:47:29.140> McKiernan 00:47:29.600 --> 00:47:29.610 align:start position:0% would be the cost commissioner McKiernan 00:47:29.610 --> 00:47:32.670 align:start position:0% would be the cost commissioner McKiernan thank<00:47:30.610> you<00:47:30.790> I<00:47:31.000> did<00:47:31.720> ask<00:47:31.900> what<00:47:32.230> would<00:47:32.350> it<00:47:32.500> take 00:47:32.670 --> 00:47:32.680 align:start position:0% thank you I did ask what would it take 00:47:32.680 --> 00:47:35.460 align:start position:0% thank you I did ask what would it take because<00:47:33.160> I've<00:47:33.730> noticed<00:47:33.970> at<00:47:34.270> least<00:47:34.510> a<00:47:34.780> couple 00:47:35.460 --> 00:47:35.470 align:start position:0% because I've noticed at least a couple 00:47:35.470 --> 00:47:36.900 align:start position:0% because I've noticed at least a couple of<00:47:35.650> occasions<00:47:35.890> where<00:47:36.280> we<00:47:36.430> haven't<00:47:36.640> been 00:47:36.900 --> 00:47:36.910 align:start position:0% of occasions where we haven't been 00:47:36.910 --> 00:47:38.310 align:start position:0% of occasions where we haven't been meeting<00:47:37.330> what<00:47:37.480> we<00:47:37.570> had<00:47:37.690> said<00:47:37.930> we<00:47:37.960> were<00:47:38.200> gonna 00:47:38.310 --> 00:47:38.320 align:start position:0% meeting what we had said we were gonna 00:47:38.320 --> 00:47:40.700 align:start position:0% meeting what we had said we were gonna meet<00:47:38.590> which<00:47:38.800> was<00:47:39.010> a<00:47:39.040> 14-day<00:47:39.700> abatement<00:47:40.210> and 00:47:40.700 --> 00:47:40.710 align:start position:0% meet which was a 14-day abatement and 00:47:40.710 --> 00:47:45.260 align:start position:0% meet which was a 14-day abatement and seeing<00:47:41.710> that<00:47:41.890> price<00:47:42.220> tag<00:47:42.550> I<00:47:42.940> think<00:47:43.630> I<00:47:43.930> am 00:47:45.260 --> 00:47:45.270 align:start position:0% seeing that price tag I think I am 00:47:45.270 --> 00:47:49.110 align:start position:0% seeing that price tag I think I am perfectly<00:47:46.270> fine<00:47:46.570> having<00:47:47.470> now<00:47:48.120> recognized 00:47:49.110 --> 00:47:49.120 align:start position:0% perfectly fine having now recognized 00:47:49.120 --> 00:47:50.940 align:start position:0% perfectly fine having now recognized what<00:47:49.330> it<00:47:49.420> would<00:47:49.540> cost<00:47:49.570> to<00:47:49.990> get<00:47:50.170> to<00:47:50.440> our<00:47:50.590> stated 00:47:50.940 --> 00:47:50.950 align:start position:0% what it would cost to get to our stated 00:47:50.950 --> 00:47:53.040 align:start position:0% what it would cost to get to our stated 14-day<00:47:51.520> abatement<00:47:51.970> if<00:47:52.030> we<00:47:52.150> didn't<00:47:52.570> fund<00:47:52.840> this 00:47:53.040 --> 00:47:53.050 align:start position:0% 14-day abatement if we didn't fund this 00:47:53.050 --> 00:47:56.040 align:start position:0% 14-day abatement if we didn't fund this but<00:47:53.680> instead<00:47:53.830> we're<00:47:54.190> very<00:47:54.400> clear<00:47:54.880> about<00:47:55.720> what 00:47:56.040 --> 00:47:56.050 align:start position:0% but instead we're very clear about what 00:47:56.050 --> 00:47:58.020 align:start position:0% but instead we're very clear about what our<00:47:56.260> procedure<00:47:57.160> and<00:47:57.430> what<00:47:57.550> our<00:47:57.670> expectations 00:47:58.020 --> 00:47:58.030 align:start position:0% our procedure and what our expectations 00:47:58.030 --> 00:48:00.300 align:start position:0% our procedure and what our expectations are<00:47:58.660> going<00:47:58.840> to<00:47:58.960> be<00:47:59.050> going<00:47:59.470> forward<00:47:59.860> because<00:48:00.190> I 00:48:00.300 --> 00:48:00.310 align:start position:0% are going to be going forward because I 00:48:00.310 --> 00:48:02.730 align:start position:0% are going to be going forward because I thought<00:48:00.670> we<00:48:01.660> were<00:48:01.810> operating<00:48:02.260> under<00:48:02.650> the 00:48:02.730 --> 00:48:02.740 align:start position:0% thought we were operating under the 00:48:02.740 --> 00:48:05.430 align:start position:0% thought we were operating under the 14-day<00:48:03.370> abatement<00:48:03.910> and<00:48:04.230> evidently<00:48:05.230> we 00:48:05.430 --> 00:48:05.440 align:start position:0% 14-day abatement and evidently we 00:48:05.440 --> 00:48:08.280 align:start position:0% 14-day abatement and evidently we haven't<00:48:05.770> been<00:48:05.920> and<00:48:06.190> it's<00:48:06.580> been<00:48:06.910> in<00:48:07.180> part<00:48:07.720> due 00:48:08.280 --> 00:48:08.290 align:start position:0% haven't been and it's been in part due 00:48:08.290 --> 00:48:10.319 align:start position:0% haven't been and it's been in part due to<00:48:08.320> funding<00:48:08.620> but<00:48:09.400> I<00:48:09.430> would<00:48:09.640> ask 00:48:10.319 --> 00:48:10.329 align:start position:0% to funding but I would ask 00:48:10.329 --> 00:48:12.839 align:start position:0% to funding but I would ask an<00:48:10.390> additional<00:48:11.049> thing<00:48:11.289> and<00:48:11.559> that<00:48:12.009> would<00:48:12.189> be<00:48:12.429> if 00:48:12.839 --> 00:48:12.849 align:start position:0% an additional thing and that would be if 00:48:12.849 --> 00:48:15.839 align:start position:0% an additional thing and that would be if we<00:48:13.269> choose<00:48:13.599> and<00:48:13.900> that<00:48:13.989> is<00:48:14.140> a<00:48:14.170> large<00:48:14.849> dollar 00:48:15.839 --> 00:48:15.849 align:start position:0% we choose and that is a large dollar 00:48:15.849 --> 00:48:19.829 align:start position:0% we choose and that is a large dollar amount<00:48:16.299> for<00:48:16.569> a<00:48:17.079> an<00:48:17.579> abatement<00:48:18.579> season<00:48:19.359> that<00:48:19.599> is 00:48:19.829 --> 00:48:19.839 align:start position:0% amount for a an abatement season that is 00:48:19.839 --> 00:48:22.589 align:start position:0% amount for a an abatement season that is winding<00:48:20.349> down<00:48:20.650> and<00:48:21.309> if<00:48:21.969> we<00:48:22.059> choose<00:48:22.329> not<00:48:22.539> to 00:48:22.589 --> 00:48:22.599 align:start position:0% winding down and if we choose not to 00:48:22.599 --> 00:48:25.829 align:start position:0% winding down and if we choose not to fund<00:48:22.989> this<00:48:23.349> for<00:48:24.130> the<00:48:24.249> entirety<00:48:24.729> of<00:48:24.759> 2019<00:48:25.569> I 00:48:25.829 --> 00:48:25.839 align:start position:0% fund this for the entirety of 2019 I 00:48:25.839 --> 00:48:29.219 align:start position:0% fund this for the entirety of 2019 I would<00:48:26.439> ask<00:48:26.709> that<00:48:26.949> we<00:48:28.019> seriously<00:48:29.019> and 00:48:29.219 --> 00:48:29.229 align:start position:0% would ask that we seriously and 00:48:29.229 --> 00:48:31.890 align:start position:0% would ask that we seriously and intentionally<00:48:30.160> build<00:48:30.880> this<00:48:31.209> into<00:48:31.779> the 00:48:31.890 --> 00:48:31.900 align:start position:0% intentionally build this into the 00:48:31.900 --> 00:48:35.120 align:start position:0% intentionally build this into the amended<00:48:32.410> 19<00:48:32.949> so<00:48:33.609> that<00:48:33.849> the<00:48:33.999> halfway<00:48:34.509> point<00:48:34.869> of 00:48:35.120 --> 00:48:35.130 align:start position:0% amended 19 so that the halfway point of 00:48:35.130 --> 00:48:38.729 align:start position:0% amended 19 so that the halfway point of 2019<00:48:36.130> if<00:48:36.579> we<00:48:36.939> are<00:48:37.089> not<00:48:37.269> keeping<00:48:37.599> up<00:48:37.989> as<00:48:38.229> we 00:48:38.729 --> 00:48:38.739 align:start position:0% 2019 if we are not keeping up as we 00:48:38.739 --> 00:48:40.589 align:start position:0% 2019 if we are not keeping up as we appear<00:48:39.069> not<00:48:39.219> to<00:48:39.279> be<00:48:39.429> doing<00:48:39.729> this<00:48:39.880> year<00:48:40.150> that 00:48:40.589 --> 00:48:40.599 align:start position:0% appear not to be doing this year that 00:48:40.599 --> 00:48:43.319 align:start position:0% appear not to be doing this year that we've<00:48:40.779> intentionally<00:48:41.229> built<00:48:41.890> in<00:48:42.279> a<00:48:42.459> backstop 00:48:43.319 --> 00:48:43.329 align:start position:0% we've intentionally built in a backstop 00:48:43.329 --> 00:48:46.589 align:start position:0% we've intentionally built in a backstop for<00:48:43.599> the<00:48:43.809> second<00:48:44.199> half<00:48:44.380> of<00:48:44.499> 2019<00:48:45.309> so<00:48:45.999> I'm<00:48:46.150> okay 00:48:46.589 --> 00:48:46.599 align:start position:0% for the second half of 2019 so I'm okay 00:48:46.599 --> 00:48:48.479 align:start position:0% for the second half of 2019 so I'm okay now<00:48:47.410> that<00:48:47.559> we've<00:48:47.679> identified<00:48:47.829> what<00:48:48.369> it's 00:48:48.479 --> 00:48:48.489 align:start position:0% now that we've identified what it's 00:48:48.489 --> 00:48:50.489 align:start position:0% now that we've identified what it's going<00:48:48.579> to<00:48:48.670> take<00:48:48.880> I<00:48:49.259> think<00:48:50.259> we<00:48:50.349> should 00:48:50.489 --> 00:48:50.499 align:start position:0% going to take I think we should 00:48:50.499 --> 00:48:51.959 align:start position:0% going to take I think we should communicate<00:48:50.709> it's<00:48:51.429> not<00:48:51.640> going<00:48:51.789> to<00:48:51.849> be<00:48:51.939> a 00:48:51.959 --> 00:48:51.969 align:start position:0% communicate it's not going to be a 00:48:51.969 --> 00:48:54.120 align:start position:0% communicate it's not going to be a 14-day<00:48:52.509> abatement<00:48:52.959> and<00:48:53.109> I<00:48:53.619> think<00:48:53.859> we<00:48:53.979> should 00:48:54.120 --> 00:48:54.130 align:start position:0% 14-day abatement and I think we should 00:48:54.130 --> 00:48:55.949 align:start position:0% 14-day abatement and I think we should intentionally<00:48:54.910> build<00:48:55.269> this<00:48:55.479> into<00:48:55.869> the 00:48:55.949 --> 00:48:55.959 align:start position:0% intentionally build this into the 00:48:55.959 --> 00:48:58.709 align:start position:0% intentionally build this into the amended<00:48:56.349> 19<00:48:56.890> so<00:48:57.459> that<00:48:57.609> we<00:48:57.729> can<00:48:57.910> pick<00:48:58.179> it<00:48:58.239> up<00:48:58.449> at 00:48:58.709 --> 00:48:58.719 align:start position:0% amended 19 so that we can pick it up at 00:48:58.719 --> 00:49:01.919 align:start position:0% amended 19 so that we can pick it up at 14<00:48:59.439> days<00:48:59.619> when<00:49:00.609> we<00:49:00.729> get<00:49:00.999> to<00:49:01.269> the<00:49:01.509> middle<00:49:01.689> of 00:49:01.919 --> 00:49:01.929 align:start position:0% 14 days when we get to the middle of 00:49:01.929 --> 00:49:16.370 align:start position:0% 14 days when we get to the middle of 2019<00:49:05.880> yes<00:49:06.880> mr.<00:49:07.660> Townsend<00:49:08.999> you're<00:49:09.999> agreeing 00:49:16.370 --> 00:49:16.380 align:start position:0% 00:49:16.380 --> 00:49:19.650 align:start position:0% maybe<00:49:17.380> four<00:49:18.160> to<00:49:18.309> six<00:49:18.549> weeks<00:49:18.759> is<00:49:19.329> that<00:49:19.390> what 00:49:19.650 --> 00:49:19.660 align:start position:0% maybe four to six weeks is that what 00:49:19.660 --> 00:49:21.900 align:start position:0% maybe four to six weeks is that what that<00:49:19.689> means<00:49:19.949> is<00:49:20.949> that<00:49:21.009> correct<00:49:21.400> I'm<00:49:21.699> just 00:49:21.900 --> 00:49:21.910 align:start position:0% that means is that correct I'm just 00:49:21.910 --> 00:49:24.469 align:start position:0% that means is that correct I'm just trying<00:49:22.179> to<00:49:22.239> make<00:49:22.509> right<00:49:22.719> now<00:49:22.749> Melissa<00:49:23.259> Dina 00:49:24.469 --> 00:49:24.479 align:start position:0% trying to make right now Melissa Dina 00:49:24.479 --> 00:49:28.949 align:start position:0% trying to make right now Melissa Dina it's<00:49:25.479> it's<00:49:25.900> really<00:49:26.170> it's<00:49:26.589> dependent<00:49:27.549> so<00:49:27.959> the 00:49:28.949 --> 00:49:28.959 align:start position:0% it's it's really it's dependent so the 00:49:28.959 --> 00:49:32.099 align:start position:0% it's it's really it's dependent so the last<00:49:29.849> count<00:49:30.849> we<00:49:30.999> had<00:49:31.239> we<00:49:31.479> were<00:49:31.630> running<00:49:32.019> it 00:49:32.099 --> 00:49:32.109 align:start position:0% last count we had we were running it 00:49:32.109 --> 00:49:33.989 align:start position:0% last count we had we were running it around<00:49:32.380> 14<00:49:32.859> days<00:49:33.039> from<00:49:33.249> May<00:49:33.369> June<00:49:33.640> July 00:49:33.989 --> 00:49:33.999 align:start position:0% around 14 days from May June July 00:49:33.999 --> 00:49:36.630 align:start position:0% around 14 days from May June July so<00:49:34.329> the<00:49:34.449> sometimes<00:49:35.049> it<00:49:35.259> depends<00:49:35.589> on<00:49:35.650> when<00:49:35.859> when 00:49:36.630 --> 00:49:36.640 align:start position:0% so the sometimes it depends on when when 00:49:36.640 --> 00:49:39.329 align:start position:0% so the sometimes it depends on when when things<00:49:37.029> get<00:49:37.269> catalogued<00:49:37.749> in<00:49:37.929> so<00:49:38.349> and<00:49:38.739> you<00:49:39.189> got 00:49:39.329 --> 00:49:39.339 align:start position:0% things get catalogued in so and you got 00:49:39.339 --> 00:49:41.400 align:start position:0% things get catalogued in so and you got that<00:49:39.489> time<00:49:39.789> from<00:49:40.239> when<00:49:40.630> it<00:49:40.779> got<00:49:41.049> into<00:49:41.289> the 00:49:41.400 --> 00:49:41.410 align:start position:0% that time from when it got into the 00:49:41.410 --> 00:49:43.769 align:start position:0% that time from when it got into the system<00:49:41.439> versus<00:49:42.130> time<00:49:43.119> from<00:49:43.390> which<00:49:43.539> it<00:49:43.689> was 00:49:43.769 --> 00:49:43.779 align:start position:0% system versus time from which it was 00:49:43.779 --> 00:49:44.309 align:start position:0% system versus time from which it was noticed 00:49:44.309 --> 00:49:44.319 align:start position:0% noticed 00:49:44.319 --> 00:49:47.130 align:start position:0% noticed okay<00:49:44.650> so<00:49:44.709> we're<00:49:45.189> running<00:49:45.519> around<00:49:45.640> there<00:49:46.140> but 00:49:47.130 --> 00:49:47.140 align:start position:0% okay so we're running around there but 00:49:47.140 --> 00:49:50.939 align:start position:0% okay so we're running around there but we<00:49:47.289> have<00:49:47.499> done<00:49:48.029> 988<00:49:49.170> statements<00:49:50.170> so<00:49:50.349> far<00:49:50.709> this 00:49:50.939 --> 00:49:50.949 align:start position:0% we have done 988 statements so far this 00:49:50.949 --> 00:49:55.979 align:start position:0% we have done 988 statements so far this year<00:49:51.719> so<00:49:52.719> that's<00:49:53.709> I<00:49:54.249> think<00:49:54.880> that<00:49:55.509> it's<00:49:55.749> the 00:49:55.979 --> 00:49:55.989 align:start position:0% year so that's I think that it's the 00:49:55.989 --> 00:49:58.410 align:start position:0% year so that's I think that it's the sheer<00:49:56.349> volume<00:49:56.619> the<00:49:57.519> three-person<00:49:58.150> team 00:49:58.410 --> 00:49:58.420 align:start position:0% sheer volume the three-person team 00:49:58.420 --> 00:50:00.689 align:start position:0% sheer volume the three-person team worked<00:49:58.689> an<00:49:58.809> average<00:49:59.170> of<00:49:59.309> 240<00:50:00.309> hours<00:50:00.339> of 00:50:00.689 --> 00:50:00.699 align:start position:0% worked an average of 240 hours of 00:50:00.699 --> 00:50:03.209 align:start position:0% worked an average of 240 hours of overtime<00:50:00.910> from<00:50:01.390> October<00:50:01.959> to<00:50:02.079> April<00:50:02.229> and<00:50:02.650> 17 00:50:03.209 --> 00:50:03.219 align:start position:0% overtime from October to April and 17 00:50:03.219 --> 00:50:06.059 align:start position:0% overtime from October to April and 17 and<00:50:03.519> an<00:50:04.059> 18<00:50:04.539> to<00:50:04.809> keep<00:50:04.989> up<00:50:05.170> with<00:50:05.650> demands 00:50:06.059 --> 00:50:06.069 align:start position:0% and an 18 to keep up with demands 00:50:06.069 --> 00:50:08.339 align:start position:0% and an 18 to keep up with demands additional<00:50:07.029> Parks<00:50:07.359> crews<00:50:07.630> have<00:50:07.869> been<00:50:07.989> working 00:50:08.339 --> 00:50:08.349 align:start position:0% additional Parks crews have been working 00:50:08.349 --> 00:50:11.130 align:start position:0% additional Parks crews have been working overtime<00:50:08.589> as<00:50:08.920> needed<00:50:09.249> so<00:50:09.400> but<00:50:10.390> you're<00:50:10.959> not 00:50:11.130 --> 00:50:11.140 align:start position:0% overtime as needed so but you're not 00:50:11.140 --> 00:50:13.859 align:start position:0% overtime as needed so but you're not this<00:50:12.039> isn't<00:50:12.429> kind<00:50:12.729> of<00:50:12.819> a<00:50:12.999> comprehensive<00:50:13.509> way 00:50:13.859 --> 00:50:13.869 align:start position:0% this isn't kind of a comprehensive way 00:50:13.869 --> 00:50:15.749 align:start position:0% this isn't kind of a comprehensive way of<00:50:13.959> looking<00:50:14.319> at<00:50:14.439> this<00:50:14.619> so<00:50:14.890> we<00:50:14.920> could<00:50:15.549> bring 00:50:15.749 --> 00:50:15.759 align:start position:0% of looking at this so we could bring 00:50:15.759 --> 00:50:17.759 align:start position:0% of looking at this so we could bring back<00:50:15.789> more<00:50:16.209> information<00:50:17.140> to<00:50:17.289> kind<00:50:17.439> of<00:50:17.559> show 00:50:17.759 --> 00:50:17.769 align:start position:0% back more information to kind of show 00:50:17.769 --> 00:50:21.390 align:start position:0% back more information to kind of show you<00:50:18.209> Melissa<00:50:19.209> I<00:50:19.329> wonder<00:50:19.569> if<00:50:19.719> so<00:50:19.900> do<00:50:20.739> we<00:50:20.890> expect 00:50:21.390 --> 00:50:21.400 align:start position:0% you Melissa I wonder if so do we expect 00:50:21.400 --> 00:50:23.590 align:start position:0% you Melissa I wonder if so do we expect that<00:50:21.819> the<00:50:22.299> numbers<00:50:22.749> freeze 00:50:23.590 --> 00:50:23.600 align:start position:0% that the numbers freeze 00:50:23.600 --> 00:50:26.440 align:start position:0% that the numbers freeze for<00:50:24.020> us<00:50:24.170> to<00:50:24.380> remediate<00:50:24.620> will<00:50:25.040> be<00:50:25.610> ratcheting 00:50:26.440 --> 00:50:26.450 align:start position:0% for us to remediate will be ratcheting 00:50:26.450 --> 00:50:28.630 align:start position:0% for us to remediate will be ratcheting down<00:50:26.660> over<00:50:26.960> time<00:50:27.200> or<00:50:27.530> is<00:50:27.590> this<00:50:27.950> a<00:50:28.010> constant 00:50:28.630 --> 00:50:28.640 align:start position:0% down over time or is this a constant 00:50:28.640 --> 00:50:33.240 align:start position:0% down over time or is this a constant supply<00:50:29.560> that<00:50:30.560> is<00:50:31.010> going<00:50:31.880> to<00:50:32.000> require<00:50:32.150> the 00:50:33.240 --> 00:50:33.250 align:start position:0% supply that is going to require the 00:50:33.250 --> 00:50:35.410 align:start position:0% supply that is going to require the equipment<00:50:34.250> and<00:50:34.370> the<00:50:34.460> staffing<00:50:34.730> on<00:50:35.180> an<00:50:35.270> ongoing 00:50:35.410 --> 00:50:35.420 align:start position:0% equipment and the staffing on an ongoing 00:50:35.420 --> 00:50:39.550 align:start position:0% equipment and the staffing on an ongoing basis<00:50:36.850> in<00:50:37.850> the<00:50:38.060> time<00:50:38.360> that<00:50:38.390> most<00:50:38.990> of<00:50:39.200> us<00:50:39.320> will 00:50:39.550 --> 00:50:39.560 align:start position:0% basis in the time that most of us will 00:50:39.560 --> 00:50:42.760 align:start position:0% basis in the time that most of us will be<00:50:39.800> here<00:50:40.220> and<00:50:40.430> probably<00:50:40.880> beyond<00:50:41.630> it<00:50:42.320> will<00:50:42.590> be 00:50:42.760 --> 00:50:42.770 align:start position:0% be here and probably beyond it will be 00:50:42.770 --> 00:50:45.370 align:start position:0% be here and probably beyond it will be constant<00:50:43.540> it's<00:50:44.540> not<00:50:44.900> going<00:50:45.140> to<00:50:45.230> turn 00:50:45.370 --> 00:50:45.380 align:start position:0% constant it's not going to turn 00:50:45.380 --> 00:50:48.730 align:start position:0% constant it's not going to turn overnight<00:50:45.860> okay<00:50:46.460> and<00:50:47.180> I've<00:50:47.570> I've<00:50:48.050> got<00:50:48.320> plenty 00:50:48.730 --> 00:50:48.740 align:start position:0% overnight okay and I've I've got plenty 00:50:48.740 --> 00:50:51.460 align:start position:0% overnight okay and I've I've got plenty more<00:50:48.860> years<00:50:49.190> ahead<00:50:49.310> of<00:50:49.430> me<00:50:49.550> so<00:50:50.470> commissioner 00:50:51.460 --> 00:50:51.470 align:start position:0% more years ahead of me so commissioner 00:50:51.470 --> 00:50:54.790 align:start position:0% more years ahead of me so commissioner McKiernan<00:50:51.880> thank<00:50:52.880> you<00:50:53.060> I<00:50:53.180> think<00:50:53.540> in<00:50:54.470> a<00:50:54.560> couple 00:50:54.790 --> 00:50:54.800 align:start position:0% McKiernan thank you I think in a couple 00:50:54.800 --> 00:50:56.380 align:start position:0% McKiernan thank you I think in a couple of<00:50:54.860> the<00:50:54.980> cases<00:50:55.340> that<00:50:55.370> I<00:50:55.490> brought<00:50:55.790> forward<00:50:56.090> I 00:50:56.380 --> 00:50:56.390 align:start position:0% of the cases that I brought forward I 00:50:56.390 --> 00:50:58.840 align:start position:0% of the cases that I brought forward I think<00:50:56.660> that<00:50:57.020> once<00:50:57.620> we<00:50:57.800> get<00:50:57.980> to<00:50:58.160> abatement<00:50:58.700> it 00:50:58.840 --> 00:50:58.850 align:start position:0% think that once we get to abatement it 00:50:58.850 --> 00:51:01.330 align:start position:0% think that once we get to abatement it actually<00:50:59.390> is<00:50:59.720> moving<00:51:00.200> reasonably<00:51:01.100> quickly 00:51:01.330 --> 00:51:01.340 align:start position:0% actually is moving reasonably quickly 00:51:01.340 --> 00:51:02.680 align:start position:0% actually is moving reasonably quickly that<00:51:02.000> I<00:51:02.030> think<00:51:02.270> there<00:51:02.390> are<00:51:02.480> some<00:51:02.570> other 00:51:02.680 --> 00:51:02.690 align:start position:0% that I think there are some other 00:51:02.690 --> 00:51:04.300 align:start position:0% that I think there are some other process<00:51:03.260> improvements<00:51:03.860> we<00:51:03.980> could<00:51:04.160> make 00:51:04.300 --> 00:51:04.310 align:start position:0% process improvements we could make 00:51:04.310 --> 00:51:06.100 align:start position:0% process improvements we could make internally<00:51:04.850> that<00:51:04.970> would<00:51:05.120> cut<00:51:05.300> the<00:51:05.450> total<00:51:05.870> time 00:51:06.100 --> 00:51:06.110 align:start position:0% internally that would cut the total time 00:51:06.110 --> 00:51:09.970 align:start position:0% internally that would cut the total time from<00:51:06.800> submission<00:51:07.520> to<00:51:07.880> completion<00:51:08.360> down<00:51:09.080> even 00:51:09.970 --> 00:51:09.980 align:start position:0% from submission to completion down even 00:51:09.980 --> 00:51:12.070 align:start position:0% from submission to completion down even if<00:51:10.100> the<00:51:10.220> abatement<00:51:10.490> still<00:51:10.940> ends<00:51:11.270> up<00:51:11.360> at<00:51:11.570> a<00:51:11.600> 14 00:51:12.070 --> 00:51:12.080 align:start position:0% if the abatement still ends up at a 14 00:51:12.080 --> 00:51:16.030 align:start position:0% if the abatement still ends up at a 14 to<00:51:12.260> 28<00:51:12.590> day<00:51:13.030> period<00:51:14.030> but<00:51:14.480> I<00:51:14.510> really<00:51:15.110> am<00:51:15.290> adamant 00:51:16.030 --> 00:51:16.040 align:start position:0% to 28 day period but I really am adamant 00:51:16.040 --> 00:51:18.970 align:start position:0% to 28 day period but I really am adamant that<00:51:16.520> when<00:51:16.760> we<00:51:16.940> start<00:51:17.510> building<00:51:18.140> next<00:51:18.650> year's 00:51:18.970 --> 00:51:18.980 align:start position:0% that when we start building next year's 00:51:18.980 --> 00:51:21.370 align:start position:0% that when we start building next year's budget<00:51:19.190> that<00:51:19.850> these<00:51:20.150> real<00:51:20.570> numbers<00:51:21.080> this 00:51:21.370 --> 00:51:21.380 align:start position:0% budget that these real numbers this 00:51:21.380 --> 00:51:22.960 align:start position:0% budget that these real numbers this accurate<00:51:21.980> assessment<00:51:22.490> of<00:51:22.550> what<00:51:22.700> it's<00:51:22.850> going 00:51:22.960 --> 00:51:22.970 align:start position:0% accurate assessment of what it's going 00:51:22.970 --> 00:51:25.240 align:start position:0% accurate assessment of what it's going to<00:51:23.030> take<00:51:23.270> be<00:51:23.840> included<00:51:24.380> from<00:51:24.620> the<00:51:24.680> very 00:51:25.240 --> 00:51:25.250 align:start position:0% to take be included from the very 00:51:25.250 --> 00:51:27.370 align:start position:0% to take be included from the very beginning<00:51:25.850> of<00:51:25.970> building<00:51:26.540> next<00:51:26.960> year's<00:51:27.170> budget 00:51:27.370 --> 00:51:27.380 align:start position:0% beginning of building next year's budget 00:51:27.380 --> 00:51:29.830 align:start position:0% beginning of building next year's budget so<00:51:28.010> we<00:51:28.220> we<00:51:28.490> don't<00:51:28.670> confront<00:51:29.060> it<00:51:29.330> like<00:51:29.540> we<00:51:29.690> do 00:51:29.830 --> 00:51:29.840 align:start position:0% so we we don't confront it like we do 00:51:29.840 --> 00:51:35.100 align:start position:0% so we we don't confront it like we do this<00:51:30.140> at<00:51:30.920> the<00:51:31.160> 11th<00:51:31.520> hour<00:51:33.190> mr.<00:51:34.190> mark<00:51:34.460> Lee<00:51:34.610> I 00:51:35.100 --> 00:51:35.110 align:start position:0% this at the 11th hour mr. mark Lee I 00:51:35.110 --> 00:51:37.450 align:start position:0% this at the 11th hour mr. mark Lee I agree<00:51:36.110> and<00:51:36.260> next<00:51:36.800> time<00:51:36.920> we<00:51:37.010> have<00:51:37.130> a<00:51:37.160> soar 00:51:37.450 --> 00:51:37.460 align:start position:0% agree and next time we have a soar 00:51:37.460 --> 00:51:39.280 align:start position:0% agree and next time we have a soar update<00:51:37.850> maybe<00:51:38.120> we<00:51:38.390> could<00:51:38.540> have<00:51:38.750> some<00:51:39.050> of<00:51:39.080> the 00:51:39.280 --> 00:51:39.290 align:start position:0% update maybe we could have some of the 00:51:39.290 --> 00:51:42.700 align:start position:0% update maybe we could have some of the additional<00:51:39.830> data<00:51:40.570> to<00:51:41.570> help<00:51:41.720> us<00:51:41.930> move<00:51:42.260> forward 00:51:42.700 --> 00:51:42.710 align:start position:0% additional data to help us move forward 00:51:42.710 --> 00:51:48.370 align:start position:0% additional data to help us move forward just<00:51:44.530> for<00:51:45.530> clarity<00:51:45.980> yes<00:51:46.490> we<00:51:47.450> are<00:51:47.630> we<00:51:47.870> paid<00:51:48.140> how 00:51:48.370 --> 00:51:48.380 align:start position:0% just for clarity yes we are we paid how 00:51:48.380 --> 00:51:53.860 align:start position:0% just for clarity yes we are we paid how much<00:51:48.590> overtime<00:51:48.920> I'm<00:51:49.340> sorry<00:51:51.940> last<00:51:52.940> year<00:51:53.480> which 00:51:53.860 --> 00:51:53.870 align:start position:0% much overtime I'm sorry last year which 00:51:53.870 --> 00:51:56.590 align:start position:0% much overtime I'm sorry last year which is<00:51:54.050> our<00:51:54.170> last<00:51:54.620> fiscal<00:51:55.220> year<00:51:55.460> that's<00:51:55.850> closed<00:51:56.210> it 00:51:56.590 --> 00:51:56.600 align:start position:0% is our last fiscal year that's closed it 00:51:56.600 --> 00:51:59.100 align:start position:0% is our last fiscal year that's closed it was<00:51:56.780> an<00:51:56.900> average<00:51:57.110> of<00:51:57.350> 240<00:51:58.190> hours<00:51:58.220> of<00:51:58.700> overtime 00:51:59.100 --> 00:51:59.110 align:start position:0% was an average of 240 hours of overtime 00:51:59.110 --> 00:52:03.220 align:start position:0% was an average of 240 hours of overtime or<00:52:00.110> that<00:52:00.410> crew<00:52:00.890> but<00:52:01.900> understand<00:52:02.900> that<00:52:03.110> we've 00:52:03.220 --> 00:52:03.230 align:start position:0% or that crew but understand that we've 00:52:03.230 --> 00:52:05.230 align:start position:0% or that crew but understand that we've also<00:52:03.500> been<00:52:03.650> pulling<00:52:04.130> another<00:52:04.400> park<00:52:04.760> staff<00:52:05.030> to 00:52:05.230 --> 00:52:05.240 align:start position:0% also been pulling another park staff to 00:52:05.240 --> 00:52:06.610 align:start position:0% also been pulling another park staff to help<00:52:05.360> out<00:52:05.600> when<00:52:05.750> they<00:52:05.900> start<00:52:05.960> getting<00:52:06.290> further 00:52:06.610 --> 00:52:06.620 align:start position:0% help out when they start getting further 00:52:06.620 --> 00:52:08.980 align:start position:0% help out when they start getting further behind<00:52:06.970> so<00:52:07.970> do<00:52:08.240> we<00:52:08.330> know<00:52:08.480> what<00:52:08.630> that<00:52:08.660> dollar 00:52:08.980 --> 00:52:08.990 align:start position:0% behind so do we know what that dollar 00:52:08.990 --> 00:52:11.530 align:start position:0% behind so do we know what that dollar amount<00:52:09.110> is<00:52:09.470> not<00:52:10.310> in<00:52:10.550> the<00:52:10.790> information<00:52:11.300> I<00:52:11.390> have 00:52:11.530 --> 00:52:11.540 align:start position:0% amount is not in the information I have 00:52:11.540 --> 00:52:15.010 align:start position:0% amount is not in the information I have before<00:52:11.720> me<00:52:12.190> okay<00:52:13.190> thanks<00:52:14.150> you<00:52:14.690> could<00:52:14.840> bring 00:52:15.010 --> 00:52:15.020 align:start position:0% before me okay thanks you could bring 00:52:15.020 --> 00:52:18.060 align:start position:0% before me okay thanks you could bring that<00:52:15.170> forward<00:52:15.470> with<00:52:15.740> that<00:52:15.860> other<00:52:16.510> implement 00:52:18.060 --> 00:52:18.070 align:start position:0% that forward with that other implement 00:52:18.070 --> 00:52:22.030 align:start position:0% that forward with that other implement mr.<00:52:19.070> Tobin<00:52:19.720> if<00:52:20.720> I<00:52:20.900> might<00:52:21.140> mayor<00:52:21.800> and 00:52:22.030 --> 00:52:22.040 align:start position:0% mr. Tobin if I might mayor and 00:52:22.040 --> 00:52:25.420 align:start position:0% mr. Tobin if I might mayor and commissioners<00:52:23.050> administrator<00:52:24.050> a<00:52:24.800> couple<00:52:25.310> of 00:52:25.420 --> 00:52:25.430 align:start position:0% commissioners administrator a couple of 00:52:25.430 --> 00:52:28.480 align:start position:0% commissioners administrator a couple of notes<00:52:25.640> going<00:52:26.630> forward<00:52:27.170> here<00:52:27.380> jack<00:52:28.070> has<00:52:28.280> had<00:52:28.310> a 00:52:28.480 --> 00:52:28.490 align:start position:0% notes going forward here jack has had a 00:52:28.490 --> 00:52:31.600 align:start position:0% notes going forward here jack has had a hard<00:52:28.730> time<00:52:28.790> in<00:52:29.210> parks<00:52:30.130> keeping<00:52:31.130> up<00:52:31.280> on<00:52:31.490> the 00:52:31.600 --> 00:52:31.610 align:start position:0% hard time in parks keeping up on the 00:52:31.610 --> 00:52:33.820 align:start position:0% hard time in parks keeping up on the part-time<00:52:32.120> people<00:52:32.810> and<00:52:33.140> bringing<00:52:33.470> them<00:52:33.620> on 00:52:33.820 --> 00:52:33.830 align:start position:0% part-time people and bringing them on 00:52:33.830 --> 00:52:36.220 align:start position:0% part-time people and bringing them on and<00:52:34.190> just<00:52:34.910> like<00:52:35.030> Melissa<00:52:35.390> said<00:52:35.720> a<00:52:35.750> few<00:52:35.930> minutes 00:52:36.220 --> 00:52:36.230 align:start position:0% and just like Melissa said a few minutes 00:52:36.230 --> 00:52:36.859 align:start position:0% and just like Melissa said a few minutes ago 00:52:36.859 --> 00:52:36.869 align:start position:0% ago 00:52:36.869 --> 00:52:38.720 align:start position:0% ago there<00:52:37.200> this<00:52:37.499> is<00:52:37.680> part<00:52:38.099> of<00:52:38.190> a<00:52:38.309> much<00:52:38.490> bigger 00:52:38.720 --> 00:52:38.730 align:start position:0% there this is part of a much bigger 00:52:38.730 --> 00:52:42.980 align:start position:0% there this is part of a much bigger picture<00:52:39.299> but<00:52:40.289> understand<00:52:41.279> for<00:52:41.549> the<00:52:41.640> future<00:52:42.029> as 00:52:42.980 --> 00:52:42.990 align:start position:0% picture but understand for the future as 00:52:42.990 --> 00:52:44.269 align:start position:0% picture but understand for the future as commissioner<00:52:43.440> MacKinnon<00:52:43.890> said<00:52:44.069> a<00:52:44.099> few 00:52:44.269 --> 00:52:44.279 align:start position:0% commissioner MacKinnon said a few 00:52:44.279 --> 00:52:46.339 align:start position:0% commissioner MacKinnon said a few minutes<00:52:44.430> ago<00:52:44.640> if<00:52:45.599> you<00:52:45.809> tried 00:52:46.339 --> 00:52:46.349 align:start position:0% minutes ago if you tried 00:52:46.349 --> 00:52:49.130 align:start position:0% minutes ago if you tried right<00:52:46.890> now<00:52:47.099> if<00:52:47.249> you<00:52:47.400> approve<00:52:47.789> this<00:52:48.049> by<00:52:49.049> the 00:52:49.130 --> 00:52:49.140 align:start position:0% right now if you approve this by the 00:52:49.140 --> 00:52:51.380 align:start position:0% right now if you approve this by the time<00:52:49.380> you<00:52:49.559> got<00:52:49.710> the<00:52:49.829> staff<00:52:50.069> on<00:52:50.339> board<00:52:50.579> and<00:52:50.940> the 00:52:51.380 --> 00:52:51.390 align:start position:0% time you got the staff on board and the 00:52:51.390 --> 00:52:53.539 align:start position:0% time you got the staff on board and the equipment<00:52:51.900> purchased<00:52:52.319> it<00:52:52.980> wouldn't<00:52:53.339> have<00:52:53.430> an 00:52:53.539 --> 00:52:53.549 align:start position:0% equipment purchased it wouldn't have an 00:52:53.549 --> 00:52:57.109 align:start position:0% equipment purchased it wouldn't have an impact<00:52:53.940> until<00:52:54.329> 2019<00:52:55.160> so<00:52:56.160> if<00:52:56.309> you<00:52:56.430> waited<00:52:56.819> to<00:52:56.970> do 00:52:57.109 --> 00:52:57.119 align:start position:0% impact until 2019 so if you waited to do 00:52:57.119 --> 00:53:00.499 align:start position:0% impact until 2019 so if you waited to do that<00:52:57.299> in<00:52:57.480> a<00:52:57.599> revised<00:52:58.579> 2019<00:52:59.579> your<00:52:59.849> impact<00:53:00.269> is 00:53:00.499 --> 00:53:00.509 align:start position:0% that in a revised 2019 your impact is 00:53:00.509 --> 00:53:03.920 align:start position:0% that in a revised 2019 your impact is gonna<00:53:00.779> be<00:53:00.960> six<00:53:01.259> months<00:53:01.559> later<00:53:01.769> probably<00:53:02.930> just 00:53:03.920 --> 00:53:03.930 align:start position:0% gonna be six months later probably just 00:53:03.930 --> 00:53:14.150 align:start position:0% gonna be six months later probably just a<00:53:04.049> note<00:53:09.349> commissioner<00:53:10.349> Kane<00:53:13.130> well<00:53:14.130> I 00:53:14.150 --> 00:53:14.160 align:start position:0% a note commissioner Kane well I 00:53:14.160 --> 00:53:16.579 align:start position:0% a note commissioner Kane well I certainly<00:53:14.490> think<00:53:14.730> we<00:53:14.999> need<00:53:15.269> to<00:53:15.390> add<00:53:15.539> some<00:53:16.230> cash 00:53:16.579 --> 00:53:16.589 align:start position:0% certainly think we need to add some cash 00:53:16.589 --> 00:53:19.549 align:start position:0% certainly think we need to add some cash to<00:53:17.069> cut<00:53:17.249> in<00:53:17.369> the<00:53:17.460> grass<00:53:18.109> and<00:53:19.109> I<00:53:19.380> would 00:53:19.549 --> 00:53:19.559 align:start position:0% to cut in the grass and I would 00:53:19.559 --> 00:53:20.989 align:start position:0% to cut in the grass and I would elaborate<00:53:20.130> but<00:53:20.339> we<00:53:20.460> don't<00:53:20.640> have<00:53:20.789> all<00:53:20.970> night 00:53:20.989 --> 00:53:20.999 align:start position:0% elaborate but we don't have all night 00:53:20.999 --> 00:53:25.609 align:start position:0% elaborate but we don't have all night long<00:53:21.359> I<00:53:23.900> have<00:53:24.900> to<00:53:25.079> agree<00:53:25.230> with<00:53:25.319> your 00:53:25.609 --> 00:53:25.619 align:start position:0% long I have to agree with your 00:53:25.619 --> 00:53:29.870 align:start position:0% long I have to agree with your commissioner<00:53:26.130> thank<00:53:26.400> you<00:53:28.309> yes<00:53:29.309> mr.<00:53:29.640> burrows 00:53:29.870 --> 00:53:29.880 align:start position:0% commissioner thank you yes mr. burrows 00:53:29.880 --> 00:53:31.549 align:start position:0% commissioner thank you yes mr. burrows so<00:53:30.089> you're<00:53:30.359> looking<00:53:30.420> at<00:53:30.660> a<00:53:30.749> six<00:53:30.960> month<00:53:31.259> time 00:53:31.549 --> 00:53:31.559 align:start position:0% so you're looking at a six month time 00:53:31.559 --> 00:53:34.789 align:start position:0% so you're looking at a six month time frame<00:53:31.730> from<00:53:32.730> the<00:53:33.509> remainder<00:53:34.170> of<00:53:34.200> this<00:53:34.740> year 00:53:34.789 --> 00:53:34.799 align:start position:0% frame from the remainder of this year 00:53:34.799 --> 00:53:37.269 align:start position:0% frame from the remainder of this year about<00:53:35.190> five<00:53:35.549> months<00:53:35.819> remaining<00:53:36.420> for<00:53:36.749> the<00:53:36.809> year 00:53:37.269 --> 00:53:37.279 align:start position:0% about five months remaining for the year 00:53:37.279 --> 00:53:40.819 align:start position:0% about five months remaining for the year so<00:53:38.279> if<00:53:38.400> you<00:53:38.519> divide<00:53:38.789> that<00:53:38.819> number<00:53:39.029> in<00:53:40.019> half<00:53:40.380> and 00:53:40.819 --> 00:53:40.829 align:start position:0% so if you divide that number in half and 00:53:40.829 --> 00:53:43.849 align:start position:0% so if you divide that number in half and then<00:53:40.950> take<00:53:41.309> five<00:53:41.880> months<00:53:42.150> from<00:53:42.720> that<00:53:42.779> I<00:53:43.259> should 00:53:43.849 --> 00:53:43.859 align:start position:0% then take five months from that I should 00:53:43.859 --> 00:53:45.920 align:start position:0% then take five months from that I should give<00:53:44.009> us<00:53:44.130> our<00:53:44.249> target<00:53:44.849> number<00:53:45.089> and<00:53:45.660> we<00:53:45.749> should 00:53:45.920 --> 00:53:45.930 align:start position:0% give us our target number and we should 00:53:45.930 --> 00:53:47.229 align:start position:0% give us our target number and we should put<00:53:46.140> into<00:53:46.289> the<00:53:46.470> budget<00:53:46.769> for<00:53:46.950> this<00:53:47.069> year 00:53:47.229 --> 00:53:47.239 align:start position:0% put into the budget for this year 00:53:47.239 --> 00:53:50.539 align:start position:0% put into the budget for this year building<00:53:48.239> up<00:53:48.509> for<00:53:48.660> nineteen<00:53:48.989> be<00:53:49.799> ready<00:53:50.009> for<00:53:50.160> 19 00:53:50.539 --> 00:53:50.549 align:start position:0% building up for nineteen be ready for 19 00:53:50.549 --> 00:53:57.890 align:start position:0% building up for nineteen be ready for 19 a<00:53:50.579> that<00:53:50.759> funded<00:53:51.059> fully<00:53:51.269> in<00:53:51.450> 19 00:53:57.890 --> 00:53:57.900 align:start position:0% 00:53:57.900 --> 00:54:00.359 align:start position:0% no<00:53:58.900> I<00:53:58.930> I<00:53:59.380> would<00:53:59.710> agree<00:53:59.890> this<00:54:00.040> would<00:54:00.220> be 00:54:00.359 --> 00:54:00.369 align:start position:0% no I I would agree this would be 00:54:00.369 --> 00:54:02.609 align:start position:0% no I I would agree this would be targeting<00:54:00.849> for<00:54:01.089> this<00:54:01.359> is<00:54:01.540> targeted<00:54:02.020> for<00:54:02.050> 19 00:54:02.609 --> 00:54:02.619 align:start position:0% targeting for this is targeted for 19 00:54:02.619 --> 00:54:06.540 align:start position:0% targeting for this is targeted for 19 you<00:54:02.890> see<00:54:03.040> the<00:54:03.240> Nate's<00:54:04.240> out<00:54:04.450> there<00:54:04.690> so<00:54:04.990> and<00:54:05.589> we 00:54:06.540 --> 00:54:06.550 align:start position:0% you see the Nate's out there so and we 00:54:06.550 --> 00:54:08.579 align:start position:0% you see the Nate's out there so and we would<00:54:06.760> we<00:54:07.119> could<00:54:07.150> modify<00:54:07.720> that<00:54:08.079> we<00:54:08.290> certainly 00:54:08.579 --> 00:54:08.589 align:start position:0% would we could modify that we certainly 00:54:08.589 --> 00:54:11.480 align:start position:0% would we could modify that we certainly wouldn't<00:54:08.829> need<00:54:09.010> to<00:54:09.040> do<00:54:09.250> the<00:54:09.430> full<00:54:09.670> year<00:54:10.000> on 00:54:11.480 --> 00:54:11.490 align:start position:0% wouldn't need to do the full year on 00:54:11.490 --> 00:54:17.430 align:start position:0% wouldn't need to do the full year on staffing<00:54:15.750> you<00:54:16.750> know<00:54:16.869> from<00:54:17.230> that<00:54:17.260> point 00:54:17.430 --> 00:54:17.440 align:start position:0% staffing you know from that point 00:54:17.440 --> 00:54:19.440 align:start position:0% staffing you know from that point forward<00:54:17.920> it<00:54:18.220> would<00:54:18.310> be<00:54:18.460> an<00:54:18.550> ongoing<00:54:18.700> number 00:54:19.440 --> 00:54:19.450 align:start position:0% forward it would be an ongoing number 00:54:19.450 --> 00:54:24.060 align:start position:0% forward it would be an ongoing number but<00:54:21.660> yes<00:54:22.660> so<00:54:23.079> but<00:54:23.349> we<00:54:23.470> could<00:54:23.650> purchase<00:54:23.829> the 00:54:24.060 --> 00:54:24.070 align:start position:0% but yes so but we could purchase the 00:54:24.070 --> 00:54:25.170 align:start position:0% but yes so but we could purchase the equipment<00:54:24.609> this<00:54:24.760> year 00:54:25.170 --> 00:54:25.180 align:start position:0% equipment this year 00:54:25.180 --> 00:54:29.660 align:start position:0% equipment this year and<00:54:25.270> have<00:54:25.450> it<00:54:25.480> ready<00:54:25.869> to<00:54:25.960> go<00:54:26.170> if<00:54:26.260> we<00:54:26.410> needed<00:54:26.680> to 00:54:29.660 --> 00:54:29.670 align:start position:0% 00:54:29.670 --> 00:54:31.740 align:start position:0% yeah<00:54:30.670> you<00:54:30.820> could<00:54:31.030> if<00:54:31.150> you<00:54:31.270> approved<00:54:31.630> the 00:54:31.740 --> 00:54:31.750 align:start position:0% yeah you could if you approved the 00:54:31.750 --> 00:54:32.930 align:start position:0% yeah you could if you approved the funding<00:54:31.900> yes 00:54:32.930 --> 00:54:32.940 align:start position:0% funding yes 00:54:32.940 --> 00:54:35.400 align:start position:0% funding yes would<00:54:33.940> that<00:54:34.060> be<00:54:34.210> the<00:54:34.329> preference<00:54:34.810> moving 00:54:35.400 --> 00:54:35.410 align:start position:0% would that be the preference moving 00:54:35.410 --> 00:54:37.589 align:start position:0% would that be the preference moving forward<00:54:35.829> too<00:54:36.040> so<00:54:37.000> that<00:54:37.180> we<00:54:37.270> don't<00:54:37.390> find 00:54:37.589 --> 00:54:37.599 align:start position:0% forward too so that we don't find 00:54:37.599 --> 00:54:39.540 align:start position:0% forward too so that we don't find ourselves<00:54:37.750> behind<00:54:38.109> the<00:54:38.349> eight-ball<00:54:38.650> in<00:54:38.829> 2019 00:54:39.540 --> 00:54:39.550 align:start position:0% ourselves behind the eight-ball in 2019 00:54:39.550 --> 00:54:42.450 align:start position:0% ourselves behind the eight-ball in 2019 for<00:54:39.760> six<00:54:40.000> months<00:54:40.980> again<00:54:41.980> commissioner<00:54:42.280> that 00:54:42.450 --> 00:54:42.460 align:start position:0% for six months again commissioner that 00:54:42.460 --> 00:54:44.700 align:start position:0% for six months again commissioner that would<00:54:42.790> you<00:54:43.180> know<00:54:43.300> that's<00:54:43.540> up<00:54:43.930> to<00:54:44.170> the<00:54:44.290> will<00:54:44.470> the 00:54:44.700 --> 00:54:44.710 align:start position:0% would you know that's up to the will the 00:54:44.710 --> 00:54:47.790 align:start position:0% would you know that's up to the will the Commission<00:54:45.130> here<00:54:45.310> as<00:54:45.490> to<00:54:46.470> what<00:54:47.470> you<00:54:47.589> want<00:54:47.740> to 00:54:47.790 --> 00:54:47.800 align:start position:0% Commission here as to what you want to 00:54:47.800 --> 00:54:49.230 align:start position:0% Commission here as to what you want to do<00:54:47.920> if<00:54:48.040> you<00:54:48.160> want<00:54:48.339> to<00:54:48.369> hit<00:54:48.520> your<00:54:48.609> 14<00:54:49.060> day 00:54:49.230 --> 00:54:49.240 align:start position:0% do if you want to hit your 14 day 00:54:49.240 --> 00:54:52.859 align:start position:0% do if you want to hit your 14 day schedule<00:54:49.720> again<00:54:50.190> then<00:54:51.300> this<00:54:52.300> was<00:54:52.510> what<00:54:52.690> was 00:54:52.859 --> 00:54:52.869 align:start position:0% schedule again then this was what was 00:54:52.869 --> 00:54:57.120 align:start position:0% schedule again then this was what was put<00:54:53.050> forward<00:54:54.540> you<00:54:55.540> know<00:54:55.630> our<00:54:55.960> if<00:54:56.530> we<00:54:56.589> funded 00:54:57.120 --> 00:54:57.130 align:start position:0% put forward you know our if we funded 00:54:57.130 --> 00:54:58.470 align:start position:0% put forward you know our if we funded this<00:54:57.280> for<00:54:57.460> next<00:54:57.700> year<00:54:57.849> we<00:54:58.000> want<00:54:58.210> to<00:54:58.329> have 00:54:58.470 --> 00:54:58.480 align:start position:0% this for next year we want to have 00:54:58.480 --> 00:55:00.120 align:start position:0% this for next year we want to have everything<00:54:58.780> on<00:54:59.079> hand<00:54:59.140> ready<00:54:59.619> to<00:54:59.770> roll<00:54:59.950> by 00:55:00.120 --> 00:55:00.130 align:start position:0% everything on hand ready to roll by 00:55:00.130 --> 00:55:02.160 align:start position:0% everything on hand ready to roll by March<00:55:00.460> April<00:55:00.730> somewhere<00:55:01.420> in<00:55:01.540> that<00:55:01.599> time<00:55:01.930> frame 00:55:02.160 --> 00:55:02.170 align:start position:0% March April somewhere in that time frame 00:55:02.170 --> 00:55:05.910 align:start position:0% March April somewhere in that time frame so<00:55:03.810> most<00:55:04.810> likely<00:55:05.050> we<00:55:05.410> can<00:55:05.560> make<00:55:05.710> that<00:55:05.859> happen 00:55:05.910 --> 00:55:05.920 align:start position:0% so most likely we can make that happen 00:55:05.920 --> 00:55:07.650 align:start position:0% so most likely we can make that happen beginning<00:55:06.460> the<00:55:06.550> year<00:55:06.730> though<00:55:06.940> it<00:55:07.119> could<00:55:07.510> be 00:55:07.650 --> 00:55:07.660 align:start position:0% beginning the year though it could be 00:55:07.660 --> 00:55:09.150 align:start position:0% beginning the year though it could be advantageous<00:55:07.900> to<00:55:08.410> get<00:55:08.530> things<00:55:08.770> done<00:55:08.950> I<00:55:09.010> don't 00:55:09.150 --> 00:55:09.160 align:start position:0% advantageous to get things done I don't 00:55:09.160 --> 00:55:11.130 align:start position:0% advantageous to get things done I don't know<00:55:09.339> what<00:55:09.490> the<00:55:09.670> dumptruck<00:55:10.210> ordering<00:55:10.720> date<00:55:10.930> is 00:55:11.130 --> 00:55:11.140 align:start position:0% know what the dumptruck ordering date is 00:55:11.140 --> 00:55:12.990 align:start position:0% know what the dumptruck ordering date is off<00:55:11.470> the<00:55:11.619> top<00:55:11.770> my<00:55:12.010> head<00:55:12.040> what<00:55:12.490> that<00:55:12.670> needs<00:55:12.880> to 00:55:12.990 --> 00:55:13.000 align:start position:0% off the top my head what that needs to 00:55:13.000 --> 00:55:14.550 align:start position:0% off the top my head what that needs to happen<00:55:13.270> in<00:55:13.359> the<00:55:13.450> fall<00:55:13.660> the<00:55:13.869> previous<00:55:14.290> year<00:55:14.530> or 00:55:14.550 --> 00:55:14.560 align:start position:0% happen in the fall the previous year or 00:55:14.560 --> 00:55:20.790 align:start position:0% happen in the fall the previous year or not<00:55:15.930> but<00:55:17.730> the<00:55:18.730> dump<00:55:18.940> truck<00:55:19.180> lead<00:55:19.720> time<00:55:19.960> depends 00:55:20.790 --> 00:55:20.800 align:start position:0% not but the dump truck lead time depends 00:55:20.800 --> 00:55:24.329 align:start position:0% not but the dump truck lead time depends again<00:55:21.369> upon<00:55:21.640> size<00:55:22.410> also<00:55:23.410> it<00:55:23.770> depends<00:55:24.040> upon<00:55:24.130> the 00:55:24.329 --> 00:55:24.339 align:start position:0% again upon size also it depends upon the 00:55:24.339 --> 00:55:26.069 align:start position:0% again upon size also it depends upon the mowers<00:55:24.640> that<00:55:24.670> they<00:55:25.030> would<00:55:25.270> want<00:55:25.630> to<00:55:25.780> bring<00:55:25.900> in 00:55:26.069 --> 00:55:26.079 align:start position:0% mowers that they would want to bring in 00:55:26.079 --> 00:55:29.400 align:start position:0% mowers that they would want to bring in for<00:55:26.230> this<00:55:26.380> smaller<00:55:27.220> the<00:55:27.430> mowers<00:55:27.640> if<00:55:28.290> that<00:55:29.290> was 00:55:29.400 --> 00:55:29.410 align:start position:0% for this smaller the mowers if that was 00:55:29.410 --> 00:55:30.690 align:start position:0% for this smaller the mowers if that was the<00:55:29.500> case<00:55:29.650> those<00:55:29.980> are<00:55:30.130> much<00:55:30.339> readily 00:55:30.690 --> 00:55:30.700 align:start position:0% the case those are much readily 00:55:30.700 --> 00:55:33.420 align:start position:0% the case those are much readily available<00:55:31.020> a<00:55:32.020> dump<00:55:32.589> truck<00:55:32.710> can<00:55:32.950> take<00:55:33.099> up<00:55:33.220> to<00:55:33.250> a 00:55:33.420 --> 00:55:33.430 align:start position:0% available a dump truck can take up to a 00:55:33.430 --> 00:55:38.660 align:start position:0% available a dump truck can take up to a year<00:55:33.839> depending<00:55:34.839> upon<00:55:35.170> how<00:55:35.440> big<00:55:35.470> you<00:55:35.829> go 00:55:38.660 --> 00:55:38.670 align:start position:0% 00:55:38.670 --> 00:55:40.950 align:start position:0% we<00:55:39.670> got<00:55:39.849> them<00:55:40.000> we'd<00:55:40.119> figure<00:55:40.390> out<00:55:40.540> how<00:55:40.690> to<00:55:40.750> get<00:55:40.900> a 00:55:40.950 --> 00:55:40.960 align:start position:0% we got them we'd figure out how to get a 00:55:40.960 --> 00:55:42.480 align:start position:0% we got them we'd figure out how to get a truck<00:55:41.230> out<00:55:41.440> there<00:55:41.470> in<00:55:41.740> the<00:55:41.829> field<00:55:42.040> for<00:55:42.280> a<00:55:42.339> while 00:55:42.480 --> 00:55:42.490 align:start position:0% truck out there in the field for a while 00:55:42.490 --> 00:55:44.760 align:start position:0% truck out there in the field for a while between<00:55:43.390> our<00:55:43.690> inventory<00:55:44.140> that<00:55:44.290> we<00:55:44.410> have<00:55:44.589> would 00:55:44.760 --> 00:55:44.770 align:start position:0% between our inventory that we have would 00:55:44.770 --> 00:55:47.550 align:start position:0% between our inventory that we have would just<00:55:44.980> need<00:55:45.280> to<00:55:45.369> replace<00:55:45.670> it<00:55:45.910> in<00:55:46.000> time<00:55:46.500> how<00:55:47.500> are 00:55:47.550 --> 00:55:47.560 align:start position:0% just need to replace it in time how are 00:55:47.560 --> 00:55:49.380 align:start position:0% just need to replace it in time how are we<00:55:47.740> doing<00:55:48.010> on<00:55:48.130> this<00:55:48.310> year<00:55:48.609> are<00:55:49.000> we<00:55:49.089> doing<00:55:49.329> all 00:55:49.380 --> 00:55:49.390 align:start position:0% we doing on this year are we doing all 00:55:49.390 --> 00:55:49.800 align:start position:0% we doing on this year are we doing all right 00:55:49.800 --> 00:55:49.810 align:start position:0% right 00:55:49.810 --> 00:55:54.279 align:start position:0% right budget<00:55:50.140> wise<00:55:50.170> this<00:55:50.530> year<00:55:51.660> fighting 00:55:54.279 --> 00:55:54.289 align:start position:0% budget wise this year fighting 00:55:54.289 --> 00:55:58.419 align:start position:0% budget wise this year fighting no<00:55:54.890> this<00:55:55.429> is<00:55:55.640> not<00:55:55.819> so<00:55:56.029> much<00:55:56.089> an<00:55:56.359> issue<00:55:56.539> of<00:55:57.429> the 00:55:58.419 --> 00:55:58.429 align:start position:0% no this is not so much an issue of the 00:55:58.429 --> 00:56:01.179 align:start position:0% no this is not so much an issue of the mowing<00:55:59.199> budget<00:56:00.199> I<00:56:00.380> think<00:56:00.410> it's<00:56:00.799> more<00:56:00.979> of<00:56:01.099> an 00:56:01.179 --> 00:56:01.189 align:start position:0% mowing budget I think it's more of an 00:56:01.189 --> 00:56:04.029 align:start position:0% mowing budget I think it's more of an issue<00:56:01.339> of<00:56:01.729> this<00:56:02.239> particular<00:56:02.869> group<00:56:03.410> that<00:56:03.919> does 00:56:04.029 --> 00:56:04.039 align:start position:0% issue of this particular group that does 00:56:04.039 --> 00:56:06.630 align:start position:0% issue of this particular group that does a<00:56:04.069> very<00:56:04.369> niche<00:56:04.759> type<00:56:05.390> of<00:56:05.630> work<00:56:05.900> which<00:56:06.289> is 00:56:06.630 --> 00:56:06.640 align:start position:0% a very niche type of work which is 00:56:06.640 --> 00:56:07.839 align:start position:0% a very niche type of work which is abatements 00:56:07.839 --> 00:56:07.849 align:start position:0% abatements 00:56:07.849 --> 00:56:11.140 align:start position:0% abatements so<00:56:08.539> there's<00:56:09.319> mowing<00:56:09.829> money<00:56:10.039> these<00:56:10.519> folks<00:56:10.880> do 00:56:11.140 --> 00:56:11.150 align:start position:0% so there's mowing money these folks do 00:56:11.150 --> 00:56:13.479 align:start position:0% so there's mowing money these folks do mow<00:56:11.390> but<00:56:11.839> there<00:56:12.049> were<00:56:12.229> they're<00:56:12.829> responding<00:56:13.279> to 00:56:13.479 --> 00:56:13.489 align:start position:0% mow but there were they're responding to 00:56:13.489 --> 00:56:15.789 align:start position:0% mow but there were they're responding to you<00:56:14.059> know<00:56:14.179> violators<00:56:14.809> then<00:56:15.380> we<00:56:15.559> have<00:56:15.679> our 00:56:15.789 --> 00:56:15.799 align:start position:0% you know violators then we have our 00:56:15.799 --> 00:56:17.469 align:start position:0% you know violators then we have our mowing<00:56:16.130> budget<00:56:16.459> that's<00:56:16.609> for<00:56:16.849> Liam<00:56:17.059> Bank<00:56:17.269> which 00:56:17.469 --> 00:56:17.479 align:start position:0% mowing budget that's for Liam Bank which 00:56:17.479 --> 00:56:19.779 align:start position:0% mowing budget that's for Liam Bank which is<00:56:17.949> different<00:56:18.949> and<00:56:19.130> then<00:56:19.249> we<00:56:19.339> have<00:56:19.459> right<00:56:19.669> away 00:56:19.779 --> 00:56:19.789 align:start position:0% is different and then we have right away 00:56:19.789 --> 00:56:21.880 align:start position:0% is different and then we have right away mowing<00:56:20.299> and<00:56:20.509> other<00:56:20.809> different<00:56:21.319> types<00:56:21.709> of 00:56:21.880 --> 00:56:21.890 align:start position:0% mowing and other different types of 00:56:21.890 --> 00:56:23.799 align:start position:0% mowing and other different types of mowing<00:56:22.279> parks<00:56:22.609> mowing<00:56:22.999> so<00:56:23.239> on<00:56:23.299> and<00:56:23.419> so<00:56:23.539> forth 00:56:23.799 --> 00:56:23.809 align:start position:0% mowing parks mowing so on and so forth 00:56:23.809 --> 00:56:27.130 align:start position:0% mowing parks mowing so on and so forth so<00:56:23.989> it's<00:56:24.890> not<00:56:24.979> a<00:56:25.099> mowing<00:56:25.729> issue<00:56:26.059> as<00:56:26.539> much<00:56:26.779> as<00:56:26.989> it 00:56:27.130 --> 00:56:27.140 align:start position:0% so it's not a mowing issue as much as it 00:56:27.140 --> 00:56:30.159 align:start position:0% so it's not a mowing issue as much as it is<00:56:27.169> it's<00:56:27.619> a<00:56:27.769> staff<00:56:28.579> to<00:56:28.609> do<00:56:29.209> the<00:56:29.329> abatement<00:56:29.719> type 00:56:30.159 --> 00:56:30.169 align:start position:0% is it's a staff to do the abatement type 00:56:30.169 --> 00:56:32.109 align:start position:0% is it's a staff to do the abatement type of<00:56:30.380> work<00:56:30.619> so<00:56:31.099> I<00:56:31.369> think<00:56:31.429> that's<00:56:31.729> what<00:56:31.999> the 00:56:32.109 --> 00:56:32.119 align:start position:0% of work so I think that's what the 00:56:32.119 --> 00:56:35.140 align:start position:0% of work so I think that's what the request<00:56:32.419> is<00:56:32.660> coming<00:56:33.019> from<00:56:33.169> so<00:56:33.849> it's<00:56:34.849> picking 00:56:35.140 --> 00:56:35.150 align:start position:0% request is coming from so it's picking 00:56:35.150 --> 00:56:37.839 align:start position:0% request is coming from so it's picking up<00:56:35.359> the<00:56:35.449> trash<00:56:35.660> debris<00:56:36.049> loading<00:56:36.709> it<00:56:36.799> up<00:56:36.919> yep 00:56:37.839 --> 00:56:37.849 align:start position:0% up the trash debris loading it up yep 00:56:37.849 --> 00:56:40.509 align:start position:0% up the trash debris loading it up yep Commissioner<00:56:38.689> McKinnon<00:56:39.109> and<00:56:39.949> I<00:56:40.099> think<00:56:40.309> that's 00:56:40.509 --> 00:56:40.519 align:start position:0% Commissioner McKinnon and I think that's 00:56:40.519 --> 00:56:42.370 align:start position:0% Commissioner McKinnon and I think that's where<00:56:40.969> a<00:56:41.179> lot<00:56:41.209> of<00:56:41.419> our<00:56:41.599> frustration<00:56:42.169> comes 00:56:42.370 --> 00:56:42.380 align:start position:0% where a lot of our frustration comes 00:56:42.380 --> 00:56:44.579 align:start position:0% where a lot of our frustration comes from<00:56:42.559> and<00:56:42.709> you<00:56:42.769> said<00:56:42.979> it<00:56:43.069> yourself<00:56:43.160> mayor<00:56:43.699> that 00:56:44.579 --> 00:56:44.589 align:start position:0% from and you said it yourself mayor that 00:56:44.589 --> 00:56:48.309 align:start position:0% from and you said it yourself mayor that it<00:56:45.589> is<00:56:46.209> disheartening<00:56:47.209> that<00:56:47.269> we<00:56:47.569> have<00:56:47.839> so<00:56:48.169> much 00:56:48.309 --> 00:56:48.319 align:start position:0% it is disheartening that we have so much 00:56:48.319 --> 00:56:51.939 align:start position:0% it is disheartening that we have so much picking<00:56:48.829> up<00:56:49.009> after<00:56:49.369> to<00:56:50.329> do<00:56:50.539> in<00:56:50.989> terms<00:56:51.559> of<00:56:51.769> both 00:56:51.939 --> 00:56:51.949 align:start position:0% picking up after to do in terms of both 00:56:51.949 --> 00:56:55.239 align:start position:0% picking up after to do in terms of both trash<00:56:52.309> and<00:56:52.729> grass<00:56:53.119> and<00:56:53.419> weeds<00:56:53.949> and<00:56:54.949> I<00:56:55.099> would 00:56:55.239 --> 00:56:55.249 align:start position:0% trash and grass and weeds and I would 00:56:55.249 --> 00:56:57.569 align:start position:0% trash and grass and weeds and I would hope<00:56:55.400> that<00:56:55.429> we<00:56:55.640> could<00:56:55.669> change<00:56:56.029> that<00:56:56.329> but 00:56:57.569 --> 00:56:57.579 align:start position:0% hope that we could change that but 00:56:57.579 --> 00:56:59.679 align:start position:0% hope that we could change that but Melissa's<00:56:58.579> assessment<00:56:59.150> is<00:56:59.269> that<00:56:59.449> it's<00:56:59.569> gonna 00:56:59.679 --> 00:56:59.689 align:start position:0% Melissa's assessment is that it's gonna 00:56:59.689 --> 00:57:01.569 align:start position:0% Melissa's assessment is that it's gonna be<00:56:59.869> the<00:56:59.989> status<00:57:00.199> quo<00:57:00.439> for<00:57:00.529> a<00:57:00.799> while<00:57:00.949> so<00:57:01.189> -<00:57:01.249> have 00:57:01.569 --> 00:57:01.579 align:start position:0% be the status quo for a while so - have 00:57:01.579 --> 00:57:04.719 align:start position:0% be the status quo for a while so - have we<00:57:01.699> identified<00:57:01.849> a<00:57:02.269> source<00:57:02.719> of<00:57:03.429> offset<00:57:04.429> for 00:57:04.719 --> 00:57:04.729 align:start position:0% we identified a source of offset for 00:57:04.729 --> 00:57:08.949 align:start position:0% we identified a source of offset for this<00:57:04.849> if<00:57:05.059> we<00:57:05.179> were<00:57:05.269> to<00:57:05.390> add<00:57:05.479> it<00:57:05.659> to<00:57:05.689> the<00:57:05.869> 19<00:57:07.959> if 00:57:08.949 --> 00:57:08.959 align:start position:0% this if we were to add it to the 19 if 00:57:08.959 --> 00:57:11.319 align:start position:0% this if we were to add it to the 19 if you<00:57:09.289> had<00:57:09.650> one<00:57:09.890> I<00:57:09.919> would<00:57:10.279> welcome<00:57:10.549> any<00:57:10.939> kind<00:57:11.239> of 00:57:11.319 --> 00:57:11.329 align:start position:0% you had one I would welcome any kind of 00:57:11.329 --> 00:57:13.120 align:start position:0% you had one I would welcome any kind of recommendations<00:57:12.109> or<00:57:12.289> thoughts<00:57:12.529> you<00:57:12.709> have<00:57:12.919> for 00:57:13.120 --> 00:57:13.130 align:start position:0% recommendations or thoughts you have for 00:57:13.130 --> 00:57:15.729 align:start position:0% recommendations or thoughts you have for that<00:57:13.309> I<00:57:14.059> don't<00:57:14.569> have<00:57:14.779> anything<00:57:15.019> off<00:57:15.409> the<00:57:15.559> top 00:57:15.729 --> 00:57:15.739 align:start position:0% that I don't have anything off the top 00:57:15.739 --> 00:57:18.370 align:start position:0% that I don't have anything off the top of<00:57:15.890> my<00:57:16.009> head<00:57:16.189> that<00:57:16.219> I'm<00:57:16.489> working<00:57:16.699> on<00:57:17.380> this 00:57:18.370 --> 00:57:18.380 align:start position:0% of my head that I'm working on this 00:57:18.380 --> 00:57:26.469 align:start position:0% of my head that I'm working on this would<00:57:18.559> be<00:57:18.679> in<00:57:18.829> the<00:57:18.859> city<00:57:19.339> general<00:57:19.849> fund<00:57:25.479> mayor 00:57:26.469 --> 00:57:26.479 align:start position:0% would be in the city general fund mayor 00:57:26.479 --> 00:57:29.769 align:start position:0% would be in the city general fund mayor question<00:57:27.699> would<00:57:28.699> this<00:57:28.849> be<00:57:29.089> part<00:57:29.419> Oh 00:57:29.769 --> 00:57:29.779 align:start position:0% question would this be part Oh 00:57:29.779 --> 00:57:32.789 align:start position:0% question would this be part Oh mr.<00:57:30.739> rock<00:57:30.919> of<00:57:31.189> the<00:57:31.489> work<00:57:31.669> you<00:57:31.880> would<00:57:32.029> do<00:57:32.209> um 00:57:32.789 --> 00:57:32.799 align:start position:0% mr. rock of the work you would do um 00:57:32.799 --> 00:57:37.419 align:start position:0% mr. rock of the work you would do um immediately<00:57:33.799> following<00:57:34.159> this<00:57:34.459> session<00:57:34.759> is<00:57:36.429> go 00:57:37.419 --> 00:57:37.429 align:start position:0% immediately following this session is go 00:57:37.429 --> 00:57:42.549 align:start position:0% immediately following this session is go try<00:57:37.699> to<00:57:37.729> find<00:57:38.890> take<00:57:39.890> from<00:57:40.159> here<00:57:40.640> put<00:57:41.029> here<00:57:41.559> yes 00:57:42.549 --> 00:57:42.559 align:start position:0% try to find take from here put here yes 00:57:42.559 --> 00:57:45.729 align:start position:0% try to find take from here put here yes bring<00:57:42.859> it<00:57:42.979> back<00:57:43.189> if<00:57:43.489> we<00:57:43.699> say<00:57:44.469> this<00:57:45.469> is<00:57:45.529> a 00:57:45.729 --> 00:57:45.739 align:start position:0% bring it back if we say this is a 00:57:45.739 --> 00:57:52.980 align:start position:0% bring it back if we say this is a priority<00:57:46.429> for<00:57:46.459> us<00:57:46.869> yes 00:57:52.980 --> 00:57:52.990 align:start position:0% 00:57:52.990 --> 00:57:56.370 align:start position:0% mr.<00:57:53.990> filbert<00:57:54.320> I<00:57:54.590> know<00:57:54.890> I<00:57:54.920> mean<00:57:55.190> I<00:57:55.370> I've<00:57:55.700> heard 00:57:56.370 --> 00:57:56.380 align:start position:0% mr. filbert I know I mean I I've heard 00:57:56.380 --> 00:57:59.110 align:start position:0% mr. filbert I know I mean I I've heard the<00:57:57.380> fact<00:57:57.710> that<00:57:57.950> yes<00:57:58.490> we<00:57:58.700> have<00:57:58.850> all<00:57:58.970> these 00:57:59.110 --> 00:57:59.120 align:start position:0% the fact that yes we have all these 00:57:59.120 --> 00:58:01.330 align:start position:0% the fact that yes we have all these different<00:57:59.390> little<00:57:59.750> pigeon<00:58:00.230> holes<00:58:00.440> that<00:58:01.160> were 00:58:01.330 --> 00:58:01.340 align:start position:0% different little pigeon holes that were 00:58:01.340 --> 00:58:03.640 align:start position:0% different little pigeon holes that were claiming<00:58:01.820> for<00:58:02.210> money<00:58:02.510> and<00:58:02.840> people's<00:58:03.320> time 00:58:03.640 --> 00:58:03.650 align:start position:0% claiming for money and people's time 00:58:03.650 --> 00:58:07.030 align:start position:0% claiming for money and people's time that<00:58:04.250> if<00:58:04.340> we<00:58:04.520> rob<00:58:05.090> Peter<00:58:05.390> to<00:58:05.540> pay<00:58:05.690> Paul<00:58:06.040> it's 00:58:07.030 --> 00:58:07.040 align:start position:0% that if we rob Peter to pay Paul it's 00:58:07.040 --> 00:58:10.420 align:start position:0% that if we rob Peter to pay Paul it's still<00:58:07.520> gonna<00:58:08.000> cost<00:58:08.360> us<00:58:08.810> so<00:58:09.410> we<00:58:09.590> still<00:58:09.920> have<00:58:10.220> to 00:58:10.420 --> 00:58:10.430 align:start position:0% still gonna cost us so we still have to 00:58:10.430 --> 00:58:12.700 align:start position:0% still gonna cost us so we still have to have<00:58:10.640> the<00:58:11.180> people<00:58:11.420> out<00:58:11.780> there<00:58:12.020> working<00:58:12.290> we 00:58:12.700 --> 00:58:12.710 align:start position:0% have the people out there working we 00:58:12.710 --> 00:58:15.130 align:start position:0% have the people out there working we can't<00:58:12.980> divide<00:58:13.370> them<00:58:13.550> in<00:58:13.670> half<00:58:13.910> and<00:58:14.240> send<00:58:14.960> them 00:58:15.130 --> 00:58:15.140 align:start position:0% can't divide them in half and send them 00:58:15.140 --> 00:58:18.370 align:start position:0% can't divide them in half and send them out<00:58:15.260> so<00:58:16.070> either<00:58:16.580> they're<00:58:17.080> working<00:58:18.080> on 00:58:18.370 --> 00:58:18.380 align:start position:0% out so either they're working on 00:58:18.380 --> 00:58:22.270 align:start position:0% out so either they're working on cleaning<00:58:19.040> up<00:58:19.810> areas<00:58:20.810> that<00:58:21.200> that<00:58:21.710> need<00:58:22.010> to<00:58:22.250> be 00:58:22.270 --> 00:58:22.280 align:start position:0% cleaning up areas that that need to be 00:58:22.280 --> 00:58:25.000 align:start position:0% cleaning up areas that that need to be abated<00:58:23.270> or<00:58:23.570> they're<00:58:23.870> mowing<00:58:24.170> they<00:58:24.560> can't<00:58:24.830> do 00:58:25.000 --> 00:58:25.010 align:start position:0% abated or they're mowing they can't do 00:58:25.010 --> 00:58:28.660 align:start position:0% abated or they're mowing they can't do both<00:58:25.220> at<00:58:25.400> the<00:58:25.430> same<00:58:25.730> time<00:58:26.140> so<00:58:27.190> that's<00:58:28.190> why<00:58:28.460> I'm 00:58:28.660 --> 00:58:28.670 align:start position:0% both at the same time so that's why I'm 00:58:28.670 --> 00:58:31.660 align:start position:0% both at the same time so that's why I'm more<00:58:28.970> impossible<00:58:29.330> a<00:58:30.230> skew<00:58:30.830> to<00:58:30.980> find<00:58:31.250> the<00:58:31.400> money 00:58:31.660 --> 00:58:31.670 align:start position:0% more impossible a skew to find the money 00:58:31.670 --> 00:58:34.300 align:start position:0% more impossible a skew to find the money I<00:58:31.990> don't<00:58:32.990> know<00:58:33.260> where<00:58:33.470> you're<00:58:33.620> gonna<00:58:33.740> make<00:58:34.070> it 00:58:34.300 --> 00:58:34.310 align:start position:0% I don't know where you're gonna make it 00:58:34.310 --> 00:58:37.390 align:start position:0% I don't know where you're gonna make it from<00:58:34.610> I<00:58:35.090> don't<00:58:35.390> have<00:58:35.570> a<00:58:35.600> tree<00:58:35.990> but<00:58:36.400> you're 00:58:37.390 --> 00:58:37.400 align:start position:0% from I don't have a tree but you're 00:58:37.400 --> 00:58:46.220 align:start position:0% from I don't have a tree but you're pretty<00:58:37.670> miraculous 00:58:46.220 --> 00:58:46.230 align:start position:0% 00:58:46.230 --> 00:58:50.930 align:start position:0% well<00:58:46.859> where<00:58:47.070> it's<00:58:47.190> clear<00:58:47.490> that<00:58:47.780> I<00:58:49.940> should 00:58:50.930 --> 00:58:50.940 align:start position:0% well where it's clear that I should 00:58:50.940 --> 00:58:58.819 align:start position:0% well where it's clear that I should build<00:58:51.210> this<00:58:51.480> in<00:58:51.780> or<00:58:52.349> not<00:58:56.119> yeah<00:58:57.119> I<00:58:57.450> it<00:58:58.320> doesn't 00:58:58.819 --> 00:58:58.829 align:start position:0% build this in or not yeah I it doesn't 00:58:58.829 --> 00:59:03.500 align:start position:0% build this in or not yeah I it doesn't mr.<00:58:59.190> Kane<00:58:59.400> I<00:59:00.650> don't<00:59:01.670> say<00:59:02.670> we<00:59:02.820> build<00:59:03.060> it<00:59:03.180> in<00:59:03.329> but 00:59:03.500 --> 00:59:03.510 align:start position:0% mr. Kane I don't say we build it in but 00:59:03.510 --> 00:59:06.349 align:start position:0% mr. Kane I don't say we build it in but we<00:59:03.570> should<00:59:03.750> add<00:59:03.900> some<00:59:03.930> monies<00:59:04.320> to<00:59:04.349> it<00:59:05.359> maybe 00:59:06.349 --> 00:59:06.359 align:start position:0% we should add some monies to it maybe 00:59:06.359 --> 00:59:08.300 align:start position:0% we should add some monies to it maybe not<00:59:06.540> this<00:59:06.750> much<00:59:06.990> but<00:59:07.260> something<00:59:07.680> to<00:59:07.920> get<00:59:08.130> us 00:59:08.300 --> 00:59:08.310 align:start position:0% not this much but something to get us 00:59:08.310 --> 00:59:11.630 align:start position:0% not this much but something to get us further<00:59:09.150> than<00:59:09.329> we've<00:59:09.630> been<00:59:09.660> this<00:59:10.020> year<00:59:10.640> you 00:59:11.630 --> 00:59:11.640 align:start position:0% further than we've been this year you 00:59:11.640 --> 00:59:13.069 align:start position:0% further than we've been this year you know<00:59:11.730> obviously<00:59:12.150> if<00:59:12.240> we<00:59:12.329> run<00:59:12.570> into<00:59:12.690> overtime 00:59:13.069 --> 00:59:13.079 align:start position:0% know obviously if we run into overtime 00:59:13.079 --> 00:59:16.280 align:start position:0% know obviously if we run into overtime issues<00:59:13.589> maybe<00:59:13.800> hire<00:59:14.070> another<00:59:14.369> person<00:59:14.990> but<00:59:15.990> I 00:59:16.280 --> 00:59:16.290 align:start position:0% issues maybe hire another person but I 00:59:16.290 --> 00:59:18.380 align:start position:0% issues maybe hire another person but I don't<00:59:17.070> think<00:59:17.250> we<00:59:17.400> can<00:59:17.579> do<00:59:17.760> it<00:59:17.970> with<00:59:18.150> the<00:59:18.270> money 00:59:18.380 --> 00:59:18.390 align:start position:0% don't think we can do it with the money 00:59:18.390 --> 00:59:20.630 align:start position:0% don't think we can do it with the money we<00:59:18.599> have<00:59:18.750> in<00:59:18.900> there<00:59:19.020> right<00:59:19.170> now<00:59:19.230> so<00:59:20.040> I<00:59:20.070> need<00:59:20.190> I 00:59:20.630 --> 00:59:20.640 align:start position:0% we have in there right now so I need I 00:59:20.640 --> 00:59:23.980 align:start position:0% we have in there right now so I need I think<00:59:20.849> we<00:59:20.970> need<00:59:21.150> to<00:59:21.270> boost<00:59:21.480> it<00:59:21.599> up<00:59:21.720> something<00:59:22.290> I 00:59:23.980 --> 00:59:23.990 align:start position:0% think we need to boost it up something I 00:59:23.990 --> 00:59:26.540 align:start position:0% think we need to boost it up something I would<00:59:24.990> agree<00:59:25.140> with<00:59:25.230> that<00:59:25.349> I<00:59:25.619> don't<00:59:26.130> know<00:59:26.339> if 00:59:26.540 --> 00:59:26.550 align:start position:0% would agree with that I don't know if 00:59:26.550 --> 00:59:31.609 align:start position:0% would agree with that I don't know if there<00:59:26.730> would<00:59:26.880> be<00:59:26.910> any<00:59:28.280> in-between<00:59:30.619> solution 00:59:31.609 --> 00:59:31.619 align:start position:0% there would be any in-between solution 00:59:31.619 --> 00:59:34.700 align:start position:0% there would be any in-between solution to<00:59:31.800> this<00:59:31.920> that<00:59:32.310> you<00:59:33.300> know<00:59:33.420> I<00:59:33.720> wouldn't<00:59:34.470> want<00:59:34.650> to 00:59:34.700 --> 00:59:34.710 align:start position:0% to this that you know I wouldn't want to 00:59:34.710 --> 00:59:36.530 align:start position:0% to this that you know I wouldn't want to go<00:59:34.829> private<00:59:35.250> contracting<00:59:35.820> but<00:59:35.970> if<00:59:36.119> if<00:59:36.510> that 00:59:36.530 --> 00:59:36.540 align:start position:0% go private contracting but if if that 00:59:36.540 --> 00:59:38.780 align:start position:0% go private contracting but if if that would<00:59:36.900> abate<00:59:37.470> temporarily<00:59:38.160> certain<00:59:38.579> things 00:59:38.780 --> 00:59:38.790 align:start position:0% would abate temporarily certain things 00:59:38.790 --> 00:59:41.680 align:start position:0% would abate temporarily certain things maybe<00:59:39.150> but<00:59:39.540> we're<00:59:40.500> already<00:59:40.680> paying<00:59:40.890> overtime 00:59:41.680 --> 00:59:41.690 align:start position:0% maybe but we're already paying overtime 00:59:41.690 --> 00:59:43.130 align:start position:0% maybe but we're already paying overtime Commissioner<00:59:42.690> McKiernan 00:59:43.130 --> 00:59:43.140 align:start position:0% Commissioner McKiernan 00:59:43.140 --> 00:59:45.740 align:start position:0% Commissioner McKiernan and<00:59:44.010> I<00:59:44.099> just<00:59:44.310> want<00:59:44.490> to<00:59:44.579> clarify<00:59:45.270> with 00:59:45.740 --> 00:59:45.750 align:start position:0% and I just want to clarify with 00:59:45.750 --> 00:59:48.440 align:start position:0% and I just want to clarify with Commissioner<00:59:46.109> Kane<00:59:47.060> so<00:59:48.060> I<00:59:48.089> want<00:59:48.240> to<00:59:48.270> clarify 00:59:48.440 --> 00:59:48.450 align:start position:0% Commissioner Kane so I want to clarify 00:59:48.450 --> 00:59:50.359 align:start position:0% Commissioner Kane so I want to clarify it<00:59:49.050> sounds<00:59:49.560> like<00:59:49.680> what<00:59:49.859> you're<00:59:49.890> talking<00:59:50.310> about 00:59:50.359 --> 00:59:50.369 align:start position:0% it sounds like what you're talking about 00:59:50.369 --> 00:59:52.280 align:start position:0% it sounds like what you're talking about is<00:59:50.640> just<00:59:50.670> additional<00:59:51.270> money<00:59:51.480> for<00:59:51.900> my<00:59:52.050> mowing 00:59:52.280 --> 00:59:52.290 align:start position:0% is just additional money for my mowing 00:59:52.290 --> 00:59:54.470 align:start position:0% is just additional money for my mowing not<00:59:52.680> necessarily<00:59:53.339> the<00:59:53.490> addition<00:59:53.940> of<00:59:54.119> this 00:59:54.470 --> 00:59:54.480 align:start position:0% not necessarily the addition of this 00:59:54.480 --> 00:59:56.809 align:start position:0% not necessarily the addition of this quick-response<00:59:55.440> trash<00:59:55.980> team<00:59:56.250> the<00:59:56.369> abatement 00:59:56.809 --> 00:59:56.819 align:start position:0% quick-response trash team the abatement 00:59:56.819 --> 00:59:57.910 align:start position:0% quick-response trash team the abatement team<00:59:56.970> would<00:59:57.180> that<00:59:57.300> be<00:59:57.420> correct 00:59:57.910 --> 00:59:57.920 align:start position:0% team would that be correct 00:59:57.920 --> 01:00:01.819 align:start position:0% team would that be correct okay<00:59:58.920> so<00:59:59.089> so<01:00:00.089> I<01:00:00.119> think<01:00:00.359> we're<01:00:01.109> talking<01:00:01.440> two 01:00:01.819 --> 01:00:01.829 align:start position:0% okay so so I think we're talking two 01:00:01.829 --> 01:00:03.920 align:start position:0% okay so so I think we're talking two related<01:00:02.250> but<01:00:02.369> separate<01:00:02.880> things<01:00:03.119> here<01:00:03.450> where 01:00:03.920 --> 01:00:03.930 align:start position:0% related but separate things here where 01:00:03.930 --> 01:00:05.420 align:start position:0% related but separate things here where as<01:00:03.990> opposed<01:00:04.349> to<01:00:04.500> the<01:00:04.650> quick-response<01:00:04.950> trash 01:00:05.420 --> 01:00:05.430 align:start position:0% as opposed to the quick-response trash 01:00:05.430 --> 01:00:09.650 align:start position:0% as opposed to the quick-response trash team<01:00:05.790> just<01:00:06.240> an<01:00:06.420> additional<01:00:07.250> money<01:00:08.329> devoted<01:00:09.329> to 01:00:09.650 --> 01:00:09.660 align:start position:0% team just an additional money devoted to 01:00:09.660 --> 01:00:13.190 align:start position:0% team just an additional money devoted to our<01:00:10.910> standard<01:00:11.910> mowing<01:00:12.240> program<01:00:12.720> is<01:00:12.990> what 01:00:13.190 --> 01:00:13.200 align:start position:0% our standard mowing program is what 01:00:13.200 --> 01:00:19.550 align:start position:0% our standard mowing program is what you're<01:00:13.410> suggesting<01:00:13.849> okay<01:00:18.170> mr.<01:00:19.170> mayor<01:00:19.319> I<01:00:19.530> have 01:00:19.550 --> 01:00:19.560 align:start position:0% you're suggesting okay mr. mayor I have 01:00:19.560 --> 01:00:25.329 align:start position:0% you're suggesting okay mr. mayor I have a<01:00:19.770> comment<01:00:20.369> or<01:00:20.640> a<01:00:20.670> question<01:00:20.730> also<01:00:22.190> go<01:00:23.190> ahead 01:00:25.329 --> 01:00:25.339 align:start position:0% 01:00:25.339 --> 01:00:32.210 align:start position:0% mayor's<01:00:26.339> you<01:00:26.520> bring<01:00:26.730> up<01:00:26.849> a<01:00:27.000> good<01:00:27.240> point<01:00:31.190> do<01:00:32.190> we 01:00:32.210 --> 01:00:32.220 align:start position:0% mayor's you bring up a good point do we 01:00:32.220 --> 01:00:35.690 align:start position:0% mayor's you bring up a good point do we is<01:00:32.609> there<01:00:32.819> something<01:00:33.359> that<01:00:33.510> exists<01:00:34.109> where<01:00:34.700> for 01:00:35.690 --> 01:00:35.700 align:start position:0% is there something that exists where for 01:00:35.700 --> 01:00:38.540 align:start position:0% is there something that exists where for emergency<01:00:36.329> abatements<01:00:36.960> and<01:00:37.170> stuff<01:00:38.160> like<01:00:38.339> that 01:00:38.540 --> 01:00:38.550 align:start position:0% emergency abatements and stuff like that 01:00:38.550 --> 01:00:42.200 align:start position:0% emergency abatements and stuff like that that<01:00:38.760> goes<01:00:38.940> on<01:00:39.180> that<01:00:40.050> temporarily<01:00:40.940> we<01:00:41.940> can 01:00:42.200 --> 01:00:42.210 align:start position:0% that goes on that temporarily we can 01:00:42.210 --> 01:00:45.050 align:start position:0% that goes on that temporarily we can subcontract<01:00:42.569> that<01:00:43.380> out<01:00:43.619> it<01:00:44.520> seems<01:00:44.849> like 01:00:45.050 --> 01:00:45.060 align:start position:0% subcontract that out it seems like 01:00:45.060 --> 01:00:47.240 align:start position:0% subcontract that out it seems like something<01:00:45.540> that<01:00:45.900> would<01:00:46.589> really<01:00:46.980> greatly 01:00:47.240 --> 01:00:47.250 align:start position:0% something that would really greatly 01:00:47.250 --> 01:00:51.559 align:start position:0% something that would really greatly benefit<01:00:47.910> small<01:00:48.920> businesses<01:00:49.920> in<01:00:50.569> Wyandotte 01:00:51.559 --> 01:00:51.569 align:start position:0% benefit small businesses in Wyandotte 01:00:51.569 --> 01:00:54.940 align:start position:0% benefit small businesses in Wyandotte County<01:00:52.790> there<01:00:53.790> are<01:00:53.819> a<01:00:53.940> number<01:00:54.150> of<01:00:54.300> small 01:00:54.940 --> 01:00:54.950 align:start position:0% County there are a number of small 01:00:54.950 --> 01:00:58.099 align:start position:0% County there are a number of small companies<01:00:56.030> that<01:00:57.030> are<01:00:57.210> locally<01:00:57.660> owned<01:00:57.869> and 01:00:58.099 --> 01:00:58.109 align:start position:0% companies that are locally owned and 01:00:58.109 --> 01:00:59.839 align:start position:0% companies that are locally owned and operated<01:00:58.579> in 01:00:59.839 --> 01:00:59.849 align:start position:0% operated in 01:00:59.849 --> 01:01:04.460 align:start position:0% operated in County<01:01:00.420> that<01:01:00.779> do<01:01:00.960> grass<01:01:01.440> mowing<01:01:01.739> and<01:01:03.470> trash 01:01:04.460 --> 01:01:04.470 align:start position:0% County that do grass mowing and trash 01:01:04.470 --> 01:01:08.630 align:start position:0% County that do grass mowing and trash removal<01:01:05.039> and<01:01:05.430> things<01:01:05.910> like<01:01:06.059> that<01:01:07.160> that<01:01:08.160> might 01:01:08.630 --> 01:01:08.640 align:start position:0% removal and things like that that might 01:01:08.640 --> 01:01:14.410 align:start position:0% removal and things like that that might be<01:01:09.499> temporarily<01:01:10.499> at<01:01:10.799> least<01:01:11.059> faster<01:01:12.059> and<01:01:13.190> also 01:01:14.410 --> 01:01:14.420 align:start position:0% be temporarily at least faster and also 01:01:14.420 --> 01:01:16.910 align:start position:0% be temporarily at least faster and also create<01:01:15.420> some<01:01:15.630> opportunity<01:01:16.259> for<01:01:16.289> some<01:01:16.650> smaller 01:01:16.910 --> 01:01:16.920 align:start position:0% create some opportunity for some smaller 01:01:16.920 --> 01:01:22.519 align:start position:0% create some opportunity for some smaller contractors<01:01:17.609> in<01:01:17.759> Wyandotte<01:01:17.999> County<01:01:21.109> so<01:01:22.109> is<01:01:22.349> it 01:01:22.519 --> 01:01:22.529 align:start position:0% contractors in Wyandotte County so is it 01:01:22.529 --> 01:01:26.359 align:start position:0% contractors in Wyandotte County so is it possible<01:01:22.859> to<01:01:23.960> if<01:01:24.960> we're<01:01:25.349> not<01:01:25.499> really<01:01:26.130> willing 01:01:26.359 --> 01:01:26.369 align:start position:0% possible to if we're not really willing 01:01:26.369 --> 01:01:28.670 align:start position:0% possible to if we're not really willing to<01:01:26.579> commit<01:01:26.880> this<01:01:27.509> level<01:01:27.869> of<01:01:27.960> funding<01:01:28.200> going 01:01:28.670 --> 01:01:28.680 align:start position:0% to commit this level of funding going 01:01:28.680 --> 01:01:31.930 align:start position:0% to commit this level of funding going forward<01:01:29.369> that<01:01:29.970> we<01:01:30.569> would<01:01:30.749> at<01:01:31.019> least<01:01:31.289> commit<01:01:31.619> to 01:01:31.930 --> 01:01:31.940 align:start position:0% forward that we would at least commit to 01:01:31.940 --> 01:01:35.019 align:start position:0% forward that we would at least commit to looking<01:01:32.940> at<01:01:33.059> other<01:01:33.380> possible<01:01:34.380> solutions<01:01:34.890> to 01:01:35.019 --> 01:01:35.029 align:start position:0% looking at other possible solutions to 01:01:35.029 --> 01:01:39.289 align:start position:0% looking at other possible solutions to reducing<01:01:36.029> the<01:01:36.180> backlog<01:01:37.729> yeah<01:01:38.729> I<01:01:38.759> think<01:01:38.910> you 01:01:39.289 --> 01:01:39.299 align:start position:0% reducing the backlog yeah I think you 01:01:39.299 --> 01:01:40.940 align:start position:0% reducing the backlog yeah I think you know<01:01:39.420> we<01:01:39.569> can<01:01:39.749> look<01:01:40.289> at<01:01:40.470> the<01:01:40.589> private 01:01:40.940 --> 01:01:40.950 align:start position:0% know we can look at the private 01:01:40.950 --> 01:01:42.559 align:start position:0% know we can look at the private contractors<01:01:41.609> and<01:01:41.849> I<01:01:41.910> would<01:01:42.059> welcome<01:01:42.269> if 01:01:42.559 --> 01:01:42.569 align:start position:0% contractors and I would welcome if 01:01:42.569 --> 01:01:45.109 align:start position:0% contractors and I would welcome if Jeremy<01:01:43.049> or<01:01:43.349> Mike<01:01:44.069> or<01:01:44.309> you<01:01:44.640> either<01:01:44.789> what<01:01:44.999> do<01:01:45.059> you 01:01:45.109 --> 01:01:45.119 align:start position:0% Jeremy or Mike or you either what do you 01:01:45.119 --> 01:01:49.309 align:start position:0% Jeremy or Mike or you either what do you want<01:01:45.269> to<01:01:45.359> comment<01:01:45.599> on<01:01:45.900> that<01:01:45.930> the<01:01:46.589> I<01:01:48.319> know 01:01:49.309 --> 01:01:49.319 align:start position:0% want to comment on that the I know 01:01:49.319 --> 01:01:51.650 align:start position:0% want to comment on that the I know previously<01:01:50.160> when<01:01:50.369> we<01:01:50.400> bet<01:01:50.880> bid<01:01:51.359> these 01:01:51.650 --> 01:01:51.660 align:start position:0% previously when we bet bid these 01:01:51.660 --> 01:01:55.130 align:start position:0% previously when we bet bid these difficult<01:01:52.349> Lots<01:01:52.680> we<01:01:53.579> don't<01:01:53.819> get<01:01:54.269> people<01:01:54.930> that 01:01:55.130 --> 01:01:55.140 align:start position:0% difficult Lots we don't get people that 01:01:55.140 --> 01:01:57.349 align:start position:0% difficult Lots we don't get people that are<01:01:55.259> that<01:01:55.380> excited<01:01:56.009> they<01:01:56.220> like<01:01:56.430> to<01:01:56.640> mow<01:01:56.849> the 01:01:57.349 --> 01:01:57.359 align:start position:0% are that excited they like to mow the 01:01:57.359 --> 01:02:00.950 align:start position:0% are that excited they like to mow the stuff<01:01:57.599> they<01:01:57.749> can<01:01:57.960> get<01:01:58.170> in<01:01:58.380> and<01:01:58.670> mow<01:01:59.670> and<01:02:00.450> when 01:02:00.950 --> 01:02:00.960 align:start position:0% stuff they can get in and mow and when 01:02:00.960 --> 01:02:03.499 align:start position:0% stuff they can get in and mow and when it<01:02:01.079> comes<01:02:01.259> to<01:02:01.499> I<01:02:01.529> mean<01:02:02.039> as<01:02:02.400> I<01:02:02.670> said<01:02:02.970> will<01:02:03.210> drop 01:02:03.499 --> 01:02:03.509 align:start position:0% it comes to I mean as I said will drop 01:02:03.509 --> 01:02:07.370 align:start position:0% it comes to I mean as I said will drop on<01:02:03.720> a<01:02:03.749> lot<01:02:04.140> and<01:02:04.640> there<01:02:05.640> happen<01:02:05.969> to<01:02:05.999> so<01:02:06.779> bid<01:02:07.349> a 01:02:07.370 --> 01:02:07.380 align:start position:0% on a lot and there happen to so bid a 01:02:07.380 --> 01:02:10.519 align:start position:0% on a lot and there happen to so bid a lot<01:02:07.739> price<01:02:08.069> to<01:02:08.430> us<01:02:08.640> and<01:02:08.910> the<01:02:09.599> variation<01:02:10.200> is<01:02:10.319> you 01:02:10.519 --> 01:02:10.529 align:start position:0% lot price to us and the variation is you 01:02:10.529 --> 01:02:11.690 align:start position:0% lot price to us and the variation is you might<01:02:10.680> be<01:02:10.799> able<01:02:10.920> to<01:02:11.009> clean<01:02:11.160> a<01:02:11.190> lot<01:02:11.369> in<01:02:11.489> 30 01:02:11.690 --> 01:02:11.700 align:start position:0% might be able to clean a lot in 30 01:02:11.700 --> 01:02:13.459 align:start position:0% might be able to clean a lot in 30 minutes<01:02:12.029> I<01:02:12.180> think<01:02:12.239> Jeremy<01:02:12.690> told<01:02:12.869> me<01:02:13.049> verses 01:02:13.459 --> 01:02:13.469 align:start position:0% minutes I think Jeremy told me verses 01:02:13.469 --> 01:02:16.579 align:start position:0% minutes I think Jeremy told me verses six<01:02:14.339> to<01:02:14.489> seven<01:02:14.849> hours<01:02:15.109> so<01:02:16.109> there's<01:02:16.349> no 01:02:16.579 --> 01:02:16.589 align:start position:0% six to seven hours so there's no 01:02:16.589 --> 01:02:19.670 align:start position:0% six to seven hours so there's no uniformity<01:02:17.279> at<01:02:17.759> all<01:02:18.059> in<01:02:18.900> trying<01:02:19.319> to<01:02:19.440> price 01:02:19.670 --> 01:02:19.680 align:start position:0% uniformity at all in trying to price 01:02:19.680 --> 01:02:22.489 align:start position:0% uniformity at all in trying to price structure<01:02:20.009> these<01:02:20.509> so<01:02:21.509> then<01:02:21.749> that<01:02:21.930> requires<01:02:22.109> us 01:02:22.489 --> 01:02:22.499 align:start position:0% structure these so then that requires us 01:02:22.499 --> 01:02:24.769 align:start position:0% structure these so then that requires us to<01:02:22.710> be<01:02:22.950> kind<01:02:23.249> of<01:02:23.400> on<01:02:23.579> site<01:02:24.059> with<01:02:24.359> them<01:02:24.539> so<01:02:24.749> that 01:02:24.769 --> 01:02:24.779 align:start position:0% to be kind of on site with them so that 01:02:24.779 --> 01:02:26.719 align:start position:0% to be kind of on site with them so that takes<01:02:25.170> another<01:02:25.380> supervisor<01:02:25.950> of<01:02:26.130> position<01:02:26.609> as 01:02:26.719 --> 01:02:26.729 align:start position:0% takes another supervisor of position as 01:02:26.729 --> 01:02:30.309 align:start position:0% takes another supervisor of position as you<01:02:26.849> go<01:02:26.999> out<01:02:27.180> to<01:02:27.390> them<01:02:27.509> so<01:02:27.660> it's<01:02:27.839> a<01:02:28.369> these<01:02:29.369> are 01:02:30.309 --> 01:02:30.319 align:start position:0% you go out to them so it's a these are 01:02:30.319 --> 01:02:32.749 align:start position:0% you go out to them so it's a these are you've<01:02:31.319> seen<01:02:31.349> them<01:02:31.739> there<01:02:32.190> are<01:02:32.279> a<01:02:32.339> lot<01:02:32.460> of<01:02:32.489> odd 01:02:32.749 --> 01:02:32.759 align:start position:0% you've seen them there are a lot of odd 01:02:32.759 --> 01:02:34.489 align:start position:0% you've seen them there are a lot of odd things<01:02:33.239> through<01:02:33.509> the<01:02:33.630> community<01:02:34.109> so<01:02:34.289> when<01:02:34.410> you 01:02:34.489 --> 01:02:34.499 align:start position:0% things through the community so when you 01:02:34.499 --> 01:02:36.680 align:start position:0% things through the community so when you come<01:02:34.680> to<01:02:34.890> them<01:02:35.039> you<01:02:35.219> know<01:02:35.339> and<01:02:35.369> then<01:02:35.630> you<01:02:36.630> know 01:02:36.680 --> 01:02:36.690 align:start position:0% come to them you know and then you know 01:02:36.690 --> 01:02:38.749 align:start position:0% come to them you know and then you know it's<01:02:36.869> pricing<01:02:37.410> so<01:02:37.589> it's<01:02:37.769> a<01:02:37.950> it's<01:02:38.279> an<01:02:38.430> awkward 01:02:38.749 --> 01:02:38.759 align:start position:0% it's pricing so it's a it's an awkward 01:02:38.759 --> 01:02:40.099 align:start position:0% it's pricing so it's a it's an awkward one<01:02:38.910> we<01:02:39.089> haven't<01:02:39.390> had<01:02:39.479> a<01:02:39.509> lot<01:02:39.599> of<01:02:39.809> good<01:02:39.930> luck 01:02:40.099 --> 01:02:40.109 align:start position:0% one we haven't had a lot of good luck 01:02:40.109 --> 01:02:41.690 align:start position:0% one we haven't had a lot of good luck with<01:02:40.319> contractors<01:02:40.979> not<01:02:41.130> to<01:02:41.309> say<01:02:41.460> that<01:02:41.609> we 01:02:41.690 --> 01:02:41.700 align:start position:0% with contractors not to say that we 01:02:41.700 --> 01:02:43.249 align:start position:0% with contractors not to say that we couldn't<01:02:41.940> find<01:02:42.150> somebody<01:02:42.479> that<01:02:42.839> could<01:02:43.049> work 01:02:43.249 --> 01:02:43.259 align:start position:0% couldn't find somebody that could work 01:02:43.259 --> 01:02:45.829 align:start position:0% couldn't find somebody that could work with<01:02:43.469> as<01:02:43.680> well<01:02:43.710> it's<01:02:44.099> just<01:02:44.190> been<01:02:44.549> a<01:02:44.839> difficult 01:02:45.829 --> 01:02:45.839 align:start position:0% with as well it's just been a difficult 01:02:45.839 --> 01:02:47.450 align:start position:0% with as well it's just been a difficult run<01:02:46.109> or<01:02:46.289> not<01:02:46.410> if<01:02:46.499> you<01:02:46.619> have<01:02:46.650> any<01:02:46.859> additional 01:02:47.450 --> 01:02:47.460 align:start position:0% run or not if you have any additional 01:02:47.460 --> 01:02:49.700 align:start position:0% run or not if you have any additional comments<01:02:48.089> that<01:02:48.210> Jeremy<01:02:48.630> maybe<01:02:48.839> I'm<01:02:49.109> missing 01:02:49.700 --> 01:02:49.710 align:start position:0% comments that Jeremy maybe I'm missing 01:02:49.710 --> 01:02:52.640 align:start position:0% comments that Jeremy maybe I'm missing something<01:02:50.059> no<01:02:51.059> you<01:02:51.089> are<01:02:51.390> correct<01:02:51.779> the<01:02:52.259> problem 01:02:52.640 --> 01:02:52.650 align:start position:0% something no you are correct the problem 01:02:52.650 --> 01:02:55.249 align:start position:0% something no you are correct the problem with<01:02:52.799> contractors<01:02:53.489> is<01:02:53.849> when<01:02:54.509> we<01:02:54.630> go<01:02:54.809> in<01:02:54.989> and<01:02:55.140> do 01:02:55.249 --> 01:02:55.259 align:start position:0% with contractors is when we go in and do 01:02:55.259 --> 01:02:58.099 align:start position:0% with contractors is when we go in and do an<01:02:55.380> abatement<01:02:55.739> it's<01:02:56.339> on<01:02:56.519> private<01:02:56.789> property<01:02:57.210> so 01:02:58.099 --> 01:02:58.109 align:start position:0% an abatement it's on private property so 01:02:58.109 --> 01:03:00.289 align:start position:0% an abatement it's on private property so we're<01:02:58.319> going<01:02:58.499> on<01:02:58.769> to<01:02:59.009> someone's<01:02:59.519> property<01:02:59.849> and 01:03:00.289 --> 01:03:00.299 align:start position:0% we're going on to someone's property and 01:03:00.299 --> 01:03:03.589 align:start position:0% we're going on to someone's property and when<01:03:00.719> you<01:03:00.809> involve<01:03:01.289> contractors<01:03:02.190> I<01:03:02.599> don't 01:03:03.589 --> 01:03:03.599 align:start position:0% when you involve contractors I don't 01:03:03.599 --> 01:03:06.650 align:start position:0% when you involve contractors I don't know<01:03:03.690> if<01:03:03.809> Ken<01:03:04.049> can<01:03:04.729> elaborate<01:03:05.729> on<01:03:05.789> that<01:03:05.969> but<01:03:06.450> I 01:03:06.650 --> 01:03:06.660 align:start position:0% know if Ken can elaborate on that but I 01:03:06.660 --> 01:03:09.200 align:start position:0% know if Ken can elaborate on that but I know<01:03:06.719> there<01:03:06.989> are<01:03:07.109> some<01:03:07.259> legalities<01:03:08.029> with<01:03:09.029> that 01:03:09.200 --> 01:03:09.210 align:start position:0% know there are some legalities with that 01:03:09.210 --> 01:03:13.009 align:start position:0% know there are some legalities with that issue<01:03:10.309> well<01:03:11.309> then<01:03:11.609> why<01:03:11.819> don't<01:03:12.029> we<01:03:12.239> have 01:03:13.009 --> 01:03:13.019 align:start position:0% issue well then why don't we have 01:03:13.019 --> 01:03:13.609 align:start position:0% issue well then why don't we have comment 01:03:13.609 --> 01:03:13.619 align:start position:0% comment 01:03:13.619 --> 01:03:17.059 align:start position:0% comment here<01:03:13.950> then<01:03:14.190> why<01:03:14.430> Jeremy<01:03:15.359> did<01:03:15.630> we<01:03:15.749> not<01:03:15.930> use<01:03:16.769> our 01:03:17.059 --> 01:03:17.069 align:start position:0% here then why Jeremy did we not use our 01:03:17.069 --> 01:03:20.089 align:start position:0% here then why Jeremy did we not use our guys<01:03:17.309> for<01:03:18.119> the<01:03:18.450> private<01:03:18.839> property<01:03:19.019> stuff<01:03:19.559> and 01:03:20.089 --> 01:03:20.099 align:start position:0% guys for the private property stuff and 01:03:20.099 --> 01:03:23.859 align:start position:0% guys for the private property stuff and use<01:03:20.490> the<01:03:20.880> contractor<01:03:21.749> for<01:03:22.049> the<01:03:22.170> public<01:03:22.529> stuff 01:03:23.859 --> 01:03:23.869 align:start position:0% use the contractor for the public stuff 01:03:23.869 --> 01:03:26.749 align:start position:0% use the contractor for the public stuff all<01:03:24.869> of<01:03:25.109> the<01:03:25.259> abatements<01:03:25.799> that<01:03:25.920> we<01:03:26.069> do<01:03:26.249> are<01:03:26.549> on 01:03:26.749 --> 01:03:26.759 align:start position:0% all of the abatements that we do are on 01:03:26.759 --> 01:03:30.200 align:start position:0% all of the abatements that we do are on private<01:03:26.999> property<01:03:28.670> we're<01:03:29.670> basically<01:03:30.029> in 01:03:30.200 --> 01:03:30.210 align:start position:0% private property we're basically in 01:03:30.210 --> 01:03:33.470 align:start position:0% private property we're basically in focus<01:03:30.569> I'm<01:03:30.839> sorry<01:03:31.220> so<01:03:32.220> I<01:03:32.579> was<01:03:32.970> also<01:03:33.150> speaking 01:03:33.470 --> 01:03:33.480 align:start position:0% focus I'm sorry so I was also speaking 01:03:33.480 --> 01:03:35.839 align:start position:0% focus I'm sorry so I was also speaking to<01:03:33.720> Mike<01:03:34.079> and<01:03:34.319> and<01:03:34.650> Brian's<01:03:35.130> comments<01:03:35.609> about 01:03:35.839 --> 01:03:35.849 align:start position:0% to Mike and and Brian's comments about 01:03:35.849 --> 01:03:37.400 align:start position:0% to Mike and and Brian's comments about mowing<01:03:36.180> so<01:03:36.480> I<01:03:36.539> won't<01:03:36.749> confuse<01:03:37.049> them<01:03:37.319> I'll 01:03:37.400 --> 01:03:37.410 align:start position:0% mowing so I won't confuse them I'll 01:03:37.410 --> 01:03:40.339 align:start position:0% mowing so I won't confuse them I'll stick<01:03:37.710> with<01:03:37.950> abatement<01:03:38.910> so<01:03:39.749> why<01:03:39.960> are<01:03:40.019> we<01:03:40.230> using 01:03:40.339 --> 01:03:40.349 align:start position:0% stick with abatement so why are we using 01:03:40.349 --> 01:03:43.069 align:start position:0% stick with abatement so why are we using some<01:03:40.980> learnt<01:03:41.579> using<01:03:41.730> our<01:03:41.999> internal<01:03:42.420> existing 01:03:43.069 --> 01:03:43.079 align:start position:0% some learnt using our internal existing 01:03:43.079 --> 01:03:45.789 align:start position:0% some learnt using our internal existing crews<01:03:43.410> for<01:03:44.099> those<01:03:44.249> emergency<01:03:44.549> abatement<01:03:45.420> and 01:03:45.789 --> 01:03:45.799 align:start position:0% crews for those emergency abatement and 01:03:45.799 --> 01:03:49.940 align:start position:0% crews for those emergency abatement and then<01:03:46.799> farming<01:03:47.609> out<01:03:48.289> the<01:03:49.289> stuff<01:03:49.559> that<01:03:49.740> they're 01:03:49.940 --> 01:03:49.950 align:start position:0% then farming out the stuff that they're 01:03:49.950 --> 01:03:53.239 align:start position:0% then farming out the stuff that they're doing<01:03:50.690> to<01:03:51.690> a<01:03:51.720> subcontractor<01:03:52.650> temporarily 01:03:53.239 --> 01:03:53.249 align:start position:0% doing to a subcontractor temporarily 01:03:53.249 --> 01:03:55.730 align:start position:0% doing to a subcontractor temporarily until<01:03:53.819> we<01:03:53.940> get<01:03:54.059> our<01:03:54.210> hands<01:03:54.450> around<01:03:54.630> that<01:03:54.930> since 01:03:55.730 --> 01:03:55.740 align:start position:0% until we get our hands around that since 01:03:55.740 --> 01:03:57.410 align:start position:0% until we get our hands around that since our<01:03:55.980> guys<01:03:56.220> are<01:03:56.430> from<01:03:56.670> here<01:03:56.940> and<01:03:57.089> they<01:03:57.210> know<01:03:57.390> our 01:03:57.410 --> 01:03:57.420 align:start position:0% our guys are from here and they know our 01:03:57.420 --> 01:03:59.930 align:start position:0% our guys are from here and they know our community<01:03:58.079> and<01:03:58.410> they<01:03:58.559> know<01:03:58.940> our 01:03:59.930 --> 01:03:59.940 align:start position:0% community and they know our 01:03:59.940 --> 01:04:00.710 align:start position:0% community and they know our neighborhoods 01:04:00.710 --> 01:04:00.720 align:start position:0% neighborhoods 01:04:00.720 --> 01:04:07.160 align:start position:0% neighborhoods why<01:04:00.839> wouldn't<01:04:01.049> we<01:04:01.170> use<01:04:01.349> them<01:04:01.589> for<01:04:01.859> that<01:04:06.170> that's 01:04:07.160 --> 01:04:07.170 align:start position:0% why wouldn't we use them for that that's 01:04:07.170 --> 01:04:09.980 align:start position:0% why wouldn't we use them for that that's exactly<01:04:07.499> what<01:04:08.039> we're<01:04:08.190> doing<01:04:08.339> we<01:04:08.789> if<01:04:09.720> we<01:04:09.900> have 01:04:09.980 --> 01:04:09.990 align:start position:0% exactly what we're doing we if we have 01:04:09.990 --> 01:04:11.809 align:start position:0% exactly what we're doing we if we have an<01:04:10.079> emergency<01:04:10.499> abatement<01:04:11.190> we'll<01:04:11.369> pull<01:04:11.609> our 01:04:11.809 --> 01:04:11.819 align:start position:0% an emergency abatement we'll pull our 01:04:11.819 --> 01:04:14.150 align:start position:0% an emergency abatement we'll pull our three<01:04:12.150> guys<01:04:12.390> that<01:04:12.779> we<01:04:12.930> have<01:04:13.140> on<01:04:13.349> that<01:04:13.380> crew<01:04:13.890> and 01:04:14.150 --> 01:04:14.160 align:start position:0% three guys that we have on that crew and 01:04:14.160 --> 01:04:15.980 align:start position:0% three guys that we have on that crew and we'll<01:04:14.640> send<01:04:14.910> them<01:04:15.029> to<01:04:15.089> that<01:04:15.509> do<01:04:15.749> that 01:04:15.980 --> 01:04:15.990 align:start position:0% we'll send them to that do that 01:04:15.990 --> 01:04:18.589 align:start position:0% we'll send them to that do that abatement<01:04:16.589> then<01:04:17.099> at<01:04:17.519> the<01:04:17.759> end<01:04:17.999> of<01:04:18.299> the<01:04:18.420> day 01:04:18.589 --> 01:04:18.599 align:start position:0% abatement then at the end of the day 01:04:18.599 --> 01:04:20.509 align:start position:0% abatement then at the end of the day once<01:04:19.109> we're<01:04:19.349> done<01:04:19.499> with<01:04:19.710> our<01:04:19.739> parks<01:04:20.220> and<01:04:20.369> with 01:04:20.509 --> 01:04:20.519 align:start position:0% once we're done with our parks and with 01:04:20.519 --> 01:04:22.970 align:start position:0% once we're done with our parks and with our<01:04:20.670> medians<01:04:21.089> and<01:04:21.329> whatnot<01:04:21.660> those<01:04:22.319> guys<01:04:22.589> will 01:04:22.970 --> 01:04:22.980 align:start position:0% our medians and whatnot those guys will 01:04:22.980 --> 01:04:25.549 align:start position:0% our medians and whatnot those guys will come<01:04:23.220> in<01:04:23.489> and<01:04:23.670> fill<01:04:23.700> in<01:04:24.390> the<01:04:24.569> back<01:04:24.809> of<01:04:25.200> where 01:04:25.549 --> 01:04:25.559 align:start position:0% come in and fill in the back of where 01:04:25.559 --> 01:04:28.640 align:start position:0% come in and fill in the back of where those<01:04:25.769> guys<01:04:26.180> pick<01:04:27.180> up<01:04:27.359> where<01:04:27.630> where<01:04:28.230> they<01:04:28.410> are 01:04:28.640 --> 01:04:28.650 align:start position:0% those guys pick up where where they are 01:04:28.650 --> 01:04:32.299 align:start position:0% those guys pick up where where they are to<01:04:29.009> help<01:04:29.220> them<01:04:29.460> out<01:04:29.640> so<01:04:29.970> that<01:04:29.999> that<01:04:31.039> makes<01:04:32.039> it<01:04:32.249> a 01:04:32.299 --> 01:04:32.309 align:start position:0% to help them out so that that makes it a 01:04:32.309 --> 01:04:36.259 align:start position:0% to help them out so that that makes it a shorter<01:04:32.730> day<01:04:34.430> right<01:04:35.430> but<01:04:35.640> our<01:04:35.759> guys<01:04:35.970> what<01:04:36.180> you 01:04:36.259 --> 01:04:36.269 align:start position:0% shorter day right but our guys what you 01:04:36.269 --> 01:04:37.579 align:start position:0% shorter day right but our guys what you were<01:04:36.390> just<01:04:36.630> saying<01:04:36.779> is<01:04:36.930> we're<01:04:37.079> paying<01:04:37.319> a<01:04:37.440> lot 01:04:37.579 --> 01:04:37.589 align:start position:0% were just saying is we're paying a lot 01:04:37.589 --> 01:04:40.609 align:start position:0% were just saying is we're paying a lot of<01:04:37.619> overtime<01:04:38.509> so<01:04:39.509> what<01:04:40.019> I'm<01:04:40.109> saying<01:04:40.319> well<01:04:40.499> we 01:04:40.609 --> 01:04:40.619 align:start position:0% of overtime so what I'm saying well we 01:04:40.619 --> 01:04:42.079 align:start position:0% of overtime so what I'm saying well we have<01:04:40.650> so<01:04:40.859> many<01:04:40.950> guys<01:04:41.249> and<01:04:41.489> we<01:04:41.579> can't<01:04:41.819> put<01:04:42.029> them 01:04:42.079 --> 01:04:42.089 align:start position:0% have so many guys and we can't put them 01:04:42.089 --> 01:04:43.849 align:start position:0% have so many guys and we can't put them on<01:04:42.269> everything<01:04:42.839> and<01:04:43.109> we<01:04:43.200> can't<01:04:43.440> work<01:04:43.650> them 01:04:43.849 --> 01:04:43.859 align:start position:0% on everything and we can't work them 01:04:43.859 --> 01:04:45.829 align:start position:0% on everything and we can't work them well<01:04:44.339> we<01:04:44.460> could<01:04:44.670> I<01:04:44.700> guess<01:04:45.059> but<01:04:45.329> we<01:04:45.599> probably 01:04:45.829 --> 01:04:45.839 align:start position:0% well we could I guess but we probably 01:04:45.839 --> 01:04:49.630 align:start position:0% well we could I guess but we probably Cindy<01:04:46.259> working<01:04:46.589> 12<01:04:47.009> hour<01:04:47.160> 10<01:04:47.489> hour<01:04:47.640> days<01:04:48.289> and 01:04:49.630 --> 01:04:49.640 align:start position:0% Cindy working 12 hour 10 hour days and 01:04:49.640 --> 01:04:52.489 align:start position:0% Cindy working 12 hour 10 hour days and unless<01:04:50.640> they<01:04:50.819> want<01:04:51.059> that<01:04:51.239> I<01:04:51.299> guess<01:04:51.630> but<01:04:51.930> from<01:04:52.380> a 01:04:52.489 --> 01:04:52.499 align:start position:0% unless they want that I guess but from a 01:04:52.499 --> 01:04:56.210 align:start position:0% unless they want that I guess but from a cost<01:04:52.739> efficiency<01:04:53.640> perspective<01:04:54.769> why<01:04:55.769> would<01:04:55.980> we 01:04:56.210 --> 01:04:56.220 align:start position:0% cost efficiency perspective why would we 01:04:56.220 --> 01:04:58.789 align:start position:0% cost efficiency perspective why would we be<01:04:56.749> subcontracting<01:04:57.749> the<01:04:57.869> easier<01:04:58.230> stuff<01:04:58.349> and 01:04:58.789 --> 01:04:58.799 align:start position:0% be subcontracting the easier stuff and 01:04:58.799 --> 01:05:01.700 align:start position:0% be subcontracting the easier stuff and just<01:04:58.980> moving<01:04:59.279> things<01:05:00.029> around<01:05:00.299> so<01:05:00.869> our<01:05:01.470> guys 01:05:01.700 --> 01:05:01.710 align:start position:0% just moving things around so our guys 01:05:01.710 --> 01:05:08.150 align:start position:0% just moving things around so our guys are<01:05:01.950> doing<01:05:02.839> the<01:05:03.839> more<01:05:06.529> the<01:05:07.529> stuff<01:05:07.829> that<01:05:08.009> will 01:05:08.150 --> 01:05:08.160 align:start position:0% are doing the more the stuff that will 01:05:08.160 --> 01:05:10.999 align:start position:0% are doing the more the stuff that will more<01:05:08.339> comfortable<01:05:08.849> doing<01:05:09.029> in-house<01:05:10.009> mr. 01:05:10.999 --> 01:05:11.009 align:start position:0% more comfortable doing in-house mr. 01:05:11.009 --> 01:05:13.099 align:start position:0% more comfortable doing in-house mr. Moore<01:05:11.220> our<01:05:11.700> ordinance<01:05:12.210> clearly<01:05:12.569> contemplates 01:05:13.099 --> 01:05:13.109 align:start position:0% Moore our ordinance clearly contemplates 01:05:13.109 --> 01:05:15.319 align:start position:0% Moore our ordinance clearly contemplates so<01:05:13.289> once<01:05:13.470> we<01:05:13.650> get<01:05:14.190> into<01:05:14.339> the<01:05:14.430> process<01:05:14.640> the 01:05:15.319 --> 01:05:15.329 align:start position:0% so once we get into the process the 01:05:15.329 --> 01:05:16.999 align:start position:0% so once we get into the process the abatement<01:05:15.509> process<01:05:16.049> that<01:05:16.230> we<01:05:16.349> do<01:05:16.829> ourselves 01:05:16.999 --> 01:05:17.009 align:start position:0% abatement process that we do ourselves 01:05:17.009 --> 01:05:19.849 align:start position:0% abatement process that we do ourselves or<01:05:17.819> have<01:05:18.059> an<01:05:18.180> authorized<01:05:18.539> agent<01:05:18.930> or<01:05:19.019> do 01:05:19.849 --> 01:05:19.859 align:start position:0% or have an authorized agent or do 01:05:19.859 --> 01:05:22.359 align:start position:0% or have an authorized agent or do have<01:05:20.039> so<01:05:20.609> it<01:05:20.970> kind<01:05:21.329> of<01:05:21.450> plays<01:05:21.630> having 01:05:22.359 --> 01:05:22.369 align:start position:0% have so it kind of plays having 01:05:22.369 --> 01:05:24.140 align:start position:0% have so it kind of plays having contractors<01:05:23.369> that<01:05:23.489> they're<01:05:23.640> doing<01:05:23.819> at<01:05:23.999> work 01:05:24.140 --> 01:05:24.150 align:start position:0% contractors that they're doing at work 01:05:24.150 --> 01:05:26.089 align:start position:0% contractors that they're doing at work the<01:05:24.539> only<01:05:24.660> requirement<01:05:25.230> that's<01:05:25.650> done<01:05:25.890> in<01:05:26.009> a 01:05:26.089 --> 01:05:26.099 align:start position:0% the only requirement that's done in a 01:05:26.099 --> 01:05:29.380 align:start position:0% the only requirement that's done in a reasonable<01:05:26.279> manner<01:05:27.380> thank<01:05:28.380> you 01:05:29.380 --> 01:05:29.390 align:start position:0% reasonable manner thank you 01:05:29.390 --> 01:05:31.609 align:start position:0% reasonable manner thank you so<01:05:30.390> they<01:05:30.539> could<01:05:30.749> consensus<01:05:31.349> of<01:05:31.470> the 01:05:31.609 --> 01:05:31.619 align:start position:0% so they could consensus of the 01:05:31.619 --> 01:05:38.029 align:start position:0% so they could consensus of the Commission<01:05:34.999> is<01:05:35.999> there<01:05:36.180> a<01:05:36.210> strong<01:05:36.599> drive<01:05:37.589> to 01:05:38.029 --> 01:05:38.039 align:start position:0% Commission is there a strong drive to 01:05:38.039 --> 01:05:43.130 align:start position:0% Commission is there a strong drive to places<01:05:38.640> on<01:05:38.789> the<01:05:38.910> budget<01:05:41.690> hearing<01:05:42.690> none<01:05:42.869> move 01:05:43.130 --> 01:05:43.140 align:start position:0% places on the budget hearing none move 01:05:43.140 --> 01:05:47.299 align:start position:0% places on the budget hearing none move on<01:05:44.809> okay<01:05:45.809> the<01:05:45.960> next<01:05:46.170> one<01:05:46.319> was<01:05:46.559> a<01:05:46.589> brought<01:05:47.190> up 01:05:47.299 --> 01:05:47.309 align:start position:0% on okay the next one was a brought up 01:05:47.309 --> 01:05:48.859 align:start position:0% on okay the next one was a brought up the<01:05:47.430> discussion<01:05:47.880> about<01:05:47.999> the<01:05:48.150> increase<01:05:48.569> to<01:05:48.779> the 01:05:48.859 --> 01:05:48.869 align:start position:0% the discussion about the increase to the 01:05:48.869 --> 01:05:52.579 align:start position:0% the discussion about the increase to the MBRs<01:05:49.589> I<01:05:50.519> we<01:05:51.509> had<01:05:51.660> some<01:05:51.869> discussion<01:05:52.319> about<01:05:52.410> it 01:05:52.579 --> 01:05:52.589 align:start position:0% MBRs I we had some discussion about it 01:05:52.589 --> 01:05:56.690 align:start position:0% MBRs I we had some discussion about it and<01:05:53.480> then<01:05:54.480> we<01:05:54.690> left<01:05:54.960> it<01:05:55.170> at<01:05:55.349> that<01:05:55.470> point<01:05:55.980> so<01:05:56.279> I 01:05:56.690 --> 01:05:56.700 align:start position:0% and then we left it at that point so I 01:05:56.700 --> 01:05:58.220 align:start position:0% and then we left it at that point so I don't<01:05:57.029> know<01:05:57.089> that<01:05:57.210> I<01:05:57.269> have<01:05:57.390> anything<01:05:57.599> else<01:05:57.930> to 01:05:58.220 --> 01:05:58.230 align:start position:0% don't know that I have anything else to 01:05:58.230 --> 01:05:59.749 align:start position:0% don't know that I have anything else to bring<01:05:58.650> to<01:05:58.799> the<01:05:58.890> table<01:05:59.039> but<01:05:59.579> I<01:05:59.609> asked 01:05:59.749 --> 01:05:59.759 align:start position:0% bring to the table but I asked 01:05:59.759 --> 01:06:02.749 align:start position:0% bring to the table but I asked Commissioner<01:05:59.970> Bynum<01:06:00.839> to<01:06:01.140> speak<01:06:01.920> to<01:06:02.039> this<01:06:02.190> sure 01:06:02.749 --> 01:06:02.759 align:start position:0% Commissioner Bynum to speak to this sure 01:06:02.759 --> 01:06:05.769 align:start position:0% Commissioner Bynum to speak to this sure um<01:06:03.059> while<01:06:03.569> I<01:06:03.680> maintain<01:06:04.680> my<01:06:04.710> position<01:06:04.920> of 01:06:05.769 --> 01:06:05.779 align:start position:0% um while I maintain my position of 01:06:05.779 --> 01:06:10.970 align:start position:0% um while I maintain my position of believing<01:06:06.779> that<01:06:08.779> returning<01:06:09.779> the<01:06:10.019> existing<01:06:10.829> in 01:06:10.970 --> 01:06:10.980 align:start position:0% believing that returning the existing in 01:06:10.980 --> 01:06:14.120 align:start position:0% believing that returning the existing in beers<01:06:11.279> to<01:06:11.730> their<01:06:11.999> funded<01:06:12.989> level<01:06:13.200> of<01:06:13.619> a<01:06:13.739> decade 01:06:14.120 --> 01:06:14.130 align:start position:0% beers to their funded level of a decade 01:06:14.130 --> 01:06:16.400 align:start position:0% beers to their funded level of a decade ago<01:06:14.309> is<01:06:14.730> something<01:06:15.359> I<01:06:15.720> support 01:06:16.400 --> 01:06:16.410 align:start position:0% ago is something I support 01:06:16.410 --> 01:06:21.229 align:start position:0% ago is something I support I<01:06:16.589> am<01:06:17.720> also<01:06:18.720> fine<01:06:19.289> with<01:06:19.910> having<01:06:20.910> a<01:06:20.999> further 01:06:21.229 --> 01:06:21.239 align:start position:0% I am also fine with having a further 01:06:21.239 --> 01:06:25.549 align:start position:0% I am also fine with having a further conversation<01:06:22.579> to<01:06:23.579> look<01:06:23.819> at<01:06:23.999> MBRs<01:06:24.989> across<01:06:25.349> the 01:06:25.549 --> 01:06:25.559 align:start position:0% conversation to look at MBRs across the 01:06:25.559 --> 01:06:27.979 align:start position:0% conversation to look at MBRs across the board<01:06:25.799> I'm<01:06:26.130> really<01:06:26.460> fine<01:06:27.150> with<01:06:27.180> that 01:06:27.979 --> 01:06:27.989 align:start position:0% board I'm really fine with that 01:06:27.989 --> 01:06:33.880 align:start position:0% board I'm really fine with that you<01:06:28.859> know<01:06:28.980> it's<01:06:29.480> $20,000<01:06:30.859> so<01:06:31.859> for<01:06:32.489> me 01:06:33.880 --> 01:06:33.890 align:start position:0% you know it's $20,000 so for me 01:06:33.890 --> 01:06:36.380 align:start position:0% you know it's $20,000 so for me returning<01:06:34.890> them<01:06:35.069> to<01:06:35.099> their<01:06:35.430> funding<01:06:35.910> level<01:06:36.239> of 01:06:36.380 --> 01:06:36.390 align:start position:0% returning them to their funding level of 01:06:36.390 --> 01:06:41.900 align:start position:0% returning them to their funding level of a<01:06:36.509> decade<01:06:36.869> ago<01:06:38.180> seems<01:06:39.180> easy<01:06:39.690> but<01:06:40.700> I'm<01:06:41.700> actually 01:06:41.900 --> 01:06:41.910 align:start position:0% a decade ago seems easy but I'm actually 01:06:41.910 --> 01:06:46.640 align:start position:0% a decade ago seems easy but I'm actually fine<01:06:42.359> with<01:06:43.339> delaying<01:06:44.339> that<01:06:44.730> and<01:06:45.470> having<01:06:46.470> a 01:06:46.640 --> 01:06:46.650 align:start position:0% fine with delaying that and having a 01:06:46.650 --> 01:06:48.769 align:start position:0% fine with delaying that and having a more<01:06:46.829> a<01:06:46.890> deeper<01:06:47.400> conversation<01:06:48.119> around<01:06:48.269> the 01:06:48.769 --> 01:06:48.779 align:start position:0% more a deeper conversation around the 01:06:48.779 --> 01:06:51.200 align:start position:0% more a deeper conversation around the work<01:06:49.739> that<01:06:49.980> they<01:06:50.160> do<01:06:50.220> in<01:06:50.549> general<01:06:51.029> is 01:06:51.200 --> 01:06:51.210 align:start position:0% work that they do in general is 01:06:51.210 --> 01:06:54.410 align:start position:0% work that they do in general is absolutely<01:06:51.900> fine<01:06:52.109> with<01:06:52.140> me<01:06:53.269> thank<01:06:54.269> you<01:06:54.329> so 01:06:54.410 --> 01:06:54.420 align:start position:0% absolutely fine with me thank you so 01:06:54.420 --> 01:06:56.120 align:start position:0% absolutely fine with me thank you so what<01:06:54.660> I<01:06:54.690> understand<01:06:55.140> is<01:06:55.319> that<01:06:55.349> you're<01:06:55.799> not 01:06:56.120 --> 01:06:56.130 align:start position:0% what I understand is that you're not 01:06:56.130 --> 01:06:58.579 align:start position:0% what I understand is that you're not asking<01:06:56.700> to<01:06:56.819> forward<01:06:57.119> this<01:06:57.299> is<01:06:57.539> there<01:06:57.690> anyone 01:06:58.579 --> 01:06:58.589 align:start position:0% asking to forward this is there anyone 01:06:58.589 --> 01:06:59.749 align:start position:0% asking to forward this is there anyone else<01:06:58.739> on<01:06:58.920> the<01:06:59.009> commission<01:06:59.369> would<01:06:59.460> like<01:06:59.609> to 01:06:59.749 --> 01:06:59.759 align:start position:0% else on the commission would like to 01:06:59.759 --> 01:07:03.559 align:start position:0% else on the commission would like to forward<01:07:00.150> this<01:07:00.269> funding<01:07:01.099> at<01:07:02.099> this<01:07:02.369> point<01:07:02.640> no<01:07:03.539> I 01:07:03.559 --> 01:07:03.569 align:start position:0% forward this funding at this point no I 01:07:03.569 --> 01:07:05.150 align:start position:0% forward this funding at this point no I don't<01:07:03.900> want<01:07:04.049> afford<01:07:04.410> it<01:07:04.559> but<01:07:04.710> I<01:07:04.769> do<01:07:04.829> want<01:07:04.980> to 01:07:05.150 --> 01:07:05.160 align:start position:0% don't want afford it but I do want to 01:07:05.160 --> 01:07:06.279 align:start position:0% don't want afford it but I do want to make<01:07:05.279> sure<01:07:05.489> we<01:07:05.609> have<01:07:05.789> that<01:07:05.819> conversation 01:07:06.279 --> 01:07:06.289 align:start position:0% make sure we have that conversation 01:07:06.289 --> 01:07:10.839 align:start position:0% make sure we have that conversation absolutely<01:07:07.289> thank<01:07:07.950> you 01:07:10.839 --> 01:07:10.849 align:start position:0% 01:07:10.849 --> 01:07:15.229 align:start position:0% next<01:07:11.849> up<01:07:11.970> mr.<01:07:12.239> Bach<01:07:12.390> all<01:07:12.749> right<01:07:13.640> the<01:07:14.640> next<01:07:14.940> item 01:07:15.229 --> 01:07:15.239 align:start position:0% next up mr. Bach all right the next item 01:07:15.239 --> 01:07:17.690 align:start position:0% next up mr. Bach all right the next item is<01:07:15.420> the<01:07:15.450> one<01:07:15.720> that<01:07:15.960> we<01:07:16.289> had<01:07:16.499> a<01:07:16.529> sheriff<01:07:17.099> ash<01:07:17.309> and 01:07:17.690 --> 01:07:17.700 align:start position:0% is the one that we had a sheriff ash and 01:07:17.700 --> 01:07:19.759 align:start position:0% is the one that we had a sheriff ash and chief<01:07:17.910> Ziegler<01:07:18.299> here<01:07:18.599> talked<01:07:19.289> about<01:07:19.529> a<01:07:19.559> few 01:07:19.759 --> 01:07:19.769 align:start position:0% chief Ziegler here talked about a few 01:07:19.769 --> 01:07:21.259 align:start position:0% chief Ziegler here talked about a few things<01:07:19.980> going<01:07:20.069> on<01:07:20.309> from<01:07:20.549> building<01:07:20.849> security 01:07:21.259 --> 01:07:21.269 align:start position:0% things going on from building security 01:07:21.269 --> 01:07:23.420 align:start position:0% things going on from building security and<01:07:21.660> they<01:07:22.170> noted<01:07:22.559> they<01:07:22.680> had<01:07:22.769> identified<01:07:23.039> a 01:07:23.420 --> 01:07:23.430 align:start position:0% and they noted they had identified a 01:07:23.430 --> 01:07:25.099 align:start position:0% and they noted they had identified a couple<01:07:23.759> hundred<01:07:24.029> thousand<01:07:24.569> dollars<01:07:24.869> which 01:07:25.099 --> 01:07:25.109 align:start position:0% couple hundred thousand dollars which 01:07:25.109 --> 01:07:26.960 align:start position:0% couple hundred thousand dollars which they<01:07:25.319> thought<01:07:25.529> would<01:07:26.339> probably<01:07:26.549> go<01:07:26.849> in 01:07:26.960 --> 01:07:26.970 align:start position:0% they thought would probably go in 01:07:26.970 --> 01:07:28.370 align:start position:0% they thought would probably go in addition<01:07:27.390> to<01:07:27.480> what<01:07:27.630> we<01:07:27.779> have<01:07:28.019> in<01:07:28.170> the<01:07:28.259> budget 01:07:28.370 --> 01:07:28.380 align:start position:0% addition to what we have in the budget 01:07:28.380 --> 01:07:32.630 align:start position:0% addition to what we have in the budget today<01:07:28.920> of<01:07:29.369> about<01:07:29.839> 150<01:07:30.839> thousand<01:07:31.519> some<01:07:32.519> of 01:07:32.630 --> 01:07:32.640 align:start position:0% today of about 150 thousand some of 01:07:32.640 --> 01:07:33.319 align:start position:0% today of about 150 thousand some of those<01:07:32.730> modifications 01:07:33.319 --> 01:07:33.329 align:start position:0% those modifications 01:07:33.329 --> 01:07:35.900 align:start position:0% those modifications Asians<01:07:33.630> are<01:07:33.839> not<01:07:33.989> 100%<01:07:34.950> as<01:07:35.069> to<01:07:35.219> what<01:07:35.489> we'll<01:07:35.700> be 01:07:35.900 --> 01:07:35.910 align:start position:0% Asians are not 100% as to what we'll be 01:07:35.910 --> 01:07:37.940 align:start position:0% Asians are not 100% as to what we'll be doing<01:07:36.059> for<01:07:36.209> sure<01:07:36.420> though<01:07:37.289> they've<01:07:37.529> done<01:07:37.709> some 01:07:37.940 --> 01:07:37.950 align:start position:0% doing for sure though they've done some 01:07:37.950 --> 01:07:40.819 align:start position:0% doing for sure though they've done some preliminary<01:07:39.140> programming<01:07:40.140> into<01:07:40.469> it<01:07:40.650> and 01:07:40.819 --> 01:07:40.829 align:start position:0% preliminary programming into it and 01:07:40.829 --> 01:07:43.219 align:start position:0% preliminary programming into it and believe<01:07:41.579> this<01:07:41.789> would<01:07:42.029> cover<01:07:42.539> the<01:07:42.779> cost<01:07:42.809> to 01:07:43.219 --> 01:07:43.229 align:start position:0% believe this would cover the cost to 01:07:43.229 --> 01:07:46.999 align:start position:0% believe this would cover the cost to make<01:07:43.380> it<01:07:43.529> happen<01:07:43.739> so<01:07:45.319> it<01:07:46.319> was<01:07:46.440> just<01:07:46.680> kind<01:07:46.859> of<01:07:46.890> an 01:07:46.999 --> 01:07:47.009 align:start position:0% make it happen so it was just kind of an 01:07:47.009 --> 01:07:48.799 align:start position:0% make it happen so it was just kind of an open<01:07:47.309> additional<01:07:47.940> two<01:07:48.150> hundred<01:07:48.180> thousand 01:07:48.799 --> 01:07:48.809 align:start position:0% open additional two hundred thousand 01:07:48.809 --> 01:07:50.329 align:start position:0% open additional two hundred thousand dollars<01:07:49.109> looking<01:07:49.440> to<01:07:49.529> add<01:07:49.650> into<01:07:50.009> our<01:07:50.039> budget 01:07:50.329 --> 01:07:50.339 align:start position:0% dollars looking to add into our budget 01:07:50.339 --> 01:07:52.759 align:start position:0% dollars looking to add into our budget I'm<01:07:50.819> okay<01:07:51.180> with<01:07:51.359> it<01:07:51.479> yeah<01:07:52.289> I<01:07:52.349> think<01:07:52.529> it's 01:07:52.759 --> 01:07:52.769 align:start position:0% I'm okay with it yeah I think it's 01:07:52.769 --> 01:07:54.190 align:start position:0% I'm okay with it yeah I think it's absolutely<01:07:52.979> necessary 01:07:54.190 --> 01:07:54.200 align:start position:0% absolutely necessary 01:07:54.200 --> 01:07:57.109 align:start position:0% absolutely necessary Commissioner<01:07:55.200> McKenna<01:07:55.469> and<01:07:55.709> when<01:07:56.579> I<01:07:56.609> saw<01:07:56.910> this 01:07:57.109 --> 01:07:57.119 align:start position:0% Commissioner McKenna and when I saw this 01:07:57.119 --> 01:07:59.209 align:start position:0% Commissioner McKenna and when I saw this particular<01:07:57.329> slide<01:07:57.900> it's<01:07:58.559> one<01:07:58.709> of<01:07:58.799> the<01:07:58.859> reasons 01:07:59.209 --> 01:07:59.219 align:start position:0% particular slide it's one of the reasons 01:07:59.219 --> 01:08:00.769 align:start position:0% particular slide it's one of the reasons that<01:07:59.369> I<01:07:59.430> said<01:07:59.729> you<01:07:59.849> know<01:07:59.940> we<01:08:00.059> can<01:08:00.180> hold<01:08:00.329> off<01:08:00.509> on 01:08:00.769 --> 01:08:00.779 align:start position:0% that I said you know we can hold off on 01:08:00.779 --> 01:08:02.930 align:start position:0% that I said you know we can hold off on the<01:08:00.839> quick<01:08:01.019> response<01:08:01.170> trash<01:08:01.650> team<01:08:01.950> because 01:08:02.930 --> 01:08:02.940 align:start position:0% the quick response trash team because 01:08:02.940 --> 01:08:05.809 align:start position:0% the quick response trash team because this<01:08:03.599> is<01:08:03.839> a<01:08:04.170> slightly<01:08:04.680> less<01:08:05.069> but<01:08:05.309> somewhat 01:08:05.809 --> 01:08:05.819 align:start position:0% this is a slightly less but somewhat 01:08:05.819 --> 01:08:07.670 align:start position:0% this is a slightly less but somewhat equivalent<01:08:06.089> amount<01:08:06.390> of<01:08:06.479> money<01:08:06.690> and<01:08:06.930> I<01:08:07.380> think 01:08:07.670 --> 01:08:07.680 align:start position:0% equivalent amount of money and I think 01:08:07.680 --> 01:08:10.789 align:start position:0% equivalent amount of money and I think it<01:08:08.130> is<01:08:08.369> probably<01:08:09.059> more<01:08:09.299> urgent<01:08:09.749> for<01:08:10.709> our 01:08:10.789 --> 01:08:10.799 align:start position:0% it is probably more urgent for our 01:08:10.799 --> 01:08:15.620 align:start position:0% it is probably more urgent for our consideration<01:08:11.430> my<01:08:11.700> opinion<01:08:13.609> I<01:08:14.609> agree<01:08:15.119> but<01:08:15.390> I 01:08:15.620 --> 01:08:15.630 align:start position:0% consideration my opinion I agree but I 01:08:15.630 --> 01:08:18.229 align:start position:0% consideration my opinion I agree but I was<01:08:15.869> just<01:08:16.049> curious<01:08:16.699> $150,000<01:08:17.699> is<01:08:17.880> that<01:08:18.029> in<01:08:18.150> the 01:08:18.229 --> 01:08:18.239 align:start position:0% was just curious $150,000 is that in the 01:08:18.239 --> 01:08:19.970 align:start position:0% was just curious $150,000 is that in the twenty<01:08:18.480> nineteen<01:08:18.839> or<01:08:19.109> the<01:08:19.230> twenty<01:08:19.500> eighteen 01:08:19.970 --> 01:08:19.980 align:start position:0% twenty nineteen or the twenty eighteen 01:08:19.980 --> 01:08:20.839 align:start position:0% twenty nineteen or the twenty eighteen amended 01:08:20.839 --> 01:08:20.849 align:start position:0% amended 01:08:20.849 --> 01:08:22.999 align:start position:0% amended so<01:08:21.060> we've<01:08:21.330> already<01:08:21.420> budgeted<01:08:21.690> I<01:08:22.199> believe<01:08:22.889> we 01:08:22.999 --> 01:08:23.009 align:start position:0% so we've already budgeted I believe we 01:08:23.009 --> 01:08:28.879 align:start position:0% so we've already budgeted I believe we have<01:08:23.099> money<01:08:23.310> and<01:08:23.520> in<01:08:24.239> both<01:08:24.420> years<01:08:24.770> okay<01:08:27.889> so 01:08:28.879 --> 01:08:28.889 align:start position:0% have money and in both years okay so 01:08:28.889 --> 01:08:30.530 align:start position:0% have money and in both years okay so there<01:08:29.040> seems<01:08:29.250> very<01:08:29.400> strong<01:08:29.730> consensus<01:08:30.389> for 01:08:30.530 --> 01:08:30.540 align:start position:0% there seems very strong consensus for 01:08:30.540 --> 01:08:32.620 align:start position:0% there seems very strong consensus for this<01:08:31.009> thank<01:08:32.009> you 01:08:32.620 --> 01:08:32.630 align:start position:0% this thank you 01:08:32.630 --> 01:08:39.349 align:start position:0% this thank you next<01:08:33.630> slide<01:08:33.839> please<01:08:37.369> okay<01:08:38.369> so<01:08:38.429> those<01:08:39.000> were<01:08:39.060> the 01:08:39.349 --> 01:08:39.359 align:start position:0% next slide please okay so those were the 01:08:39.359 --> 01:08:42.289 align:start position:0% next slide please okay so those were the main<01:08:39.839> ones<01:08:40.139> from<01:08:40.469> a<01:08:40.819> financial<01:08:41.819> change<01:08:42.089> that 01:08:42.289 --> 01:08:42.299 align:start position:0% main ones from a financial change that 01:08:42.299 --> 01:08:44.749 align:start position:0% main ones from a financial change that were<01:08:42.359> right<01:08:42.569> at<01:08:42.690> hand<01:08:43.020> these<01:08:43.859> are<01:08:43.920> ones<01:08:44.549> that 01:08:44.749 --> 01:08:44.759 align:start position:0% were right at hand these are ones that 01:08:44.759 --> 01:08:46.099 align:start position:0% were right at hand these are ones that kind<01:08:44.880> of<01:08:45.000> titik<01:08:45.299> take<01:08:45.480> us<01:08:45.599> from<01:08:45.690> a<01:08:45.869> different 01:08:46.099 --> 01:08:46.109 align:start position:0% kind of titik take us from a different 01:08:46.109 --> 01:08:46.970 align:start position:0% kind of titik take us from a different perspective 01:08:46.970 --> 01:08:46.980 align:start position:0% perspective 01:08:46.980 --> 01:08:49.099 align:start position:0% perspective they<01:08:47.190> are<01:08:47.339> financial<01:08:48.210> and<01:08:48.389> consideration 01:08:49.099 --> 01:08:49.109 align:start position:0% they are financial and consideration 01:08:49.109 --> 01:08:50.240 align:start position:0% they are financial and consideration though<01:08:49.290> they<01:08:49.440> fall<01:08:49.619> out<01:08:49.739> of<01:08:49.799> the<01:08:49.920> general 01:08:50.240 --> 01:08:50.250 align:start position:0% though they fall out of the general 01:08:50.250 --> 01:08:53.030 align:start position:0% though they fall out of the general funds<01:08:50.639> into<01:08:50.969> the<01:08:51.089> area<01:08:51.449> of<01:08:51.540> debt<01:08:51.779> so<01:08:52.679> the<01:08:52.830> first 01:08:53.030 --> 01:08:53.040 align:start position:0% funds into the area of debt so the first 01:08:53.040 --> 01:08:56.780 align:start position:0% funds into the area of debt so the first direction<01:08:53.369> was<01:08:53.699> on<01:08:53.909> our<01:08:54.029> juvenile<01:08:54.449> center<01:08:55.790> we 01:08:56.780 --> 01:08:56.790 align:start position:0% direction was on our juvenile center we 01:08:56.790 --> 01:08:58.579 align:start position:0% direction was on our juvenile center we had<01:08:57.000> a<01:08:57.029> twenty<01:08:57.690> four<01:08:57.839> point<01:08:58.139> eight<01:08:58.349> million 01:08:58.579 --> 01:08:58.589 align:start position:0% had a twenty four point eight million 01:08:58.589 --> 01:09:00.680 align:start position:0% had a twenty four point eight million dollar<01:08:58.859> project<01:08:59.460> I<01:08:59.609> brought<01:08:59.819> to<01:09:00.029> you<01:09:00.210> that 01:09:00.680 --> 01:09:00.690 align:start position:0% dollar project I brought to you that 01:09:00.690 --> 01:09:02.539 align:start position:0% dollar project I brought to you that what<01:09:00.900> we<01:09:01.080> projected<01:09:01.290> to<01:09:01.799> probably<01:09:02.250> need<01:09:02.400> an 01:09:02.539 --> 01:09:02.549 align:start position:0% what we projected to probably need an 01:09:02.549 --> 01:09:06.260 align:start position:0% what we projected to probably need an additional<01:09:02.819> 2.7<01:09:03.599> million<01:09:04.139> dollars<01:09:04.679> to<01:09:05.639> do<01:09:06.060> the 01:09:06.260 --> 01:09:06.270 align:start position:0% additional 2.7 million dollars to do the 01:09:06.270 --> 01:09:09.140 align:start position:0% additional 2.7 million dollars to do the project<01:09:06.900> as<01:09:07.109> we<01:09:08.009> were<01:09:08.130> contemplating<01:09:08.549> to<01:09:09.000> do 01:09:09.140 --> 01:09:09.150 align:start position:0% project as we were contemplating to do 01:09:09.150 --> 01:09:12.320 align:start position:0% project as we were contemplating to do it<01:09:09.330> because<01:09:10.199> of<01:09:10.349> the<01:09:10.460> inflationary<01:09:11.460> mostly 01:09:12.320 --> 01:09:12.330 align:start position:0% it because of the inflationary mostly 01:09:12.330 --> 01:09:13.999 align:start position:0% it because of the inflationary mostly inflationary<01:09:12.989> aspects<01:09:13.589> of<01:09:13.739> what<01:09:13.889> was 01:09:13.999 --> 01:09:14.009 align:start position:0% inflationary aspects of what was 01:09:14.009 --> 01:09:16.809 align:start position:0% inflationary aspects of what was changing<01:09:14.429> in<01:09:14.549> the<01:09:14.750> cost<01:09:15.750> of<01:09:15.929> operations 01:09:16.809 --> 01:09:16.819 align:start position:0% changing in the cost of operations 01:09:16.819 --> 01:09:18.950 align:start position:0% changing in the cost of operations Commission<01:09:17.819> asked<01:09:18.060> me<01:09:18.150> to<01:09:18.359> go<01:09:18.540> back<01:09:18.690> and 01:09:18.950 --> 01:09:18.960 align:start position:0% Commission asked me to go back and 01:09:18.960 --> 01:09:20.359 align:start position:0% Commission asked me to go back and figure<01:09:19.080> out<01:09:19.199> a<01:09:19.259> couple<01:09:19.589> different<01:09:19.859> options<01:09:20.190> on 01:09:20.359 --> 01:09:20.369 align:start position:0% figure out a couple different options on 01:09:20.369 --> 01:09:22.789 align:start position:0% figure out a couple different options on this<01:09:20.609> so<01:09:20.790> the<01:09:20.880> first<01:09:21.029> was<01:09:21.330> how<01:09:22.290> do<01:09:22.349> I<01:09:22.469> get<01:09:22.560> the 01:09:22.789 --> 01:09:22.799 align:start position:0% this so the first was how do I get the 01:09:22.799 --> 01:09:24.379 align:start position:0% this so the first was how do I get the scope<01:09:23.040> back<01:09:23.279> down<01:09:23.520> to<01:09:23.670> twenty<01:09:23.969> four<01:09:24.150> point 01:09:24.379 --> 01:09:24.389 align:start position:0% scope back down to twenty four point 01:09:24.389 --> 01:09:26.870 align:start position:0% scope back down to twenty four point eight<01:09:24.599> million<01:09:24.839> dollars<01:09:25.580> Jeff<01:09:26.580> and<01:09:26.759> his<01:09:26.819> team 01:09:26.870 --> 01:09:26.880 align:start position:0% eight million dollars Jeff and his team 01:09:26.880 --> 01:09:29.990 align:start position:0% eight million dollars Jeff and his team went<01:09:27.330> to<01:09:27.420> work<01:09:27.599> on<01:09:27.779> this<01:09:28.219> they<01:09:29.219> came<01:09:29.429> back<01:09:29.639> so 01:09:29.990 --> 01:09:30.000 align:start position:0% went to work on this they came back so 01:09:30.000 --> 01:09:33.470 align:start position:0% went to work on this they came back so we<01:09:30.239> would<01:09:30.420> look<01:09:31.290> at<01:09:31.409> the<01:09:31.589> third-floor<01:09:32.480> court 01:09:33.470 --> 01:09:33.480 align:start position:0% we would look at the third-floor court 01:09:33.480 --> 01:09:36.320 align:start position:0% we would look at the third-floor court room<01:09:33.690> area<01:09:34.139> where<01:09:34.529> we<01:09:34.770> had<01:09:34.980> built<01:09:35.730> that<01:09:35.940> into 01:09:36.320 --> 01:09:36.330 align:start position:0% room area where we had built that into 01:09:36.330 --> 01:09:38.030 align:start position:0% room area where we had built that into it<01:09:36.449> so<01:09:36.599> we<01:09:36.690> have<01:09:36.839> all<01:09:37.020> the<01:09:37.139> programming<01:09:37.650> that 01:09:38.030 --> 01:09:38.040 align:start position:0% it so we have all the programming that 01:09:38.040 --> 01:09:39.769 align:start position:0% it so we have all the programming that would<01:09:38.190> be<01:09:38.310> in<01:09:38.429> place<01:09:38.699> to<01:09:38.730> do<01:09:39.150> the<01:09:39.299> juveniles 01:09:39.769 --> 01:09:39.779 align:start position:0% would be in place to do the juveniles 01:09:39.779 --> 01:09:41.839 align:start position:0% would be in place to do the juveniles from<01:09:40.080> the<01:09:40.349> services<01:09:40.889> they<01:09:41.130> have<01:09:41.339> to<01:09:41.670> the 01:09:41.839 --> 01:09:41.849 align:start position:0% from the services they have to the 01:09:41.849 --> 01:09:43.939 align:start position:0% from the services they have to the detention<01:09:42.210> areas<01:09:42.719> and<01:09:42.960> then<01:09:43.560> where<01:09:43.710> we'd 01:09:43.939 --> 01:09:43.949 align:start position:0% detention areas and then where we'd 01:09:43.949 --> 01:09:45.799 align:start position:0% detention areas and then where we'd build<01:09:44.190> the<01:09:44.310> courtrooms<01:09:44.759> on<01:09:45.000> the<01:09:45.060> third<01:09:45.270> floor 01:09:45.799 --> 01:09:45.809 align:start position:0% build the courtrooms on the third floor 01:09:45.809 --> 01:09:48.200 align:start position:0% build the courtrooms on the third floor we<01:09:46.380> would<01:09:46.559> just<01:09:46.589> leave<01:09:47.009> them<01:09:47.279> in<01:09:47.429> a<01:09:47.520> shell<01:09:47.849> type 01:09:48.200 --> 01:09:48.210 align:start position:0% we would just leave them in a shell type 01:09:48.210 --> 01:09:50.749 align:start position:0% we would just leave them in a shell type finish<01:09:48.599> and<01:09:48.989> we<01:09:49.829> believe<01:09:50.279> that's<01:09:50.579> a 01:09:50.749 --> 01:09:50.759 align:start position:0% finish and we believe that's a 01:09:50.759 --> 01:09:52.430 align:start position:0% finish and we believe that's a difference<01:09:51.150> that<01:09:51.359> would<01:09:51.539> save<01:09:51.750> us<01:09:51.779> about<01:09:52.020> that 01:09:52.430 --> 01:09:52.440 align:start position:0% difference that would save us about that 01:09:52.440 --> 01:09:57.229 align:start position:0% difference that would save us about that 2.7<01:09:53.309> Jefferson<01:09:53.940> correct<01:09:54.239> that's<01:09:54.449> correct<01:09:56.239> so 01:09:57.229 --> 01:09:57.239 align:start position:0% 2.7 Jefferson correct that's correct so 01:09:57.239 --> 01:09:59.720 align:start position:0% 2.7 Jefferson correct that's correct so that's<01:09:57.719> an<01:09:57.960> option<01:09:58.170> to<01:09:58.619> reduce<01:09:58.800> the<01:09:59.340> amount<01:09:59.639> of 01:09:59.720 --> 01:09:59.730 align:start position:0% that's an option to reduce the amount of 01:09:59.730 --> 01:10:02.209 align:start position:0% that's an option to reduce the amount of money<01:09:59.940> and<01:10:00.239> keep<01:10:00.960> us<01:10:01.139> within<01:10:01.650> the<01:10:01.770> original 01:10:02.209 --> 01:10:02.219 align:start position:0% money and keep us within the original 01:10:02.219 --> 01:10:05.569 align:start position:0% money and keep us within the original budget<01:10:02.639> a<01:10:03.230> couple<01:10:04.230> of<01:10:04.349> other<01:10:04.559> options<01:10:04.650> we<01:10:05.340> came 01:10:05.569 --> 01:10:05.579 align:start position:0% budget a couple of other options we came 01:10:05.579 --> 01:10:08.799 align:start position:0% budget a couple of other options we came up<01:10:05.820> with<01:10:06.030> and<01:10:06.780> now<01:10:06.929> we've<01:10:07.110> already<01:10:07.320> issued<01:10:07.889> the 01:10:08.799 --> 01:10:08.809 align:start position:0% up with and now we've already issued the 01:10:08.809 --> 01:10:11.330 align:start position:0% up with and now we've already issued the PBC<01:10:09.809> or<01:10:10.050> through<01:10:10.260> the<01:10:10.440> public<01:10:11.010> building 01:10:11.330 --> 01:10:11.340 align:start position:0% PBC or through the public building 01:10:11.340 --> 01:10:13.189 align:start position:0% PBC or through the public building commission<01:10:11.730> so<01:10:11.909> these<01:10:12.059> bonds<01:10:12.539> are<01:10:12.630> issued<01:10:12.809> or 01:10:13.189 --> 01:10:13.199 align:start position:0% commission so these bonds are issued or 01:10:13.199 --> 01:10:16.339 align:start position:0% commission so these bonds are issued or in<01:10:13.349> place<01:10:13.590> but<01:10:14.489> if<01:10:14.579> we<01:10:14.730> needed<01:10:15.599> to<01:10:15.750> spend<01:10:16.079> more 01:10:16.339 --> 01:10:16.349 align:start position:0% in place but if we needed to spend more 01:10:16.349 --> 01:10:18.799 align:start position:0% in place but if we needed to spend more money<01:10:16.409> and<01:10:16.800> we<01:10:17.039> elected<01:10:17.489> to<01:10:17.780> do<01:10:18.780> the 01:10:18.799 --> 01:10:18.809 align:start position:0% money and we elected to do the 01:10:18.809 --> 01:10:23.180 align:start position:0% money and we elected to do the additional<01:10:19.440> finish<01:10:19.770> work<01:10:20.210> one<01:10:21.210> option<01:10:21.750> is<01:10:22.190> to 01:10:23.180 --> 01:10:23.190 align:start position:0% additional finish work one option is to 01:10:23.190 --> 01:10:25.399 align:start position:0% additional finish work one option is to go<01:10:23.639> to<01:10:23.699> the<01:10:23.909> parking<01:10:24.389> lot<01:10:24.480> by<01:10:24.780> Memorial<01:10:25.170> Hall 01:10:25.399 --> 01:10:25.409 align:start position:0% go to the parking lot by Memorial Hall 01:10:25.409 --> 01:10:28.189 align:start position:0% go to the parking lot by Memorial Hall and<01:10:25.770> as<01:10:26.489> that<01:10:26.730> Memorial<01:10:27.300> Hall<01:10:27.449> is<01:10:27.780> largely 01:10:28.189 --> 01:10:28.199 align:start position:0% and as that Memorial Hall is largely 01:10:28.199 --> 01:10:32.180 align:start position:0% and as that Memorial Hall is largely serving<01:10:28.739> the<01:10:29.059> well<01:10:30.059> at<01:10:30.239> 50%<01:10:30.989> for<01:10:31.500> the<01:10:31.530> project 01:10:32.180 --> 01:10:32.190 align:start position:0% serving the well at 50% for the project 01:10:32.190 --> 01:10:34.189 align:start position:0% serving the well at 50% for the project for<01:10:32.369> employees<01:10:32.880> but<01:10:33.119> the<01:10:33.270> other<01:10:33.389> for<01:10:33.750> serving 01:10:34.189 --> 01:10:34.199 align:start position:0% for employees but the other for serving 01:10:34.199 --> 01:10:36.020 align:start position:0% for employees but the other for serving Memorial<01:10:34.619> Hall<01:10:34.800> we<01:10:35.039> believe<01:10:35.280> it's<01:10:35.460> eligible 01:10:36.020 --> 01:10:36.030 align:start position:0% Memorial Hall we believe it's eligible 01:10:36.030 --> 01:10:38.629 align:start position:0% Memorial Hall we believe it's eligible to<01:10:36.150> use<01:10:36.179> transient<01:10:36.869> guests<01:10:37.079> tax<01:10:37.349> dollars<01:10:37.860> so 01:10:38.629 --> 01:10:38.639 align:start position:0% to use transient guests tax dollars so 01:10:38.639 --> 01:10:41.390 align:start position:0% to use transient guests tax dollars so we<01:10:38.820> could<01:10:39.000> spend<01:10:39.619> $450,000<01:10:40.619> of<01:10:40.800> cash<01:10:41.039> from 01:10:41.390 --> 01:10:41.400 align:start position:0% we could spend $450,000 of cash from 01:10:41.400 --> 01:10:44.959 align:start position:0% we could spend $450,000 of cash from that<01:10:41.639> project<01:10:41.909> area<01:10:43.099> also<01:10:44.099> when<01:10:44.550> Kathleen 01:10:44.959 --> 01:10:44.969 align:start position:0% that project area also when Kathleen 01:10:44.969 --> 01:10:46.370 align:start position:0% that project area also when Kathleen went<01:10:45.210> through<01:10:45.420> the<01:10:45.539> numbers<01:10:45.900> the<01:10:46.050> other<01:10:46.110> night 01:10:46.370 --> 01:10:46.380 align:start position:0% went through the numbers the other night 01:10:46.380 --> 01:10:47.839 align:start position:0% went through the numbers the other night and<01:10:46.559> showed<01:10:46.770> you<01:10:46.949> the<01:10:47.099> amount<01:10:47.309> of<01:10:47.429> money<01:10:47.639> we 01:10:47.839 --> 01:10:47.849 align:start position:0% and showed you the amount of money we 01:10:47.849 --> 01:10:50.470 align:start position:0% and showed you the amount of money we had<01:10:48.030> in<01:10:48.179> debt<01:10:48.480> reserves<01:10:48.929> on<01:10:49.230> the<01:10:49.349> county<01:10:49.770> side 01:10:50.470 --> 01:10:50.480 align:start position:0% had in debt reserves on the county side 01:10:50.480 --> 01:10:53.839 align:start position:0% had in debt reserves on the county side we<01:10:51.480> think<01:10:51.719> we<01:10:51.840> could<01:10:51.989> just<01:10:52.199> cash<01:10:52.670> we<01:10:53.670> have 01:10:53.839 --> 01:10:53.849 align:start position:0% we think we could just cash we have 01:10:53.849 --> 01:10:55.939 align:start position:0% we think we could just cash we have enough<01:10:54.389> money<01:10:54.630> that<01:10:54.750> we<01:10:54.960> could<01:10:55.110> cash<01:10:55.469> into 01:10:55.939 --> 01:10:55.949 align:start position:0% enough money that we could cash into 01:10:55.949 --> 01:10:57.740 align:start position:0% enough money that we could cash into that<01:10:56.130> a<01:10:56.340> million<01:10:56.670> dollars<01:10:57.059> from<01:10:57.270> that<01:10:57.449> account 01:10:57.740 --> 01:10:57.750 align:start position:0% that a million dollars from that account 01:10:57.750 --> 01:11:00.350 align:start position:0% that a million dollars from that account so<01:10:58.590> essentially<01:10:59.489> that's<01:10:59.610> about<01:10:59.880> a<01:10:59.940> million 01:11:00.350 --> 01:11:00.360 align:start position:0% so essentially that's about a million 01:11:00.360 --> 01:11:02.839 align:start position:0% so essentially that's about a million and<01:11:00.420> a<01:11:00.539> half<01:11:00.570> dollars<01:11:01.230> if<01:11:01.409> we<01:11:01.559> said<01:11:01.829> do<01:11:02.699> the 01:11:02.839 --> 01:11:02.849 align:start position:0% and a half dollars if we said do the 01:11:02.849 --> 01:11:04.279 align:start position:0% and a half dollars if we said do the twenty<01:11:03.119> seven<01:11:03.420> and<01:11:03.480> a<01:11:03.570> half<01:11:03.750> million<01:11:04.020> dollar 01:11:04.279 --> 01:11:04.289 align:start position:0% twenty seven and a half million dollar 01:11:04.289 --> 01:11:08.240 align:start position:0% twenty seven and a half million dollar project<01:11:04.949> I<01:11:05.659> could<01:11:06.659> fund<01:11:06.989> that<01:11:07.170> by<01:11:07.469> this 01:11:08.240 --> 01:11:08.250 align:start position:0% project I could fund that by this 01:11:08.250 --> 01:11:09.500 align:start position:0% project I could fund that by this million<01:11:08.639> and<01:11:08.760> a<01:11:08.820> half<01:11:09.059> and<01:11:09.360> then<01:11:09.480> just 01:11:09.500 --> 01:11:09.510 align:start position:0% million and a half and then just 01:11:09.510 --> 01:11:12.709 align:start position:0% million and a half and then just increase<01:11:10.230> the<01:11:10.440> debt<01:11:10.650> by<01:11:10.860> the<01:11:10.920> balance<01:11:11.300> or<01:11:12.300> hope 01:11:12.709 --> 01:11:12.719 align:start position:0% increase the debt by the balance or hope 01:11:12.719 --> 01:11:14.330 align:start position:0% increase the debt by the balance or hope that<01:11:12.929> the<01:11:13.020> bids<01:11:13.230> come<01:11:13.500> in<01:11:13.650> lower<01:11:13.889> and<01:11:14.159> not 01:11:14.330 --> 01:11:14.340 align:start position:0% that the bids come in lower and not 01:11:14.340 --> 01:11:15.919 align:start position:0% that the bids come in lower and not quite<01:11:14.610> get<01:11:14.909> all<01:11:14.940> the<01:11:15.179> way<01:11:15.270> up<01:11:15.300> to<01:11:15.599> that<01:11:15.719> full 01:11:15.919 --> 01:11:15.929 align:start position:0% quite get all the way up to that full 01:11:15.929 --> 01:11:18.700 align:start position:0% quite get all the way up to that full amount<01:11:16.230> so<01:11:16.550> I've<01:11:17.550> tried<01:11:17.969> to<01:11:18.090> throw<01:11:18.300> some 01:11:18.700 --> 01:11:18.710 align:start position:0% amount so I've tried to throw some 01:11:18.710 --> 01:11:21.890 align:start position:0% amount so I've tried to throw some options<01:11:19.710> at<01:11:19.889> you<01:11:20.190> as<01:11:20.369> far<01:11:20.579> as<01:11:20.610> you<01:11:21.599> want<01:11:21.750> me<01:11:21.809> to 01:11:21.890 --> 01:11:21.900 align:start position:0% options at you as far as you want me to 01:11:21.900 --> 01:11:23.500 align:start position:0% options at you as far as you want me to stay<01:11:22.020> at<01:11:22.110> twenty<01:11:22.440> four<01:11:22.590> point<01:11:22.889> eight<01:11:23.039> million 01:11:23.500 --> 01:11:23.510 align:start position:0% stay at twenty four point eight million 01:11:23.510 --> 01:11:26.029 align:start position:0% stay at twenty four point eight million will<01:11:24.510> do<01:11:24.690> it<01:11:24.840> and<01:11:24.960> then<01:11:25.530> there's<01:11:25.739> about<01:11:25.889> a 01:11:26.029 --> 01:11:26.039 align:start position:0% will do it and then there's about a 01:11:26.039 --> 01:11:27.260 align:start position:0% will do it and then there's about a million<01:11:26.400> and<01:11:26.460> a<01:11:26.550> half<01:11:26.579> we<01:11:26.849> could<01:11:26.969> do<01:11:27.150> an 01:11:27.260 --> 01:11:27.270 align:start position:0% million and a half we could do an 01:11:27.270 --> 01:11:28.700 align:start position:0% million and a half we could do an additional<01:11:27.659> add-ons<01:11:28.050> depending<01:11:28.440> on<01:11:28.530> where 01:11:28.700 --> 01:11:28.710 align:start position:0% additional add-ons depending on where 01:11:28.710 --> 01:11:31.629 align:start position:0% additional add-ons depending on where the<01:11:28.829> bids<01:11:29.039> come<01:11:29.599> and<01:11:30.599> you<01:11:30.690> go<01:11:30.809> from<01:11:30.989> there 01:11:31.629 --> 01:11:31.639 align:start position:0% the bids come and you go from there 01:11:31.639 --> 01:11:33.319 align:start position:0% the bids come and you go from there makes<01:11:32.639> remarks<01:11:32.880> sense 01:11:33.319 --> 01:11:33.329 align:start position:0% makes remarks sense 01:11:33.329 --> 01:11:36.560 align:start position:0% makes remarks sense major<01:11:33.840> Martling<01:11:34.489> I<01:11:35.489> like<01:11:35.880> the<01:11:36.000> option<01:11:36.360> that 01:11:36.560 --> 01:11:36.570 align:start position:0% major Martling I like the option that 01:11:36.570 --> 01:11:38.839 align:start position:0% major Martling I like the option that option<01:11:36.989> B<01:11:37.469> you've<01:11:37.800> come<01:11:38.010> up<01:11:38.039> with<01:11:38.190> where<01:11:38.670> we 01:11:38.839 --> 01:11:38.849 align:start position:0% option B you've come up with where we 01:11:38.849 --> 01:11:40.819 align:start position:0% option B you've come up with where we can<01:11:39.179> have<01:11:39.480> that<01:11:39.659> higher<01:11:39.900> budget<01:11:40.199> if<01:11:40.469> needed 01:11:40.819 --> 01:11:40.829 align:start position:0% can have that higher budget if needed 01:11:40.829 --> 01:11:43.520 align:start position:0% can have that higher budget if needed but<01:11:41.250> I<01:11:41.520> guess<01:11:41.699> I<01:11:41.880> would<01:11:42.059> say<01:11:42.090> I<01:11:42.599> would<01:11:43.170> be<01:11:43.289> okay 01:11:43.520 --> 01:11:43.530 align:start position:0% but I guess I would say I would be okay 01:11:43.530 --> 01:11:45.290 align:start position:0% but I guess I would say I would be okay with<01:11:43.559> authorizing<01:11:44.340> that<01:11:44.489> higher<01:11:44.670> budget<01:11:44.969> I 01:11:45.290 --> 01:11:45.300 align:start position:0% with authorizing that higher budget I 01:11:45.300 --> 01:11:46.970 align:start position:0% with authorizing that higher budget I would<01:11:45.510> still<01:11:45.780> like<01:11:45.960> to<01:11:46.020> see<01:11:46.409> if<01:11:46.530> we<01:11:46.619> can<01:11:46.829> bring 01:11:46.970 --> 01:11:46.980 align:start position:0% would still like to see if we can bring 01:11:46.980 --> 01:11:48.529 align:start position:0% would still like to see if we can bring that<01:11:47.130> number<01:11:47.309> down<01:11:47.489> and<01:11:48.090> although<01:11:48.389> I 01:11:48.529 --> 01:11:48.539 align:start position:0% that number down and although I 01:11:48.539 --> 01:11:50.330 align:start position:0% that number down and although I appreciate<01:11:49.170> that<01:11:49.199> the<01:11:49.590> courtroom<01:11:49.920> finish<01:11:50.190> is 01:11:50.330 --> 01:11:50.340 align:start position:0% appreciate that the courtroom finish is 01:11:50.340 --> 01:11:52.100 align:start position:0% appreciate that the courtroom finish is a<01:11:50.369> way<01:11:50.550> to<01:11:50.610> take<01:11:50.849> that<01:11:51.030> whole<01:11:51.270> 2.7<01:11:51.960> million 01:11:52.100 --> 01:11:52.110 align:start position:0% a way to take that whole 2.7 million 01:11:52.110 --> 01:11:54.470 align:start position:0% a way to take that whole 2.7 million often<01:11:52.590> one<01:11:52.800> kick<01:11:53.159> I'm<01:11:53.429> guessing<01:11:54.300> there<01:11:54.449> are 01:11:54.470 --> 01:11:54.480 align:start position:0% often one kick I'm guessing there are 01:11:54.480 --> 01:11:56.149 align:start position:0% often one kick I'm guessing there are other<01:11:54.630> smaller<01:11:55.019> things<01:11:55.139> that<01:11:55.650> we<01:11:55.769> could<01:11:55.980> take 01:11:56.149 --> 01:11:56.159 align:start position:0% other smaller things that we could take 01:11:56.159 --> 01:11:57.529 align:start position:0% other smaller things that we could take away<01:11:56.400> that<01:11:56.610> would<01:11:56.730> wheedle<01:11:57.090> away<01:11:57.329> a<01:11:57.360> little 01:11:57.529 --> 01:11:57.539 align:start position:0% away that would wheedle away a little 01:11:57.539 --> 01:11:59.759 align:start position:0% away that would wheedle away a little pieces<01:11:57.900> of<01:11:58.289> that 01:11:59.759 --> 01:11:59.769 align:start position:0% pieces of that 01:11:59.769 --> 01:12:02.520 align:start position:0% pieces of that and<01:12:00.309> I<01:12:00.429> would<01:12:00.610> still<01:12:00.820> be<01:12:00.939> in<01:12:01.030> favor<01:12:01.300> of<01:12:01.530> doing 01:12:02.520 --> 01:12:02.530 align:start position:0% and I would still be in favor of doing 01:12:02.530 --> 01:12:04.949 align:start position:0% and I would still be in favor of doing that<01:12:02.949> to<01:12:03.550> keep<01:12:03.729> that<01:12:03.849> number<01:12:04.179> lower<01:12:04.389> while 01:12:04.949 --> 01:12:04.959 align:start position:0% that to keep that number lower while 01:12:04.959 --> 01:12:07.049 align:start position:0% that to keep that number lower while having<01:12:05.499> the<01:12:05.619> option<01:12:06.130> for<01:12:06.489> the<01:12:06.550> higher<01:12:06.699> amount 01:12:07.049 --> 01:12:07.059 align:start position:0% having the option for the higher amount 01:12:07.059 --> 01:12:08.810 align:start position:0% having the option for the higher amount part<01:12:07.659> of<01:12:07.719> the<01:12:07.780> reason<01:12:07.989> I<01:12:08.050> say<01:12:08.229> that<01:12:08.260> is<01:12:08.439> because 01:12:08.810 --> 01:12:08.820 align:start position:0% part of the reason I say that is because 01:12:08.820 --> 01:12:10.739 align:start position:0% part of the reason I say that is because we<01:12:09.820> don't<01:12:09.969> know<01:12:10.059> how<01:12:10.209> the<01:12:10.269> bids<01:12:10.510> are<01:12:10.630> gonna 01:12:10.739 --> 01:12:10.749 align:start position:0% we don't know how the bids are gonna 01:12:10.749 --> 01:12:13.589 align:start position:0% we don't know how the bids are gonna come<01:12:10.989> in<01:12:11.170> and<01:12:11.409> so<01:12:11.769> having<01:12:12.519> it<01:12:12.760> authorized<01:12:13.329> is 01:12:13.589 --> 01:12:13.599 align:start position:0% come in and so having it authorized is 01:12:13.599 --> 01:12:17.069 align:start position:0% come in and so having it authorized is at<01:12:13.749> least<01:12:14.820> the<01:12:15.820> money's<01:12:16.090> out<01:12:16.239> there<01:12:16.510> but<01:12:16.780> I 01:12:17.069 --> 01:12:17.079 align:start position:0% at least the money's out there but I 01:12:17.079 --> 01:12:19.560 align:start position:0% at least the money's out there but I still<01:12:17.530> think<01:12:17.920> there<01:12:18.130> are<01:12:18.670> ways<01:12:18.939> we<01:12:19.179> could<01:12:19.329> save 01:12:19.560 --> 01:12:19.570 align:start position:0% still think there are ways we could save 01:12:19.570 --> 01:12:22.379 align:start position:0% still think there are ways we could save less<01:12:20.199> than<01:12:20.439> 2.7<01:12:21.070> million<01:12:21.219> but<01:12:21.969> still<01:12:22.209> save 01:12:22.379 --> 01:12:22.389 align:start position:0% less than 2.7 million but still save 01:12:22.389 --> 01:12:24.839 align:start position:0% less than 2.7 million but still save some<01:12:22.570> money<01:12:22.719> and<01:12:23.079> get<01:12:23.949> our<01:12:24.099> third<01:12:24.280> program 01:12:24.839 --> 01:12:24.849 align:start position:0% some money and get our third program 01:12:24.849 --> 01:12:27.239 align:start position:0% some money and get our third program personally<01:12:25.650> Commissioner<01:12:26.650> McKiernan<01:12:26.949> I 01:12:27.239 --> 01:12:27.249 align:start position:0% personally Commissioner McKiernan I 01:12:27.249 --> 01:12:30.299 align:start position:0% personally Commissioner McKiernan I would<01:12:28.239> agree<01:12:28.479> with<01:12:28.659> that<01:12:28.719> I<01:12:29.139> mean<01:12:29.349> I'm<01:12:29.979> the<01:12:30.189> one 01:12:30.299 --> 01:12:30.309 align:start position:0% would agree with that I mean I'm the one 01:12:30.309 --> 01:12:31.949 align:start position:0% would agree with that I mean I'm the one who's<01:12:30.459> had<01:12:30.579> the<01:12:30.670> concern<01:12:30.969> about<01:12:31.179> the<01:12:31.510> creep<01:12:31.719> in 01:12:31.949 --> 01:12:31.959 align:start position:0% who's had the concern about the creep in 01:12:31.959 --> 01:12:34.850 align:start position:0% who's had the concern about the creep in the<01:12:32.050> project<01:12:32.530> scope<01:12:32.860> and<01:12:33.420> to<01:12:34.420> be<01:12:34.570> able<01:12:34.689> to 01:12:34.850 --> 01:12:34.860 align:start position:0% the project scope and to be able to 01:12:34.860 --> 01:12:38.069 align:start position:0% the project scope and to be able to increase<01:12:35.860> from<01:12:36.130> 25<01:12:36.729> 24<01:12:37.510> point<01:12:37.780> 8<01:12:37.900> to 01:12:38.069 --> 01:12:38.079 align:start position:0% increase from 25 24 point 8 to 01:12:38.079 --> 01:12:41.969 align:start position:0% increase from 25 24 point 8 to effectively<01:12:38.999> 25<01:12:39.999> to<01:12:40.809> 26<01:12:41.289> Rather's<01:12:41.679> about<01:12:41.949> a 01:12:41.969 --> 01:12:41.979 align:start position:0% effectively 25 to 26 Rather's about a 01:12:41.979 --> 01:12:45.359 align:start position:0% effectively 25 to 26 Rather's about a million<01:12:42.340> dollars<01:12:42.729> of<01:12:42.999> additional<01:12:44.099> debt<01:12:45.099> that 01:12:45.359 --> 01:12:45.369 align:start position:0% million dollars of additional debt that 01:12:45.369 --> 01:12:48.149 align:start position:0% million dollars of additional debt that doesn't<01:12:45.699> that<01:12:46.389> does<01:12:46.809> not<01:12:47.019> necessarily<01:12:47.409> need 01:12:48.149 --> 01:12:48.159 align:start position:0% doesn't that does not necessarily need 01:12:48.159 --> 01:12:50.449 align:start position:0% doesn't that does not necessarily need to<01:12:48.189> be<01:12:48.400> ultimately<01:12:49.090> funded<01:12:49.659> and<01:12:49.869> used 01:12:50.449 --> 01:12:50.459 align:start position:0% to be ultimately funded and used 01:12:50.459 --> 01:12:52.890 align:start position:0% to be ultimately funded and used depending<01:12:51.459> on<01:12:51.550> how<01:12:51.670> the<01:12:51.729> project<01:12:51.969> comes<01:12:52.449> in 01:12:52.890 --> 01:12:52.900 align:start position:0% depending on how the project comes in 01:12:52.900 --> 01:12:56.569 align:start position:0% depending on how the project comes in so<01:12:53.289> I<01:12:53.579> exactly<01:12:54.579> I<01:12:54.789> would<01:12:55.360> be<01:12:55.510> comfortable<01:12:55.989> with 01:12:56.569 --> 01:12:56.579 align:start position:0% so I exactly I would be comfortable with 01:12:56.579 --> 01:13:03.330 align:start position:0% so I exactly I would be comfortable with the<01:12:57.579> second<01:12:57.939> option 01:13:03.330 --> 01:13:03.340 align:start position:0% 01:13:03.340 --> 01:13:05.400 align:start position:0% Commissioner<01:13:04.060> Johnson<01:13:04.270> like<01:13:04.690> options<01:13:05.200> I 01:13:05.400 --> 01:13:05.410 align:start position:0% Commissioner Johnson like options I 01:13:05.410 --> 01:13:08.130 align:start position:0% Commissioner Johnson like options I think<01:13:05.740> that<01:13:05.980> if<01:13:06.730> we<01:13:07.510> had<01:13:07.630> been<01:13:07.750> led<01:13:07.960> to<01:13:07.990> believe 01:13:08.130 --> 01:13:08.140 align:start position:0% think that if we had been led to believe 01:13:08.140 --> 01:13:10.680 align:start position:0% think that if we had been led to believe that<01:13:08.710> it<01:13:08.830> could<01:13:08.950> be<01:13:09.100> done<01:13:09.340> for<01:13:10.120> the<01:13:10.270> original 01:13:10.680 --> 01:13:10.690 align:start position:0% that it could be done for the original 01:13:10.690 --> 01:13:12.960 align:start position:0% that it could be done for the original mouth<01:13:10.840> from<01:13:11.350> someone<01:13:11.800> and<01:13:12.490> I<01:13:12.550> think<01:13:12.760> we<01:13:12.850> need 01:13:12.960 --> 01:13:12.970 align:start position:0% mouth from someone and I think we need 01:13:12.970 --> 01:13:17.100 align:start position:0% mouth from someone and I think we need to<01:13:13.090> flush<01:13:13.690> that<01:13:13.930> out<01:13:13.990> to<01:13:14.890> make<01:13:15.100> sure<01:13:15.510> that<01:13:16.510> what 01:13:17.100 --> 01:13:17.110 align:start position:0% to flush that out to make sure that what 01:13:17.110 --> 01:13:20.310 align:start position:0% to flush that out to make sure that what was<01:13:17.290> said<01:13:17.560> can<01:13:17.890> be<01:13:18.070> done<01:13:18.280> and<01:13:18.660> you<01:13:19.660> know<01:13:20.170> I'm 01:13:20.310 --> 01:13:20.320 align:start position:0% was said can be done and you know I'm 01:13:20.320 --> 01:13:22.680 align:start position:0% was said can be done and you know I'm all<01:13:20.500> for<01:13:20.800> options<01:13:21.790> and<01:13:22.000> I<01:13:22.030> don't<01:13:22.090> want<01:13:22.360> us<01:13:22.420> to 01:13:22.680 --> 01:13:22.690 align:start position:0% all for options and I don't want us to 01:13:22.690 --> 01:13:25.980 align:start position:0% all for options and I don't want us to hamstring<01:13:23.140> as<01:13:23.290> this<01:13:23.440> project<01:13:23.850> but<01:13:24.990> when 01:13:25.980 --> 01:13:25.990 align:start position:0% hamstring as this project but when 01:13:25.990 --> 01:13:27.660 align:start position:0% hamstring as this project but when someone<01:13:26.380> says<01:13:26.410> we<01:13:26.830> think<01:13:26.860> it<01:13:27.190> can<01:13:27.340> be<01:13:27.370> done<01:13:27.490> for 01:13:27.660 --> 01:13:27.670 align:start position:0% someone says we think it can be done for 01:13:27.670 --> 01:13:29.940 align:start position:0% someone says we think it can be done for that<01:13:27.970> and<01:13:28.330> I<01:13:28.390> think<01:13:28.630> me<01:13:28.810> too 01:13:29.940 --> 01:13:29.950 align:start position:0% that and I think me too 01:13:29.950 --> 01:13:31.920 align:start position:0% that and I think me too to<01:13:30.250> vet<01:13:30.550> that<01:13:30.790> and<01:13:31.090> flush<01:13:31.330> it<01:13:31.360> out<01:13:31.600> to<01:13:31.780> make 01:13:31.920 --> 01:13:31.930 align:start position:0% to vet that and flush it out to make 01:13:31.930 --> 01:13:35.280 align:start position:0% to vet that and flush it out to make sure<01:13:32.190> that<01:13:33.190> what<01:13:33.910> they<01:13:34.030> said<01:13:34.300> was<01:13:34.480> true<01:13:34.510> or<01:13:35.020> at 01:13:35.280 --> 01:13:35.290 align:start position:0% sure that what they said was true or at 01:13:35.290 --> 01:13:45.120 align:start position:0% sure that what they said was true or at least<01:13:35.350> find<01:13:35.680> out<01:13:35.890> why<01:13:37.140> it's<01:13:38.140> not<01:13:41.970> yes<01:13:42.990> so<01:13:43.990> so<01:13:44.890> in 01:13:45.120 --> 01:13:45.130 align:start position:0% least find out why it's not yes so so in 01:13:45.130 --> 01:13:48.900 align:start position:0% least find out why it's not yes so so in that<01:13:45.280> case<01:13:45.550> is<01:13:45.820> it<01:13:46.000> possible<01:13:46.600> to<01:13:46.840> to<01:13:47.910> like 01:13:48.900 --> 01:13:48.910 align:start position:0% that case is it possible to to like 01:13:48.910 --> 01:13:52.710 align:start position:0% that case is it possible to to like approve<01:13:49.420> the<01:13:49.720> the<01:13:50.140> 24<01:13:50.860> well<01:13:51.640> the<01:13:51.940> total<01:13:52.240> but 01:13:52.710 --> 01:13:52.720 align:start position:0% approve the the 24 well the total but 01:13:52.720 --> 01:13:55.970 align:start position:0% approve the the 24 well the total but ask<01:13:52.990> that<01:13:53.320> we<01:13:53.470> it<01:13:53.770> be<01:13:53.950> brought<01:13:54.220> back<01:13:54.550> to<01:13:54.940> us 01:13:55.970 --> 01:13:55.980 align:start position:0% ask that we it be brought back to us 01:13:55.980 --> 01:13:58.590 align:start position:0% ask that we it be brought back to us what<01:13:56.980> we're<01:13:57.430> spending<01:13:57.640> it<01:13:57.910> on<01:13:58.030> what<01:13:58.420> this 01:13:58.590 --> 01:13:58.600 align:start position:0% what we're spending it on what this 01:13:58.600 --> 01:14:01.290 align:start position:0% what we're spending it on what this looks<01:13:58.960> like<01:13:59.080> so<01:13:59.290> we<01:13:59.950> can<01:14:00.250> go<01:14:00.640> ahead<01:14:00.790> with<01:14:01.030> the 01:14:01.290 --> 01:14:01.300 align:start position:0% looks like so we can go ahead with the 01:14:01.300 --> 01:14:03.690 align:start position:0% looks like so we can go ahead with the project<01:14:01.800> you<01:14:02.800> understand<01:14:03.160> what<01:14:03.280> I'm<01:14:03.400> saying 01:14:03.690 --> 01:14:03.700 align:start position:0% project you understand what I'm saying 01:14:03.700 --> 01:14:05.940 align:start position:0% project you understand what I'm saying yes<01:14:04.300> we<01:14:04.540> want<01:14:04.720> to<01:14:04.780> put<01:14:04.930> more<01:14:05.080> strings<01:14:05.410> on<01:14:05.590> it<01:14:05.740> is 01:14:05.940 --> 01:14:05.950 align:start position:0% yes we want to put more strings on it is 01:14:05.950 --> 01:14:08.160 align:start position:0% yes we want to put more strings on it is basically<01:14:06.760> what<01:14:07.000> it<01:14:07.120> comes<01:14:07.150> down<01:14:07.540> to<01:14:07.600> we<01:14:07.960> want 01:14:08.160 --> 01:14:08.170 align:start position:0% basically what it comes down to we want 01:14:08.170 --> 01:14:10.260 align:start position:0% basically what it comes down to we want to<01:14:08.230> see<01:14:08.440> where<01:14:09.220> that<01:14:09.430> difference<01:14:10.000> in<01:14:10.150> that 01:14:10.260 --> 01:14:10.270 align:start position:0% to see where that difference in that 01:14:10.270 --> 01:14:12.480 align:start position:0% to see where that difference in that money's<01:14:10.630> gonna<01:14:10.780> go<01:14:11.050> if<01:14:11.290> we<01:14:11.500> actually<01:14:11.680> have<01:14:12.280> to 01:14:12.480 --> 01:14:12.490 align:start position:0% money's gonna go if we actually have to 01:14:12.490 --> 01:14:16.350 align:start position:0% money's gonna go if we actually have to spend<01:14:12.790> it<01:14:12.940> between<01:14:13.510> the<01:14:13.780> 24<01:14:14.320> and<01:14:14.470> the<01:14:14.590> 27<01:14:15.360> does 01:14:16.350 --> 01:14:16.360 align:start position:0% spend it between the 24 and the 27 does 01:14:16.360 --> 01:14:21.540 align:start position:0% spend it between the 24 and the 27 does that<01:14:16.540> make<01:14:16.690> sense<01:14:17.760> it<01:14:18.760> does<01:14:19.510> I<01:14:19.900> mean<01:14:19.930> I<01:14:20.260> I<01:14:20.560> mean 01:14:21.540 --> 01:14:21.550 align:start position:0% that make sense it does I mean I I mean 01:14:21.550 --> 01:14:24.780 align:start position:0% that make sense it does I mean I I mean just<01:14:22.440> Jeff<01:14:23.440> I<01:14:23.650> mean<01:14:23.800> maybe<01:14:24.040> you<01:14:24.220> can<01:14:24.430> speak<01:14:24.730> to 01:14:24.780 --> 01:14:24.790 align:start position:0% just Jeff I mean maybe you can speak to 01:14:24.790 --> 01:14:28.130 align:start position:0% just Jeff I mean maybe you can speak to that<01:14:25.060> point<01:14:25.330> I<01:14:25.600> mean<01:14:25.810> it<01:14:25.990> is<01:14:26.140> the<01:14:26.290> difference 01:14:28.130 --> 01:14:28.140 align:start position:0% that point I mean it is the difference 01:14:28.140 --> 01:14:32.250 align:start position:0% that point I mean it is the difference if<01:14:29.140> the<01:14:29.410> project<01:14:29.920> came<01:14:30.190> in<01:14:30.460> as<01:14:30.810> we<01:14:31.810> have<01:14:31.990> been 01:14:32.250 --> 01:14:32.260 align:start position:0% if the project came in as we have been 01:14:32.260 --> 01:14:34.110 align:start position:0% if the project came in as we have been it<01:14:32.440> which<01:14:32.680> is<01:14:32.860> the<01:14:33.010> entire<01:14:33.310> project<01:14:33.610> that's 01:14:34.110 --> 01:14:34.120 align:start position:0% it which is the entire project that's 01:14:34.120 --> 01:14:35.550 align:start position:0% it which is the entire project that's where<01:14:34.270> you're<01:14:34.360> spending<01:14:34.690> the<01:14:34.750> money<01:14:34.930> so<01:14:35.320> if<01:14:35.410> it 01:14:35.550 --> 01:14:35.560 align:start position:0% where you're spending the money so if it 01:14:35.560 --> 01:14:37.820 align:start position:0% where you're spending the money so if it comes<01:14:35.800> in<01:14:35.950> at<01:14:36.040> 27<01:14:36.700> million<01:14:36.880> dollars<01:14:37.120> we're 01:14:37.820 --> 01:14:37.830 align:start position:0% comes in at 27 million dollars we're 01:14:37.830 --> 01:14:42.740 align:start position:0% comes in at 27 million dollars we're bidding<01:14:38.830> the<01:14:38.980> whole<01:14:39.160> project<01:14:39.790> and<01:14:40.150> it's<01:14:40.990> not<01:14:41.260> a 01:14:42.740 --> 01:14:42.750 align:start position:0% bidding the whole project and it's not a 01:14:42.750 --> 01:14:47.430 align:start position:0% bidding the whole project and it's not a just<01:14:43.750> to<01:14:43.900> code<01:14:44.380> that<01:14:44.590> term<01:14:45.300> this<01:14:46.300> increase<01:14:47.170> to 01:14:47.430 --> 01:14:47.440 align:start position:0% just to code that term this increase to 01:14:47.440 --> 01:14:48.960 align:start position:0% just to code that term this increase to go<01:14:47.530> from<01:14:47.710> the<01:14:47.830> twenty<01:14:48.100> four<01:14:48.250> point<01:14:48.490> eight<01:14:48.640> the 01:14:48.960 --> 01:14:48.970 align:start position:0% go from the twenty four point eight the 01:14:48.970 --> 01:14:50.430 align:start position:0% go from the twenty four point eight the twenty<01:14:49.210> seven<01:14:49.480> point<01:14:49.600> five<01:14:49.810> was<01:14:50.020> not<01:14:50.170> project 01:14:50.430 --> 01:14:50.440 align:start position:0% twenty seven point five was not project 01:14:50.440 --> 01:14:52.650 align:start position:0% twenty seven point five was not project creep<01:14:51.010> we<01:14:51.250> did<01:14:51.400> not<01:14:51.520> change<01:14:51.940> any<01:14:52.450> of<01:14:52.510> the 01:14:52.650 --> 01:14:52.660 align:start position:0% creep we did not change any of the 01:14:52.660 --> 01:14:55.080 align:start position:0% creep we did not change any of the project<01:14:53.140> scope<01:14:53.500> to<01:14:53.770> go<01:14:53.920> to<01:14:53.980> that<01:14:54.160> point<01:14:54.580> no<01:14:55.060> I 01:14:55.080 --> 01:14:55.090 align:start position:0% project scope to go to that point no I 01:14:55.090 --> 01:14:58.080 align:start position:0% project scope to go to that point no I don't<01:14:55.420> think<01:14:55.480> it's<01:14:55.810> just<01:14:56.040> increased<01:14:57.040> in<01:14:57.400> cost 01:14:58.080 --> 01:14:58.090 align:start position:0% don't think it's just increased in cost 01:14:58.090 --> 01:15:00.090 align:start position:0% don't think it's just increased in cost so<01:14:58.600> when<01:14:58.780> we<01:14:58.930> went<01:14:59.110> through<01:14:59.410> and<01:14:59.650> did<01:14:59.740> it<01:14:59.920> we 01:15:00.090 --> 01:15:00.100 align:start position:0% so when we went through and did it we 01:15:00.100 --> 01:15:03.030 align:start position:0% so when we went through and did it we believe<01:15:00.310> the<01:15:00.670> cost<01:15:00.970> over<01:15:01.360> where<01:15:01.570> we<01:15:01.600> were<01:15:02.040> when 01:15:03.030 --> 01:15:03.040 align:start position:0% believe the cost over where we were when 01:15:03.040 --> 01:15:04.860 align:start position:0% believe the cost over where we were when we<01:15:03.220> built<01:15:03.460> this<01:15:03.640> budget<01:15:04.090> than<01:15:04.240> last<01:15:04.480> year<01:15:04.750> has 01:15:04.860 --> 01:15:04.870 align:start position:0% we built this budget than last year has 01:15:04.870 --> 01:15:06.300 align:start position:0% we built this budget than last year has had<01:15:04.990> that<01:15:05.230> much<01:15:05.440> kind<01:15:05.680> of<01:15:05.740> inflationary 01:15:06.300 --> 01:15:06.310 align:start position:0% had that much kind of inflationary 01:15:06.310 --> 01:15:07.860 align:start position:0% had that much kind of inflationary impact<01:15:06.520> to<01:15:06.910> go<01:15:07.030> this<01:15:07.210> year<01:15:07.420> so<01:15:07.540> we<01:15:07.630> haven't 01:15:07.860 --> 01:15:07.870 align:start position:0% impact to go this year so we haven't 01:15:07.870 --> 01:15:10.460 align:start position:0% impact to go this year so we haven't changed<01:15:08.320> it<01:15:08.470> no<01:15:08.770> I<01:15:08.800> don't<01:15:09.340> mean<01:15:09.640> that 01:15:10.460 --> 01:15:10.470 align:start position:0% changed it no I don't mean that 01:15:10.470 --> 01:15:13.010 align:start position:0% changed it no I don't mean that I'm<01:15:10.560> not<01:15:10.770> trying<01:15:11.130> to<01:15:11.190> imply<01:15:11.490> that<01:15:11.780> but<01:15:12.780> what<01:15:12.990> I 01:15:13.010 --> 01:15:13.020 align:start position:0% I'm not trying to imply that but what I 01:15:13.020 --> 01:15:15.440 align:start position:0% I'm not trying to imply that but what I am<01:15:13.230> is<01:15:13.440> I'm<01:15:13.620> following<01:15:13.860> up<01:15:14.250> on<01:15:14.430> what<01:15:14.730> Angela's 01:15:15.440 --> 01:15:15.450 align:start position:0% am is I'm following up on what Angela's 01:15:15.450 --> 01:15:18.590 align:start position:0% am is I'm following up on what Angela's saying<01:15:15.780> and<01:15:16.290> that<01:15:16.830> is<01:15:16.860> that<01:15:17.670> she'd<01:15:18.330> like<01:15:18.570> to 01:15:18.590 --> 01:15:18.600 align:start position:0% saying and that is that she'd like to 01:15:18.600 --> 01:15:20.930 align:start position:0% saying and that is that she'd like to see<01:15:19.080> and<01:15:19.320> understand<01:15:19.890> as<01:15:20.010> well<01:15:20.160> as<01:15:20.370> I<01:15:20.580> would 01:15:20.930 --> 01:15:20.940 align:start position:0% see and understand as well as I would 01:15:20.940 --> 01:15:24.080 align:start position:0% see and understand as well as I would you<01:15:21.870> know<01:15:22.020> well<01:15:22.380> so<01:15:22.680> if<01:15:23.100> somebody<01:15:23.520> comes<01:15:23.820> in 01:15:24.080 --> 01:15:24.090 align:start position:0% you know well so if somebody comes in 01:15:24.090 --> 01:15:26.750 align:start position:0% you know well so if somebody comes in lower<01:15:24.470> you<01:15:25.470> know<01:15:25.620> and<01:15:25.890> we<01:15:26.010> can<01:15:26.220> do<01:15:26.430> it<01:15:26.580> for 01:15:26.750 --> 01:15:26.760 align:start position:0% lower you know and we can do it for 01:15:26.760 --> 01:15:29.870 align:start position:0% lower you know and we can do it for let's<01:15:27.090> say<01:15:27.240> 25<01:15:27.810> mm-hmm<01:15:28.680> you<01:15:28.830> know<01:15:29.010> what<01:15:29.730> is 01:15:29.870 --> 01:15:29.880 align:start position:0% let's say 25 mm-hmm you know what is 01:15:29.880 --> 01:15:31.970 align:start position:0% let's say 25 mm-hmm you know what is that<01:15:29.910> you<01:15:30.570> know<01:15:30.810> that<01:15:31.020> looks<01:15:31.260> like<01:15:31.410> that's 01:15:31.970 --> 01:15:31.980 align:start position:0% that you know that looks like that's 01:15:31.980 --> 01:15:34.400 align:start position:0% that you know that looks like that's great<01:15:32.250> that<01:15:32.670> we'll<01:15:32.880> take<01:15:33.150> that<01:15:33.510> that<01:15:34.110> we<01:15:34.260> will 01:15:34.400 --> 01:15:34.410 align:start position:0% great that we'll take that that we will 01:15:34.410 --> 01:15:39.070 align:start position:0% great that we'll take that that we will take<01:15:34.620> that<01:15:34.680> lower<01:15:35.160> bid<01:15:35.520> though<01:15:35.760> huh 01:15:39.070 --> 01:15:39.080 align:start position:0% 01:15:39.080 --> 01:15:45.890 align:start position:0% it's<01:15:40.080> just<01:15:43.700> Angela<01:15:44.700> will<01:15:44.910> you<01:15:45.030> say<01:15:45.450> out<01:15:45.870> loud 01:15:45.890 --> 01:15:45.900 align:start position:0% it's just Angela will you say out loud 01:15:45.900 --> 01:15:48.500 align:start position:0% it's just Angela will you say out loud what<01:15:46.290> you're<01:15:46.440> saying<01:15:46.710> yeah<01:15:47.580> I<01:15:47.790> just<01:15:48.030> said<01:15:48.210> I 01:15:48.500 --> 01:15:48.510 align:start position:0% what you're saying yeah I just said I 01:15:48.510 --> 01:15:52.460 align:start position:0% what you're saying yeah I just said I mean<01:15:48.600> we<01:15:49.290> we<01:15:49.890> can<01:15:50.220> ask<01:15:50.970> fitters<01:15:51.540> to<01:15:51.870> get<01:15:52.140> we<01:15:52.350> can 01:15:52.460 --> 01:15:52.470 align:start position:0% mean we we can ask fitters to get we can 01:15:52.470 --> 01:15:54.260 align:start position:0% mean we we can ask fitters to get we can give<01:15:52.680> material<01:15:53.220> options<01:15:53.670> and<01:15:53.880> ask<01:15:54.000> for 01:15:54.260 --> 01:15:54.270 align:start position:0% give material options and ask for 01:15:54.270 --> 01:15:55.910 align:start position:0% give material options and ask for different<01:15:54.390> bids<01:15:54.750> based<01:15:55.050> on<01:15:55.260> the<01:15:55.350> materials 01:15:55.910 --> 01:15:55.920 align:start position:0% different bids based on the materials 01:15:55.920 --> 01:15:58.340 align:start position:0% different bids based on the materials and<01:15:56.340> we<01:15:56.910> saw<01:15:57.240> parts<01:15:57.630> of<01:15:57.750> the<01:15:57.870> building<01:15:58.170> that 01:15:58.340 --> 01:15:58.350 align:start position:0% and we saw parts of the building that 01:15:58.350 --> 01:16:00.140 align:start position:0% and we saw parts of the building that maybe<01:15:58.590> had<01:15:58.800> pricier<01:15:59.280> materials<01:15:59.790> and<01:15:59.940> we<01:16:00.000> can 01:16:00.140 --> 01:16:00.150 align:start position:0% maybe had pricier materials and we can 01:16:00.150 --> 01:16:02.780 align:start position:0% maybe had pricier materials and we can afford<01:16:00.270> I<01:16:00.720> would<01:16:00.870> say<01:16:01.160> so<01:16:02.160> I<01:16:02.220> just<01:16:02.610> want<01:16:02.760> to 01:16:02.780 --> 01:16:02.790 align:start position:0% afford I would say so I just want to 01:16:02.790 --> 01:16:04.220 align:start position:0% afford I would say so I just want to make<01:16:02.940> sure<01:16:03.090> that<01:16:03.270> we're<01:16:03.450> doing<01:16:03.630> everything<01:16:03.990> we 01:16:04.220 --> 01:16:04.230 align:start position:0% make sure that we're doing everything we 01:16:04.230 --> 01:16:07.100 align:start position:0% make sure that we're doing everything we can<01:16:04.740> to<01:16:05.130> make<01:16:05.340> sure<01:16:05.400> that<01:16:05.820> we<01:16:06.030> are<01:16:06.180> getting<01:16:06.390> the 01:16:07.100 --> 01:16:07.110 align:start position:0% can to make sure that we are getting the 01:16:07.110 --> 01:16:09.170 align:start position:0% can to make sure that we are getting the building<01:16:07.410> we<01:16:07.530> want<01:16:07.710> for<01:16:08.310> the<01:16:08.640> lowest<01:16:08.820> price 01:16:09.170 --> 01:16:09.180 align:start position:0% building we want for the lowest price 01:16:09.180 --> 01:16:13.070 align:start position:0% building we want for the lowest price possible<01:16:10.370> so<01:16:11.370> like<01:16:12.180> I<01:16:12.270> said<01:16:12.480> I<01:16:12.510> just<01:16:12.600> like<01:16:12.930> to 01:16:13.070 --> 01:16:13.080 align:start position:0% possible so like I said I just like to 01:16:13.080 --> 01:16:14.690 align:start position:0% possible so like I said I just like to have<01:16:13.200> that<01:16:13.320> discussion<01:16:13.620> I<01:16:13.980> mean<01:16:14.100> I<01:16:14.160> understand 01:16:14.690 --> 01:16:14.700 align:start position:0% have that discussion I mean I understand 01:16:14.700 --> 01:16:16.400 align:start position:0% have that discussion I mean I understand what<01:16:14.820> Doug<01:16:14.940> saying<01:16:15.240> people<01:16:15.840> are<01:16:16.020> gonna<01:16:16.170> bid<01:16:16.380> on 01:16:16.400 --> 01:16:16.410 align:start position:0% what Doug saying people are gonna bid on 01:16:16.410 --> 01:16:18.020 align:start position:0% what Doug saying people are gonna bid on it<01:16:16.530> and<01:16:16.830> they're<01:16:17.190> gonna<01:16:17.280> bid<01:16:17.520> a<01:16:17.550> certain<01:16:17.850> price 01:16:18.020 --> 01:16:18.030 align:start position:0% it and they're gonna bid a certain price 01:16:18.030 --> 01:16:19.220 align:start position:0% it and they're gonna bid a certain price and<01:16:18.060> that's<01:16:18.330> what<01:16:18.510> we're<01:16:18.600> gonna<01:16:18.690> have<01:16:18.780> to<01:16:19.020> pay 01:16:19.220 --> 01:16:19.230 align:start position:0% and that's what we're gonna have to pay 01:16:19.230 --> 01:16:21.050 align:start position:0% and that's what we're gonna have to pay but<01:16:19.800> at<01:16:19.920> the<01:16:20.040> question<01:16:20.340> I<01:16:20.460> think<01:16:20.490> is<01:16:20.760> what<01:16:20.940> are 01:16:21.050 --> 01:16:21.060 align:start position:0% but at the question I think is what are 01:16:21.060 --> 01:16:22.370 align:start position:0% but at the question I think is what are we<01:16:21.150> having<01:16:21.390> them<01:16:21.510> bid<01:16:21.660> on<01:16:21.810> and<01:16:22.020> we're<01:16:22.230> having 01:16:22.370 --> 01:16:22.380 align:start position:0% we having them bid on and we're having 01:16:22.380 --> 01:16:24.320 align:start position:0% we having them bid on and we're having them<01:16:22.590> bit<01:16:22.830> in<01:16:22.950> an<01:16:23.040> ivory<01:16:23.190> tower<01:16:23.550> and<01:16:23.910> we<01:16:24.180> can 01:16:24.320 --> 01:16:24.330 align:start position:0% them bit in an ivory tower and we can 01:16:24.330 --> 01:16:25.970 align:start position:0% them bit in an ivory tower and we can only<01:16:24.420> afford<01:16:24.600> brick<01:16:25.050> then<01:16:25.350> we<01:16:25.650> need<01:16:25.800> to<01:16:25.890> know 01:16:25.970 --> 01:16:25.980 align:start position:0% only afford brick then we need to know 01:16:25.980 --> 01:16:30.770 align:start position:0% only afford brick then we need to know that<01:16:28.760> the<01:16:29.760> construction<01:16:30.330> manager<01:16:30.660> at<01:16:30.690> risk 01:16:30.770 --> 01:16:30.780 align:start position:0% that the construction manager at risk 01:16:30.780 --> 01:16:33.020 align:start position:0% that the construction manager at risk method<01:16:31.470> gives<01:16:32.040> us<01:16:32.160> great<01:16:32.400> ability<01:16:32.730> to<01:16:32.790> do<01:16:32.880> that 01:16:33.020 --> 01:16:33.030 align:start position:0% method gives us great ability to do that 01:16:33.030 --> 01:16:34.850 align:start position:0% method gives us great ability to do that was<01:16:33.240> my<01:16:33.450> reasons<01:16:33.840> why<01:16:33.960> we<01:16:34.230> chose<01:16:34.260> that<01:16:34.470> method 01:16:34.850 --> 01:16:34.860 align:start position:0% was my reasons why we chose that method 01:16:34.860 --> 01:16:37.490 align:start position:0% was my reasons why we chose that method of<01:16:35.190> delivery<01:16:35.580> is<01:16:35.700> on<01:16:36.660> the<01:16:36.810> front<01:16:37.080> end<01:16:37.260> and<01:16:37.380> we 01:16:37.490 --> 01:16:37.500 align:start position:0% of delivery is on the front end and we 01:16:37.500 --> 01:16:40.190 align:start position:0% of delivery is on the front end and we give<01:16:37.710> bids<01:16:37.980> we<01:16:38.910> look<01:16:39.090> at<01:16:39.210> those<01:16:39.390> together<01:16:39.810> and 01:16:40.190 --> 01:16:40.200 align:start position:0% give bids we look at those together and 01:16:40.200 --> 01:16:43.790 align:start position:0% give bids we look at those together and find<01:16:40.890> solutions<01:16:41.460> to<01:16:42.240> problems<01:16:42.750> and<01:16:42.840> so<01:16:43.140> we'll 01:16:43.790 --> 01:16:43.800 align:start position:0% find solutions to problems and so we'll 01:16:43.800 --> 01:16:45.380 align:start position:0% find solutions to problems and so we'll absolutely<01:16:43.950> do<01:16:44.460> that<01:16:44.490> over<01:16:44.820> the<01:16:44.880> next<01:16:44.940> week 01:16:45.380 --> 01:16:45.390 align:start position:0% absolutely do that over the next week 01:16:45.390 --> 01:16:47.060 align:start position:0% absolutely do that over the next week and<01:16:45.720> do<01:16:45.900> everything<01:16:46.140> we<01:16:46.380> can<01:16:46.560> to<01:16:46.620> get<01:16:46.830> it<01:16:46.920> under 01:16:47.060 --> 01:16:47.070 align:start position:0% and do everything we can to get it under 01:16:47.070 --> 01:16:50.900 align:start position:0% and do everything we can to get it under 24<01:16:47.490> 8<01:16:48.320> the<01:16:49.320> market<01:16:49.800> has<01:16:49.950> driven<01:16:50.160> the<01:16:50.370> cost<01:16:50.550> up 01:16:50.900 --> 01:16:50.910 align:start position:0% 24 8 the market has driven the cost up 01:16:50.910 --> 01:16:53.540 align:start position:0% 24 8 the market has driven the cost up from<01:16:51.090> the<01:16:51.180> 24<01:16:51.660> 8<01:16:51.870> not<01:16:52.170> the<01:16:52.410> scope<01:16:52.590> Reese<01:16:52.860> got<01:16:53.400> us 01:16:53.540 --> 01:16:53.550 align:start position:0% from the 24 8 not the scope Reese got us 01:16:53.550 --> 01:16:55.970 align:start position:0% from the 24 8 not the scope Reese got us to<01:16:53.700> 24<01:16:54.120> 8<01:16:54.300> and<01:16:54.510> now<01:16:54.600> its<01:16:54.840> market<01:16:55.320> cause<01:16:55.500> it's 01:16:55.970 --> 01:16:55.980 align:start position:0% to 24 8 and now its market cause it's 01:16:55.980 --> 01:17:00.590 align:start position:0% to 24 8 and now its market cause it's just<01:16:57.470> commissioner<01:16:58.470> Kane<01:16:59.240> well<01:17:00.240> I<01:17:00.480> think 01:17:00.590 --> 01:17:00.600 align:start position:0% just commissioner Kane well I think 01:17:00.600 --> 01:17:02.420 align:start position:0% just commissioner Kane well I think Commission<01:17:01.350> media<01:17:01.680> said<01:17:01.890> it<01:17:01.980> the<01:17:02.070> other<01:17:02.130> day 01:17:02.420 --> 01:17:02.430 align:start position:0% Commission media said it the other day 01:17:02.430 --> 01:17:04.160 align:start position:0% Commission media said it the other day we<01:17:02.670> don't<01:17:02.850> need<01:17:03.000> any<01:17:03.150> bells<01:17:03.360> and<01:17:03.570> whistles<01:17:03.930> but 01:17:04.160 --> 01:17:04.170 align:start position:0% we don't need any bells and whistles but 01:17:04.170 --> 01:17:06.080 align:start position:0% we don't need any bells and whistles but the<01:17:04.770> longer<01:17:05.130> we<01:17:05.280> wait<01:17:05.430> the<01:17:05.490> more<01:17:05.640> expensive 01:17:06.080 --> 01:17:06.090 align:start position:0% the longer we wait the more expensive 01:17:06.090 --> 01:17:08.420 align:start position:0% the longer we wait the more expensive it's<01:17:06.390> kind<01:17:06.540> of<01:17:06.600> good<01:17:06.810> and<01:17:07.740> we<01:17:07.890> knew<01:17:08.070> this<01:17:08.220> was<01:17:08.400> a 01:17:08.420 --> 01:17:08.430 align:start position:0% it's kind of good and we knew this was a 01:17:08.430 --> 01:17:10.880 align:start position:0% it's kind of good and we knew this was a big<01:17:08.670> project<01:17:08.910> when<01:17:09.270> we<01:17:09.300> took<01:17:09.480> it<01:17:09.600> on<01:17:09.750> so<01:17:10.560> if 01:17:10.880 --> 01:17:10.890 align:start position:0% big project when we took it on so if 01:17:10.890 --> 01:17:13.970 align:start position:0% big project when we took it on so if it's<01:17:11.070> that<01:17:11.280> price<01:17:11.580> it's<01:17:11.910> that<01:17:12.120> price<01:17:12.800> but<01:17:13.800> if 01:17:13.970 --> 01:17:13.980 align:start position:0% it's that price it's that price but if 01:17:13.980 --> 01:17:16.160 align:start position:0% it's that price it's that price but if we<01:17:14.160> heal<01:17:14.460> around<01:17:14.790> and<01:17:15.180> doing<01:17:15.480> all<01:17:15.900> that's 01:17:16.160 --> 01:17:16.170 align:start position:0% we heal around and doing all that's 01:17:16.170 --> 01:17:18.290 align:start position:0% we heal around and doing all that's gonna<01:17:16.320> do<01:17:16.470> is<01:17:16.500> go<01:17:16.770> up<01:17:16.980> and<01:17:17.250> I'm<01:17:17.610> glad<01:17:17.880> cuz<01:17:18.120> our 01:17:18.290 --> 01:17:18.300 align:start position:0% gonna do is go up and I'm glad cuz our 01:17:18.300 --> 01:17:21.170 align:start position:0% gonna do is go up and I'm glad cuz our guys<01:17:18.510> get<01:17:18.720> paid<01:17:18.930> I<01:17:19.370> don't<01:17:20.370> want<01:17:20.670> to<01:17:20.760> put<01:17:20.940> it<01:17:21.030> off 01:17:21.170 --> 01:17:21.180 align:start position:0% guys get paid I don't want to put it off 01:17:21.180 --> 01:17:21.810 align:start position:0% guys get paid I don't want to put it off to<01:17:21.420> miss 01:17:21.810 --> 01:17:21.820 align:start position:0% to miss 01:17:21.820 --> 01:17:24.030 align:start position:0% to miss I<01:17:21.850> just<01:17:22.120> want<01:17:22.300> to<01:17:22.420> follow<01:17:23.050> along<01:17:23.470> with<01:17:23.530> with 01:17:24.030 --> 01:17:24.040 align:start position:0% I just want to follow along with with 01:17:24.040 --> 01:17:27.380 align:start position:0% I just want to follow along with with Angela<01:17:24.670> with<01:17:25.000> what<01:17:25.210> she's<01:17:25.450> saying 01:17:27.380 --> 01:17:27.390 align:start position:0% Angela with what she's saying 01:17:27.390 --> 01:17:30.480 align:start position:0% Angela with what she's saying well<01:17:28.390> we<01:17:28.540> certainly<01:17:29.070> certainly<01:17:30.070> will<01:17:30.250> bring 01:17:30.480 --> 01:17:30.490 align:start position:0% well we certainly certainly will bring 01:17:30.490 --> 01:17:32.070 align:start position:0% well we certainly certainly will bring back<01:17:30.700> and<01:17:30.940> show<01:17:31.120> you<01:17:31.150> what<01:17:31.330> the<01:17:31.690> scope<01:17:31.870> of<01:17:32.020> the 01:17:32.070 --> 01:17:32.080 align:start position:0% back and show you what the scope of the 01:17:32.080 --> 01:17:34.290 align:start position:0% back and show you what the scope of the project<01:17:32.290> is<01:17:32.800> and<01:17:33.130> what<01:17:33.280> decisions<01:17:33.820> were<01:17:34.030> made 01:17:34.290 --> 01:17:34.300 align:start position:0% project is and what decisions were made 01:17:34.300 --> 01:17:36.000 align:start position:0% project is and what decisions were made to<01:17:34.540> come<01:17:34.720> to<01:17:34.930> it<01:17:35.080> to<01:17:35.320> determine<01:17:35.800> what 01:17:36.000 --> 01:17:36.010 align:start position:0% to come to it to determine what 01:17:36.010 --> 01:17:38.100 align:start position:0% to come to it to determine what materials<01:17:36.580> were<01:17:36.790> putting<01:17:37.390> into<01:17:37.540> it<01:17:37.870> and<01:17:38.020> if 01:17:38.100 --> 01:17:38.110 align:start position:0% materials were putting into it and if 01:17:38.110 --> 01:17:41.250 align:start position:0% materials were putting into it and if there<01:17:38.290> were<01:17:38.440> some<01:17:38.770> changes<01:17:39.370> to<01:17:39.630> reduce<01:17:40.630> some 01:17:41.250 --> 01:17:41.260 align:start position:0% there were some changes to reduce some 01:17:41.260 --> 01:17:44.130 align:start position:0% there were some changes to reduce some aspects<01:17:41.770> or<01:17:42.480> you<01:17:43.480> know<01:17:43.690> you<01:17:43.840> know<01:17:43.930> how<01:17:44.080> we 01:17:44.130 --> 01:17:44.140 align:start position:0% aspects or you know you know how we 01:17:44.140 --> 01:17:47.040 align:start position:0% aspects or you know you know how we reached<01:17:44.440> a<01:17:44.620> total<01:17:44.800> and<01:17:45.400> if<01:17:45.910> you<01:17:46.090> are<01:17:46.330> giving<01:17:46.780> me 01:17:47.040 --> 01:17:47.050 align:start position:0% reached a total and if you are giving me 01:17:47.050 --> 01:17:49.080 align:start position:0% reached a total and if you are giving me authority<01:17:47.500> to<01:17:47.590> work<01:17:47.770> within<01:17:48.010> the<01:17:48.280> 27<01:17:48.910> and<01:17:49.030> a 01:17:49.080 --> 01:17:49.090 align:start position:0% authority to work within the 27 and a 01:17:49.090 --> 01:17:52.920 align:start position:0% authority to work within the 27 and a half<01:17:49.650> recognizing<01:17:50.650> that<01:17:50.830> the<01:17:51.100> tools<01:17:51.370> of<01:17:51.930> you 01:17:52.920 --> 01:17:52.930 align:start position:0% half recognizing that the tools of you 01:17:52.930 --> 01:17:54.240 align:start position:0% half recognizing that the tools of you know<01:17:53.020> working<01:17:53.230> with<01:17:53.410> any<01:17:53.710> of<01:17:53.890> the<01:17:53.950> reserve 01:17:54.240 --> 01:17:54.250 align:start position:0% know working with any of the reserve 01:17:54.250 --> 01:17:56.160 align:start position:0% know working with any of the reserve money<01:17:54.490> we<01:17:54.730> are<01:17:54.760> anticipating<01:17:55.480> this<01:17:55.630> year<01:17:55.960> or 01:17:56.160 --> 01:17:56.170 align:start position:0% money we are anticipating this year or 01:17:56.170 --> 01:17:58.530 align:start position:0% money we are anticipating this year or the<01:17:56.620> first<01:17:57.190> option<01:17:57.730> being<01:17:57.910> the<01:17:58.090> transient 01:17:58.530 --> 01:17:58.540 align:start position:0% the first option being the transient 01:17:58.540 --> 01:18:00.300 align:start position:0% the first option being the transient guest<01:17:58.720> funding<01:17:59.110> so<01:17:59.290> let's<01:17:59.500> say<01:17:59.620> we<01:17:59.770> came<01:17:59.920> in<01:18:00.130> at 01:18:00.300 --> 01:18:00.310 align:start position:0% guest funding so let's say we came in at 01:18:00.310 --> 01:18:02.220 align:start position:0% guest funding so let's say we came in at twenty<01:18:01.210> five<01:18:01.360> point<01:18:01.660> three<01:18:01.720> million<01:18:02.110> dollars 01:18:02.220 --> 01:18:02.230 align:start position:0% twenty five point three million dollars 01:18:02.230 --> 01:18:04.710 align:start position:0% twenty five point three million dollars I<01:18:02.830> essentially<01:18:03.370> be<01:18:03.520> taking<01:18:04.060> that<01:18:04.150> option<01:18:04.600> and 01:18:04.710 --> 01:18:04.720 align:start position:0% I essentially be taking that option and 01:18:04.720 --> 01:18:05.490 align:start position:0% I essentially be taking that option and that'd<01:18:04.900> be<01:18:04.930> it 01:18:05.490 --> 01:18:05.500 align:start position:0% that'd be it 01:18:05.500 --> 01:18:08.040 align:start position:0% that'd be it but<01:18:06.040> then<01:18:06.250> in<01:18:06.520> the<01:18:06.790> last<01:18:06.970> option<01:18:07.300> being<01:18:07.750> to<01:18:07.930> do 01:18:08.040 --> 01:18:08.050 align:start position:0% but then in the last option being to do 01:18:08.050 --> 01:18:09.270 align:start position:0% but then in the last option being to do anything<01:18:08.260> to<01:18:08.500> increase<01:18:08.800> where<01:18:09.070> we're<01:18:09.190> at<01:18:09.250> on 01:18:09.270 --> 01:18:09.280 align:start position:0% anything to increase where we're at on 01:18:09.280 --> 01:18:14.150 align:start position:0% anything to increase where we're at on debt<01:18:10.470> I'm<01:18:11.470> good<01:18:11.710> with<01:18:11.830> that 01:18:14.150 --> 01:18:14.160 align:start position:0% 01:18:14.160 --> 01:18:20.430 align:start position:0% just<01:18:15.160> one<01:18:15.580> final<01:18:15.850> comment<01:18:16.180> I<01:18:16.390> support<01:18:16.900> it<01:18:19.440> you 01:18:20.430 --> 01:18:20.440 align:start position:0% just one final comment I support it you 01:18:20.440 --> 01:18:22.200 align:start position:0% just one final comment I support it you know<01:18:20.590> looking<01:18:20.920> at<01:18:21.100> cuts<01:18:21.400> of<01:18:21.820> one<01:18:22.030> of<01:18:22.120> the 01:18:22.200 --> 01:18:22.210 align:start position:0% know looking at cuts of one of the 01:18:22.210 --> 01:18:24.300 align:start position:0% know looking at cuts of one of the reasons<01:18:22.600> why<01:18:22.960> it's<01:18:23.500> because<01:18:23.920> if<01:18:24.100> we're 01:18:24.300 --> 01:18:24.310 align:start position:0% reasons why it's because if we're 01:18:24.310 --> 01:18:26.550 align:start position:0% reasons why it's because if we're looking<01:18:24.460> at<01:18:24.850> cuts<01:18:25.150> and<01:18:25.660> and<01:18:25.990> one<01:18:26.320> of<01:18:26.440> the 01:18:26.550 --> 01:18:26.560 align:start position:0% looking at cuts and and one of the 01:18:26.560 --> 01:18:29.580 align:start position:0% looking at cuts and and one of the things<01:18:26.830> we're<01:18:27.100> saying<01:18:27.370> is<01:18:27.820> that<01:18:28.210> we<01:18:29.200> wouldn't 01:18:29.580 --> 01:18:29.590 align:start position:0% things we're saying is that we wouldn't 01:18:29.590 --> 01:18:31.910 align:start position:0% things we're saying is that we wouldn't do<01:18:29.770> a<01:18:29.800> third-floor<01:18:30.160> courtroom<01:18:31.090> finish<01:18:31.570> that 01:18:31.910 --> 01:18:31.920 align:start position:0% do a third-floor courtroom finish that 01:18:31.920 --> 01:18:35.310 align:start position:0% do a third-floor courtroom finish that that<01:18:32.920> alarms<01:18:33.520> me<01:18:33.640> given<01:18:34.270> our<01:18:34.420> current<01:18:34.750> state 01:18:35.310 --> 01:18:35.320 align:start position:0% that alarms me given our current state 01:18:35.320 --> 01:18:39.030 align:start position:0% that alarms me given our current state of<01:18:35.380> affairs<01:18:36.750> current<01:18:37.750> look<01:18:37.960> at<01:18:38.140> all<01:18:38.380> security 01:18:39.030 --> 01:18:39.040 align:start position:0% of affairs current look at all security 01:18:39.040 --> 01:18:42.060 align:start position:0% of affairs current look at all security in<01:18:39.220> all<01:18:39.370> buildings<01:18:39.850> and<01:18:40.320> and<01:18:41.320> something<01:18:41.740> like 01:18:42.060 --> 01:18:42.070 align:start position:0% in all buildings and and something like 01:18:42.070 --> 01:18:44.310 align:start position:0% in all buildings and and something like that<01:18:42.280> strikes<01:18:42.580> me<01:18:42.760> as<01:18:42.880> an<01:18:43.330> important<01:18:43.900> function 01:18:44.310 --> 01:18:44.320 align:start position:0% that strikes me as an important function 01:18:44.320 --> 01:18:45.990 align:start position:0% that strikes me as an important function not<01:18:44.800> only<01:18:45.040> at<01:18:45.160> the<01:18:45.280> building<01:18:45.640> but<01:18:45.850> the 01:18:45.990 --> 01:18:46.000 align:start position:0% not only at the building but the 01:18:46.000 --> 01:18:49.670 align:start position:0% not only at the building but the security<01:18:46.390> overall<01:18:46.960> so<01:18:47.500> I<01:18:48.150> want<01:18:49.150> to<01:18:49.240> add<01:18:49.360> my 01:18:49.670 --> 01:18:49.680 align:start position:0% security overall so I want to add my 01:18:49.680 --> 01:18:53.160 align:start position:0% security overall so I want to add my vote<01:18:50.680> of<01:18:50.890> consensus<01:18:51.580> for<01:18:51.910> the<01:18:52.150> options<01:18:52.960> you 01:18:53.160 --> 01:18:53.170 align:start position:0% vote of consensus for the options you 01:18:53.170 --> 01:18:56.670 align:start position:0% vote of consensus for the options you brought<01:18:53.440> forward<01:18:55.230> okay<01:18:56.230> thank<01:18:56.500> you 01:18:56.670 --> 01:18:56.680 align:start position:0% brought forward okay thank you 01:18:56.680 --> 01:19:00.180 align:start position:0% brought forward okay thank you next<01:18:57.840> okay<01:18:58.840> we<01:18:58.990> had<01:18:59.110> the<01:18:59.200> case<01:18:59.410> seven<01:19:00.040> and 01:19:00.180 --> 01:19:00.190 align:start position:0% next okay we had the case seven and 01:19:00.190 --> 01:19:02.010 align:start position:0% next okay we had the case seven and parallel<01:19:00.610> project<01:19:01.180> this<01:19:01.360> is<01:19:01.480> a<01:19:01.540> three<01:19:01.780> point 01:19:02.010 --> 01:19:02.020 align:start position:0% parallel project this is a three point 01:19:02.020 --> 01:19:04.260 align:start position:0% parallel project this is a three point six<01:19:02.320> million<01:19:02.530> dollar<01:19:02.770> project<01:19:03.340> which<01:19:03.610> quedan 01:19:04.260 --> 01:19:04.270 align:start position:0% six million dollar project which quedan 01:19:04.270 --> 01:19:05.640 align:start position:0% six million dollar project which quedan has<01:19:04.540> brought<01:19:04.780> to<01:19:04.990> us<01:19:05.020> that<01:19:05.290> they're<01:19:05.470> funding 01:19:05.640 --> 01:19:05.650 align:start position:0% has brought to us that they're funding 01:19:05.650 --> 01:19:09.210 align:start position:0% has brought to us that they're funding they've<01:19:06.040> asked<01:19:06.280> us<01:19:06.580> to<01:19:06.610> do<01:19:07.860> maximum<01:19:08.860> match 01:19:09.210 --> 01:19:09.220 align:start position:0% they've asked us to do maximum match 01:19:09.220 --> 01:19:10.680 align:start position:0% they've asked us to do maximum match amount<01:19:09.610> of<01:19:09.790> three<01:19:10.000> hundred<01:19:10.240> thousand<01:19:10.630> in 01:19:10.680 --> 01:19:10.690 align:start position:0% amount of three hundred thousand in 01:19:10.690 --> 01:19:12.630 align:start position:0% amount of three hundred thousand in nineteen<01:19:10.930> and<01:19:11.320> twenty<01:19:11.380> there<01:19:11.890> was<01:19:12.040> we<01:19:12.490> had 01:19:12.630 --> 01:19:12.640 align:start position:0% nineteen and twenty there was we had 01:19:12.640 --> 01:19:14.550 align:start position:0% nineteen and twenty there was we had considerable<01:19:13.120> discussion<01:19:13.600> about<01:19:13.960> this<01:19:14.200> as 01:19:14.550 --> 01:19:14.560 align:start position:0% considerable discussion about this as 01:19:14.560 --> 01:19:16.650 align:start position:0% considerable discussion about this as they<01:19:14.740> were<01:19:15.190> here<01:19:15.400> with<01:19:15.580> is<01:19:15.760> an<01:19:15.910> are<01:19:16.030> city 01:19:16.650 --> 01:19:16.660 align:start position:0% they were here with is an are city 01:19:16.660 --> 01:19:21.210 align:start position:0% they were here with is an are city engineer<01:19:17.140> to<01:19:17.290> go<01:19:17.410> over<01:19:17.740> the<01:19:18.550> project<01:19:19.230> and<01:19:20.230> I 01:19:21.210 --> 01:19:21.220 align:start position:0% engineer to go over the project and I 01:19:21.220 --> 01:19:23.040 align:start position:0% engineer to go over the project and I believe<01:19:21.460> there<01:19:21.700> was<01:19:21.850> differing<01:19:22.480> opinions 01:19:23.040 --> 01:19:23.050 align:start position:0% believe there was differing opinions 01:19:23.050 --> 01:19:25.470 align:start position:0% believe there was differing opinions from<01:19:23.200> the<01:19:23.260> Commission<01:19:23.740> whether<01:19:23.950> we<01:19:24.480> continue 01:19:25.470 --> 01:19:25.480 align:start position:0% from the Commission whether we continue 01:19:25.480 --> 01:19:28.800 align:start position:0% from the Commission whether we continue to<01:19:25.600> build<01:19:25.720> this<01:19:25.930> into<01:19:26.170> the<01:19:26.350> 2019<01:19:27.240> budget<01:19:28.240> or 01:19:28.800 --> 01:19:28.810 align:start position:0% to build this into the 2019 budget or 01:19:28.810 --> 01:19:34.380 align:start position:0% to build this into the 2019 budget or not<01:19:30.810> so<01:19:31.810> mission<01:19:32.800> or<01:19:32.920> Walters<01:19:33.310> I<01:19:33.550> starts<01:19:33.970> of<01:19:34.180> my 01:19:34.380 --> 01:19:34.390 align:start position:0% not so mission or Walters I starts of my 01:19:34.390 --> 01:19:35.149 align:start position:0% not so mission or Walters I starts of my right 01:19:35.149 --> 01:19:35.159 align:start position:0% right 01:19:35.159 --> 01:19:38.719 align:start position:0% right datian<01:19:35.519> or<01:19:35.849> my<01:19:36.829> suggestion<01:19:37.829> last<01:19:38.189> week<01:19:38.429> was 01:19:38.719 --> 01:19:38.729 align:start position:0% datian or my suggestion last week was 01:19:38.729 --> 01:19:41.649 align:start position:0% datian or my suggestion last week was that<01:19:38.909> we<01:19:38.999> eliminate<01:19:39.300> this<01:19:39.719> project<01:19:40.260> from<01:19:40.469> our 01:19:41.649 --> 01:19:41.659 align:start position:0% that we eliminate this project from our 01:19:41.659 --> 01:19:46.580 align:start position:0% that we eliminate this project from our 2018<01:19:42.689> excuse<01:19:43.439> me<01:19:43.590> 2019<01:19:44.249> and<01:19:44.429> 2020<01:19:44.909> budget<01:19:45.809> in 01:19:46.580 --> 01:19:46.590 align:start position:0% 2018 excuse me 2019 and 2020 budget in 01:19:46.590 --> 01:19:47.600 align:start position:0% 2018 excuse me 2019 and 2020 budget in its<01:19:46.769> entirety 01:19:47.600 --> 01:19:47.610 align:start position:0% its entirety 01:19:47.610 --> 01:19:56.000 align:start position:0% its entirety I<01:19:53.419> support<01:19:54.419> Commissioner<01:19:54.840> Walters<01:19:55.289> and<01:19:55.590> that 01:19:56.000 --> 01:19:56.010 align:start position:0% I support Commissioner Walters and that 01:19:56.010 --> 01:19:59.299 align:start position:0% I support Commissioner Walters and that decision<01:19:56.489> I<01:19:57.320> don't<01:19:58.320> travel<01:19:58.590> that<01:19:58.739> road<01:19:59.039> much 01:19:59.299 --> 01:19:59.309 align:start position:0% decision I don't travel that road much 01:19:59.309 --> 01:20:02.060 align:start position:0% decision I don't travel that road much but<01:19:59.699> it<01:20:00.239> is<01:20:00.389> his<01:20:00.599> district<01:20:01.079> and<01:20:01.349> I<01:20:01.590> will<01:20:01.829> tell 01:20:02.060 --> 01:20:02.070 align:start position:0% but it is his district and I will tell 01:20:02.070 --> 01:20:05.989 align:start position:0% but it is his district and I will tell you<01:20:02.099> the<01:20:02.699> design<01:20:03.599> I<01:20:04.340> just<01:20:05.340> I<01:20:05.550> don't<01:20:05.729> like<01:20:05.849> the 01:20:05.989 --> 01:20:05.999 align:start position:0% you the design I just I don't like the 01:20:05.999 --> 01:20:08.089 align:start position:0% you the design I just I don't like the design<01:20:06.179> either<01:20:06.539> it<01:20:06.719> looks<01:20:06.749> like<01:20:07.050> the<01:20:07.229> oblong 01:20:08.089 --> 01:20:08.099 align:start position:0% design either it looks like the oblong 01:20:08.099 --> 01:20:11.209 align:start position:0% design either it looks like the oblong roundabouts<01:20:08.880> and<01:20:09.479> I'm<01:20:10.469> as<01:20:10.829> well<01:20:11.099> as 01:20:11.209 --> 01:20:11.219 align:start position:0% roundabouts and I'm as well as 01:20:11.219 --> 01:20:12.859 align:start position:0% roundabouts and I'm as well as commissioner<01:20:11.459> Tina<01:20:11.880> said<01:20:12.150> I'm<01:20:12.300> not<01:20:12.479> a<01:20:12.539> fan<01:20:12.840> of 01:20:12.859 --> 01:20:12.869 align:start position:0% commissioner Tina said I'm not a fan of 01:20:12.869 --> 01:20:22.120 align:start position:0% commissioner Tina said I'm not a fan of roundabouts<01:20:13.530> so<01:20:13.860> it's<01:20:14.010> a<01:20:14.159> road 01:20:22.120 --> 01:20:22.130 align:start position:0% 01:20:22.130 --> 01:20:33.270 align:start position:0% I<01:20:22.250> support<01:20:23.240> Commissioner<01:20:24.050> Walters 01:20:33.270 --> 01:20:33.280 align:start position:0% 01:20:33.280 --> 01:20:35.560 align:start position:0% census<01:20:34.280> both<01:20:34.459> our<01:20:34.669> districts<01:20:35.059> I<01:20:35.179> support 01:20:35.560 --> 01:20:35.570 align:start position:0% census both our districts I support 01:20:35.570 --> 01:20:41.259 align:start position:0% census both our districts I support Commissioner<01:20:35.959> Walters<01:20:39.820> I'm<01:20:40.820> gonna<01:20:41.030> suggest 01:20:41.259 --> 01:20:41.269 align:start position:0% Commissioner Walters I'm gonna suggest 01:20:41.269 --> 01:20:43.899 align:start position:0% Commissioner Walters I'm gonna suggest that<01:20:41.630> there<01:20:42.050> are<01:20:42.169> four<01:20:42.469> who<01:20:42.889> are<01:20:43.070> not<01:20:43.340> in<01:20:43.519> an 01:20:43.899 --> 01:20:43.909 align:start position:0% that there are four who are not in an 01:20:43.909 --> 01:20:46.719 align:start position:0% that there are four who are not in an agreement<01:20:44.510> at<01:20:44.749> least<01:20:44.900> four<01:20:45.139> so<01:20:45.590> I<01:20:46.010> don't<01:20:46.400> see 01:20:46.719 --> 01:20:46.729 align:start position:0% agreement at least four so I don't see 01:20:46.729 --> 01:20:48.929 align:start position:0% agreement at least four so I don't see strong<01:20:47.059> consensus<01:20:47.630> to<01:20:47.719> move<01:20:47.749> forward 01:20:48.929 --> 01:20:48.939 align:start position:0% strong consensus to move forward 01:20:48.939 --> 01:20:51.729 align:start position:0% strong consensus to move forward although<01:20:49.939> I<01:20:50.179> would<01:20:50.510> like<01:20:50.689> to<01:20:50.900> see<01:20:51.110> it<01:20:51.289> and<01:20:51.559> I 01:20:51.729 --> 01:20:51.739 align:start position:0% although I would like to see it and I 01:20:51.739 --> 01:20:53.649 align:start position:0% although I would like to see it and I know<01:20:51.800> it's<01:20:52.039> not<01:20:52.189> my<01:20:52.369> district<01:20:52.909> so<01:20:53.360> I'll<01:20:53.449> just 01:20:53.649 --> 01:20:53.659 align:start position:0% know it's not my district so I'll just 01:20:53.659 --> 01:20:56.739 align:start position:0% know it's not my district so I'll just say<01:20:53.840> that<01:20:54.110> I<01:20:54.459> would<01:20:55.459> suggest<01:20:55.639> that<01:20:56.059> I<01:20:56.239> think 01:20:56.739 --> 01:20:56.749 align:start position:0% say that I would suggest that I think 01:20:56.749 --> 01:20:58.239 align:start position:0% say that I would suggest that I think some<01:20:56.900> of<01:20:56.929> the<01:20:57.019> concerns<01:20:57.199> that<01:20:57.530> Commissioner 01:20:58.239 --> 01:20:58.249 align:start position:0% some of the concerns that Commissioner 01:20:58.249 --> 01:21:00.759 align:start position:0% some of the concerns that Commissioner Walters<01:20:58.639> raises<01:20:59.300> I<01:20:59.389> think<01:20:59.419> it<01:21:00.199> seems<01:21:00.439> to<01:21:00.619> me<01:21:00.739> a 01:21:00.759 --> 01:21:00.769 align:start position:0% Walters raises I think it seems to me a 01:21:00.769 --> 01:21:03.040 align:start position:0% Walters raises I think it seems to me a lot<01:21:01.010> of<01:21:01.070> it<01:21:01.219> comes<01:21:01.369> down<01:21:01.639> to<01:21:01.699> what<01:21:02.630> the<01:21:02.809> fact 01:21:03.040 --> 01:21:03.050 align:start position:0% lot of it comes down to what the fact 01:21:03.050 --> 01:21:04.149 align:start position:0% lot of it comes down to what the fact this<01:21:03.139> will<01:21:03.349> have<01:21:03.469> on<01:21:03.619> economic<01:21:03.769> development 01:21:04.149 --> 01:21:04.159 align:start position:0% this will have on economic development 01:21:04.159 --> 01:21:08.199 align:start position:0% this will have on economic development and<01:21:04.729> what<01:21:04.969> the<01:21:05.169> ultimate<01:21:06.849> development<01:21:07.849> of 01:21:08.199 --> 01:21:08.209 align:start position:0% and what the ultimate development of 01:21:08.209 --> 01:21:10.449 align:start position:0% and what the ultimate development of this<01:21:08.329> stretch<01:21:09.320> of<01:21:09.349> highway<01:21:09.469> will<01:21:09.919> be<01:21:10.099> that<01:21:10.340> is 01:21:10.449 --> 01:21:10.459 align:start position:0% this stretch of highway will be that is 01:21:10.459 --> 01:21:12.310 align:start position:0% this stretch of highway will be that is trying<01:21:10.939> to<01:21:11.059> turn<01:21:11.360> it<01:21:11.389> into<01:21:11.599> a<01:21:11.749> superhighway 01:21:12.310 --> 01:21:12.320 align:start position:0% trying to turn it into a superhighway 01:21:12.320 --> 01:21:15.250 align:start position:0% trying to turn it into a superhighway and<01:21:12.800> whether<01:21:13.039> other<01:21:13.369> options<01:21:14.030> in<01:21:14.329> play<01:21:14.929> that 01:21:15.250 --> 01:21:15.260 align:start position:0% and whether other options in play that 01:21:15.260 --> 01:21:19.390 align:start position:0% and whether other options in play that were<01:21:15.679> not<01:21:15.889> brought<01:21:16.849> to<01:21:17.090> us<01:21:17.119> by<01:21:17.239> KDOT<01:21:18.189> those<01:21:19.189> are 01:21:19.390 --> 01:21:19.400 align:start position:0% were not brought to us by KDOT those are 01:21:19.400 --> 01:21:21.250 align:start position:0% were not brought to us by KDOT those are I<01:21:19.610> think<01:21:19.849> significant<01:21:20.510> concerns<01:21:20.869> and<01:21:21.110> perhaps 01:21:21.250 --> 01:21:21.260 align:start position:0% I think significant concerns and perhaps 01:21:21.260 --> 01:21:22.989 align:start position:0% I think significant concerns and perhaps is<01:21:21.590> this<01:21:21.949> coming<01:21:22.280> year<01:21:22.369> we<01:21:22.519> can<01:21:22.699> get<01:21:22.820> more 01:21:22.989 --> 01:21:22.999 align:start position:0% is this coming year we can get more 01:21:22.999 --> 01:21:24.609 align:start position:0% is this coming year we can get more information<01:21:23.510> on<01:21:23.599> this<01:21:23.749> and<01:21:23.959> then<01:21:24.079> bring<01:21:24.499> this 01:21:24.609 --> 01:21:24.619 align:start position:0% information on this and then bring this 01:21:24.619 --> 01:21:26.669 align:start position:0% information on this and then bring this back<01:21:24.829> up<01:21:24.860> next<01:21:25.309> year 01:21:26.669 --> 01:21:26.679 align:start position:0% back up next year 01:21:26.679 --> 01:21:30.069 align:start position:0% back up next year yes<01:21:27.679> mr.<01:21:27.979> Kane<01:21:28.159> when<01:21:28.999> they<01:21:29.119> do<01:21:29.179> it<01:21:29.479> I<01:21:29.599> think 01:21:30.069 --> 01:21:30.079 align:start position:0% yes mr. Kane when they do it I think 01:21:30.079 --> 01:21:32.620 align:start position:0% yes mr. Kane when they do it I think they<01:21:30.199> should<01:21:30.409> sit<01:21:30.889> down<01:21:31.010> with<01:21:31.159> us<01:21:31.189> and<01:21:31.630> fully 01:21:32.620 --> 01:21:32.630 align:start position:0% they should sit down with us and fully 01:21:32.630 --> 01:21:34.149 align:start position:0% they should sit down with us and fully explain<01:21:33.079> what's<01:21:33.349> going<01:21:33.409> on<01:21:33.679> I'm<01:21:33.860> not<01:21:34.070> an 01:21:34.149 --> 01:21:34.159 align:start position:0% explain what's going on I'm not an 01:21:34.159 --> 01:21:36.819 align:start position:0% explain what's going on I'm not an engineer<01:21:34.749> fully<01:21:35.749> explain<01:21:36.199> what's<01:21:36.439> going<01:21:36.559> on 01:21:36.819 --> 01:21:36.829 align:start position:0% engineer fully explain what's going on 01:21:36.829 --> 01:21:39.189 align:start position:0% engineer fully explain what's going on you<01:21:37.400> know<01:21:37.429> and<01:21:37.760> say<01:21:37.939> all<01:21:38.059> right<01:21:38.090> this<01:21:38.659> this<01:21:38.959> and 01:21:39.189 --> 01:21:39.199 align:start position:0% you know and say all right this this and 01:21:39.199 --> 01:21:39.509 align:start position:0% you know and say all right this this and that 01:21:39.509 --> 01:21:39.519 align:start position:0% that 01:21:39.519 --> 01:21:42.640 align:start position:0% that here's<01:21:40.519> your<01:21:40.699> options<01:21:41.179> but<01:21:42.139> when<01:21:42.289> we<01:21:42.409> talked 01:21:42.640 --> 01:21:42.650 align:start position:0% here's your options but when we talked 01:21:42.650 --> 01:21:44.500 align:start position:0% here's your options but when we talked about<01:21:42.739> that<01:21:43.070> before<01:21:43.249> I<01:21:43.969> mean<01:21:44.119> this<01:21:44.239> was<01:21:44.479> the 01:21:44.500 --> 01:21:44.510 align:start position:0% about that before I mean this was the 01:21:44.510 --> 01:21:46.540 align:start position:0% about that before I mean this was the superhighway<01:21:45.349> and<01:21:45.829> this<01:21:45.919> was<01:21:46.070> gonna<01:21:46.159> be<01:21:46.369> all 01:21:46.540 --> 01:21:46.550 align:start position:0% superhighway and this was gonna be all 01:21:46.550 --> 01:21:48.429 align:start position:0% superhighway and this was gonna be all this<01:21:46.760> and<01:21:47.030> the<01:21:47.090> baggage<01:21:47.419> ship<01:21:47.599> Cindy<01:21:47.989> Cass<01:21:48.199> was 01:21:48.429 --> 01:21:48.439 align:start position:0% this and the baggage ship Cindy Cass was 01:21:48.439 --> 01:21:51.279 align:start position:0% this and the baggage ship Cindy Cass was there<01:21:48.590> on<01:21:48.709> that<01:21:48.860> ran<01:21:49.039> it<01:21:49.219> you<01:21:50.030> know<01:21:50.150> and<01:21:50.659> that 01:21:51.279 --> 01:21:51.289 align:start position:0% there on that ran it you know and that 01:21:51.289 --> 01:21:54.399 align:start position:0% there on that ran it you know and that was<01:21:51.439> from<01:21:51.619> one<01:21:51.679> extreme<01:21:52.010> to<01:21:52.219> another<01:21:52.900> so<01:21:53.900> I 01:21:54.399 --> 01:21:54.409 align:start position:0% was from one extreme to another so I 01:21:54.409 --> 01:21:57.279 align:start position:0% was from one extreme to another so I think<01:21:55.400> they'd<01:21:55.789> be<01:21:55.909> better<01:21:55.939> served<01:21:56.780> you<01:21:56.989> we 01:21:57.279 --> 01:21:57.289 align:start position:0% think they'd be better served you we 01:21:57.289 --> 01:21:59.109 align:start position:0% think they'd be better served you we knew<01:21:57.709> more<01:21:57.889> about<01:21:57.949> the<01:21:58.309> project<01:21:58.729> and<01:21:58.880> we<01:21:58.969> know 01:21:59.109 --> 01:21:59.119 align:start position:0% knew more about the project and we know 01:21:59.119 --> 01:22:05.379 align:start position:0% knew more about the project and we know now<01:22:01.389> and<01:22:02.389> so<01:22:02.840> it's<01:22:03.019> decided<01:22:03.909> so<01:22:04.909> this<01:22:05.150> will 01:22:05.379 --> 01:22:05.389 align:start position:0% now and so it's decided so this will 01:22:05.389 --> 01:22:10.949 align:start position:0% now and so it's decided so this will remain<01:22:05.630> in<01:22:06.019> the<01:22:06.139> budget<01:22:06.499> as<01:22:06.619> it<01:22:07.070> currently<01:22:07.280> is 01:22:10.949 --> 01:22:10.959 align:start position:0% 01:22:10.959 --> 01:22:19.229 align:start position:0% he's<01:22:11.959> asking<01:22:12.320> to<01:22:12.380> remove<01:22:12.679> it<01:22:12.800> no<01:22:13.010> okay 01:22:19.229 --> 01:22:19.239 align:start position:0% 01:22:19.239 --> 01:22:26.890 align:start position:0% knowing<01:22:20.239> that<01:22:20.480> though<01:22:22.300> it's<01:22:23.300> all<01:22:23.449> day<01:22:25.900> okay 01:22:26.890 --> 01:22:26.900 align:start position:0% knowing that though it's all day okay 01:22:26.900 --> 01:22:30.879 align:start position:0% knowing that though it's all day okay next<01:22:27.320> slide<01:22:28.300> so<01:22:29.300> the<01:22:29.449> first<01:22:29.690> item<01:22:29.900> I<01:22:30.320> will<01:22:30.739> say 01:22:30.879 --> 01:22:30.889 align:start position:0% next slide so the first item I will say 01:22:30.889 --> 01:22:32.259 align:start position:0% next slide so the first item I will say I<01:22:30.920> don't<01:22:31.099> know<01:22:31.639> that<01:22:31.789> I<01:22:31.849> have<01:22:31.969> to<01:22:32.059> really<01:22:32.210> show 01:22:32.259 --> 01:22:32.269 align:start position:0% I don't know that I have to really show 01:22:32.269 --> 01:22:33.970 align:start position:0% I don't know that I have to really show anything<01:22:32.630> because<01:22:32.900> it<01:22:33.050> is<01:22:33.199> in<01:22:33.530> the<01:22:33.829> budget 01:22:33.970 --> 01:22:33.980 align:start position:0% anything because it is in the budget 01:22:33.980 --> 01:22:37.569 align:start position:0% anything because it is in the budget that<01:22:34.190> way<01:22:34.750> and<01:22:35.750> we<01:22:35.989> I've<01:22:36.650> recommended<01:22:37.039> it<01:22:37.369> at 01:22:37.569 --> 01:22:37.579 align:start position:0% that way and we I've recommended it at 01:22:37.579 --> 01:22:39.490 align:start position:0% that way and we I've recommended it at the<01:22:37.699> 27<01:22:38.300> and<01:22:38.360> a<01:22:38.420> half<01:22:38.480> million<01:22:38.929> dollar<01:22:39.110> level 01:22:39.490 --> 01:22:39.500 align:start position:0% the 27 and a half million dollar level 01:22:39.500 --> 01:22:40.930 align:start position:0% the 27 and a half million dollar level it's<01:22:39.650> just<01:22:39.829> our<01:22:39.949> sources<01:22:40.369> of<01:22:40.489> revenue<01:22:40.909> that 01:22:40.930 --> 01:22:40.940 align:start position:0% it's just our sources of revenue that 01:22:40.940 --> 01:22:44.259 align:start position:0% it's just our sources of revenue that I'm<01:22:41.179> working<01:22:41.360> with<01:22:41.719> the<01:22:42.380> second<01:22:42.800> item<01:22:43.210> want<01:22:44.210> me 01:22:44.259 --> 01:22:44.269 align:start position:0% I'm working with the second item want me 01:22:44.269 --> 01:22:50.459 align:start position:0% I'm working with the second item want me to<01:22:44.389> show<01:22:44.539> that<01:22:44.690> as<01:22:44.780> a<01:22:44.809> deduct<01:22:45.280> okay<01:22:46.280> next<01:22:47.269> slide 01:22:50.459 --> 01:22:50.469 align:start position:0% 01:22:50.469 --> 01:22:53.020 align:start position:0% all<01:22:51.469> right<01:22:51.619> these<01:22:51.800> are<01:22:51.860> procedural<01:22:52.550> changes 01:22:53.020 --> 01:22:53.030 align:start position:0% all right these are procedural changes 01:22:53.030 --> 01:22:55.359 align:start position:0% all right these are procedural changes not<01:22:53.929> ones<01:22:54.170> that<01:22:54.349> I<01:22:54.409> feel<01:22:54.590> like<01:22:54.739> we<01:22:54.889> need<01:22:55.039> to<01:22:55.070> do 01:22:55.359 --> 01:22:55.369 align:start position:0% not ones that I feel like we need to do 01:22:55.369 --> 01:22:57.609 align:start position:0% not ones that I feel like we need to do but<01:22:55.789> we<01:22:56.030> was<01:22:56.329> brought<01:22:56.599> up<01:22:56.809> that<01:22:56.989> we<01:22:57.079> needed<01:22:57.260> to 01:22:57.609 --> 01:22:57.619 align:start position:0% but we was brought up that we needed to 01:22:57.619 --> 01:23:00.279 align:start position:0% but we was brought up that we needed to look<01:22:58.489> at<01:22:58.789> how<01:22:59.179> we<01:22:59.239> were<01:22:59.570> mowing<01:22:59.750> our<01:23:00.050> right 01:23:00.279 --> 01:23:00.289 align:start position:0% look at how we were mowing our right 01:23:00.289 --> 01:23:02.049 align:start position:0% look at how we were mowing our right away<01:23:00.559> last<01:23:01.010> year<01:23:01.309> we<01:23:01.400> brought<01:23:01.550> forward<01:23:01.909> a 01:23:02.049 --> 01:23:02.059 align:start position:0% away last year we brought forward a 01:23:02.059 --> 01:23:05.379 align:start position:0% away last year we brought forward a policy<01:23:02.570> to<01:23:02.980> stop<01:23:03.980> mowing<01:23:04.280> in<01:23:04.670> the<01:23:04.969> right<01:23:05.150> away 01:23:05.379 --> 01:23:05.389 align:start position:0% policy to stop mowing in the right away 01:23:05.389 --> 01:23:06.910 align:start position:0% policy to stop mowing in the right away and<01:23:05.539> make<01:23:05.599> the<01:23:05.869> homeowners<01:23:06.380> that<01:23:06.650> own<01:23:06.860> that 01:23:06.910 --> 01:23:06.920 align:start position:0% and make the homeowners that own that 01:23:06.920 --> 01:23:09.879 align:start position:0% and make the homeowners that own that property<01:23:07.460> mow<01:23:07.880> their<01:23:08.090> own<01:23:08.210> property<01:23:08.889> that 01:23:09.879 --> 01:23:09.889 align:start position:0% property mow their own property that 01:23:09.889 --> 01:23:11.890 align:start position:0% property mow their own property that we've<01:23:10.070> had<01:23:10.280> some<01:23:10.550> concerns<01:23:11.210> with<01:23:11.360> that<01:23:11.659> and<01:23:11.840> I 01:23:11.890 --> 01:23:11.900 align:start position:0% we've had some concerns with that and I 01:23:11.900 --> 01:23:13.810 align:start position:0% we've had some concerns with that and I know<01:23:11.960> there<01:23:12.380> was<01:23:12.530> brought<01:23:13.309> forward<01:23:13.610> that 01:23:13.810 --> 01:23:13.820 align:start position:0% know there was brought forward that 01:23:13.820 --> 01:23:15.310 align:start position:0% know there was brought forward that that's<01:23:14.000> something<01:23:14.239> we<01:23:14.480> needed<01:23:14.719> we<01:23:14.960> probably 01:23:15.310 --> 01:23:15.320 align:start position:0% that's something we needed we probably 01:23:15.320 --> 01:23:17.500 align:start position:0% that's something we needed we probably need<01:23:15.530> to<01:23:15.619> look<01:23:15.769> at<01:23:16.010> so<01:23:16.280> I've<01:23:16.429> asked<01:23:16.849> mr.<01:23:17.059> Fisher 01:23:17.500 --> 01:23:17.510 align:start position:0% need to look at so I've asked mr. Fisher 01:23:17.510 --> 01:23:19.660 align:start position:0% need to look at so I've asked mr. Fisher to<01:23:17.630> go<01:23:17.750> back<01:23:17.960> through<01:23:18.230> this<01:23:18.469> and<01:23:18.769> he<01:23:19.460> has 01:23:19.660 --> 01:23:19.670 align:start position:0% to go back through this and he has 01:23:19.670 --> 01:23:21.640 align:start position:0% to go back through this and he has developed<01:23:20.150> some<01:23:20.510> procedural<01:23:21.079> changes<01:23:21.500> I 01:23:21.640 --> 01:23:21.650 align:start position:0% developed some procedural changes I 01:23:21.650 --> 01:23:24.250 align:start position:0% developed some procedural changes I think<01:23:21.679> that<01:23:22.099> can<01:23:22.250> put<01:23:23.239> us<01:23:23.360> back<01:23:23.539> into<01:23:23.840> to 01:23:24.250 --> 01:23:24.260 align:start position:0% think that can put us back into to 01:23:24.260 --> 01:23:26.649 align:start position:0% think that can put us back into to mowing<01:23:24.679> some<01:23:25.670> of<01:23:25.849> the<01:23:25.940> right<01:23:26.119> away<01:23:26.360> worse 01:23:26.649 --> 01:23:26.659 align:start position:0% mowing some of the right away worse 01:23:26.659 --> 01:23:28.450 align:start position:0% mowing some of the right away worse needed<01:23:27.079> no<01:23:27.230> less<01:23:27.409> Jeff<01:23:27.710> step<01:23:28.070> through<01:23:28.309> these 01:23:28.450 --> 01:23:28.460 align:start position:0% needed no less Jeff step through these 01:23:28.460 --> 01:23:32.379 align:start position:0% needed no less Jeff step through these sure<01:23:29.800> we<01:23:30.849> anticipated<01:23:31.849> that<01:23:31.969> we<01:23:32.030> would<01:23:32.119> run 01:23:32.379 --> 01:23:32.389 align:start position:0% sure we anticipated that we would run 01:23:32.389 --> 01:23:34.660 align:start position:0% sure we anticipated that we would run into<01:23:32.449> these<01:23:32.869> sorts<01:23:33.139> of<01:23:33.230> things<01:23:33.460> my<01:23:34.460> past 01:23:34.660 --> 01:23:34.670 align:start position:0% into these sorts of things my past 01:23:34.670 --> 01:23:37.209 align:start position:0% into these sorts of things my past experience<01:23:35.210> we<01:23:35.329> did<01:23:35.480> as<01:23:35.599> well<01:23:35.750> so<01:23:36.050> we<01:23:36.679> are<01:23:36.710> we 01:23:37.209 --> 01:23:37.219 align:start position:0% experience we did as well so we are we 01:23:37.219 --> 01:23:40.120 align:start position:0% experience we did as well so we are we are<01:23:37.400> prepared<01:23:37.789> to<01:23:37.820> shift<01:23:38.119> resources<01:23:39.010> in<01:23:40.010> a 01:23:40.120 --> 01:23:40.130 align:start position:0% are prepared to shift resources in a 01:23:40.130 --> 01:23:42.970 align:start position:0% are prepared to shift resources in a limited<01:23:40.369> way<01:23:40.639> and<01:23:40.969> we<01:23:41.510> kind<01:23:42.019> of<01:23:42.110> have 01:23:42.970 --> 01:23:42.980 align:start position:0% limited way and we kind of have 01:23:42.980 --> 01:23:45.660 align:start position:0% limited way and we kind of have highlighted<01:23:43.369> some<01:23:43.610> criteria<01:23:44.210> here<01:23:44.449> for<01:23:44.659> staff 01:23:45.660 --> 01:23:45.670 align:start position:0% highlighted some criteria here for staff 01:23:45.670 --> 01:23:49.319 align:start position:0% highlighted some criteria here for staff will<01:23:46.670> have<01:23:46.820> to<01:23:46.880> work<01:23:47.119> with<01:23:47.380> codes<01:23:48.380> as<01:23:48.980> well 01:23:49.319 --> 01:23:49.329 align:start position:0% will have to work with codes as well 01:23:49.329 --> 01:23:51.990 align:start position:0% will have to work with codes as well through<01:23:50.329> this<01:23:50.480> just<01:23:51.199> to<01:23:51.260> make<01:23:51.440> sure<01:23:51.469> that 01:23:51.990 --> 01:23:52.000 align:start position:0% through this just to make sure that 01:23:52.000 --> 01:23:54.399 align:start position:0% through this just to make sure that we're<01:23:53.000> not<01:23:53.030> gonna<01:23:53.300> mow<01:23:53.630> anything<01:23:54.139> that's 01:23:54.399 --> 01:23:54.409 align:start position:0% we're not gonna mow anything that's 01:23:54.409 --> 01:23:56.319 align:start position:0% we're not gonna mow anything that's gonna<01:23:54.769> be<01:23:54.949> abated<01:23:55.219> in<01:23:55.460> two<01:23:55.610> days<01:23:55.789> or<01:23:56.090> something 01:23:56.319 --> 01:23:56.329 align:start position:0% gonna be abated in two days or something 01:23:56.329 --> 01:23:58.299 align:start position:0% gonna be abated in two days or something like<01:23:56.389> that<01:23:56.690> but<01:23:56.929> essentially<01:23:57.679> what<01:23:58.010> we'll<01:23:58.159> do 01:23:58.299 --> 01:23:58.309 align:start position:0% like that but essentially what we'll do 01:23:58.309 --> 01:24:01.750 align:start position:0% like that but essentially what we'll do is<01:23:58.869> we'll<01:23:59.869> identify<01:23:59.989> or<01:24:00.679> monitor<01:24:01.159> the 01:24:01.750 --> 01:24:01.760 align:start position:0% is we'll identify or monitor the 01:24:01.760 --> 01:24:04.319 align:start position:0% is we'll identify or monitor the roadways<01:24:02.119> as<01:24:02.300> we<01:24:02.449> have<01:24:02.630> been<01:24:02.869> and<01:24:03.139> things 01:24:04.319 --> 01:24:04.329 align:start position:0% roadways as we have been and things 01:24:04.329 --> 01:24:07.180 align:start position:0% roadways as we have been and things segments<01:24:05.329> of<01:24:05.449> road<01:24:05.690> or<01:24:06.019> corridors<01:24:06.500> or<01:24:06.769> areas 01:24:07.180 --> 01:24:07.190 align:start position:0% segments of road or corridors or areas 01:24:07.190 --> 01:24:09.100 align:start position:0% segments of road or corridors or areas that<01:24:07.219> month<01:24:07.760> that<01:24:07.909> are<01:24:08.090> creating<01:24:08.480> a<01:24:08.570> hazard<01:24:08.989> to 01:24:09.100 --> 01:24:09.110 align:start position:0% that month that are creating a hazard to 01:24:09.110 --> 01:24:13.169 align:start position:0% that month that are creating a hazard to motorists<01:24:09.559> pedestrians<01:24:09.710> and<01:24:10.250> bicyclists<01:24:11.679> or 01:24:13.169 --> 01:24:13.179 align:start position:0% motorists pedestrians and bicyclists or 01:24:13.179 --> 01:24:15.910 align:start position:0% motorists pedestrians and bicyclists or are<01:24:14.179> creating<01:24:14.539> obstacles<01:24:14.750> for<01:24:15.320> pedestrians 01:24:15.910 --> 01:24:15.920 align:start position:0% are creating obstacles for pedestrians 01:24:15.920 --> 01:24:18.879 align:start position:0% are creating obstacles for pedestrians around<01:24:16.190> the<01:24:16.280> schools<01:24:16.579> area<01:24:17.380> we<01:24:18.380> would<01:24:18.590> we 01:24:18.879 --> 01:24:18.889 align:start position:0% around the schools area we would we 01:24:18.889 --> 01:24:22.419 align:start position:0% around the schools area we would we would<01:24:19.039> mow<01:24:19.340> and<01:24:20.619> then<01:24:21.619> also<01:24:21.829> special 01:24:22.419 --> 01:24:22.429 align:start position:0% would mow and then also special 01:24:22.429 --> 01:24:24.580 align:start position:0% would mow and then also special consideration<01:24:23.030> for<01:24:23.239> those<01:24:23.360> primary<01:24:23.869> arterial 01:24:24.580 --> 01:24:24.590 align:start position:0% consideration for those primary arterial 01:24:24.590 --> 01:24:26.470 align:start position:0% consideration for those primary arterial those<01:24:24.800> major<01:24:25.099> arterial<01:24:25.639> roadways<01:24:25.880> like<01:24:26.119> you 01:24:26.470 --> 01:24:26.480 align:start position:0% those major arterial roadways like you 01:24:26.480 --> 01:24:29.990 align:start position:0% those major arterial roadways like you see<01:24:26.659> there<01:24:26.869> state<01:24:27.199> Avenue<01:24:27.469> parallel<01:24:28.039> etc 01:24:29.990 --> 01:24:30.000 align:start position:0% see there state Avenue parallel etc 01:24:30.000 --> 01:24:33.290 align:start position:0% see there state Avenue parallel etc we<01:24:31.000> can<01:24:31.150> do<01:24:31.270> that<01:24:31.420> and<01:24:31.660> respond<01:24:32.620> very<01:24:32.830> quickly 01:24:33.290 --> 01:24:33.300 align:start position:0% we can do that and respond very quickly 01:24:33.300 --> 01:24:36.660 align:start position:0% we can do that and respond very quickly but<01:24:34.300> again<01:24:34.540> will<01:24:34.780> work<01:24:34.960> and<01:24:35.260> kind<01:24:36.219> of<01:24:36.280> seamless 01:24:36.660 --> 01:24:36.670 align:start position:0% but again will work and kind of seamless 01:24:36.670 --> 01:24:39.300 align:start position:0% but again will work and kind of seamless collaboration<01:24:36.850> with<01:24:37.480> codes<01:24:38.010> to<01:24:39.010> make<01:24:39.070> sure 01:24:39.300 --> 01:24:39.310 align:start position:0% collaboration with codes to make sure 01:24:39.310 --> 01:24:41.580 align:start position:0% collaboration with codes to make sure we're<01:24:39.580> not<01:24:39.610> conflicting<01:24:40.480> or<01:24:40.690> being<01:24:41.050> redundant 01:24:41.580 --> 01:24:41.590 align:start position:0% we're not conflicting or being redundant 01:24:41.590 --> 01:24:45.540 align:start position:0% we're not conflicting or being redundant in<01:24:41.710> any<01:24:41.830> way<01:24:42.239> so<01:24:43.239> we<01:24:44.140> thought<01:24:44.350> we<01:24:44.560> could<01:24:44.830> do 01:24:45.540 --> 01:24:45.550 align:start position:0% in any way so we thought we could do 01:24:45.550 --> 01:24:48.380 align:start position:0% in any way so we thought we could do this<01:24:45.670> pretty<01:24:45.940> quickly<01:24:46.300> get<01:24:46.900> on<01:24:46.930> top<01:24:47.200> of<01:24:47.230> things 01:24:48.380 --> 01:24:48.390 align:start position:0% this pretty quickly get on top of things 01:24:48.390 --> 01:24:50.520 align:start position:0% this pretty quickly get on top of things follow<01:24:49.390> up<01:24:49.630> with<01:24:49.840> those<01:24:49.960> property<01:24:50.500> owners 01:24:50.520 --> 01:24:50.530 align:start position:0% follow up with those property owners 01:24:50.530 --> 01:24:54.000 align:start position:0% follow up with those property owners another<01:24:51.160> front<01:24:51.520> another<01:24:51.910> friendly<01:24:52.680> letter<01:24:53.680> to 01:24:54.000 --> 01:24:54.010 align:start position:0% another front another friendly letter to 01:24:54.010 --> 01:24:55.290 align:start position:0% another front another friendly letter to remind<01:24:54.310> them<01:24:54.520> that<01:24:54.550> that<01:24:54.880> is<01:24:54.940> their 01:24:55.290 --> 01:24:55.300 align:start position:0% remind them that that is their 01:24:55.300 --> 01:24:57.870 align:start position:0% remind them that that is their responsibility<01:24:56.170> and<01:24:56.380> then<01:24:57.219> if<01:24:57.340> we<01:24:57.460> have<01:24:57.610> to<01:24:57.730> do 01:24:57.870 --> 01:24:57.880 align:start position:0% responsibility and then if we have to do 01:24:57.880 --> 01:25:03.540 align:start position:0% responsibility and then if we have to do it<01:24:57.969> again<01:24:58.270> and<01:24:58.840> we<01:24:59.080> could<01:24:59.290> build<01:24:59.590> them<01:25:02.550> there 01:25:03.540 --> 01:25:03.550 align:start position:0% it again and we could build them there 01:25:03.550 --> 01:25:05.870 align:start position:0% it again and we could build them there any<01:25:03.670> questions<01:25:04.090> regarding<01:25:04.570> that<01:25:04.780> Richard 01:25:05.870 --> 01:25:05.880 align:start position:0% any questions regarding that Richard 01:25:05.880 --> 01:25:07.950 align:start position:0% any questions regarding that Richard it's<01:25:06.880> one<01:25:07.060> question<01:25:07.450> and<01:25:07.660> I<01:25:07.719> should<01:25:07.870> have 01:25:07.950 --> 01:25:07.960 align:start position:0% it's one question and I should have 01:25:07.960 --> 01:25:08.910 align:start position:0% it's one question and I should have picked<01:25:08.140> up<01:25:08.290> on<01:25:08.380> this<01:25:08.500> and<01:25:08.680> earlier 01:25:08.910 --> 01:25:08.920 align:start position:0% picked up on this and earlier 01:25:08.920 --> 01:25:10.500 align:start position:0% picked up on this and earlier discussions<01:25:09.430> but<01:25:09.610> you<01:25:09.670> mentioned<01:25:10.000> your<01:25:10.270> past 01:25:10.500 --> 01:25:10.510 align:start position:0% discussions but you mentioned your past 01:25:10.510 --> 01:25:12.630 align:start position:0% discussions but you mentioned your past experiences<01:25:11.320> with<01:25:11.380> making<01:25:12.070> this<01:25:12.219> transition 01:25:12.630 --> 01:25:12.640 align:start position:0% experiences with making this transition 01:25:12.640 --> 01:25:15.540 align:start position:0% experiences with making this transition I'm<01:25:13.090> just<01:25:13.330> curious<01:25:13.540> I'm<01:25:14.280> assuming<01:25:15.280> that<01:25:15.340> at 01:25:15.540 --> 01:25:15.550 align:start position:0% I'm just curious I'm assuming that at 01:25:15.550 --> 01:25:17.880 align:start position:0% I'm just curious I'm assuming that at some<01:25:15.760> point<01:25:15.790> you<01:25:16.120> felt<01:25:16.390> like<01:25:16.570> you<01:25:16.750> made<01:25:16.930> a<01:25:16.960> B 01:25:17.880 --> 01:25:17.890 align:start position:0% some point you felt like you made a B 01:25:17.890 --> 01:25:19.650 align:start position:0% some point you felt like you made a B semi<01:25:18.280> successful<01:25:18.820> transition<01:25:19.360> or<01:25:19.540> you 01:25:19.650 --> 01:25:19.660 align:start position:0% semi successful transition or you 01:25:19.660 --> 01:25:21.540 align:start position:0% semi successful transition or you wouldn't<01:25:19.900> be<01:25:19.989> going<01:25:20.469> through<01:25:20.680> that<01:25:20.980> here<01:25:21.280> so 01:25:21.540 --> 01:25:21.550 align:start position:0% wouldn't be going through that here so 01:25:21.550 --> 01:25:23.820 align:start position:0% wouldn't be going through that here so I'm<01:25:21.670> curious<01:25:21.880> we<01:25:22.210> kind<01:25:22.510> of<01:25:22.570> outline<01:25:22.900> what 01:25:23.820 --> 01:25:23.830 align:start position:0% I'm curious we kind of outline what 01:25:23.830 --> 01:25:25.320 align:start position:0% I'm curious we kind of outline what happened<01:25:24.190> in<01:25:24.340> your<01:25:24.430> previous<01:25:24.760> experiences 01:25:25.320 --> 01:25:25.330 align:start position:0% happened in your previous experiences 01:25:25.330 --> 01:25:26.880 align:start position:0% happened in your previous experiences and<01:25:25.600> did<01:25:25.690> you<01:25:25.810> eventually<01:25:25.989> get<01:25:26.380> to<01:25:26.500> a<01:25:26.530> happier 01:25:26.880 --> 01:25:26.890 align:start position:0% and did you eventually get to a happier 01:25:26.890 --> 01:25:30.720 align:start position:0% and did you eventually get to a happier place<01:25:27.270> we<01:25:28.270> did<01:25:28.450> it<01:25:28.630> was<01:25:28.810> a<01:25:28.840> smaller<01:25:29.500> scale<01:25:29.860> it 01:25:30.720 --> 01:25:30.730 align:start position:0% place we did it was a smaller scale it 01:25:30.730 --> 01:25:32.640 align:start position:0% place we did it was a smaller scale it only<01:25:30.880> took<01:25:31.090> us<01:25:31.150> one<01:25:31.480> year<01:25:31.510> of<01:25:32.110> this<01:25:32.380> kind<01:25:32.590> of 01:25:32.640 --> 01:25:32.650 align:start position:0% only took us one year of this kind of 01:25:32.650 --> 01:25:34.170 align:start position:0% only took us one year of this kind of pain<01:25:32.860> points<01:25:33.310> to<01:25:33.430> get<01:25:33.550> through<01:25:33.790> that<01:25:33.940> in<01:25:34.150> the 01:25:34.170 --> 01:25:34.180 align:start position:0% pain points to get through that in the 01:25:34.180 --> 01:25:36.650 align:start position:0% pain points to get through that in the second<01:25:34.870> year<01:25:34.989> hardly<01:25:35.860> had<01:25:35.980> anything 01:25:36.650 --> 01:25:36.660 align:start position:0% second year hardly had anything 01:25:36.660 --> 01:25:39.930 align:start position:0% second year hardly had anything obviously<01:25:37.660> we're<01:25:38.070> 2400<01:25:39.070> Lane<01:25:39.250> miles<01:25:39.550> here<01:25:39.910> in 01:25:39.930 --> 01:25:39.940 align:start position:0% obviously we're 2400 Lane miles here in 01:25:39.940 --> 01:25:42.870 align:start position:0% obviously we're 2400 Lane miles here in Wyandotte<01:25:40.540> County<01:25:41.160> so<01:25:42.160> it's<01:25:42.310> probably<01:25:42.730> going 01:25:42.870 --> 01:25:42.880 align:start position:0% Wyandotte County so it's probably going 01:25:42.880 --> 01:25:45.229 align:start position:0% Wyandotte County so it's probably going to<01:25:42.969> take<01:25:43.030> 2<01:25:43.300> or<01:25:43.330> 3<01:25:43.510> years<01:25:43.930> to<01:25:44.650> get<01:25:44.800> through<01:25:45.010> this 01:25:45.229 --> 01:25:45.239 align:start position:0% to take 2 or 3 years to get through this 01:25:45.239 --> 01:25:48.090 align:start position:0% to take 2 or 3 years to get through this I<01:25:46.239> think<01:25:46.810> it's<01:25:46.960> worth<01:25:47.170> reminding<01:25:47.530> and 01:25:48.090 --> 01:25:48.100 align:start position:0% I think it's worth reminding and 01:25:48.100 --> 01:25:50.940 align:start position:0% I think it's worth reminding and especially<01:25:48.520> for<01:25:48.910> the<01:25:48.969> public<01:25:49.360> the<01:25:50.140> drivers 01:25:50.940 --> 01:25:50.950 align:start position:0% especially for the public the drivers 01:25:50.950 --> 01:25:56.820 align:start position:0% especially for the public the drivers behind<01:25:51.280> this<01:25:51.580> is<01:25:52.060> Street<01:25:52.810> maintenance<01:25:53.260> we<01:25:55.830> we 01:25:56.820 --> 01:25:56.830 align:start position:0% behind this is Street maintenance we we 01:25:56.830 --> 01:26:00.690 align:start position:0% behind this is Street maintenance we we have<01:25:56.950> some<01:25:57.100> work<01:25:57.280> to<01:25:57.460> do<01:25:57.610> and<01:25:59.010> pass<01:26:00.010> to<01:26:00.280> citizen 01:26:00.690 --> 01:26:00.700 align:start position:0% have some work to do and pass to citizen 01:26:00.700 --> 01:26:03.209 align:start position:0% have some work to do and pass to citizen surveys<01:26:01.090> they<01:26:01.690> wanted<01:26:02.080> them<01:26:02.290> more<01:26:02.680> influence 01:26:03.209 --> 01:26:03.219 align:start position:0% surveys they wanted them more influence 01:26:03.219 --> 01:26:05.400 align:start position:0% surveys they wanted them more influence more<01:26:03.460> emphasis<01:26:03.940> on<01:26:04.180> Street<01:26:04.600> maintenance<01:26:04.870> and 01:26:05.400 --> 01:26:05.410 align:start position:0% more emphasis on Street maintenance and 01:26:05.410 --> 01:26:06.990 align:start position:0% more emphasis on Street maintenance and mowing<01:26:05.830> right<01:26:06.010> away<01:26:06.219> is<01:26:06.370> not<01:26:06.580> Street 01:26:06.990 --> 01:26:07.000 align:start position:0% mowing right away is not Street 01:26:07.000 --> 01:26:10.800 align:start position:0% mowing right away is not Street maintenance<01:26:07.239> and<01:26:07.719> so<01:26:08.160> we<01:26:09.160> have<01:26:09.280> 70<01:26:09.790> FTEs<01:26:10.480> on 01:26:10.800 --> 01:26:10.810 align:start position:0% maintenance and so we have 70 FTEs on 01:26:10.810 --> 01:26:13.620 align:start position:0% maintenance and so we have 70 FTEs on 2400<01:26:11.710> Lane<01:26:11.860> miles<01:26:12.160> like<01:26:12.430> we<01:26:12.640> saw<01:26:12.820> last<01:26:12.969> week<01:26:13.420> in 01:26:13.620 --> 01:26:13.630 align:start position:0% 2400 Lane miles like we saw last week in 01:26:13.630 --> 01:26:16.380 align:start position:0% 2400 Lane miles like we saw last week in the<01:26:13.750> presentation<01:26:14.910> compared<01:26:15.910> to<01:26:16.030> some<01:26:16.210> other 01:26:16.380 --> 01:26:16.390 align:start position:0% the presentation compared to some other 01:26:16.390 --> 01:26:19.680 align:start position:0% the presentation compared to some other agencies<01:26:17.140> in<01:26:17.290> the<01:26:17.410> area<01:26:17.650> that's<01:26:18.690> Overland 01:26:19.680 --> 01:26:19.690 align:start position:0% agencies in the area that's Overland 01:26:19.690 --> 01:26:23.550 align:start position:0% agencies in the area that's Overland Park<01:26:19.870> 77<01:26:20.770> to<01:26:21.040> give<01:26:21.190> you<01:26:21.280> an<01:26:21.400> example<01:26:22.230> and<01:26:23.230> so 01:26:23.550 --> 01:26:23.560 align:start position:0% Park 77 to give you an example and so 01:26:23.560 --> 01:26:29.130 align:start position:0% Park 77 to give you an example and so we're<01:26:24.250> gonna<01:26:24.310> increase<01:26:24.730> our<01:26:25.170> 56<01:26:26.670> PCI<01:26:27.670> to<01:26:28.110> 70<01:26:29.110> or 01:26:29.130 --> 01:26:29.140 align:start position:0% we're gonna increase our 56 PCI to 70 or 01:26:29.140 --> 01:26:32.330 align:start position:0% we're gonna increase our 56 PCI to 70 or something<01:26:29.440> that<01:26:30.000> is<01:26:31.000> more<01:26:31.300> acceptable<01:26:31.690> I 01:26:32.330 --> 01:26:32.340 align:start position:0% something that is more acceptable I 01:26:32.340 --> 01:26:36.580 align:start position:0% something that is more acceptable I think<01:26:33.340> these<01:26:33.460> are<01:26:33.520> things<01:26:33.820> we<01:26:33.969> need<01:26:34.150> to<01:26:34.210> do 01:26:36.580 --> 01:26:36.590 align:start position:0% 01:26:36.590 --> 01:26:39.439 align:start position:0% so<01:26:37.590> last<01:26:37.829> year<01:26:37.949> we<01:26:38.309> implemented<01:26:38.849> this<01:26:39.119> change 01:26:39.439 --> 01:26:39.449 align:start position:0% so last year we implemented this change 01:26:39.449 --> 01:26:41.479 align:start position:0% so last year we implemented this change we<01:26:39.809> didn't<01:26:40.079> have<01:26:40.199> a<01:26:40.229> budget<01:26:40.499> reduction<01:26:41.219> we 01:26:41.479 --> 01:26:41.489 align:start position:0% we didn't have a budget reduction we 01:26:41.489 --> 01:26:43.129 align:start position:0% we didn't have a budget reduction we just<01:26:41.699> had<01:26:41.849> a<01:26:41.880> redirection<01:26:42.570> of<01:26:42.599> staff 01:26:43.129 --> 01:26:43.139 align:start position:0% just had a redirection of staff 01:26:43.139 --> 01:26:46.219 align:start position:0% just had a redirection of staff resources<01:26:43.380> as<01:26:43.979> Jeff<01:26:44.249> said<01:26:44.280> so<01:26:44.939> in<01:26:45.209> order<01:26:45.809> to<01:26:46.050> go 01:26:46.219 --> 01:26:46.229 align:start position:0% resources as Jeff said so in order to go 01:26:46.229 --> 01:26:48.649 align:start position:0% resources as Jeff said so in order to go back<01:26:46.260> on<01:26:46.709> components<01:26:47.340> of<01:26:47.489> it<01:26:47.639> not<01:26:48.389> seeking 01:26:48.649 --> 01:26:48.659 align:start position:0% back on components of it not seeking 01:26:48.659 --> 01:26:50.179 align:start position:0% back on components of it not seeking additional<01:26:49.260> money<01:26:49.469> he<01:26:49.709> will<01:26:49.860> just<01:26:50.039> be 01:26:50.179 --> 01:26:50.189 align:start position:0% additional money he will just be 01:26:50.189 --> 01:26:51.889 align:start position:0% additional money he will just be redirecting<01:26:50.909> some<01:26:50.939> of<01:26:51.209> the<01:26:51.269> people<01:26:51.539> he's<01:26:51.689> put 01:26:51.889 --> 01:26:51.899 align:start position:0% redirecting some of the people he's put 01:26:51.899 --> 01:26:53.239 align:start position:0% redirecting some of the people he's put on<01:26:51.989> some<01:26:52.229> of<01:26:52.289> the<01:26:52.349> street<01:26:52.619> maintenance<01:26:52.800> work 01:26:53.239 --> 01:26:53.249 align:start position:0% on some of the street maintenance work 01:26:53.249 --> 01:26:55.609 align:start position:0% on some of the street maintenance work back<01:26:53.999> to<01:26:54.239> do<01:26:54.389> this<01:26:54.599> right<01:26:54.899> away<01:26:54.929> maintenance 01:26:55.609 --> 01:26:55.619 align:start position:0% back to do this right away maintenance 01:26:55.619 --> 01:26:59.149 align:start position:0% back to do this right away maintenance work<01:26:55.829> to<01:26:56.659> do<01:26:57.659> it<01:26:57.809> and<01:26:57.989> we'll<01:26:58.289> be<01:26:58.439> sharing<01:26:58.860> that 01:26:59.149 --> 01:26:59.159 align:start position:0% work to do it and we'll be sharing that 01:26:59.159 --> 01:27:03.469 align:start position:0% work to do it and we'll be sharing that as<01:26:59.309> we<01:26:59.429> move<01:26:59.610> through<01:27:00.090> the<01:27:00.179> process<01:27:02.479> there's 01:27:03.469 --> 01:27:03.479 align:start position:0% as we move through the process there's 01:27:03.479 --> 01:27:08.080 align:start position:0% as we move through the process there's no<01:27:03.599> financial<01:27:03.869> change<01:27:05.419> yes<01:27:06.419> I<01:27:06.659> just<01:27:06.840> ask<01:27:07.349> that 01:27:08.080 --> 01:27:08.090 align:start position:0% no financial change yes I just ask that 01:27:08.090 --> 01:27:13.100 align:start position:0% no financial change yes I just ask that once<01:27:09.090> mowing<01:27:09.539> season<01:27:10.079> is<01:27:10.169> over<01:27:11.869> whenever<01:27:12.869> that 01:27:13.100 --> 01:27:13.110 align:start position:0% once mowing season is over whenever that 01:27:13.110 --> 01:27:17.089 align:start position:0% once mowing season is over whenever that is<01:27:13.169> maybe<01:27:14.130> you<01:27:14.550> could<01:27:14.849> bring<01:27:16.099> Standing 01:27:17.089 --> 01:27:17.099 align:start position:0% is maybe you could bring Standing 01:27:17.099 --> 01:27:22.389 align:start position:0% is maybe you could bring Standing Committee<01:27:17.550> a<01:27:19.159> report<01:27:20.159> on<01:27:20.309> how<01:27:20.579> this<01:27:20.929> went<01:27:21.929> and 01:27:22.389 --> 01:27:22.399 align:start position:0% Committee a report on how this went and 01:27:22.399 --> 01:27:24.919 align:start position:0% Committee a report on how this went and absolutely<01:27:23.399> further<01:27:24.030> adjustments<01:27:24.749> that<01:27:24.869> you 01:27:24.919 --> 01:27:24.929 align:start position:0% absolutely further adjustments that you 01:27:24.929 --> 01:27:27.919 align:start position:0% absolutely further adjustments that you might<01:27:25.199> make<01:27:25.439> to<01:27:25.709> the<01:27:25.860> program<01:27:26.309> for<01:27:26.610> next<01:27:27.539> year 01:27:27.919 --> 01:27:27.929 align:start position:0% might make to the program for next year 01:27:27.929 --> 01:27:30.799 align:start position:0% might make to the program for next year for<01:27:28.079> an<01:27:28.260> even<01:27:28.530> smoother<01:27:28.979> transition<01:27:29.699> I<01:27:29.969> think 01:27:30.799 --> 01:27:30.809 align:start position:0% for an even smoother transition I think 01:27:30.809 --> 01:27:33.229 align:start position:0% for an even smoother transition I think that<01:27:30.989> would<01:27:31.169> be<01:27:31.199> helpful<01:27:31.590> I'd<01:27:32.519> also<01:27:32.669> like<01:27:33.030> to 01:27:33.229 --> 01:27:33.239 align:start position:0% that would be helpful I'd also like to 01:27:33.239 --> 01:27:35.750 align:start position:0% that would be helpful I'd also like to add<01:27:33.360> how<01:27:34.349> can<01:27:34.559> the<01:27:34.649> commissioners<01:27:35.249> help<01:27:35.550> in 01:27:35.750 --> 01:27:35.760 align:start position:0% add how can the commissioners help in 01:27:35.760 --> 01:27:37.310 align:start position:0% add how can the commissioners help in furthering<01:27:36.239> the<01:27:36.269> information<01:27:36.929> and<01:27:37.139> getting 01:27:37.310 --> 01:27:37.320 align:start position:0% furthering the information and getting 01:27:37.320 --> 01:27:40.639 align:start position:0% furthering the information and getting it<01:27:37.530> out<01:27:37.709> to<01:27:38.010> folks<01:27:38.249> so<01:27:39.090> they<01:27:39.300> understand<01:27:40.169> what 01:27:40.639 --> 01:27:40.649 align:start position:0% it out to folks so they understand what 01:27:40.649 --> 01:27:44.389 align:start position:0% it out to folks so they understand what this<01:27:41.159> really<01:27:41.459> means<01:27:41.849> and<01:27:42.510> so<01:27:43.260> I<01:27:43.590> I'm 01:27:44.389 --> 01:27:44.399 align:start position:0% this really means and so I I'm 01:27:44.399 --> 01:27:46.399 align:start position:0% this really means and so I I'm constantly<01:27:44.969> talking<01:27:45.239> to<01:27:45.570> everybody<01:27:45.809> and<01:27:46.229> tell 01:27:46.399 --> 01:27:46.409 align:start position:0% constantly talking to everybody and tell 01:27:46.409 --> 01:27:48.919 align:start position:0% constantly talking to everybody and tell them<01:27:46.439> they<01:27:46.649> have<01:27:46.880> responsibilities<01:27:47.880> but<01:27:48.780> they 01:27:48.919 --> 01:27:48.929 align:start position:0% them they have responsibilities but they 01:27:48.929 --> 01:27:51.830 align:start position:0% them they have responsibilities but they also<01:27:49.110> there's<01:27:49.769> also<01:27:49.949> issues<01:27:50.669> to<01:27:51.059> where<01:27:51.689> they 01:27:51.830 --> 01:27:51.840 align:start position:0% also there's also issues to where they 01:27:51.840 --> 01:27:54.919 align:start position:0% also there's also issues to where they can't<01:27:52.110> deal<01:27:52.380> with<01:27:52.409> them<01:27:52.769> so<01:27:53.570> now<01:27:54.570> we'll<01:27:54.899> be 01:27:54.919 --> 01:27:54.929 align:start position:0% can't deal with them so now we'll be 01:27:54.929 --> 01:27:57.199 align:start position:0% can't deal with them so now we'll be working<01:27:55.469> together<01:27:55.829> I<01:27:56.340> might<01:27:56.729> add<01:27:56.880> I<01:27:56.999> was 01:27:57.199 --> 01:27:57.209 align:start position:0% working together I might add I was 01:27:57.209 --> 01:28:00.560 align:start position:0% working together I might add I was talking<01:27:57.570> with<01:27:57.630> staff<01:27:58.019> earlier<01:27:58.289> and<01:27:59.030> in<01:28:00.030> some 01:28:00.560 --> 01:28:00.570 align:start position:0% talking with staff earlier and in some 01:28:00.570 --> 01:28:03.109 align:start position:0% talking with staff earlier and in some areas<01:28:00.899> like<01:28:00.929> on<01:28:01.409> the<01:28:01.559> major<01:28:02.130> arterials<01:28:02.849> where 01:28:03.109 --> 01:28:03.119 align:start position:0% areas like on the major arterials where 01:28:03.119 --> 01:28:05.060 align:start position:0% areas like on the major arterials where the<01:28:03.300> ug<01:28:03.749> was<01:28:03.929> mowing<01:28:04.289> that<01:28:04.469> right<01:28:04.739> away<01:28:04.889> or 01:28:05.060 --> 01:28:05.070 align:start position:0% the ug was mowing that right away or 01:28:05.070 --> 01:28:07.399 align:start position:0% the ug was mowing that right away or some<01:28:05.309> of<01:28:05.429> that<01:28:05.579> I<01:28:05.999> was<01:28:06.659> awesome<01:28:06.840> obviously 01:28:07.399 --> 01:28:07.409 align:start position:0% some of that I was awesome obviously 01:28:07.409 --> 01:28:10.189 align:start position:0% some of that I was awesome obviously very<01:28:07.619> frequent<01:28:08.280> but<01:28:08.449> some<01:28:09.449> of<01:28:09.539> these<01:28:09.630> more 01:28:10.189 --> 01:28:10.199 align:start position:0% very frequent but some of these more 01:28:10.199 --> 01:28:13.790 align:start position:0% very frequent but some of these more rural<01:28:10.439> areas<01:28:10.979> like<01:28:11.729> we<01:28:12.149> spoke<01:28:12.389> today<01:28:12.840> I<01:28:13.260> don't 01:28:13.790 --> 01:28:13.800 align:start position:0% rural areas like we spoke today I don't 01:28:13.800 --> 01:28:16.850 align:start position:0% rural areas like we spoke today I don't think<01:28:14.010> the<01:28:14.099> expectation<01:28:14.880> is<01:28:15.090> that<01:28:15.929> they<01:28:16.649> mow 01:28:16.850 --> 01:28:16.860 align:start position:0% think the expectation is that they mow 01:28:16.860 --> 01:28:19.189 align:start position:0% think the expectation is that they mow it<01:28:17.070> every<01:28:17.610> month<01:28:17.849> or<01:28:18.119> every<01:28:18.149> two<01:28:18.570> weeks<01:28:18.809> you 01:28:19.189 --> 01:28:19.199 align:start position:0% it every month or every two weeks you 01:28:19.199 --> 01:28:20.989 align:start position:0% it every month or every two weeks you know<01:28:19.289> we<01:28:19.769> were<01:28:19.889> only<01:28:20.039> mowing<01:28:20.579> some<01:28:20.789> of<01:28:20.880> those 01:28:20.989 --> 01:28:20.999 align:start position:0% know we were only mowing some of those 01:28:20.999 --> 01:28:24.350 align:start position:0% know we were only mowing some of those areas<01:28:21.209> twice<01:28:21.780> a<01:28:22.050> year<01:28:22.320> right<01:28:22.889> so<01:28:23.340> and<01:28:23.729> I<01:28:24.239> was 01:28:24.350 --> 01:28:24.360 align:start position:0% areas twice a year right so and I was 01:28:24.360 --> 01:28:28.279 align:start position:0% areas twice a year right so and I was acceptable<01:28:24.840> so<01:28:25.610> I<01:28:26.610> think<01:28:27.510> the<01:28:27.719> inspectors<01:28:28.199> are 01:28:28.279 --> 01:28:28.289 align:start position:0% acceptable so I think the inspectors are 01:28:28.289 --> 01:28:33.620 align:start position:0% acceptable so I think the inspectors are doing<01:28:28.559> a<01:28:28.619> good<01:28:29.070> job<01:28:29.130> they<01:28:29.489> understand<01:28:29.909> that 01:28:33.620 --> 01:28:33.630 align:start position:0% 01:28:33.630 --> 01:28:38.129 align:start position:0% okay<01:28:34.630> next<01:28:34.960> topic<01:28:36.239> all<01:28:37.239> right<01:28:37.389> so<01:28:37.750> these<01:28:37.960> are 01:28:38.129 --> 01:28:38.139 align:start position:0% okay next topic all right so these are 01:28:38.139 --> 01:28:40.680 align:start position:0% okay next topic all right so these are ones<01:28:38.440> that<01:28:38.560> I<01:28:38.969> believe<01:28:39.969> the<01:28:40.119> Commissioner<01:28:40.540> has 01:28:40.680 --> 01:28:40.690 align:start position:0% ones that I believe the Commissioner has 01:28:40.690 --> 01:28:42.689 align:start position:0% ones that I believe the Commissioner has had<01:28:40.900> future<01:28:41.199> expectations<01:28:42.130> the<01:28:42.280> first<01:28:42.489> one 01:28:42.689 --> 01:28:42.699 align:start position:0% had future expectations the first one 01:28:42.699 --> 01:28:44.729 align:start position:0% had future expectations the first one I'm<01:28:43.150> quite<01:28:43.570> clear<01:28:43.869> on<01:28:43.929> where<01:28:44.290> we're<01:28:44.469> with<01:28:44.590> this 01:28:44.729 --> 01:28:44.739 align:start position:0% I'm quite clear on where we're with this 01:28:44.739 --> 01:28:46.740 align:start position:0% I'm quite clear on where we're with this one<01:28:44.980> and<01:28:45.130> that<01:28:45.219> is<01:28:45.280> the<01:28:45.520> Western<01:28:45.880> fire<01:28:46.179> station 01:28:46.740 --> 01:28:46.750 align:start position:0% one and that is the Western fire station 01:28:46.750 --> 01:28:48.750 align:start position:0% one and that is the Western fire station that<01:28:46.900> we<01:28:47.020> will<01:28:47.139> provide<01:28:47.440> monthly<01:28:48.070> reports<01:28:48.550> to 01:28:48.750 --> 01:28:48.760 align:start position:0% that we will provide monthly reports to 01:28:48.760 --> 01:28:51.290 align:start position:0% that we will provide monthly reports to the<01:28:48.849> Standing<01:28:49.270> Committee<01:28:49.300> regarding<01:28:49.780> this 01:28:51.290 --> 01:28:51.300 align:start position:0% the Standing Committee regarding this 01:28:51.300 --> 01:28:55.530 align:start position:0% the Standing Committee regarding this work<01:28:53.040> there<01:28:54.040> was<01:28:54.190> a<01:28:54.219> comment<01:28:54.610> made<01:28:55.119> or<01:28:55.510> a 01:28:55.530 --> 01:28:55.540 align:start position:0% work there was a comment made or a 01:28:55.540 --> 01:28:57.419 align:start position:0% work there was a comment made or a couple<01:28:55.810> of<01:28:55.960> them<01:28:56.110> toward<01:28:56.349> there's<01:28:57.099> a<01:28:57.190> state 01:28:57.419 --> 01:28:57.429 align:start position:0% couple of them toward there's a state 01:28:57.429 --> 01:28:59.819 align:start position:0% couple of them toward there's a state employee<01:28:57.790> to<01:28:58.510> come<01:28:58.840> to<01:28:59.020> do<01:28:59.170> the<01:28:59.440> statewide 01:28:59.819 --> 01:28:59.829 align:start position:0% employee to come to do the statewide 01:28:59.829 --> 01:29:02.729 align:start position:0% employee to come to do the statewide economic<01:29:00.270> overview<01:29:01.270> is<01:29:01.989> that<01:29:02.230> an<01:29:02.349> expectation 01:29:02.729 --> 01:29:02.739 align:start position:0% economic overview is that an expectation 01:29:02.739 --> 01:29:05.669 align:start position:0% economic overview is that an expectation that<01:29:03.159> they<01:29:03.460> would<01:29:03.610> come<01:29:03.820> back<01:29:03.969> to<01:29:04.030> the<01:29:04.679> full 01:29:05.669 --> 01:29:05.679 align:start position:0% that they would come back to the full 01:29:05.679 --> 01:29:07.979 align:start position:0% that they would come back to the full commission<01:29:06.040> and<01:29:06.400> a<01:29:06.520> full<01:29:07.150> commission<01:29:07.480> meeting 01:29:07.979 --> 01:29:07.989 align:start position:0% commission and a full commission meeting 01:29:07.989 --> 01:29:11.129 align:start position:0% commission and a full commission meeting or<01:29:08.520> what<01:29:09.520> was<01:29:09.730> just<01:29:10.420> want<01:29:10.630> to<01:29:10.690> make<01:29:10.780> sure<01:29:10.810> that 01:29:11.129 --> 01:29:11.139 align:start position:0% or what was just want to make sure that 01:29:11.139 --> 01:29:14.520 align:start position:0% or what was just want to make sure that was<01:29:11.320> something<01:29:11.679> you<01:29:11.800> want<01:29:11.980> us<01:29:12.099> to<01:29:12.280> do<01:29:12.460> or<01:29:13.440> so<01:29:14.440> is 01:29:14.520 --> 01:29:14.530 align:start position:0% was something you want us to do or so is 01:29:14.530 --> 01:29:16.800 align:start position:0% was something you want us to do or so is this<01:29:14.619> an<01:29:14.800> economic<01:29:15.610> forecast<01:29:16.150> for<01:29:16.480> the<01:29:16.570> state 01:29:16.800 --> 01:29:16.810 align:start position:0% this an economic forecast for the state 01:29:16.810 --> 01:29:24.510 align:start position:0% this an economic forecast for the state or<01:29:17.020> revenues<01:29:17.530> or<01:29:19.920> Commissioner<01:29:23.010> that<01:29:24.010> we<01:29:24.310> have 01:29:24.510 --> 01:29:24.520 align:start position:0% or revenues or Commissioner that we have 01:29:24.520 --> 01:29:27.089 align:start position:0% or revenues or Commissioner that we have an<01:29:24.639> opportunity<01:29:24.909> here<01:29:25.270> the<01:29:25.869> impact<01:29:26.380> and<01:29:26.770> the 01:29:27.089 --> 01:29:27.099 align:start position:0% an opportunity here the impact and the 01:29:27.099 --> 01:29:29.790 align:start position:0% an opportunity here the impact and the economic<01:29:27.610> opportunities<01:29:28.510> are<01:29:29.139> happening<01:29:29.469> all 01:29:29.790 --> 01:29:29.800 align:start position:0% economic opportunities are happening all 01:29:29.800 --> 01:29:31.470 align:start position:0% economic opportunities are happening all across<01:29:29.920> Kansas<01:29:30.610> some<01:29:30.790> of<01:29:30.880> the<01:29:30.940> challenges<01:29:31.360> we 01:29:31.470 --> 01:29:31.480 align:start position:0% across Kansas some of the challenges we 01:29:31.480 --> 01:29:32.250 align:start position:0% across Kansas some of the challenges we face<01:29:31.690> as<01:29:31.869> a<01:29:31.900> state 01:29:32.250 --> 01:29:32.260 align:start position:0% face as a state 01:29:32.260 --> 01:29:34.530 align:start position:0% face as a state now<01:29:32.500> it's<01:29:32.679> may<01:29:33.159> filter<01:29:33.460> down<01:29:33.760> to<01:29:33.820> what<01:29:34.150> we<01:29:34.329> do 01:29:34.530 --> 01:29:34.540 align:start position:0% now it's may filter down to what we do 01:29:34.540 --> 01:29:36.479 align:start position:0% now it's may filter down to what we do moving<01:29:34.960> our<01:29:35.079> budget<01:29:35.409> forward<01:29:35.650> some<01:29:36.340> of<01:29:36.369> the 01:29:36.479 --> 01:29:36.489 align:start position:0% moving our budget forward some of the 01:29:36.489 --> 01:29:38.069 align:start position:0% moving our budget forward some of the projects<01:29:37.000> we<01:29:37.150> see<01:29:37.329> we've<01:29:37.510> had<01:29:37.540> a<01:29:37.719> tremendous 01:29:38.069 --> 01:29:38.079 align:start position:0% projects we see we've had a tremendous 01:29:38.079 --> 01:29:40.919 align:start position:0% projects we see we've had a tremendous plethora<01:29:38.860> of<01:29:38.980> discussion<01:29:39.550> over<01:29:39.699> the<01:29:39.880> last<01:29:40.030> six 01:29:40.919 --> 01:29:40.929 align:start position:0% plethora of discussion over the last six 01:29:40.929 --> 01:29:42.540 align:start position:0% plethora of discussion over the last six weeks<01:29:41.020> in<01:29:41.380> reference<01:29:41.679> to<01:29:41.739> this<01:29:41.949> budget<01:29:42.400> and<01:29:42.520> I 01:29:42.540 --> 01:29:42.550 align:start position:0% weeks in reference to this budget and I 01:29:42.550 --> 01:29:44.910 align:start position:0% weeks in reference to this budget and I think<01:29:42.579> there's<01:29:42.969> some<01:29:43.150> fiscal<01:29:43.810> impact<01:29:44.440> that 01:29:44.910 --> 01:29:44.920 align:start position:0% think there's some fiscal impact that 01:29:44.920 --> 01:29:46.649 align:start position:0% think there's some fiscal impact that the<01:29:45.040> economy<01:29:45.550> and<01:29:45.909> the<01:29:46.090> report<01:29:46.480> from<01:29:46.570> the 01:29:46.649 --> 01:29:46.659 align:start position:0% the economy and the report from the 01:29:46.659 --> 01:29:49.680 align:start position:0% the economy and the report from the state<01:29:46.989> may<01:29:47.199> have<01:29:47.230> on<01:29:47.710> our<01:29:47.739> budget<01:29:48.219> and<01:29:48.400> I<01:29:49.300> just 01:29:49.680 --> 01:29:49.690 align:start position:0% state may have on our budget and I just 01:29:49.690 --> 01:29:52.770 align:start position:0% state may have on our budget and I just recommended<01:29:50.409> that<01:29:50.880> suggested<01:29:51.880> that<01:29:51.909> we<01:29:52.540> have 01:29:52.770 --> 01:29:52.780 align:start position:0% recommended that suggested that we have 01:29:52.780 --> 01:29:54.479 align:start position:0% recommended that suggested that we have the<01:29:52.929> individual<01:29:53.710> come<01:29:53.920> in<01:29:54.070> and<01:29:54.250> give<01:29:54.369> an 01:29:54.479 --> 01:29:54.489 align:start position:0% the individual come in and give an 01:29:54.489 --> 01:29:56.459 align:start position:0% the individual come in and give an overview<01:29:54.790> I<01:29:55.119> leave<01:29:55.719> a<01:29:55.750> fully<01:29:56.050> up<01:29:56.230> to<01:29:56.260> the 01:29:56.459 --> 01:29:56.469 align:start position:0% overview I leave a fully up to the 01:29:56.469 --> 01:30:00.000 align:start position:0% overview I leave a fully up to the Commission<01:29:56.949> if<01:29:57.159> you<01:29:57.760> care<01:29:57.969> not<01:29:58.179> to<01:29:58.829> have<01:29:59.829> the 01:30:00.000 --> 01:30:00.010 align:start position:0% Commission if you care not to have the 01:30:00.010 --> 01:30:01.439 align:start position:0% Commission if you care not to have the presentation<01:30:00.460> and<01:30:00.760> a<01:30:00.849> full<01:30:01.000> commission 01:30:01.439 --> 01:30:01.449 align:start position:0% presentation and a full commission 01:30:01.449 --> 01:30:04.020 align:start position:0% presentation and a full commission meeting<01:30:01.780> but<01:30:01.960> would<01:30:02.139> just<01:30:02.349> soon<01:30:02.530> have<01:30:02.739> it<01:30:02.790> in<01:30:03.790> a 01:30:04.020 --> 01:30:04.030 align:start position:0% meeting but would just soon have it in a 01:30:04.030 --> 01:30:06.209 align:start position:0% meeting but would just soon have it in a small<01:30:04.719> subcommittee<01:30:05.349> meetings<01:30:05.710> just<01:30:05.800> let<01:30:06.099> me 01:30:06.209 --> 01:30:06.219 align:start position:0% small subcommittee meetings just let me 01:30:06.219 --> 01:30:08.790 align:start position:0% small subcommittee meetings just let me know<01:30:06.250> and<01:30:06.639> I'll<01:30:07.270> work<01:30:07.449> the<01:30:07.599> Kathleen<01:30:08.020> we'll 01:30:08.790 --> 01:30:08.800 align:start position:0% know and I'll work the Kathleen we'll 01:30:08.800 --> 01:30:10.020 align:start position:0% know and I'll work the Kathleen we'll see<01:30:08.980> if<01:30:09.040> we<01:30:09.130> can<01:30:09.280> get<01:30:09.429> it<01:30:09.520> arranged<01:30:09.790> but<01:30:09.969> I 01:30:10.020 --> 01:30:10.030 align:start position:0% see if we can get it arranged but I 01:30:10.030 --> 01:30:11.640 align:start position:0% see if we can get it arranged but I would<01:30:10.270> find<01:30:10.540> I<01:30:10.780> found<01:30:10.989> it<01:30:11.230> very<01:30:11.409> interesting 01:30:11.640 --> 01:30:11.650 align:start position:0% would find I found it very interesting 01:30:11.650 --> 01:30:13.470 align:start position:0% would find I found it very interesting that<01:30:12.159> that<01:30:12.190> found<01:30:12.610> that<01:30:12.760> very<01:30:12.909> pertinent<01:30:13.210> to 01:30:13.470 --> 01:30:13.480 align:start position:0% that that found that very pertinent to 01:30:13.480 --> 01:30:15.020 align:start position:0% that that found that very pertinent to the<01:30:13.570> discussion<01:30:13.989> we're<01:30:14.110> having<01:30:14.139> to<01:30:14.409> see<01:30:14.560> them 01:30:15.020 --> 01:30:15.030 align:start position:0% the discussion we're having to see them 01:30:15.030 --> 01:30:18.600 align:start position:0% the discussion we're having to see them yeah<01:30:16.030> I'd<01:30:16.210> like<01:30:16.389> to<01:30:16.570> hear<01:30:16.750> it<01:30:16.840> too<01:30:17.489> there<01:30:18.489> you 01:30:18.600 --> 01:30:18.610 align:start position:0% yeah I'd like to hear it too there you 01:30:18.610 --> 01:30:18.959 align:start position:0% yeah I'd like to hear it too there you are 01:30:18.959 --> 01:30:18.969 align:start position:0% are 01:30:18.969 --> 01:30:20.700 align:start position:0% are so<01:30:19.360> we'll<01:30:19.480> look<01:30:19.570> at<01:30:19.659> that<01:30:19.719> for<01:30:20.079> a<01:30:20.110> special 01:30:20.700 --> 01:30:20.710 align:start position:0% so we'll look at that for a special 01:30:20.710 --> 01:30:26.950 align:start position:0% so we'll look at that for a special session<01:30:20.920> that'll<01:30:21.460> work 01:30:26.950 --> 01:30:26.960 align:start position:0% 01:30:26.960 --> 01:30:29.050 align:start position:0% the<01:30:27.140> next<01:30:27.380> one<01:30:27.560> I<01:30:27.590> think<01:30:27.770> targets<01:30:28.580> toward<01:30:28.850> our 01:30:29.050 --> 01:30:29.060 align:start position:0% the next one I think targets toward our 01:30:29.060 --> 01:30:31.420 align:start position:0% the next one I think targets toward our fall<01:30:29.330> retreat<01:30:29.840> and<01:30:30.050> that<01:30:30.350> would<01:30:30.500> be<01:30:30.650> they<01:30:31.370> were 01:30:31.420 --> 01:30:31.430 align:start position:0% fall retreat and that would be they were 01:30:31.430 --> 01:30:32.920 align:start position:0% fall retreat and that would be they were looking<01:30:31.760> at<01:30:31.850> economic<01:30:32.300> development<01:30:32.330> planning 01:30:32.920 --> 01:30:32.930 align:start position:0% looking at economic development planning 01:30:32.930 --> 01:30:36.160 align:start position:0% looking at economic development planning project<01:30:33.500> area<01:30:33.890> strategic<01:30:34.610> planning<01:30:35.000> I<01:30:35.300> think 01:30:36.160 --> 01:30:36.170 align:start position:0% project area strategic planning I think 01:30:36.170 --> 01:30:37.780 align:start position:0% project area strategic planning I think that<01:30:36.500> falls<01:30:36.740> into<01:30:36.980> what<01:30:37.190> we<01:30:37.340> would<01:30:37.430> do<01:30:37.580> during 01:30:37.780 --> 01:30:37.790 align:start position:0% that falls into what we would do during 01:30:37.790 --> 01:30:39.280 align:start position:0% that falls into what we would do during the<01:30:37.940> fall<01:30:38.120> retreat<01:30:38.420> if<01:30:38.720> I'm<01:30:38.870> reading<01:30:39.080> that 01:30:39.280 --> 01:30:39.290 align:start position:0% the fall retreat if I'm reading that 01:30:39.290 --> 01:30:43.600 align:start position:0% the fall retreat if I'm reading that correctly<01:30:39.500> and<01:30:41.860> then<01:30:42.860> I<01:30:42.890> think<01:30:43.220> we<01:30:43.340> had<01:30:43.490> the 01:30:43.600 --> 01:30:43.610 align:start position:0% correctly and then I think we had the 01:30:43.610 --> 01:30:44.890 align:start position:0% correctly and then I think we had the same<01:30:43.820> discussion<01:30:44.180> about<01:30:44.480> liberal 01:30:44.890 --> 01:30:44.900 align:start position:0% same discussion about liberal 01:30:44.900 --> 01:30:47.710 align:start position:0% same discussion about liberal neighbourhood<01:30:45.710> staffing<01:30:46.310> that<01:30:46.550> that<01:30:47.390> needed 01:30:47.710 --> 01:30:47.720 align:start position:0% neighbourhood staffing that that needed 01:30:47.720 --> 01:30:49.870 align:start position:0% neighbourhood staffing that that needed to<01:30:47.750> be<01:30:47.990> considered<01:30:48.680> in<01:30:48.860> coordinating<01:30:49.370> with 01:30:49.870 --> 01:30:49.880 align:start position:0% to be considered in coordinating with 01:30:49.880 --> 01:30:52.300 align:start position:0% to be considered in coordinating with other<01:30:50.270> priorities<01:30:50.720> for<01:30:51.380> staffing<01:30:51.740> and<01:30:52.160> where 01:30:52.300 --> 01:30:52.310 align:start position:0% other priorities for staffing and where 01:30:52.310 --> 01:30:53.830 align:start position:0% other priorities for staffing and where we<01:30:52.460> might<01:30:52.640> want<01:30:52.820> to<01:30:52.850> put<01:30:53.030> our<01:30:53.120> emphasis<01:30:53.270> and 01:30:53.830 --> 01:30:53.840 align:start position:0% we might want to put our emphasis and 01:30:53.840 --> 01:30:55.900 align:start position:0% we might want to put our emphasis and then<01:30:53.930> we<01:30:54.020> would<01:30:54.200> talk<01:30:54.350> about<01:30:54.410> that<01:30:54.830> again<01:30:55.130> as 01:30:55.900 --> 01:30:55.910 align:start position:0% then we would talk about that again as 01:30:55.910 --> 01:30:57.490 align:start position:0% then we would talk about that again as we<01:30:56.240> look<01:30:56.270> about<01:30:56.600> those<01:30:56.810> areas<01:30:57.170> during<01:30:57.410> the 01:30:57.490 --> 01:30:57.500 align:start position:0% we look about those areas during the 01:30:57.500 --> 01:31:03.180 align:start position:0% we look about those areas during the retreat<01:30:57.830> time<01:31:00.340> very<01:31:01.340> good 01:31:03.180 --> 01:31:03.190 align:start position:0% retreat time very good 01:31:03.190 --> 01:31:05.560 align:start position:0% retreat time very good so<01:31:04.190> I'd<01:31:04.340> entertain<01:31:04.580> a<01:31:04.730> motion<01:31:04.850> to<01:31:05.270> go<01:31:05.450> into 01:31:05.560 --> 01:31:05.570 align:start position:0% so I'd entertain a motion to go into 01:31:05.570 --> 01:31:09.540 align:start position:0% so I'd entertain a motion to go into executive<01:31:05.660> session<01:31:06.110> to<01:31:06.530> discuss<01:31:06.650> matters 01:31:09.540 --> 01:31:09.550 align:start position:0% 01:31:09.550 --> 01:31:12.280 align:start position:0% related<01:31:10.550> to<01:31:10.810> employer<01:31:11.810> employee 01:31:12.280 --> 01:31:12.290 align:start position:0% related to employer employee 01:31:12.290 --> 01:31:17.440 align:start position:0% related to employer employee negotiations<01:31:15.700> all<01:31:16.700> right<01:31:16.880> I<01:31:16.910> knew<01:31:17.210> that<01:31:17.240> the 01:31:17.440 --> 01:31:17.450 align:start position:0% negotiations all right I knew that the 01:31:17.450 --> 01:31:18.760 align:start position:0% negotiations all right I knew that the Commission<01:31:17.840> go<01:31:18.020> into<01:31:18.200> executive<01:31:18.470> session 01:31:18.760 --> 01:31:18.770 align:start position:0% Commission go into executive session 01:31:18.770 --> 01:31:22.270 align:start position:0% Commission go into executive session until<01:31:19.640> 8:15<01:31:20.390> p.m.<01:31:20.420> to<01:31:21.320> discuss<01:31:21.350> confidential 01:31:22.270 --> 01:31:22.280 align:start position:0% until 8:15 p.m. to discuss confidential 01:31:22.280 --> 01:31:23.890 align:start position:0% until 8:15 p.m. to discuss confidential matters<01:31:22.520> regarding<01:31:22.760> the<01:31:23.090> status<01:31:23.450> and<01:31:23.630> future 01:31:23.890 --> 01:31:23.900 align:start position:0% matters regarding the status and future 01:31:23.900 --> 01:31:26.200 align:start position:0% matters regarding the status and future direction<01:31:24.200> of<01:31:24.410> labor<01:31:24.620> negotiations<01:31:25.490> all<01:31:25.970> is 01:31:26.200 --> 01:31:26.210 align:start position:0% direction of labor negotiations all is 01:31:26.210 --> 01:31:28.090 align:start position:0% direction of labor negotiations all is justified<01:31:26.750> under<01:31:26.960> the<01:31:27.080> employer<01:31:27.650> employee 01:31:28.090 --> 01:31:28.100 align:start position:0% justified under the employer employee 01:31:28.100 --> 01:31:30.910 align:start position:0% justified under the employer employee negotiate<01:31:28.730> negotiate<01:31:29.440> exception<01:31:30.440> the<01:31:30.590> Kansas 01:31:30.910 --> 01:31:30.920 align:start position:0% negotiate negotiate exception the Kansas 01:31:30.920 --> 01:31:33.100 align:start position:0% negotiate negotiate exception the Kansas Open<01:31:31.250> Meetings<01:31:31.520> Act<01:31:31.670> and<01:31:32.000> the<01:31:32.420> staff<01:31:32.690> does<01:31:32.960> it 01:31:33.100 --> 01:31:33.110 align:start position:0% Open Meetings Act and the staff does it 01:31:33.110 --> 01:31:34.570 align:start position:0% Open Meetings Act and the staff does it designated<01:31:33.620> by<01:31:33.710> the<01:31:33.770> county<01:31:34.040> and<01:31:34.070> minister<01:31:34.460> to 01:31:34.570 --> 01:31:34.580 align:start position:0% designated by the county and minister to 01:31:34.580 --> 01:31:35.920 align:start position:0% designated by the county and minister to be<01:31:34.610> present<01:31:35.060> to<01:31:35.150> participate<01:31:35.720> in<01:31:35.840> the 01:31:35.920 --> 01:31:35.930 align:start position:0% be present to participate in the 01:31:35.930 --> 01:31:38.440 align:start position:0% be present to participate in the discussion<01:31:36.440> and<01:31:36.620> that<01:31:37.160> we<01:31:37.310> reconvene<01:31:37.880> in<01:31:38.120> open 01:31:38.440 --> 01:31:38.450 align:start position:0% discussion and that we reconvene in open 01:31:38.450 --> 01:31:40.990 align:start position:0% discussion and that we reconvene in open session<01:31:38.690> at<01:31:39.080> 8:15<01:31:39.770> p.m.<01:31:39.800> here<01:31:40.580> in<01:31:40.610> the<01:31:40.790> fifth 01:31:40.990 --> 01:31:41.000 align:start position:0% session at 8:15 p.m. here in the fifth 01:31:41.000 --> 01:31:49.820 align:start position:0% session at 8:15 p.m. here in the fifth floor<01:31:41.150> conference<01:31:41.540> room<01:31:42.460> second<01:31:45.700> 8:15 01:31:49.820 --> 01:31:49.830 align:start position:0% 01:31:49.830 --> 01:31:52.410 align:start position:0% it's<01:31:50.830> too<01:31:51.040> oh<01:31:51.070> goodness<01:31:51.310> that<01:31:51.640> was<01:31:51.910> the<01:31:52.060> motion 01:31:52.410 --> 01:31:52.420 align:start position:0% it's too oh goodness that was the motion 01:31:52.420 --> 01:31:55.140 align:start position:0% it's too oh goodness that was the motion in<01:31:53.080> second<01:31:53.500> yep<01:31:53.830> roll<01:31:54.700> call 01:31:55.140 --> 01:31:55.150 align:start position:0% in second yep roll call 01:31:55.150 --> 01:32:03.960 align:start position:0% in second yep roll call hi<01:32:01.860> you<01:32:02.860> said<01:32:03.070> how<01:32:03.280> do<01:32:03.340> we<01:32:03.460> need<01:32:03.580> a<01:32:03.640> roll<01:32:03.790> call 01:32:03.960 --> 01:32:03.970 align:start position:0% hi you said how do we need a roll call 01:32:03.970 --> 01:32:15.580 align:start position:0% hi you said how do we need a roll call for<01:32:04.180> this<01:32:04.240> nope<01:32:05.020> nope<01:32:05.410> okay<01:32:06.180> all<01:32:07.180> in<01:32:07.450> favor 01:32:15.580 --> 01:32:15.590 align:start position:0% 01:32:15.590 --> 01:32:22.359 align:start position:0% you 01:32:22.359 --> 01:32:22.369 align:start position:0% 01:32:22.369 --> 01:32:24.429 align:start position:0% you